JANUARY 1999 ISSN 0952-7583 Vol. 11, Parts 3/4
@L461. B74
iv. il
no. 3-4
January
»RITISH JOURNAL OF
ENTOMOLOGY
AND NATURAL HISTORY
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY AND NATURAL HISTORY
Published by the British Entomological and Natural History Society
and incorporating its Proceedings and Transactions
Editor: M. Wilson, Ph.D., F.R.E.S., F.L.S. Department of Biodiversity & Systematic Biology,
National Museums & Galleries of Wales, Cardiff CF1 3NP. (Tel: 01222 573263, Fax: 01222
239009) email: Mike. Wilson@nmgw.ac.uk.
Associate Editor: Richard A. Jones, B.Sc., F.R.E.S., F.L.S. 13 Bellwood Road, Nunhead,
London SE15 3DE. (Tel: 0171 732 2440. Fax: 0171 277 8725).
Editorial Committee:
D. J. L. Agassiz, M.A., Ph.D., F.R.E.S. T. G. Howarth, B.E.M., F-R.E3S.
R. D. G. Barrington, B.Sc. I. F..G; McLean, Ph.D... ER_-ES
P. J. Chandler, B.Sc., F.R.E.S. M. J. Simmons, M.Sc.
B. Goater, B.Sc., M.I.Biol. P. A. Sokoloff, M.Sc., C.Biol., M.I.Biol., F.R.E.S.
A. J. Halstead, M.Sc., F.R.E.S. T. R. E. Southwood, K.B., D.Sc., F.R.E.S.
R. D. Hawkins, M.A. R. W. J. Uffen, M.Sc., F.R.E.S.
P. J. Hodge B. K. West, B.Ed.
British Journal of Entomology and Natural History is published by the British Entomological and
Natural History Society, Dinton Pastures Country Park, Davis Street, Hurst, Reading, Berkshire
RG10 OTH, UK. Tel: 01189-321402. The Journal is distributed free to BENHS members.
© 1999 British Entomological and Natural History Society.
Typeset by Dobbie Typesetting Limited, Tavistock, Devon.
Printed in England by Henry Ling Ltd, Dorchester, Dorset.
BRITISH ENTOMOLOGICAL AND NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY
Registered charity number: 213149
Meetings of the Society are held regularly in London, at the rooms of the Royal Entomological
Society, 41 Queen’s Gate, London SW7 and the well-known ANNUAL EXHIBITION is
planned for Saturday 31 October 1998 at Imperial College, London SW7. Frequent Field
Meetings are held at weekends in the summer. Visitors are welcome at all meetings. The current
Programme Card can be had on application to the Secretary, J. Muggleton, at the address given
below.
The Society maintains a library, and collections at its headquarters in Dinton Pastures, which
are open to members on various advertised days each month, telephone 01189-321402 for the
latest meeting news. The Society’s web site is: http://www.BENHS.org.uk
Applications for membership to the Membership Secretary: A. Godfrey, 90 Bence Lane, Darton,
Barnsley, South Yorkshire $75 SDA.
Subscriptions and changes of address to the Membership Secretary: R. D. Hawkins, 30d
Meadowcroft Close, Horley, Surrey RH6 9EL.
Non-arrival of the Journal, faulty copies or other problems arising from distribution of the
Journal or notices to the Distribution Secretary: D. Young, 9 Marten Place, Tilehurst, Reading,
Berkshire RG31 6FB.
Orders for books and back numbers of the Journal and Proceedings to the Sales Secretary: G.
Boyd, 91 Fullingdale Road, Northampton NN3 2PZ. Tel: 01604 410056.
General Enquiries to the Secretary: J. Muggleton, 30 Penton Road, Staines, Middlesex TW18
2LD. Tel: 01784-464537. email: jmuggleton(@compuserve.com
Cover illustration: adult Ledra aurita, the largest European leafhopper. photo: A. J. A. Stewart
NOTE: The Editor invites submission of photographs for black and white reproduction on the
front covers of the journal. The subject matter is open, with an emphasis on aesthetic value
rather than scientific novelty. Submissions can be in the form of colour or black and white
prints or colour transparencies.
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 129
AN ESTIMATE OF THE RANGE AND POPULATION LEVELS OF
FISHER’S ESTUARINE MOTH (GORTYNA BORELII LUNATA
FREYER), (LEP.: NOCTUIDAE) IN ESSEX, JULY AND OCTOBER 1996
COLIN HART
Fourpenny Cottage, Dungates Lane, Buckland, Betchworth, Surrey RH3 7BD.
Fisher’s estuarine moth (Gortyna borelii lunata Freyer) was first discovered in 1968
by Mr Ben Fisher at a lighted window of his home at Beaumont-cum-Moze in Essex.
It was soon realized that the only home of this insect in the United Kingdom is the
islands and inlets of nearby Hamford Water where it is an internal feeder on hog’s
fennel (Peucedanum officinale L.). The moth is illustrated in Skinner (1984) Plate 39,
Fig. 3. The Essex Wildlife Trust has monitored the population of adults by mercury
vapour light and by searching with torches on its Skipper’s Island reserve almost
every year since 1971. This monitoring has generally yielded very small numbers of
moths, with three years showing none, and an average of under 14 individuals in
years when the insect appears. Recent years have generally been better and 33 adults
were recorded in 1995 (Table 1). These results have led to the conclusion that the
moth exists at relatively low population levels and is subject to wide fluctuations in
numbers from year to year. My understanding is that no attempt is made to
standardize recording effort and methods, and it seems possible that this may
contribute to the variation in results. Larval surveys have also been undertaken but
the results are not available. BENHS members who have visited the Hamford Water
area over the years report that the larvae are easy to find and often common in June
and July, and that adults are fairly common at mercury vapour light later in the year.
It has been reported to us that sixteen adults were recorded at light one night in the
autumn of 1995. At a council meeting of the BENHS in 1996 concern was shown
Year Skipper’s Island Beaumont Quay The number of The number of plants
damaged stems ona __ showing this damage
197] il - plant
LO72 9 =
1973 0 — 1 20
1974 0 _ 2 16
1975 I - 3 24
1976 25 - 4 18
1978 12 - 5 12
eye 40 - 6 4
1981 0 - 7 6
1983 13 - 8 3
1986 4 - 9 2
1994 11 - 10 0
1995 33 ~ 1] 2
1996 9 ~17 iN. 1
1997 — 14 16 |
a eee teksts haters ane) Ai IE en Le LS ee l
Table 1. Essex Wildlife Trust annual survey 22 ]
for adults of G. borelii. Z5 l
Table 2. Frequency of damaged stems per
plant.
130 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
over the disparity between the abundance of G. horelii as reported by the Essex
Wildlife Trust and in reports from our own members, particularly as_ this
information may be used as the basis for legislation. In addition the exact range
of the species within the Hamford Water area was not known with certainty. In an
attempt to reconcile these facts a survey was organized to gain information about the
current range of the moth together with an indication of population levels at some of
the sites.
METHODS
Two main methods of surveying for G. bhorelii were considered. The first was
searching for larval workings in the summer and the second was attracting adults to
mercury vapour light and searching with torches in October. A survey of larvae in
July was considered to be the most effective for a number of reasons. In early July the
larvae feed by mining the lower part of stems of the foodplant. They are growing
rapidly at this time and produce copious amounts of white frass from the holes in the
stem which makes their presence easy to detect. Many plants can be searched and
several sites surveyed with relative ease during the course of a day. The white frass is
unique to G. horelii; no other insect 1s known to feed on hog’s fennel in this way. If
mercury vapour lights were used to attract the adults this would be subject to the
uncertainties of the autumn weather and other factors which define a good or bad
night. On a given night not all adults may fly; when both lights and searching are used
about half the records are of moths quietly at rest on or near the foodplant. Some
moths may not yet have emerged from the pupa: others may have flown away or died.
Finally, with one set of lights only one site can be surveyed per night. In the event
both methods were used although the larval survey produced almost all the records.
THE LARVAL SURVEY
The survey team consisted of Reg Arthur, Joe Firmin, Colin Hart, Alan Jenkins,
Colin Plant and Bernard Skinner. We arranged to meet near Beaumont Quay on the
morning of 12 July 1996 and searched a few plants which grow alongside the B1414
road. We soon discovered that most of the plants had several stems which showed
signs of feeding damage but did not contain larvae. Our original information was
that the larva enters a stem of hog’s fennel at a leaf axil a metre or so above ground
and mines its way down, finally leaving the stem near ground level. Closer
examination of several plants showed a pattern of stems with progressively larger
entrance holes and larger frass pellet size. In stems with smaller holes there was a
tendency to yellowing of leaves and stem. On a typical plant there would be three
damaged stems and sometimes a pile of frass on the crown of the plant suggesting a
larva was now feeding on the underground stem. We confirmed the presence of a
larva in a stem only about three or four times. This was because we wanted to
minimize disturbance to the larva and its foodplant, and also it is much quicker to
count stems exuding frass than to split each stem open and search for the larva
within. Without further detailed research we cannot prove that each larva feeds in
about three stems before going down to the rootstock, but our field observations
suggested that this is probably the case (Table 2). An alternative view is that each
larva feeds in only one stem and mortality at this stage is very high, although this
seems less likely.
In the early 1970s Don Down reared G. borelii through its whole life cycle and
found that the second and third instar larvae move from one stem to another when
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 131
the pith on which they feed is mostly exhausted. This was seen when larvae were
reared in boxes and also when feeding on a growing plant of hog’s fennel (D. Down,
pers. comm.). The larvae are dark purple in colour with a pale band between each
segment; almost all larvae which are internal feeders are entirely pale coloured. When
removed from their feeding place the larvae are active and able to move relatively
quickly; both these factors are characteristic of species which move from one stem to
another as part of their normal feeding pattern. We assumed that each larva utilized
about three stems and for this reason we divided the number of damaged stems
recorded on a plant by three to estimate the number of larvae on that particular plant.
The season was slightly advanced and to judge from the conical piles of frass on
some of the rootstocks a number of larvae were now feeding underground. The team
felt that this did not detract from the survey as the damaged stems exuding frass
remain visible for some weeks after the larva has left the stem. A few plants had a
large number of damaged stems; 25 was the highest number recorded on a single
plant. At this site every plant large enough to support a larva showed signs of feeding
damage. It is known that larvae can be cannibalistic when feeding in the rootstock,
so on smaller plants only one larva may reach maturity.
We moved on, monitoring a line of plants which grow on the bank of a small
brook between the road and the farm near Beaumont Quay. On reaching the sea we
were presented with a long area of coastal grassland which stretched along the sea-
wall towards Landermere and extended back to the borrowdyke drainage system.
This area was scattered throughout with hog’s fennel plants. We split into three
groups of two and spent the rest of the morning counting plants and larvae in this
area on the south side of the inlet (Table 3). A large number of plants were examined
and larvae were found on approximately one plant in three. In total 12 man hours
were spent on the morning survey.
In the afternoon, having first obtained permission for the visit, CH, AJ, CP and BS
visited Exchem Organics at Bramble Island and spent the rest of the day surveying
several sites in this extensive locality. In some places hog’s fennel was abundant,
forming the dominant vegetation over a considerable area. One stand of foodplant
was estimated to be half an acre in extent (locally identified as building M17) and
another over an acre (P4-Z4). Each site must have contained thousands of plants.
Rabbits were present and their grazing had affected the ground vegetation
considerably. Rabbits will only eat hog’s fennel when their normal food is in short
supply, possibly because hog’s fennel is distasteful, but almost all other low plants
were heavily grazed almost to the point of extinction. With no competition the hog’s
fennel had formed dense patches up to six feet in height. On these sites it was
unrealistic to survey all the plants and so one or more sample areas were paced out
and all the plants within the area were monitored. Despite the abundance of
foodplant we found relatively few stems damaged by larval feeding (Tables 3 and 4).
However, one remote site on Bramble Island resembled the Beaumont Quay-
Landermere site in that it consisted of an isolated stand of six mature plants amongst
dense grass. All the plants here showed signs of feeding. The afternoon survey
occupied 12 man hours.
On the following day two of us (CH and BS) searched other areas surrounding
Hamford Water but with very poor results. We searched for colonies of hog’s fennel
at several sites where the plant had been recorded previously (Thornton, 1990). Only
one stand of the plant was found and this was near to a marina at the channel called
The Twizzle (TM 247232). The site was a few yards outside the marina fence and
contained only twenty plants, many of them tiny. Despite the isolation and small size
of the site eight of the plants were inhabited by larvae.
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
[B10] payeuns”A oquinu osv1isay
“POUTLURXS JOM SJUR]C [Te IY SopIS 1B VIeP [BAIR] MWjadog"H *¢
SEZ = IVAIL] [LO] poyeUNs|”
8 00'1 vee 8 OC
| 00'1 I I 9
9 00'1 [TCC bv 9 2
0) 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0)
0 0 0
0 0 c
0 0 S
Ol br | Mr L I]
OP 611 Pee 26.5 be Lt
Cl 00°C 9978 9 6
S 00'| ECE GP CS 6
I! 86.0 om Ter St £8 ce tel S| OC
Leve Gs &£
Ip Cor sl eC Ol Lee is G9 e lee PL Sc 9C ck
61 IT? OS'S 6 tl
81 tS COOL OSH S 8
Lt LV? ‘Sanat Li CC
9¢ tet Bos GS Pet bl UGiiee Be S| S|
HIS sty] 1e
sid posvuep
dPAIV] JO Joquunu Jod avAivy jo juvyd sod suajs ovArey Wypatog Aq poururexa sjuryd
poseuirp jo sioquinu jo sojdwieg = pasewep sjurfg Jo Jaquinu [Ro]
qe
aspo UIO]svd—vULIP|y
SUIPULIS vsyeq—puUPIS] I[qQuUIvI
poys Ayal pjo—purysy oqueig
apisprol— We [[Tys}Uay
purys] saoddryg ayisoddg
}svO ]]RE Yyoug
}SOM [[VH Yourg
apis jsea—Avnd) Aqiry
ec jsom—Aengd AqIDy
“J 0} [JBM vos—AeNe) JUOWNRIg
QINJS d}d9I9UOD 0}—ALN) JUOWINRIG
[JBM vas pulyoq—ArNgd JUOWNLIg
Ar Aengd juownrog
Af ysreu—Arn?) Juownrag
Af [jem vas—Arend Juownrog
[JVM vas—Aen?) JUOWNRIg
yurqgioali—Arnd JUOUNRg
pvol JO apis "‘N—Aeng) JUOWUNLIG
apispeoi—Arngd JuouNrog
uondiosap
ous
133
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
“PouTUTeXd d1OM sJURd Jo adures B DIDYM “xoSsy “PURIST IIQUILIG UO soj}Is OM} Je LIeP [RAIL] a40g “DH “y IQeL
000
$08 = dPAIP] [B10] po}eUtys|
vZ-td 389}
[dxo—puryjs]
987 LV 61 ie! pL a 8t “ov Sea quelq =f
OTN Peers]
0919 960 Ce Wl cl el qquelg Vv
puod reou
LVN Pues]
8It Sc 8 SL0 eel Il SC YC 50 qquelg = Vv
LTW— Poel
0c 1 Lv 0 Iie IG 6 te qquelqg WV
OHS SI] 18
ous yoro = Bae aydures = jueid poseurep (¢ ut yueyd | Ajfesoues) pouruexea podures
}@ IVAIL] JO UI DBAIL] JO tod ovarey sjurid poseurep jo odures seArey M[910q sjuryd vole (a70v) Bore
Joquinu [e}0} JoquINU [e}0} jo Joquinu v uo yueyd sod suiajs Aq poseurep jo soqunu jo oase} — ayis [e}0}
polewnys|” poyeuns|” ISLIDAV poseurep jo Joquinyy sjurlq [e10,, -Uddlog = poy RUITSY SUIVU IG IS
ee ee a SS OL EL eae
134 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
25
20
The
number of 15
plants with AN
this
number of 10
damaged
stems 5
= 2 3.4 § © f° 62840770
The number of damaged stems per plant
Fig. | Frequency of damaged stems on hog’s fennel plants.
Fig.2. Running lights for G. borelii, Bernard Skinner, Malcolm Braithwaite, Joe Firmin, Reg
Arthur and an Exchem employee.
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 135
A few days later CP returned to the area to survey other mainland sites. At Kirby
Quay only seven plants were seen and no larvae. Three sites near Birch Hall and
facing Skipper’s Island were covered with soil from dyke working, apparently in 1993
or 1994, and the plants appeared to have been destroyed.
Most of the sites we visited contained a limited number of plants which allowed
every plant to be examined individually for larval damage. We recorded the total
number of plants present, and the number which showed signs of feeding larvae. One
in every five plants which showed signs of feeding was examined more closely and the
number of damaged stems on that plant was counted and recorded.
In the few localities with large stands of foodplant one or more representative
areas were selected and all the plants in those areas were examined as before. The
total number of larvae was estimated from the proportions of the sample areas to the
whole area.
It was earlier mentioned that we formed the opinion that each larva mines about
three stems before feeding in the rootstock. This information was unexpected.
However, as we had counted all the damaged stems on over 100 plants it was possible
that this data may indicate that there were more plants with three and six damaged
stems than other numbers. Fig. 1 shows the numbers of plants with each number of
damaged stems and does show a peak at 3 stems and may show a second at 7. It must
be pointed out that the number of plants with more than 6 damaged stems is low and
that this data has not been subjected to any statistical analysis, therefore no firm
conclusions can be drawn.
THE SURVEY FOR ADULTS
On 10 October 1996 six members of the BENHS and about eight Exchem
employees gathered at the Exchem works on Bramble Island to search and run lights
for G. borelii (Fig. 2). Six mercury vapour lights were run in two large stands of hog’s
fennel, the first at P4-Z4, and the second nearby, adjacent to the main access road.
An additional area near building M17 was searched by torchlight. Despite over a
dozen people actively searching for three hours, only one moth, a freshly emerged
female, was found. This moth was discovered at rest on the foodplant near to the
access road. It was admired by all present and was photographed before being
released at the end of the evening. It was not a good night for running lights as the
weather that day was cold and wet, but at least the rain held off for the evening.
Despite the poor conditions the Exchem employees searched with enthusiasm and
showed a genuine interest in their special moth. I was very thankful that we did find
at least one Fisher’s estuarine moth to show them. The six mercury vapour lights
produced only seven macro species between them. On the way home at about 11 pm
we stopped at Beaumont Quay for a quick look over a few easily accessible plants.
One moth, again a female, was seen clinging to a dead flower head of hog’s fennel.
Although not part of this survey an account of an adult moth attracted to a light
states, ‘It approached a light at 2300 hours, arrived at high speed and crashed in and
around like a large yellow underwing before dropping into the Skinner trap. It gave
the appearance of being strongly attracted’ (R. Arthur, pers. comm.).
CONCLUSIONS
It has been suggested (P. Waring, pers. comm.) that the population of G. bore/ii in
the Hamford Water area constitutes a single large colony. This means that there is
annual mixing of sub-populations from different sites, and even a few moths on a
136 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
handful of isolated plants can still be part of the main colony. The discovery of about
six larvae on a small isolated stand of foodplant (at The Twizzle) tends to support
this view. With only two exceptions we found larvae present wherever we found a few
plants of hog’s fennel. On some sites almost every plant showed signs of feeding
damage. Gortyna borelii is also present on Skipper’s Island and probably other
islands which we did not visit. The situation on Bramble Island is very different. Here
there is plenty of foodplant but the population density appears to be much lower
than at other sites. Research is needed to find out why this apparently excellent
resource is not better used. We did notice that pheasants were present at Bramble
Island and rabbit grazing was very heavy, resulting in an almost complete absence of
grass Cover in some areas.
In 1990 Thornton’s survey of hog’s fennel identified twenty colonies of the plant.
In 1996 the current survey visited fourteen of these colonies and found that hog’s
fennel had disappeared altogether from three of the smaller sites. It was worrying to
see that there was a marked reduction in the number of plants at several other sites.
This reduction has been caused by dumping soil from dredging or sea defence work
and certain farming activities, including ploughing.
Hog’s fennel is a robust plant; once established the underground stem can
withstand drought, severe cutting as part of scrub clearance, and being buried, at
least by a couple of feet of soil. However, dumping several feet of soil onto a plant in
the course of channel dredging or reinforcing sea defences will kill it, together with
any larvae which may be present. General farm activities such as ploughing and re-
seeding rough pasture which previously contained hog’s fennel have seriously
reduced the number of plants in the fields around Beaumont Quay.
Probably the most serious single threat to the survival of G. borelii is mowing the
hog’s fennel to discourage scrub invasion. In early summer the insect is present as
small larvae feeding high up in the stems of hog’s fennel. If a site is mown at this time
of year it will kill almost all the larvae present. A single cut, taken in August when
the larvae are feeding in the underground stems, will greatly reduce the risk to this
species. The overwintering eggs are laid on dead grass and hog’s fennel stems and
leaves. This material should be left in situ at the end of the summer and not tidied up
or burnt. On many sites the amount of foodplant has reduced over the last ten or
fifteen years and this gave us cause for concern. Conservation efforts should be
directed towards maintaining a healthy population of hog’s fennel plants, especially
in those areas identified as favoured habitats for G. borelii.
SUMMARY
In a survey which spanned only three days and did not visit several good sites on
islands, we found evidence for nearly 1000 larvae; the true population can only be
guessed at but must be at least several times this figure. With two exceptions larvae
were found at every site which still carried the foodplant, although at some sites the
population density was low. At favoured sites all mature plants carried larvae and at
most other sites about 30% of plants showed feeding damage. It was not clear why
some sites had a very high level of larval damage while at other sites quite close by
damage was rare. At all the favoured sites we noticed that hog’s fennel grows
amongst long rank grass which had to be parted to see the base of the stems. At
Bramble Island, where larvae were rare, we noticed that rabbits and pheasants were
common and hardly any ground layer vegetation was present. Further research is
needed to find the exact conditions which G. borelii requires in order to thrive. While
breeding the moth in the 1970s Don Down found that eggs were laid in rows tucked
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 137
into the sheaths surrounding the stems of long grass, in a very similar manner to that
adopted by the White-point (Mythimna albipuncta D. & S.) and other members of
this genus.
The overall impression is of an insect which is common as a larva in some favoured
areas and appears to have increased in numbers in the past few years, but exists at a
low level in adjacent and superficially similar areas.
Since the survey was completed it has become generally agreed that considerable
mortality occurs between half-grown larvae and adult moths. This will clearly have
an effect on results of the larva survey and the cause of this loss is an urgent area for
further research. One result of this survey is to highlight the fact that our knowledge
of the exact habitat requirements and life history of G. borelii is far from complete.
Research is needed in several areas and BENHS members should continue to play
their part. Amateurs often have more time for monitoring and research than the
professional who is necessarily driven by contracts and deadlines. An unintentional
side-effect of this survey has been to unearth information on egg-laying and larval
feeding which may have considerable conservation importance. One effect of
Schedule 5 listing would be to curtail this unofficial amateur research.
In January 1998, just before this report was completed, news of the Essex Sea Wall
Management Experiment was received from English Nature. This experiment will
subject sections of the sea wall which hold G. borelii to four different management
regimes. In coming years the fauna and flora will be monitored in detail to record the
impact of the different regimes. I should add that all four regimes appear to be an
improvement on the management practised up to 1996. The most appropriate regime
will be considered for management of other sea walls in Essex and will contribute to
the Biodiversity Action Plans for Gortyna and Peucedanum. It should be remembered
that the first priority of a sea wall is to maintain the sea defences, but maintenance of
hog’s fennel and G. borelii are also high priority. The note concludes with the
sentence: ‘If .. . interested parties would like to take part in the relevant aspects of
this experiment in future years, I would love to hear from you.’ Interested members
should contact Dr Chris Gibson, English Nature, Harbour House, Hythe Quay,
Colchester, Essex CO2 8JF.
CAUTION
Many of the sites for G. borelii are private property and some of the landowners do
not tolerate trespass. Bramble Island is a prohibited area and permission is rarely
given for access. We were accompanied by Exchem staff at all times. The
conservation of G. borelii, its foodplant and environment depend on co-operation
between entomologists, conservation bodies and local landowners and this should
not be jeopardized.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I should like to thank the following people for assistance with the surveys: Bernard
Skinner, Colin Plant, Alan Jenkins, Joe Firmin, Reg Arthur and Jan Rose. Dr
Malcolm Braithwaite of Exchem Organics for permission to survey part of the site,
Dr Peter Frith, and other employees of Exchem Organics for their interest and time,
The Essex Wildlife Trust for permission to survey The Naze, and English Nature
(Eastern Office) for help and advice.
138 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
REFERENCES
Chalmers-Hunt, J. M. 1972. Notes on the discovery of the larva and pupa in Britain of Gortyna
horelii Pierret: Fisher’s Estuarine Moth. Ent. Rec., 84: 52-53.
Firmin, J. 1996. Unpublished report for BENHS Council on Fisher’s estuarine moth.
Fisher, J. B., 1971. Gortyna borelii Pierret (ssp /unata Freyer?): a new British moth. Ent. Rec.,
83: 51-52.
Heath, J. & Emmet, A. M., eds., 1983. The moths and butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland,
Harley Books, Essex, 10: 247.
Perring, F. H. & Walters, S. M. 1962. Atlas of the British flora. Thomas Nelson, London.
Skinner, B. F. 1984. Colour identification guide to moths of the British Isles, Viking, Middlesex.
Thornton, G. 1990. An environmental flora of Peucedanum officinale. Dissertation for the University
of Cambridge Board of Extra-mural studies Certificate in Ecology and Landscape.
POSTSCRIPT
In early 1997 the Department of the Environment invited submissions from
interested parties on the proposed addition of G. borelii to schedule 5 of the Wildlife
and Countryside Act (1981). On 4 June 1997 a draft of this paper together with a
covering letter setting out the views of Council were submitted to the Species
Conservation Branch of the D.O.E. in Bristol.
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Troilism in Sicus ferrugineus (L.) (Diptera: Conopidae)—I was interested to read the
recent account in this journal of delayed mating in two males and one female of
Conops quadrifasciata Degeer (Uffen, R. W. J. Br. J. Ent. Nat. Hist. 1998; 11: 30, Plate
I, Fig. 2). Many years ago I remember finding three specimens of Sicus ferrugineus
locked together as one and running around in the sun on a sycamore leaf. At the
time I was more interested in the discovery of what was to me then a new and exciting
fly than the possibility that I had observed some sort of mate-guarding behaviour.
My memory was jogged a couple of years ago when another interesting short note
in this journal reported two males of the sand wasp Ammophila sabulosa (L.)
(Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) jostling for the attention of a single female (Callow, N. A.
Br. J. Ent. Nat. Hist. 1991, 4: 96, Plate IV, Fig. 2). I thought then to write a short
comment on my conopid observations, but time slipped by until the appearance of
the recent Conops note.
The three specimens of Sicus still stand in my collection: two males and a female of
Sicus ferrugineus, taken together ‘in copula on a sycamore leaf in the sunshine, in the
woods above Denton, East Sussex, 30.vii.1970. I clearly recall taking the threesome
on a hot July day. Unlike Uffen’s tenacious trio, the three Sicus separated in the net;
one male crawled loose while the true mating pair remained together.
Mate guarding must be quite common in the Conopidae; I have several times seen
pairs sitting about on flowers, a male and a female, clinging together, but obviously not
coupled. In Nunhead Cemetery and other sites in south-east London I regularly see
unattached ‘couples’ of both Conops quadrifasciata and Conops ceriaeformis Meigen
(the commonest species in this area), sitting together, especially on ragwort flowers.
As with other examples of mate-guarding behaviour, it is probably competition for
females which drives the males to invest time and effort in hanging around after the
copulatory act. Certainly male conopids always seem to outnumber females, both in
the field and also in dipterists’ collections. RICHARD A. JONES, 13 Bellwood Road,
Nunhead, London SE15 3DE.
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 139
A ‘BEE-LOUSE’ BRAULA SCHMITZI OROSI-PAL (DIPTERA:
BRAULIDAE) NEW TO THE BRITISH ISLES, AND THE STATUS OF
BRAULA SPP. IN ENGLAND AND WALES
JOHN R. DOBSON
46 Elmwood Avenue, Kenton, Harrow, Middlesex HA3 8AH UK.
The Braulidae (“bee-lice’) is a family of wingless and otherwise atypical acalyptrate
flies living as inquilines or kleptoparasites (larvae) and as kleptoparasites (adults) in
honey bee (Apis sp.) colonies. It is a family with a rather chequered taxonomic
history, particularly regarding its proposed affinities with related groups (Grimaldi &
Underwood, 1986; Peterson, 1987). The genus Braula comprises five species and one
subspecies (Or6ési-Pal, 1966b), and is associated exclusively with Apis mellifera L. The
only other genus in the family, Megabraula, comprises two large species
(M. antecessor and M. onerosa) described by Grimaldi & Underwood (1986)
from Nepalese material, and which are both associated with the largest
species of honey bee, Apis laboriosa Smith.
A map of the international distribution of Braula spp. is given by Nixon (1982),
and Papp (1984) records three members of the genus as resident in the Palaearctic
region: B. coeca Nitzsch, B. orientalis Or6ési-Pal and B. schmitzi Or6si-Pal.
International records of B. coeca, the most ubiquitous species, are detailed by Smith
& Caron (1985). However, it is not always possible to gauge from the literature
whether specimens recorded as B. coeca have been examined critically or have been
recorded as that species by default. It is suspected that the latter is sometimes the
case, and records of other members of the genus are therefore likely to be more
reliable. Papp (1984) gives international records of B. schmitzi, which is widely
distributed in Europe including France and Italy. B. kohli Schmitz, B. pretoriensis
Or6si-Pal and B. coeca ssp. angulata Orési-Pal are all Afrotropical in origin, but
B. coeca ssp. angulata is recorded as an introduction to Italy, and there is a
questionable record of B. kohli from Belgium. To date, only one member of the
family, B. coeca, has been recorded from the British Isles (Kloet & Hincks, 1976).
Adults of Braula spp. are phoretic on adult honey bees (scanning electron
micrograph, Muggleton, 1992; photograph, Morton & Brown, 1996) and disperse
between bee colonies by this means. In addition they may be spread as a result of bee
keeping practices. Braula spp. are not generally considered to cause any significant
harm to honey bees, and the main impact of B. coeca occurs when the wax-lined
larval tunnels spoil the appearance of honeycombs intended for show or sale.
Hive floor inserts and hive debris samples from England and Wales are submitted
on a voluntary or statutory basis to the Central Science Laboratory National Bee
Unit (NBU) for diagnosis of the Varroa mite, Varroa jacobsoni Oudemans, a serious
pest of honey bees first discovered in the British Isles in South Devon (VC 3) in 1992
(Bew, 1993). In addition to Varroa, these samples contain specimens of other
invertebrates, which have been either killed by varroacidal agents administered to the
colony, or are present due to natural mortality. At the author’s request, a number of
specimens of Brau/a were taken from these hive samples in the period Autumn 1994—
Spring 1995. The resulting pooled sample of Braula was given to the author (an
employee of the NBU at that time) for detailed examination. 157 specimens were
examined for characters described and illustrated by Or6ési-Pal (1966a, 1966b) and it
was apparent on the basis of external features that some specimens conformed to
Ordési-Pal’s ‘schmitzi group’ (comprising B. schmitzi and B. orientalis). Examination
140 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
of the characteristic female cerci confirmed the presence of B. schmitzi in significant
numbers in the sample, and it is added to the British fauna on this basis.
Subsequent examination of the male terminalia revealed clear differences between
the aedeagi of B. coeca and B. schmitzi (Figs 3, 8), and the two species are
distinguished on that basis for the first time.
The NBU sample comprised 116 B. coeca (80 males, 36 females; sex ratio (m/f)
2.2: 1) and 41 B. schmitzi (22 males, 19 females; sex ratio 1.2: 1). As these specimens
were from a pooled sample, the data can only be given as England and/or Wales,
autumn 1994-spring 1995. The specimens of B. schmitzi may have come from one
bee colony or many, so the relatively high numbers of this species in the sample do
not indicate whether it is local or widespread in England and Wales.
A sample from a hive at Hatch End, Middlesex collected on 2 March 1997, and
kindly made available by J. Telfer, comprised 36 specimens of B. coeca (23 males, 13
females; sex ratio 1.8: 1). The large excess of males in both samples of B. coeca may
reflect the situation in nature. On the other hand it may be an artefact of the
sampling method; for example if the sexes favour different areas within a hive, or
exhibit a differential susceptibility to varroacidal agents.
The few UK specimens of Braul/a held by the Natural History Museum, London,
and stored in alcohol are all B. coeca. Carded specimens, where the abdominal venter
was inaccessible, were not examined.
B. schmitzi is almost certainly an introduced species. Active honey bees need to
feed regularly, and it is thought extremely unlikely that they would be capable of
flying across the English Channel (M. A. Brown, pers. comm.) and that phoretic
Braula spp. adults could colonize England by this means.
The activities of bee keepers play an important role in determining the
international, national and regional dispersal of Brau/a spp. Both commercial and
amateur bee keepers seek to improve the honey yield and/or behaviour of their
colonies via the introduction of strains of queen with the required characteristics.
These strains of honey bee may originate from different countries, and the
international transport of honey bees is regulated in Europe and elsewhere. In
addition, very large numbers of honey bee colonies are transported long distances
each year by road to act as pollinating agents for commercial crops, or to obtain
honey derived from a specific source (e.g. heather). The international transport of
bees within and into the EU is subject to restrictions and health checks under a
variety of legislation implemented under the BALAI Directive (92/65/EEC) and the
Veterinary Checks Directives (90/425 and 90/675/EEC), and in the UK through
Orders under The Bees Act 1980. The import of honey bees into the UK is permitted
only from a small number of approved countries, and the movement of bees to sites
outside the Statutory Infected Area (SIA) in the UK (introduced to slow the spread
of the Varroa mite) is permitted only under licence. Infestation with Braula is not,
however, a notifiable bee disease, and an import/export or movement licence would
not be withheld due to its presence. In spite of the existing regulations, there is some
degree of illicit traffic in bees. Live queens may be successfully packaged and posted
between countries, accompanied by a small number of attendant workers. Altern-
atively, queens of desirable strains may be carried between countries in hand luggage.
Historically, there has been importation of honey bee strains into the UK on a
massive scale, particularly following the epidemic of the enigmatic ‘Isle of Wight
disease’ early this century. These bees originated mainly from Europe but also, more
recently, from Israel and the USA. Statutory controls on importation are a relatively
recent development under the Bees Act 1980. In addition, invertebrates living largely
within honey bee colonies such as Braula spp. are not subject to the same
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 141
climatological constraints to their distribution as free-living species, since environ-
mental conditions within a honey bee colony are closely regulated by the bees.
Thus there are a number of mechanisms by which human intervention may lead to
the colonization of new areas, countries and continents by species of Braula, and for
this reason Papp (1984) lists all known members of the genus as potential additions
to the Palaearctic fauna. It is thought that these same mechanisms are also in part
responsible for the spread of the Varroa mite. It is perhaps not surprising then that
B. schmitzi has colonized the UK, and it is thought likely that additional species,
such as B. orientalis, may be found here eventually.
Nothing is known of the distinction between the biology of B. coeca and
B. schmitzi, although the biology of B. coeca has been discussed by a number
of authors (e.g. Hassanein & Abd El-Salam, 1962; Grimaldi & Underwood,
1986; Morse, 1987; Smith & Caron, 1984; Ramirez & Malavasi, 1992). Ordési-Pal
(1966b) states that B. coeca oviposits on the inner surface of the cappings of
partially sealed honey cells, while B. schmitzi oviposits on the outer surface.
Smith & Caron (1984) point out, however, that B. coeca has been observed
to oviposit both on the underside and on the external surface of honey cell
cappings. It would be convenient if the two species could be distinguished on
the basis of a macroscopic characteristic of their larval tunnels, and it is
hoped that future observations might clarify this possibility.
Oroési-Pal (1966a) records coexisting populations of B. coeca and B. schmitzi in
hives in Yugoslavia and Sicily, as well as coexisting populations of B. pretoriensis and
B. coeca ssp. angulata from colonies in Natal. It is not known whether two species of
Braula are normally able to maintain a stable coexistence within a single bee colony,
or whether the reported associations were, for example, artefacts of apiary
management.
Adult Braula are found, normally singly, on the thorax or gaster of drones and
workers. Mated (but not virgin) queens may, however, harbour large numbers of
Braula about their body. Smith & Caron (1984) report various levels of infestation in
the United States, up to 29 B. coeca ona queen in one case, and J. Morton (pers. comm.)
has observed about 40 specimens of Brau/a on a queen in the UK. It is not known to
what extent, if any, this level of infestation might affect a queen’s behaviour and
hence colony performance. It is of interest that 18 individuals of Braula were recorded
on a drone in a queenless honey bee colony in South Africa by Skaife (1921).
The adults of B. coeca live as kleptoparasites on regurgitated material (protein-
and fat-rich secretions fed to the queen and larvae), which is taken directly from the
bee’s mouth-parts, where it appears in response to stimulation by the fly. Skaife
(1921) quotes a description by A. I. Root of Braula feeding on ‘honey’ regurgitated
by a bee in response to stimulation of its mouthparts by the feet of the adult Braula.
Argo (1926) describes Braula feeding on material regurgitated from the mouthparts
of a bee in response to the fly ‘frantically clawing’ at the bee’s clypeus with its two
anterior pairs of tarsi. Skaife (1921) notes that the contents of the crop of dissected
adults of Braula tasted of honey.
The period between hatching of ova and the emergence of adults in B. coeca (in
Egypt) is 16-24 days (Hassanein & Abd El-Salam, 1962). The longevity of adults,
and the period between emergence and oviposition is unknown, and Smith & Caron
(1984) state that adults over-winter in bee colonies. Peak breeding in Braula is likely
to coincide with periods of maximum nectar-flow, when most honey cells are capped
by the bees. A number of authors (e.g. Argo, 1926; Orési-Pal 1966a; Smith & Caron,
1984) and bee keepers (pers. comms.) note a pronounced autumn peak in the
numbers of Braula adults, as well as a spring minimum, the latter, according to Smith
142 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
& Caron (1984), coinciding with the death of females following oviposition.
Voltinism and adult longevity in Brau/a, and the seasonal relationship between
fecundity in Braula and the activities of bees, requires further investigation.
The anatomy of the adult and larva of B. coecais detailed by Peterson (1987), and the
early stages of this species are described by Ferrar (1987) and Smith (1989). The ova of
Braula spp. are equipped with a pair of membranous flanges, possibly associated
with flotation in a viscous medium, and hence gas exchange. Characters described by
Orési-Pal’s (1966b) distinguishing the ova of ‘coeca group’ from ‘schmitzi group’
species are based entirely on these flanges, and for this reason may appear questionable.
Authors differ in their interpretation of the larval pabulum of B. coeca, and Ferrar
(1987) considers this problem unresolved. Imms (1942) states that the digestive
system of the larvae contains wax and often pollen grains, and cites Ordési-Pal’s
(1938) suggestion that the micro-organisms present in the epithelial cells of the mid-
intestine of the larvae are capable of digesting wax. Hassanein & Abd El-Salam
(1962) describe larvae feeding on honey cell cappings, while Smith & Caron (1984)
state that the larvae develop as commensals in the wax cappings of honey cells,
obtaining nourishment from debris in the wax. Morse (1987) also reports larvae in
cappings feeding on honey, pollen and perhaps wax. While it appears that the larvae
of B. coeca ingest a variety of substance in cell capping material, which of these is/are
required for larval development is unknown. Pupariation is generally held to occur
within larval tunnels in cell cappings (e.g. Ferrar, 1987).
Skaife (1921) states that newly hatched lavae of *B. coeca enter brood cells and
obtain their nutrition from food supplied to the larvae by nurse bees. The same
author reports finding puparia and exuvia exclusively in sealed drone cells following
a search of a (queenless) bee colony in South Africa. These observations, which
associate the immature stages with sealed brood cells rather than honey cell
cappings, appear anomalous and deserve further comment. Skaife’s illustrations of
the dissected reproductive organs of both sexes of ‘B. coeca’ (Figs 9 and 10 of that
author) show terminalia which correspond most closely with those of B. pretoriensis
as illustrated by Ordsi-Pal (1966b) (B. pretoriensis was described as a new species by
Or6ési-Pal in 1938, on the basis of material from Natal Province (Papp, 1984)). In
addition, Skaife’s illustration of the ovum of his species corresponds most closely
with that of B. pretoriensis as illustrated by Or6si-Pal (1966b), in that both authors
illustrate an ovum with a well-defined rounded protrusion at each apex, a feature
unique to that species according to Ord6si-Pal’s illustrations. Further, the larval
cephalopharyngeal skeleton illustrated by Skaife differs from that of B. coeca as
illustrated in Ferrar (1987) (Skaife specifies the length (‘about 2mm’), but not the
instar of the larva illustrated. Comparison with dimensions of the larval instars of
B. coeca cited by Hassanein & Abd El-Salam (1962) (second instar 1.24mm, third
instar 2.07—2.25 mm) is indicative, but does not establish, that Skaife’s illustration is
of a third instar larva). It appears then, that Skaife’s pioneering study gives a useful
and probably unique account of the biology and early stages of B. pretoriensis, and
that, if Skaife’s observations are repeatable, this represents the only published
account enabling clear differences between the biology of species of Braula to be
demonstrated. The early stages of B. pretoriensis appear to occupy an area in the bee
colony (sealed brood cells) which is spatially distinct from that occupied by B. coeca
(honey cell cappings). The larvae of B. pretoriensis are apparently kleptoparasitic on
food supplied to the bee larvae, and their pabulum is thus closely related to that of
the adult. The larvae of B. coeca seem to be strict inquilines in cell capping material.
Any observations recording distinctions between the life-histories of B. coeca and B.
schmitzi will be of particular interest.
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 143
It is probable that the erroneous descriptions of the larvae of B. coeca developing
in brood cells, which appear widely in standard texts on Diptera (e.g. Colyer &
Hammond, 1968; O’Toole, 1978; Cogan, 1980 (who incorrectly refers Skaife’s species
to B. coeca ssp. angulata) and Smith, 1989) are the result of propagation of Skaife’s
early description of the life-history of ‘B. coeca’, which was published before Braula
was resolved into several species.
STATUS OF BRAULA SP. INENGLAND AND WALES
The NBU has an extensive data-set of records of Braula sp. from England and
Wales, and a map compiled from this unpublished data for the period 1 January
1992-13 July 1995, shows that it is recorded from every Vice-County, and from more
than 90% of 10km squares in the area. Paxton & Mwale (1993) conducted a survey
by questionnaire of bee pests and diseases in England and Wales in 1991. Only Braula
sp. and Galleria mellonella L. (greater wax moth) showed significant regional
variation in incidence. The percentage of bee keepers reporting the presence of Braula
in their colonies in the south-west region was 73%. The figures for other regions range
from 34% (‘west region’=Wales) to 50% (central England), and display no
discernible geographical trend. The same authors identified a statistically significant
higher reporting of Braula sp. from bee keepers practising migratory bee keeping, and
suggest that the movement of colonies may be a stress factor favouring colonization
by the fly. Braula is recorded from Scotland (G. E. Rotheray, pers. comm.) and from
the Irish Republic (P. J. Chandler, pers. comm.), but there is no data available to the
author regarding its prevalence in these areas. It probably occurs with honey bees
throughout the British Isles, but does not often come to the attention of entomologists.
Varroosis indirectly affects the populations of honey bee-associated organisms
such as Braula, both through the decline in numbers of managed and feral bee
colonies, and through the toxicity of varroacidal agents to non-target species. While
many bee keepers (pers. comms.) feel that the loss of bee colonies due to varroosis is
likely to be dramatic, it will be some years before the actual impact becomes clear.
The use of varroacides is currently the norm in all regions of the world subject to
- Varroa infestations, and the only major geographical regions in which Varroa is so
far unrecorded are Australasia and southern Africa (J. Morton, pers. comm.).
The list of acaricides licensed as varroacides by the EU includes flumethrin (e.g.
Bayvarol), fluvalinate (e.g. Apistan), amitraz (e.g. Apivar), formulations based on
thymol and other essential oils, as well as a variety of other agents (Morton &
Brown, 1996). In addition, treatment using unlicensed substances such as lactic- and
formic acid is not uncommon. Flumethrin formulated as ‘Bayvarol’ strips is the only
substance currently licensed for this use in the UK.
The toxicity of these substances to Braula and other honey bee-associated
invertebrates remains largely uninvestigated, but Kulincevic et al. (1991) show that,
while both fluvalinate and amitraz are effective against Varroa, fluvalinate has
significantly greater toxicity than amitraz towards Braula adults 7 days post-
treatment. The use of amitraz as a varroacide, however, is far less common overall
than treatment with pyrethroids. While amitraz is a formamidine acaricide, both
flumethrin and fluvalinate are synthetic pyrethroids and are therefore fat-soluble. Liu
(1992) shows that fluvalinate is absorbed into beeswax, and the early stages of Braula
are therefore likely to be exposed to it, although the effect of such agents on the early
stages is unknown.
There is little doubt that Braula suffers significant mortality due to the widespread
application of varroacidal agents, and that this is likely to be the case internationally.
144 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
Following conversations with bee keepers based in England and Wales, no clear
consensus has emerged as to whether a noticeable decline in the population of Braula
has occurred to date. Some have noted that Braula has become less common since
the arrival of Varroa, while others have always regarded Braula infestation as an
infrequent occurrence (pers. comms.). Braula was present in honey bee colonies in the
same apiary in London, in both July 1997 and July 1998, where these colonies had
received several (c.3-6+) treatments against Varroa, mainly with Bayvarol (J.
Morton, pers. comm.). While this might indicate that Braula has developed some
resistance to flumethrin, both flumethrin and fluvalinate are unusual among
pyrethroids in that they are significantly less toxic to insects than to mites, and
this differential toxicity is probably a factor in determining the ability of Braula to
persist in flumethrin-treated honey bee colonies.
The development of resistance to fluvalinate in the Varroa mite was first reported
by Sugden ef al. (1995) in the USA. Fluvalinate resistance in Varroa has
subsequently been recorded in EU countries such as France and Italy, and these
mites also show resistance to flumethrin (Morton & Brown, 1996). As resistance
becomes more prevalent, and currently licensed pyrethroid varroacides lose their
efficacy, there will be a switch to alternative treatments. These are likely to exhibit
significantly greater toxicity to non-target species such as Braula than currently
licensed compounds. While it is vital that Varroa infestation is managed by all
appropriate means, it is also important to be aware of the indirect effects of varroosis
on populations of honey bee-associated invertebrates such as Braula.
NOTES ON IDENTIFICATION
Specimens derived from hive debris etc. are desiccated and brittle, and many are in
relatively poor condition. Most males from this source have the aedeagus extended,
and as a result it is often broken. Examination of a number of males may thus be
necessary to locate those with the aedeagus entire. In practice, however, worn
specimens can often be identified as long as the abdominal venter 1s clearly visible.
Subsequent to softening specimens for examination by soaking them overnight in
10% KOH, a brief (c. 30 seconds) boiling in this solution will dissolve adherent wax
particles, which may otherwise obscure diagnostic features. The terminalia may
sometimes be exerted in softened specimens of both sexes by gently ‘pumping’ the
abdominal venter with a blunt object.
The shape of the abdominal sternites is rather variable between individuals of
Braula. For example, the anteriolateral extensions of synsternite | + 2 may be either
pointed (Figs 1, 5) or truncate in both sexes of B. coeca and B. schmitzi. Sternite 3 is
often quite short with curved or divergent lateral margins in B. coeca (Fig. 1), and
significantly longer with parallel lateral margins in B. schmitzi (Fig. 5). This feature is
too variable, however, to reliably separate the species.
In a few specimens of both species from the NBU sample a ‘false posterior margin’
was present on synsternite 1 + 2 (Fig. 6). This weakly defined suture may or may not
represent a partial reversion to the plesiomorphic state, in which sternites | and 2 are
separate.
Nomenclature of abdominal sternites follows Peterson (1987), which differs from
that adopted by Orési-Pal (1966b).
DETERMINING SEX IN BRAULA
Four fully formed and pigmented median ventral abdominal sclerites (sternites
| + 2-5) clearly visible (Fig. 5). Sternite 6 is present, but it is very short and turned
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 145
under the posterior margin of sternite 5, where it is often visible as a crescent-
shaped silhouette (Fig. 5). Aedeagus (Figs 3, 8) frequently extended in samples
from hive debris, although sometimes broken in these specimens. Aedeagal
apodeme/hypandrium normally visible in silhouette within the abdominal cavity.
see Males
Five entire and fully pigmented median ventral abdominal sclerites (sternites 1 + 2—
6) clearly visible (Fig. 1) [The posterior margin of sternite 6 may be darkened in some
females, and this should not be confused with the silhouette of sternite 6 as seen in
males]. Cerci (Figs 4, 9) usually visible in part when the tip of the abdomen is
viewed ventrally, although may be substantially obscured in some specimens.
: \. Females
KEY TO BRITISH SPECIES OF BRAULA
1 Both sexes: Synsternite 1+2 with a moderate to sparse covering of irregularly
arranged hairs on disc (Fig. 1) [The hair-pits can be seen by oblique transmitted
light in worn specimens]. Abdomen ‘barrel-shaped’ in dorsal view (Fig. 2).
Males: Aedeagus sinuous, extending well beyond parameres and _ tapering
uniformly to tip (Fig. 3).
Females: Cerci not longer than wide, broadly contiguous but unpigmented
medially on the apical margin, which forms a shallow curve (Fig. 4) [High
magnification e.g. x 80 is required to see the un-pigmented median region of the
cerci|
t Perkeoeca
Both sexes: Disc of syntergosternite 1 +2 normally without hairs (Fig. 5). If a few
hairs are presented they often trace out the path of a ‘false posterior margin’ (Fig.
6) [The latter condition also arises in occasional specimens of B. coeca, and
intermediates occur in respect of this character]. Abdomen ‘vase-shaped’ in dorsal
view (Fig. 7).
Males: Aedeagus more-or-less straight, extending only slightly beyond parameres
and hardly tapering. Tip narrowing abruptly to form a hook-shaped process
(Fig. 8).
Females: Length of outer margins of cerci about twice their width. Cerci
unpigmented basally on their median margins (Fig. 9)
i>)
. . Schmitzi
ADDITIONAL SPECIES
As has already been discussed, all species of Brau/a are potential additions to the
UK fauna. Orési-Pal (1966b) keys all species, but it would appear that for a number
of species only females are clearly separable on the basis of his key. While external
characters would normally run a specimen to one, or a pair of species, Orési-Pal’s
illustrations of female cerci are diagnostic at this level. On the other hand, both the
illustrations and descriptions of male terminalia are often difficult to interpret. The
aedeagus appears to be broken or missing in all Ordési-Pal’s photographs of male
terminalia and the aedeagal characters described in the present article, which clearly
separate males of B. schmitzi and B. coeca, are not keyed or discussed. Examination
of the aedeagi of male type material of the genus may prove fruitful in this respect.
The following notes (based on the key and illustrations in Orési-Pal, 1966b) should
highlight the possible presence of additional species in suspect female specimens.
146 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
St. 5
9S
1 St. 6 (beneath St. 5)
Figs 1-9. B. coeca. 1. female, abdominal sternites 1+2-6. 2. dorsal view of abdomen. 3.
aedeagus and parameres. 4. female cerci. B. schmitzi: 5. male, abdominal sternites | + 2-6. 6.
synsternite 1 +2 showing ‘false’ posterior margin. 7. dorsal view of abdomen. 8. aedeagus and
parameres. 9. female cerci. Abbreviations: St.—Sternite. Synst.—Synsternite.
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 147
Syntergosternite 1+2 hairy, abdomen ‘barrel-shaped’ (as B. coeca). Female cerci
distinctly broader at apex than at base.
2B. pretoriensis [or B. kohli]
Keys to B. coeca but sternite 3 hairy on disc and apical margin of female cerci
forming a well defined angle of about 120° at the mid line.
2B. coeca ssp. angulata
Keys to B. schmitzi but female cerci deeply divided medially, the inner margins
pigmented and setose as per the outer margins.
?B. orientalis
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to express my gratitude to the staff of the Central Science Laboratory
National Bee Unit for the pooled sample of Braula, and particularly to James I. C.
Morton, South Eastern Regional Bee Inspector for the NBU, for his extensive and
helpful comments and suggestions during the preparation of this article, and to P. D.
Wilkinson for extracting and mapping records of Brau/a from the Unit’s database. In
addition I would like to thank Mrs. J. Telfer of the Harrow Beekeepers Association
for collecting samples of Braula for me.
REFERENCES
Argo, V. N. 1926. Braula coeca in Maryland. J. Econ. Ent. 19(1): 170-174.
Bew, M. 1993. Hunting for Varroa in the UK. pp. 67-69. In: Coles, R. (ed.) The Beekeepers
Annual. Northern Bee Books, Mytholmroyd.
Cogan, B. H. 1980. Braulidae. p. 627 in: Crosskey, R. W. (ed.) Catalogue of the Diptera of the
Afrotropical region. British Museum (Natural History), London.
Colyer, C. N. & Hammond, C. O. 1968. Flies of the British Isles. 2nd Edn. Frederick Warne &
Co. Ltd.
Ferrar, P. 1987. A guide to the breeding habits and immature stages of Diptera Cyclorrhapha
(Part 1: text, Part 2: figures). Entomonograph 8. E. J. Brill/Scandinavian Science Press.
Leiden and Copenhagen.
Grimaldi, D. & Underwood, B. A. 1986. Megabraula, a new genus for two new species of
Braulidae (Diptera), and a discussion of braulid evolution. Sys. Ent. 11: 427-438.
Hassanein, M. H. & Abd El-Salam, A. L. 1962. Biological studies on the bee louse, Braula coeca
Nitzsch (Diptera: Braulidae). Bull. Soc. ent. Egypt. 46: 87-95.
Imms, A. D. 1942. On Braula coeca Nitzsch and its affinities. Parasitology. 34: 88-100.
Kulincevic, J. M., Rinderer, T. E. & Mladjan, V. J. 1991. Effects of fluvalinate and amitraz on
bee lice (Braula coeca Nitzsch) in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies in Yugoslavia.
Apidologie. 22(1): 43-47.
Kloet, G. S. & Hincks, W. D. 1976. A check list of British Insects. Part 5: Diptera and
Siphonaptera (2nd edition). Handbks Ident. Br. Insects. 11(5).
Liu, T. P. 1992. Fluvalinate and its after-effects. Am. Bee J. 132(6): 398.
Morse, R. A. 1987. The Braulids. Am. Bee J. 127(6): 429-431.
Morton, J. & Brown, M. 1996. Varroosis—a parasitic infestation of honey bees. MAFF leaflet
PB 2581.
Muggleton, J. 1992. [BENHS indoor meeting, 14 April 1992]. Br. J. Ent. Nat. Hist. 5(4): 165-166.
Nixon, M. 1982. Preliminary world maps of honeybee diseases and parasites. Bee World. 63(1):
23-42.
O’Toole, C. 1978. Ants, Bees and Wasps (Aculeate Hymenoptera). pp. 157-164 in: Stubbs, A. &
Chandler, P. (eds.). A Dipterist’s Handbook. The Amateur Entomologist. 15.
Ordési-Pal, Z. 1938. Studien iiber die Bienenlaus (Braula coeca Nitzsch, Diptera). Z. Parasiten.
10: 221-238.
148 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
Or6si-Pal, Z. 1966a. A new bee louse: Braula coeca angulata. J. Apic. Res. 5(1): 27-32.
Orési-Pal, Z. 1966b. Die Bienenlaus-Arten. Angew. Parasit. 7: 138-171.
Papp, L. 1984. Braulidae. pp 178-180 in: Soos, A., Papp, L. (eds.) Catalogue of Palaearctic
Diptera, 10: Clusiidae-Chloropidae. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam/Akademiai
Kiado, Budapest.
Paxton, R. J. & Mwale, V. D. 1993. The ‘other’ honey bee diseases, pests and problems in
England and Wales—a survey in 1991. Beekeeper’s Quart. 33: 25-28.
Peterson, B. V. 1987. Braulidae pp.913—918 in: McAlpine, J. F. (ed.). Manual of Nearctic
Diptera. Monograph 28, vol. 2. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada.
Ramirez, B. W. & Malavasi, J. 1992. Conformation of the pretarsus of Braula coeca Nitzsch
(Braulidae: Diptera), the bee louse. Bee Science. 2(2): 106—107.
Skaife, S. H. 1921. On Braula caeca Nitzsch, a dipterous parasite of the honey bee. Trans. R.
Soc. S. Af. 10: 41-48. [Author’s note: Cogan (1980) lists caeca as a variant spelling of
coeca.|
Smith, I. B. & Caron, D. M. 1984. Distribution of the bee louse Braula coeca Nitzsch in
honeybee colonies and its preferences among workers, queens and drones. J. Apic. Res.
23(3): 171-176.
Smith, I. B. & Caron, D. M. 1985. Distribution of the bee louse Braula coeca, in Maryland and
worldwide. Am. Bee J. 125(4): 294-296.
Smith, K. G. V. 1989. An introduction to the immature stages of British flies. Handbks Ident.
Br. Insects. 10(14).
Sugden, E., Williams, K. & Sammataro, D. 1995. [Report on the] 9th International Congress of
Acarology. Bee Culture. 123(2): 80-81.
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Ulopa trivia Germar (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) in Wales—Two species of the
cicadellid (leafhopper) genus Ulopa are found in Britain (Le Quesne, 1965). Both
species are usually flightless, with convex thickened forewings, and are found near
ground level. Ulopa reticulata (Fab.) is found commonly under Erica and Calluna
over almost all Britain. U/opa trivia Germar is a very local species (designated
Notable B by Kirby, 1992) with scattered records in southern England (Morris, 1971;
Kirby, 1992). It is a species of chalk and limestone grassland and calcareous dunes,
although its hosts plants are not known with certainty. An association with Plantago
is possible (Morris, 1971). It appears that the species is univoltine with females
overwintering to lay eggs in the spring. A short visit on 4.1x.98 to Whiteford Burrows
NNR (SN437944) on the north Gower coast in south Wales (VC 41, Glamorgan)
produced 4 females of U. trivia by vacuum sampling. The site was a large, warm,
south facing, dune slack with short, rabbit-grazed vegetation. Poor weather
prevented further examination of other areas of the dunes on this occasion. This
record appears to be the first for the species in Wales, and is some distance from other
recorded sites (the nearest being Brean Down, nr Weston-super-Mare, N. Somerset,
according to Morris, 1971)—-M. R. WILSON, Department of Biodiversity and
Systematic Biology, National Museums and Galleries of Wales, Cardiff CF1 3NP.
REFERENCES
Kirby, P. 1992. A review of the scarce and threatened Hemiptera of Great Britain. JNCC,
Peterborough.
Le Quesne, W. J. 1965. Hemiptera Cicadomorpha (excluding Deltocephalinae and Typhlocy-
binae). Handbks Ident. British Insects. 2(2a): 1-64.
Morris, M. G. 1971. Distributional and ecological notes on Ulopa trivia Germar (Hem.,
Cicadellidae) Entomologist’s Monthly Mag. 107: 174-181.
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 149
A BREEDING EXPERIMENT WITH MANIOLA JURTINA L. AB.
FRACTA ZWEIGLT (LEP.: SATYRIDAE)
RUPERT BARRINGTON
101 Egerton Road, Bishopston, Bristol BS7 SHR, UK.
Maniola jurtina ab. fracta Zweiglt is a scarce and highly distinctive aberration.
During fieldwork over 17 years I have found it in seven separate locations in Dorset,
Wiltshire, Somerset and the Isles of Scilly. It has occurred in all grades of expression,
from examples barely distinguishable from the type form, through to the most
extreme expressions (Fig. 8).
M. jurtina ab. fracta can be described, in the fully developed form, as having a
single strip of dark scaling crossing the pale median band on the underside of the
hindwings (Russwurm, 1978). This always runs along the anterior side of vein 4
(English numbering system) or vein M3 (using the Universal Comstock System).
This connects the darker basal and marginal areas (Figs 5-8). R. M. Craske, who has
a lifelong experience of this species and its varieties in the field, has described the
form as having a ‘great stab right across the pale band’. I can think of no more
graphic description than that. In the field, extreme examples invariably give the
impression of a type specimen with a heavy tear in the wing. Only close inspection
reveals it to be this lovely aberration. It occurs in both sexes, although the male
specimen illustrated (Fig. 7) is the only example of that sex (compared to over twenty
female specimens) that I have found, despite careful scrutiny.
In some specimens the variation may be visible on the upper surface of the
hindwings (Fig. 2). Some female specimens also show ab. antiaurolancea Leeds on
the upperside of the forewings (Fig. 2). This consists of a reduction of the fulvous
coloration between the veins. The most extreme expressions have only a ring of
fulvous remaining around the apical spot (although the fulvous in the ‘cell’ area
remains, as the effect of the aberrant genes seems to be restricted to the median band
_ area of the wings only). This variation also occurs on the upperside of ab.
postmultifidus Lipscomb. Postmultifidus is described as having ‘the top half of the
band on the underside of the hindwings entire, the lower half broken up into well
separated segments’ (Lipscomb, 1980). While I have captured and bred examples of
postmultifidus showing the extreme expression of antiaurolancea on the upperside, I
have not seen extreme antiaurolancea on a specimen of fracta.
While some satyrid aberrations may occur as analogous forms across a range of
different species which share the relevant pattern elements (e.g. variation in
submedian spot size, shape or number) there seems to be nothing similar to fracta
recorded in those satyrid species which share the hindwing underside band pattern
element.
The original female for the breeding experiment (Fig. 1) was captured on 1| July
1995 in a North Dorset hay meadow where this aberration has appeared regularly
since 1983. It is clearly a very minor expression of the form with just the first sign of
the dark strip pushing into the median band from the basal area of darker coloration.
Approximately 250 eggs were laid, resulting in an F, brood of 86 adults in June
1996. The brood was graded from typical specimens to those with the median band
distinctly narrowed (much like the F, specimens in Figs 3 and 4). There was no sign
of any development of the fracta hindwing cross-band. A number of these forms
were paired and about 1000 eggs were laid.
150 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
Figs 1-8. Maniola jurtina ab. fracta 1. Female transitional to fracta. Captured Dorset
I.vii.1995. 2. Female ab. fracta+ antiaurolancea Bred F, v. 1997. 3. Male transitional to fracta.
Bred F5 v. 1997. 4. Female transitional to fracta. Bred F> v. 1997. 5. Female fracta. Bred F>
v. 1997. 6. Female fracta. Bred F> v. 1997. 7. Male fracta. Captured Dorset 11.vii.1983. 8.
Female fracta. Captured Dorset 12.vii.1983. All specimens coll. R. Barrington.
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 15]
The F, generation contained 118 adults (45 male and 73 female). The brood was
graded from type through to full fracta (Figs 5 and 6), with typical insects
predominating. Three females were fully developed fracta and two others nearly so.
Two males were weak expressions of fracta. The female specimens of fracta, and a
number of the transitional female forms, were also antiaurolancea, though none was
extreme (Fig. 2).
The hindwing median band width in specimens of fracta ranges from Fig. 8 in
which the width is unaffected, through to the bred examples (Figs 5 and 6) in which
the band is considerably narrowed, so the dark fracta cross-band is shorter.
Fieldwork throws up all degrees of median band width between these two extremes,
so probably this variable narrowing is part of the expression of fracta. In my
experience full fracta with the median band of normal width (i.e. Fig. 8) is the rarest
of all expressions.
The above results suggests that fracta is controlled by a multifactorial gene
complex, in which a number of genes operate in an additive manner to give broods
graded from type to full aberrations. There is no differentiation into distinct groups
as there is when an aberration is under the control of a single mutant gene.
REFERENCES
Barrington, R. D. G. 1992. A breeding experiment with Maniola jurtina L. (Meadow Brown
Butterfly) ab. postmultifidus Lipscomb. Br. J. Ent. Nat. Hist. 5: 155-157.
Lipscomb, C. G. 1980. A new form of Maniola jurtina L. related to M. jurtina ab. postaurolancia
Leeds. Entomologist’s Rec. J. Var. 92: 205.
Russwurm, A. D. A. 1978. Aberrations of British Butterflies E. W. Classey Ltd.
FIELD MEETING REPORT
Sidney Wood, Dunsfold, Surrey
20 June 1998
Leader: John Phillips. Totally against the trend of extremely adverse weather
conditions being experienced in June, the day chosen for this meeting turned out to
be virtually ideal, being hot although overcast during the afternoon, but humid
during the evening.
Four members plus the leader attended the afternoon session including Gail and
Stephen Jeffcoate, who are responsible for managing nearby Oaken Wood Reserve
on behalf of Surrey & SW London Branch of Butterfly Conservation, and David
Baldock who initiated the group into the mysteries of the Hymenoptera. Butterflies
were conspicuous by their absence, the only species of real interest being a female
Wood White Leptidea sinapis (L.); this complex of woodland being one of its well
known strongholds.
Bees and wasps seemed to fare somewhat better however, although, the only
species of note was Ectemnius borealis (Zett.) RDB3 taken at umbellifer flower;
nationally this is only known from about five sites in East Hampshire and West
Sussex and was first recorded for Surrey in 1996 in Botany Bay, a few miles east of
Sidney Wood.
152 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
ME 2
SITY coe
ee
Fig. 1. Sidney Wood, Surrey. l-r Stephen & Gail Jeffcoate, Sylvia Bucknell, David Baldock
(photo: J. W. Phillips).
MV light trapping in the evening attracted three members plus the leader; this was
somewhat disappointing bearing in mind the quality of the site and the perfect
weather conditions. This may have had something to do with the rival attraction of a
simultaneous society meeting being held at Ranmore Common, Dorking, or of
course world cup football, heaven forbid!
Six MV lights were operated in various areas of this extensive block of deciduous
woodland and 130 species of macro-lepidoptera were recorded, notable of which
were Elaphra venustula (Hb.) (rosy marbled), Meganola strigula (D&S) (small black
arches), Pechipogo strigilata (L.) (common fan-foot) and Paracolax tristalis (Fab.)
(clay fan-foot). One additional surprise was the appearance on the sheet of a
Synanthedon vespiformis (L.) (yellow-legged clearwing), this being the first time I
have ever recorded a sesiid at light.
A full species list has been prepared and forwarded to Forestry Commission and
the Surrey County Moth Recorder, as well as being retained by the Society.
My sincere thanks to Forest Enterprise for allowing BENHS access for the
meeting and to all those that made the effort to attend.
—
a
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 153
THE FOOD-PLANTS OF THE BROWNTAIL MOTH EUPROCTIS
CHRYSORRHOEA L. (LEP.: LYMANTRITDAE) IN EAST LONDON
G. E. KING
c/o de las Minas, 20-22, 1°F, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
The stature of Euproctis chrysorrhoea L., the browntail, as a pest in east London
is well-documented: Chalmers-Hunt (1977), Plant (1993) and Hoyle (1993) describe
browntail infestation in the London Borough of Newham, with the first two
named authors referring to plagues in the 1970s. Chalmers-Hunt (1977) specifically
named Wanstead Flats and Tower Hamlets. Hoyle (1993) detailed Newham in the
context of infestation across most of London. Data on specific food-plants used in
east London, or in urban areas generally, are restricted to Hoyle (1993) and Plant
(1993), with additional unpublished data being available from certain London
boroughs. Voute & van der Linde (1963) described the food-plants used by the
browntail in the Netherlands, and the frequency with which certain plants were
used over others. This field study aimed to look at the plants used by
E. chrysorrhoea in east London over two years (1995-1996) and to assess food-plant
preferences.
If compared with other Western European Lymantridae, E. chrysorrhoea is not
untypical in terms of it being a polyphagous insect, this being understood to
include those species whose larvae consume host plants from more than fwo plant
families (Cates, 1981; Bernays & Chapman, 1994). Table 1 details recognized food-
plants for E. chrysorrhoea according to British and continental European data. A
total of fifteen plant families are detailed, with 32.7% of the plant species belonging
to the Rosaceae. Unfortunately the references do not indicate the frequency with
which the species uses the food-plants detailed, with the exception of Sterling
(1989), who made a distinction between those plants attacked on infrequent
occasions and especially when the species reached outbreak proportions, that is
unorthodox larval food-plants, and those attacked on a more regular basis. In
addition, Torrosian et al. (1988) further emphasized the difference between those
plants which may act as food-plants but which do not support the hibernacula. The
term ‘hibernacula’ refers to the silken nests that the larvae manufacture in order to
pass the winter. Although it is generally assumed that the larvae construct the
overwintering nest (in the 3rd instar) on the host plant, before hibernation
commences in early September (Soria, 1987), this cannot always be taken for
granted. However, one of the plants listed in Table 1, Cornus sanguinea, was indeed
seen to serve in both capacities in east London, as a food-plant as well as a site for
the winter nest (King, 1995; 1996).
METHODS
Sterling (1989) described browntail hibernacula as being easy to count on leafless
trees and shrubs, with data from this simple method being used to assess future
population sizes (Calinski et al., 1959; Tseitgamel, 1974). An extensive field study of
the food-plants of E. chrysorrhoea took place between January 1995 and April 1996,
in effect over two winters. The logistics of data collection involved counting the
hibernacula on bushes and trees throughout the London borough of Newham,
visiting the borough from north to south covering a distance of 4.98 km?. In addition
to the winter larval webs being counted, observations of the spring re-emergence of
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
not known to sup-
port winter nests
larvae (Torrosian,
et al. 1988)
Alnus glutinosa
A. lanuginosa
Corylus avellana
Castanea vulgaris
Ribes uva-crispa
154
Table 1. Larval food-plants of E. chrysorrhoea
Family Food-plant References Food-plants utilized Larval food-plants
(authors in Britain on
1-10) occasion, especially
following defoliation of E. chrysorrhoea
of more orthodox
food-plants
(Sterling, 1989)
Betulaceae Alnus glutinosa 10 Betula pendula
A. lanuginosa 10
Corylus avellana 10
Betula pendula 10,9
Carpinus betulus 10
Fagaceae Quercus robur 9
Q. pyrenaica 3, 8
Quercus spp. 10
Fagus spp. 2 tit
Castanea vulgaris 10, 3
Polygonaceae 9 Rumex crispus
R. obtusifolius
Tiliaceae Tilia sp. 10
Ulmaceae Ulmus procera 9
U. glabra 9,372
U. campestris 10
Urticaceae 9 Urtica dioica
Salicaceae Salix fragilis 9
S. caprea 9
S. cinerea 9
S. alba 10
Populus tremula 10
P. nigra 10
Ericaceae Arbutus unedo 3, 6,4
Rosaceae Rubus fruticosus 10, 9, 3, 1 Cotoneaster spp.
R. idaeus 10 Filipendula ulmaria
Rosa canina group 9
Rosa (‘wild’ & om Rubus idaeus
‘cultivated’)
Prunus spinosa 10,9 R. caesius
P. institia 9 Potentilla anserina
P. domestica 10,9 P. reptans
P. armeniaca 10, 3 Geum urbanum
Prunus spp. 9 Agrimonia eupatoria
Crataegus monogyna 9
& other Crataegus
spp.
Crataegus spp. e.g. C. 10, 3
oxyacantha
Sorbus aucuparia& 9
other Sorbus spp.
Pyrus pyraster 9
Pyrus sp. 10
Malus domestica 10,9
group & other
Malus spp.
Ribes uva-crispa 10, |
Fragaria sp.
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 155
Table 1. (continued)
Family Food-plant References Food-plants utilized Larval food-plants
(authors in Britain on not known to sup-
1-10) occasion, especially port winter nests
following defoliation of E. chrysorrhoea
of more orthodox larvae (Torrosian,
food-plants et al. 1988)
(Sterling, 1989)
Fabaceae Robinia pseudoacacia 10 Robinia
pseudoacacia
Cornaceae Cornus sanguinea OS Cornus sanguinea
Eleaegnaceae Hippophae JU ae
rhamnoides
Hippocastanaceae Aesculus spp. mt
Aceraceae Acer pseudoplatanus 9 Acer platanoides
A. campestre 10
Juglandaceae Juglans spp. 1
Buddlejaceae Buddleja davidii & 7s. tak
other Buddleja spp.
Oleaceae Forsythia sp. HO; i Fraxinus excelsior
Fraxinus excelsior Os 3522
Ligustrum sp. 2
Asteraceae 9 Senecio jacobaea
Tussilago farfara
Pulicaria
dysenterica
Achillea
: millefolium
Gramineae 9 Holcus lanatus
Key to authors: |. Carter (1984) 2. Gomez de Aizpurua (1986) 3. Gomez Bustillo (1979) 4. King
(pers. ob.) 5. King (1995) 6. Passos de Carvalho & Corley (1995) 7. Plant (1993) 8. Soria (1987)
9. Sterling (1989) 10. Torrosian, Torrosian & Roque (1988) 11. West (1992)
the larvae were also taken, both to ascertain host-plant and to check for parasitoids.
In order to be provided with an idea of the abundance of broad-leaved plants in
Newham and to assess whether the moth was choosing the most common plant
available, a transect of 724 trees and shrubs was undertaken of the whole borough
(King, 1997).
RESULTS
The trees and shrubs upon which larval nests of E. chrysorrhoea were found over
the winters of 1995 and 1996 are shown in Table 2: Of the 22 plant species detailed,
62% are rosaceous plants (13 species), with the remaining nine species belonging to
seven plant families, two of these being Fagaceae and Salicaceae. Fifteen plants were
noted supporting the larval nests over both winters, although the degree of
‘usefulness’ was not consistent; for example, the percentage of Crataegus dropped
from 26.9% of the total in the first winter of the study to only 7.9% of the total in the
second winter. However, this may be a function of the smaller number of hibernacula
counted that year, although an apparently ‘minor’ role played by Cotoneaster in
156 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
Table 2. Percentage of total hibernacula on plants in Newham, London: 1995-1996
Plant species: Jan.—Apr. 1995 Sept.—_Apr. 1996
total: 22 total nests: 1,744 total nests: 493
% of total nests % of total nests
Family Species
Betulaceae Betula pendula 0.5 n/a
Fagaceae Quercus sp. oA 0.8
Fagus sp. 5.4 0.2
Tiliaceae Tilia sp. n/a 1.0
Ulmaceae Ulmus sp. 0.2 n/a
Salicaceae Populus nigra 0.9 n/a
Salix sp. tL 0.6
Rosaceae Crataegus sp. 26.9 719
Sorbus sp. 20.8 17.4
Prunus vars. Lt.7 14.4
Cotoneaster sp. 4.0 23.3
Pyracantha sp. 3.0 Led
Prunus spinosa a3 0.4
Malus vars. 25 0.8
Rosa vars. 29 0.8
Cydonia sp. 0.5 n/a
Rubus fruticosus 0.1 0.6
Prunus laurocerasus 0.06 13
Amelanchier sp. 0.5 19
Pyrus sp. n/a 1.0
Cornaceae Cornus sanguinea 0.6 n/a
Aceraceae Acer pseudoplatanus & other Acer spp. 5.9 Tat
1995, at 4.0% of the total, was followed by the same plant being 5.8 times more
‘attractive’ the following season.
PRINCIPAL, SECONDARY AND ACCESSORY FOOD-PLANTS
Eleven of the twenty-two species of plants recorded in the field study should be
regarded as being less important as food-plants, or as sites for the winter webs, at
least in terms of the insect in London. These plants were either noted in one winter
only, or if noted across both years, did not provide important figures. Betula is one
such tree, being included in 1995 at only 0.52% of the 1,744 webs seen that year.
Indeed, Sterling (1989) for this very reason includes it in the list of ‘occasional’ host-
plants (see Table 1). Torrosian et al. (1988) also make a distinction between principal
host plants, and secondary and accessory host-plants, describing all Quercus species
in the first-named category. Secondary host plants would include Carpinus betulus,
Acer campestre, Ulmus campestris and fruit trees, especially Malus. In the category of
accessory host plants are included: U/mus, Tilia, Salix and Populus. The east London
field study supports the observation that the last-named trees are accessory food-
plants, as winter nests were not counted on these trees in both winters (except Salix),
and none of the four were seen to be actively consumed by the larvae, either before or
after the winter period. The London Borough of Redbridge gave similarly
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 157
unimportant figures (1994, unpub.) for hibernacula on lime: 2/40 trees in 1993, and
for birch: 1/25 trees in 1994. However, two species of trees mentioned previously are
described as being defoliated in Spain, these being elm and poplar (Romanyk &
Cadahia, 1992). Of the other six plants which were found to play a marginal role, five
plants are rosaceous; these included Rosa, Prunus spinosa, and Rubus. Despite this,
Torrosian et al. (1988) described P. spinosa, Rubus fruticosus and R. idaeus as being
major food-plants in the French Mid-Pyrenees. Table 1 includes two species related
to bramble, R. caesius and R. idaeus, regarded by Sterling (1989) as being minor
food-plants in Britain. The east London field study suggests that R. fruticosus is also
used less often as well. Rose is described by Gomez Bustillo (1979) and Sterling
(1989) as a food-plant. However, the east London data would suggest that its role as
anything other than a winter nest-support is marginal, given that larvae were not
seen feeding on it. In addition, the London borough of Redbridge’s nine plant
species (1994) listed as being infested by browntail winter webs did not include Rosa
in 1992-94, as playing host to hibernacula. Interestingly Rosa is a common plant
accounting for 10.4% of a transect of the trees and shrubs in the London Borough of
Newham (King, 1997) but it does not seem to be used. Neither Pyrus nor Malus were
seen as playing important hosts to the larval webs in London, despite apple being
included by Torrosian ef a/. (1988), as a major, but secondary host plant in the Mid-
Pyrenees.
UNRECORDED FOOD-PLANTS
Three of the plants which were recorded as supporting the hibernacula over the
two winters, are not detailed as browntail food-plants. These are Pyracantha sp.,
Amelanchier sp. and Prunus laurocerasus L., all of which are rosaceous. One other
plant is not mentioned either, Cotoneaster spp., but Sterling (1989) (see Table 1),
does include it as an occasional food-plant. As a note of caution, although Cydonia
and Amelanchier were noted providing structural support for the larval nest, it
cannot be assumed that these plants were actively consumed by the larvae, during the
- spring and early summer of either season, and thereby acting as bona fide food-
plants. However, given that Amelanchier was seriously infested by the species in such
a limited area, it would be highly likely that it was used as a food-plant. On this
note, data supplied by Redbridge in 1994 (unpub.) refers to three specimens of
Amelanchier as playing host to winter nests in 1994, but not in the winters of 1992 or
1993, suggesting its marginal role. The dominance that the Rosaceae play in the diet
of E. chrysorrhoea is illustrated by the additional plants included by Sterling (1989)
(see Table 1), when he cites six species of rosaceous plants, which might be called
‘low plants’. None of these were noted being attacked by the larvae in London; all
rosaceous plants which were attacked were ‘woody’, indeed the larvae were not seen
attacking low plants at all. Whether Pyracantha, Cotoneaster, Amelanchier, Cydonia
or Prunus laurocerasus were utilized by the larvae as food-plants, or as support
structures for the winter webs, what they all have in common is the fact that they are
exotic cultivars. In addition, with the exception of Cydonia and Amelanchier, they are
also evergreens. Sippell (1957) and Hodson (1941) discuss the reasons why certain
trees are selected by the females for egg-laying; they came to the conclusion that an
important factor was early-leafing dates, with the earliest leafers being selected in
preference, providing as example, Malacosoma disstria Hiibn. in Canada, whose
females choose to lay on poplar rather than oak, the former coming into leaf sooner.
Of the poplars Sippell (1957) describes the importance of two species, Populus
158 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
grandidentata and P. tremuloides, with the latter taking pride of place as the
ovipositional host.
THE IMPORTANCE OF EXOTIC CULTIVARS
The two years of the east London field study illustrated the adaptablity of
E. chrysorrhoea to a wide range of plant species, twenty-two overall, with twenty
being utilized in the first year of the study, and seventeen in the second. However, as
was to be expected, rosaceous plants provided most of the data, twelve species being
used in 1995, and twelve also being used in 1996. Two plants in the Rosaceae were
not used in both years, these being Cydonia sp. and Pyrus sp. Five other plants in
different families were also not used across both years of the field study, these being
Betula pendula, Tilia sp., Ulmus sp., Populus nigra and Cornus sanguinea. The moth
did not appear to be consistent in terms of plants used, with ‘favourite’ plant species
(i.e. those which gave relatively high percentage rates out of the total numbers of
hibernacula counted in the first year) not being used to the same extent in the
following year. Yela (1992) described some noctuids (especially polyphagous species,
e.g. Peridroma saucia (Hiibn.)) as attacking certain herbaceous strata, this being the
determining characteristic in choosing the food-plant or plants. There may be some
structural importance of plants in the dietary choices being made by browntail moth
larvae as they mature and disperse, or where the female moth decides to lay the egg-
batch. Also, some plant species were utilized to only a limited extent in the first year,
whilst in the second year of the study, the same plant was used to a far greater extent.
Plants in this category include: Cotoneaster sp., Pyracantha sp. and Prunus
laurocerasus (erroneously identified as Laurus, King, 1995). One notable point is
the willingness of E. chrysorrhoea to exploit those plants which are planted for
amenity purposes by the local authority. This is in stark contrast to self-seeded or
‘wild’ plants, for example Rubus fruticosus (bramble), which actively seemed to be
ignored by the moth. With this in mind, it would appear that if food-plant
availability is a factor which contributes in some way to population increases of
E. chrysorrhoea in a given area, then consciously planting important host-plants for
such an injurious pest species is of no help to local people, but of considerable benefit
to the moth.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank the following: Dr David Corke at the University of East
London for tutorial support during the completion of this paper, which formed part
of my thesis for the MSc: the Entomology Club, Oxford for the provision of a grant
of £200; Dr Phil Sterling for the use of data from his unpublished PhD thesis; the
London Borough of Redbridge for the use of unpublished data, and the London
Borough of Waltham Forest for information about outbreaks in that part of
London.
REFERENCES
Bernays, E. A. & Chapman, R. F. 1994. Host plant selection by phytophagous insects. Chapman
& Hall, New York, USA.
Calinski, T., Pierkarezyk, K. & Studzinski, A. 1959. Investigations about the establishment for
the method of autumn—winter observations of Euproctis chrysorrhoea L. for prognostic
purposes. In Russian. Poznansskie Institutu Ochrrony Roslin B 6: 7-18.
er
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 159
Carter D. J. 1984. Pest Lepidoptera of Europe, with special reference to the British Isles. Series
Entomologica ed. Spencer, K. A. 31, Dr W. Junk Publishers, Kluwer Academic Publishers
Group, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster.
Cates, R. G. 1981. Host plant predictability and the feeding patterns of Monophagous,
Oligophagous and Polyphagous insect herbivores. Oecologia 48: 319-326.
Chalmers-Hunt, J. M. 1977. Indoor meetings. Proc. Trans. Br. Ent. Nat. Hist. Soc. 10: 115.
Gomez de Aizpurua, C. 1986. Biologia y morfologia de las orugas, tomo II, Cossidae, Sphingidae,
Thaumetopoeidae, Lymantriidae, Arctiidae. MAPA, Madrid.
Gomez Bustillo, M. R. 1979. Mariposas de la Peninsula Ibérica, Heterdceros II, tomo IV.
MAPA, Madrid.
Hodson, A. C. 1941. An ecological study of the forest tent caterpillar, Malacosoma disstria
Hib. in northern Minnesota. Univ. Minn. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 148: 1—55.
Hoyle, E. 1993. The pattern of outbreaks of Browntail moth across London boroughs, 1993.
ADAS. Unpublished.
King, G. E. 1995. Two new food plants for Euproctis chrysorrhoea L. (Lep. Lymantriidae)
noted in east London, March/April 1995. Entomologist’s Rec. J. Var. 107: 276.
King, G. E. 1996. More comments on the food plants of Euproctis chrysorrhoea L. (Lep.:
Lymantriidae), Entomologist’s Rec. J. Var. 108: 142.
King, G. E. 1997. The ecological status of the browntail moth (Euproctis chrysorrhoea L. 1758)
(Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), a serious pest in east London. With particular reference to a
field study, 1995-1996. Unpublished MSc thesis, University of East London.
Passos de Carvalho, J. & Corley, M. F. V. 1995. Additions to the Lepidoptera of Algarve,
Portugal (Insecta: Lepidoptera), SHILAP Revta. Lepid. 23(91): 191—230.
Plant, C. 1993. The larger moths of the London area. London Natural History Society.
Redbridge, London borough of. 1992, 1993 & 1994. Highways (council owned trees) reported
incidence of browntail moth caterpillars. Unpublished data.
Romanyk, N. & Cadahia, D. 1992. Plagas de insectos en las masas forestales espanoles. pp. 139-
140. Direccion General de Sanidad de la Produccion Agraria, MAPA, Madrid.
Sippell, W. L. 1957. A study of the forest tent caterpillar, Malacosoma disstria Hiibn., and its
parasitoid complex in Ontario. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Soria, S. 1987. Lepidopteros defoliadores de Quercus pyrenaica Willdenow, 1805. Bol. San Veg.
MAPA, Madrid.
Sterling, P. H. 1989. Natural mortalities of Euproctis chrysorrhoea L. and the use of its
baculovirus in biocontrol. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Oxford.
Torrosian, C., Torrosian, F. & Roques, L. 1988. Le Bombyx cul brun: Euproctis chrysorrhoea
(1) cycle biologique—ecologie—nuisbilite. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse 124: 127-174.
Tseitgamel, Yu. S. 1974. The population dynamics of Euproctis chrysorrhoea in the Central
Chernozem State Reservation. In Russian. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 53: 125-174.
Voute, A. D. & van der Linde, R. J. 1963. Die Reihenfolge der Wirtspflanzen beim
Massenauftreten von Euproctis chrysorrhoea L. Zeitschrift fiir angewandte Entomologie 51:
215-217.
West, B. K. 1992. Euproctis chrysorrhoea L. (Lep. Lymantriidae); larval infestation in the
Kentish Weald. Entomologist’s Rec. J. Var. 104: 330.
Yela, J. L. 1992. Los noctuidos (Lepidoptera) de la Alcarria (Espana central) y su relacion con
las principales formaciones vegetales de porte arboreo. MAPA, Madrid, Spain.
160 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
NEW MOTH RECORDS FOR THE ISLE OF LEWIS
A. P. LEFTWICH and W. R. ELLIOTT
Penny Anderson Associates. 60 Park Road, Buxton, Derbyshire SK17 UK and Hephzibah,
16 Woodlands Avenue, Hamworthy, Poole, Dorset BH15 4EE, UK
During a warm dry period in late August 1997, a Skinner trap was operated in the
grounds of a cottage at Breascleit (NB219353), on the Isle of Lewis. This site lies at
the edge of an extensive mosaic of moorland and blanket bog, within a coastal
farmland landscape. The trapping occurred over 6 consecutive nights between 17-22
August, and those moths present inside the trap in the early morning were identified
(see Table 1). Although only 24 species were recorded, these included large ear
Amphipoea lucens (Freyer), crinan ear A. crinanensis (Burr.), grey chi Antitype chi
(L.), flame carpet XYanthorhoe designata (Hufn.) and the Tortricid Epinotia caprana
(Fab.) all new to Lewis. A further 3 species were re-confirmations of species last
recorded on this island before 1900, these being small wainscot Photedes pygmina
(Haw), coast dart Euxoa cursoria (Hufn.) and the Pyralid Eudonia murana (Curt.)
The northern deep-brown dart Aporophyla lueneburgensis (Freyer) was also
recorded, a species not listed for the Outer Hebrides. As this moth was formerly
treated as a sub-species of deep-brown dart A. lutulenta (D. & S.) and has only
Table 1. List of moths recorded from Lewis during August 1997.
Species English name No. individuals
Geometridae
Epirrhoe alternata obscurata (South) common carpet l
Eulithis testata (L.) chevron 5
Hydriomena impluviata (D. & S.) May highflyer 2
Perizoma didymata (L.) twin-spot carpet 2
Xanthorhoe designata (Hufn.) flame carpet ]
X. fluctuata (L.) garden carpet 2
X. decoloraria (Esper) red carpet 5
Noctuidae
Amphipoea crinanensis (Burr.) crinan ear l
A. fucosa paludis (Tutt) saltern ear fi
A. lucens (Freyer) large ear z
Antitype chi (L.) grey chi l
Apamea monoglypha (Hufn.) dark arches 4
Aporophyla lueneburgensis (Freyer) northern deep-brown dart ]
Cerapteryx graminis (L.) antler moth 12
Euxoa cursoria (Hufn.) coast dart 3
Hydraecia micacea (Esper) rosy rustic 27
Mythimna impura (Hibn.) smoky wainscot Z
Noctua pronuba L. large yellow underwing 20
Paradiarsia glareosa (Esper) autumnal rustic l
Photedes pygmina (Haw.) small wainscot ]
Xestia xanthographa (D. & S.) square-spot rustic l
Pyralidae
Eudonia murana (Curt.) — ]
Udea lutealis (Hiibn.) — 4
Tortricidae
Epinotia caprana (Fab.) 2 ]
ee
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 161
recently been raised to species status, this might be expected. Older records for deep-
brown dart may therefore include this former sub-species.
Only two incidental records from daytime excursions on the island were made,
these being dark marbled carpet Chloroclysta citrata citrata (L.), frequent on rocky
outcrops near Acha Mor (NB295288) on 2 August, and pink-barred sallow Xanthia
togata (Esp.). The latter had also not been recorded on Lewis, and was collected on
21 August from an aspen Populus tremula thicket within a steep coastal ravine (along
the Abhainn na Cloich at NB537508).
The lepidopteran fauna of the Outer Hebrides, similar to much of the west coast of
Scotland, is still poorly known due to the relative paucity of recorders. In
Waterston’s review (1981) 352 species of moth are acknowledged (approximately
14% of the British list) since the first records were taken on St Kilda (MacGillvray,
1842). Lewis appears to be one of the better studied islands, with 201 species (57% of
total) after including the new records. There is a long but sporadic history of moth
recording on this island which began when Weir (1881) established a list of 58 species
based on a private collection. This list has been subsequently extended through
collections and surveys (South, 1888; Fremlin, 1900; Griffith, 1900; Scott, 1915;
Evans, 1916); a series of papers by Harrison between 1938-59 (in particular 1940,
1949, 1953, 1956b and 1956); and most recently Hulme (1978).
It is interesting to note that approximately 33% of moth species known from
Lewis are from records which pre-date 1900, further emphasising the lack of active
recording. The listings also reveal an apparent disparity in the distribution of species,
with 55 species (16% of the Outer Hebridean fauna) having only been recorded on
Lewis. While Lewis might possibly possess a greater species richness due to its size
and range of habitats, more comprehensive surveying of the moth fauna is clearly
needed before comparisons between islands can be made.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank Dr Phil Sterling for verifying the micro-moth
specimens, and Dr Graham Rotheray for helpful comments.
REFERENCES
Evans, W. 1916. Lepidoptera and other insects at Scottish lighthouses in 1915. Scott. Nat.
(1916). 129-133.
Fremlin, H. S. 1900. Collecting on the Isle of Lewis. Entomologist 33: 37-39.
Griffith, A. F. 1900. Nyssia zonaria in the Hebrides. Entomologist’s Mon. Mag. 36, p. 41.
Harrison, J. W. H. 1940. New Outer Hebridean localities for Nyssia zonaria Schiff. On the isles of
Lewis, Great Bernera, Little Bernera, Pabbay and Berneray. Entomologist’s Rec. J. Var. 52: 20.
Harrison, J. W. H. 1949. A contribution to our knowledge of the Lepidoptera of the Isles of
Lewis and Harris. Entomologist 82, pp. 16-19.
Harrison, J. W. H. 1953. Lepidoptera in the Isles of Lewis and Harris in 1952. Entomologist 86:
53-55.
Harrison, J. W. H. 1956d. Lepidoptera in the Isles of Lewis and Harris in 1955. Entomologist's
Rec. J. Var. 68: 40-43.
Harrison, J. W. H. 1956b. Peronea sponsana Fab. and Leucoptera laburnella St on the Isle of
Lewis. Entomologist 89: 128.
Hulme, P. D. 1978. Isle of Lewis Lepidoptera. 1977. MS list in the Royal Scottish Museum,
Edinburgh.
MacGillivray, J. 1842. Account of the Island of St Kilda, chiefly with reference to its natural
history from notes made during a visit in July 1840. Edinb. New Phil. J. 32: 47-70.
Scott, H. 1915. Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, Neuroptera and Siphonaptera collected in the
Outer Hebrides. Scott. Nat. (1915): 252-254.
162 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
South, R. 1888. Lepidoptera of the Outer Hebrides. Entomologist 21: 25-27.
Waterston, A. R. 1981. Present knowledge of the non-marine invertebrate fauna of the Outer
Hebrides. Proc. Royal Soc. Edin., 79B: 215-321.
Weir, J. J. 1881. Notes on the Lepidoptera of the Outer Hebrides. Entomologist 14: 218-223.
BOOK REVIEW
The natural history of moths, by M. Young. T. & A. D. Poyser, London, 1997,
xiv+272 pages, 16 colour plates, £25.00, hardback.—For an entomologist who
always studiously avoided looking at moths because beetles and the ‘other’ orders
always seemed so much more interesting, it came as quite a shock to realize what I
had missed. I must admit that in recent years I had already started to pay the
Lepidoptera a bit more attention and a lot more respect. It began, not with the stark
greenish glow of a mercury vapour light, but with the sight of a copper underwing
through a camera viewfinder, and the discovery that I quite liked watching sycamore
caterpillars crawl over my hands.
There are various identification guides for adult moths (and their caterpillars) now
available, and I have collected a few of them to help me name the fairly common
moth species that I occasionally come across. Each guide 1s useful in its way, but they
all seem to concentrate almost exclusively on the Spartan details necessary for initial
discovery and identification and with only a cursory glance at the varied natural
histories of the moths themselves. I must have neglected to buy Ford’s New
Naturalist on moths and for that easy general ecological introduction to the group, I
had nothing on my library shelves. I do now.
In fact, Young claims Ford’s book as one of his main inspirations, and goes on to
say that he has tried to take off from where Ford stopped. The main emphasis of the
book is the biology and ecology of moths—how we came to have our British fauna,
what it does here, how it has evolved, how it is changing, how it can be studied and
how it can be conserved. And it makes fascinating reading. Although not patronizing
in its tone for the experienced entomologist, it is also not too complex and
heavyweight for the errant miscreant like myself who comes with only a sketchy
knowledge of the British moth fauna.
The author works through a series of very complex and up-to-date discussions, but
always in a thoroughly readable and illuminating way. Many of the topics are
illustrated with charming and helpful line figures, but I must admit that I sniggered
when I saw an artist’s impression of the wingless belted beauty Lycia zonaria hitching
a lift on the bow of a small boat across the sea between the Hebridean islands on
which it has its headquarters. There are some excellent colour plates too, showing
different aspects of moth biology from resting attitude to larval form.
Often, the real test of a book like this, one on a particular group of insects, is how
much can it relate to other orders, and to entomology as a whole—how it fits in and
around the reader’s existing knowledge and enthusiasm. Young’s book passes with
flying colours, for whichever section I was reading, I found the discussions and
arguments set my mind working off in other directions, on other insects and other
fields of enquiry. And every so often I came across an idea I wanted to follow up—no
problem because of the extensive reference list.
As I said earlier, I do not have many moth books on my shelves, but Mark
Young’s is one I now reach for most often.
RICHARD A. JONES
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 163
FROST SURVIVAL BY CRYPTOLAEMUS MONTROUZIERI MULS.
(COLEOPTERA: COCCINELLIDAE) IN AN OUTDOOR SITUATION
A. J. HALSTEAD
RHS Garden, Wisley, Woking, Surrey GU23 6QOB
Cryptolaemus montrouzieri is a ladybird beetle that originates from Australia but
has been widely distributed as a biological control of mealybugs. It has been
commercially available in Britain since 1980 and is widely used in botanic gardens,
butterfly houses and amateur greenhouses and conservatories against mealybugs
such as Planococcus citri (Risso), Pseudococcus affinis (Maskell) and P. longispinus
(Targioni-Tozzetti) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Both the adult beetles and their
larvae feed on the eggs and active stages of mealybugs.
While the larvae remain on plants, adult C. montrouzieri have a tendency to escape
from greenhouses by either crawling or flying through open door and ventilators.
Constantine & Majerus (1994) recorded two adults within five minutes of each other
flying across a school playing field at Skipsea, N. Humberside, on a hot day in July
1991. The optimal temperature range for the development and activity of
C. montrouzieri is 22—25 °C (Malais & Ravensberg (1992)). At 18 °C the life cycle
from egg to egg takes 72 days but this is reduced to 25 days at 30 °C. At 33 °C the
beetles stop feeding and they are also relatively inactive at temperatures below 16 °C.
Because of the requirement for warm conditions, it has been assumed that C.
montrouzieri would be unable to survive for long out of doors, except perhaps in the
warmest parts of the British Isles, such as the Scilly Isles. Another difficulty facing
the beetle is finding a source of food, since mealybugs outside glasshouses are not a
common commodity in Britain.
In 1977 a New Zealand mealybug, Balanococcus (Trionymus) diminutus
(Leonardi), began arriving in Britain on imported plants of New Zealand flax,
Phormium tenax (Bartlett 1981). Eradication attempts failed and this mealybug is
now of widespread occurrence in garden centres and gardens. Unlike most exotic
mealybugs, B. diminutus is able to withstand hard frost and it occurs at the Royal
Horticultural Society’s Garden, Wisley, Surrey on Phormium tenax Forst. & Forst.
and P. cookianum Le Jolis. In late September 1997, adults and larvae of C.
montrouzieri were discovered on a large mealybug-infested P. tenax growing in the
Monocot Borders about 180 m to the north of the nearest glasshouse from where the
beetle might have escaped. A survey of other Phormium at Wisley Garden revealed
another montrouzieri colony on a large P. tenax growing 140 m in a south-easterly
direction from the main glasshouse range. The plant in the Monocot Border was the
more accessible, so observations were made on this plant to see how long the
ladybird would persist. The last adult C. montrouzieri of 1997 was seen on 22
October but larvae were found on warm sunny days on 27 October, 5, 11 and 26
November, and 10 December. No larvae were seen in 1998 during January to March
but a single adult was found on 11 February. It is possible that this might have been
a recent escape from a heated glasshouse, but it is unlikely that outdoor temperatures
would be sufficient at that time of year to allow flight. The maximum daytime
temperature on 11 February was 14.8 °C. Apart from 14.9 °C on 9 January, that had
been the warmest day of the year up until then.
Daily weather records are made at Wisley in a meteorological station situated in
the Fruit Field about 200 m from the study plant. This Phormium is growing in a
164 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
more sheltered position between two parallel 2 m high yew hedges but temperatures
recorded in the Fruit Field give an indication of the weather conditions that
C. montrouzieri survived. The first air frost of the autumn, —1.7 °C, occurred on 25
October and this was followed by eight consecutive nights with air frosts. The coldest
nights were 29 and 30 October with —5.7 °C. November had a total of five air frosts
with the coldest being —4 °C on 1 November. December was a relatively mild month
with 5 December at —2.8 °C being the coldest of seven nights with air frosts.
January and February 1998 had six and four air frosts respectively, with —6.5 °C on
20 January and —5.2 °C on 2 February. There was a prolonged period of cold
weather between 20 January and 5 February, when air frosts occurred on ten nights.
Mature plants of Phormium tenax are well designed to give insects shelter from
inclement weather. The plant in the Monocot Border is approximately 2 m in
diameter and consists of a dense mass of upright sword-shaped leaves which are
about 2 m tall. The basal part of a Phormium leaf is folded upwards almost
completely in half and this is where most of the mealybugs reside. Any insects living
within the folded leaf bases are going to be sheltered from wind and rain and the
temperature there could be several degrees above those recorded in the Fruit Field
meteorological station. These observations do, however, show that C. montrouzieri
has some tolerance of cold conditions. With the trend towards milder winters, it
might be able to survive the winter out of doors in sheltered places where it can locate
a reliable supply of prey insects.
REFERENCES
Bartlett, P. W. 1981. Trionymus diminutus (Leonardi) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) infesting
New Zealand flax in England. P/. Path. 30: 56-58.
Constantine, B. & Majerus, M. E. N. 1994. Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Coleoptera:
Coccinellidae) in Britain. Ent. Mon. Mag. 130: 45—46.
Malais, M. & Ravensberg, W. J. 1992. Knowing and recognizing: the biology of glasshouse pests
and their natural enemies. Koppert, Berkel en Rodenrijs, Holland.
FIELD MEETING REPORT
Killiecrankie RSPB reserve, Balrobbie Farm end, Perthshire,
8 & 9 August 1998
Leader: Paul Waring. This was a field meeting for which the weather was superb
on the day in an otherwise prolonged dull, wet and rather cool period, at least in
Scotland and northern England. By contrast, my home in Peterborough had had a
glorious week of sun and weather so dry that both our garden water butts were
empty and we had had to top up our pond from the mains supply. I drove north as
far as Stirling the day before the meeting, in rain from Lancashire northwards, and
stayed overnight with RES member Barbara Tigar at her home on open grassy hills
at Blackford. That night I operated a Robinson trap all night here, in rough pasture
by the house, catching 220 macro-moths of 28 species, largely dark arches Apamea
monoglypha (Hufn.) and large yellow underwing Noctua pronuba L. and other
ubiquitous species but also several species common in the north of Britain but
;
:
|
|
.
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 165
5 ES
we.
Fig. 1. Field meeting at Killiecrankie RSPB reserve, Perthshire, on 8 August 1998. The flush
which produced the small rufous moth Coenobia rufa. L—-R: Richard Little, Michael
Clementson, Barbara Tigar & Betty Clementson. (Photo: Paul Waring)
worthy of mention, including the antler moth Cerapteryx graminis (L.) and dotted
clay Xestia baja (D. & S.), a gold spangle Autographa bractea (D. & S.), a gold spot
Plusia festucae (L.) (not P. putnami gracilis Lempke), the rosy minor Mesoligia
literosa (Haw.), the double lobed Apamea ophiogramma (Esp.) and three garden tiger
moths Arctia caja (L.).
The morning of the meeting was hot and sunny, almost from dawn, as Barbara
and I drove north to meet with the RSPB reserve manager Bruce Anderson at the
RSPB car park at Balrobbie Farm (NN905628) an hour before the meeting was due
to start. BENHS members Mike & Betty Clementson and Richard and Liz Little had
already arrived. Another couple of members were expected but failed to show,
probably on account of the poor weather still being experienced in some other parts
of Scotland.
We had a most enjoyable afternoon’s walk along the bank which runs from the
car-park to the base-rich flushes which are reported to be some of the most species-
rich for plants in Scotland. We saw plants such as grass of parnassus Parnassia
palustris L., lady’s-mantle Alchemilla vulgaris agg. and wood sorrel Oxalis acetosella
L. and great swathes of cotton-grass Eriophorum angustifolium Honck. and were glad
to take a break from the sun and rest in the shade and humidity of the birch
woodland. Butterflies were few. We saw several scotch argus Erebia aethiops (Esp.)
and recorded the common blue Polyommatus icarus (Rott.), large white Pieris
brassicae (L.) and small tortoiseshell Aglais urticae (L.). Several twin-spot carpet
moths Perizoma didymata (L.) and striped twin-spot carpets Nebula salicata
latentaria (Curt.) were flushed from birch trunks and a yellow shell Camptogramma
bilineata (L.) flew up from the grass. A small rufous Coenobia rufa (Haw.) flew up
166 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
and was netted as I walked across one of the flushes. An azure hawker dragonfly
Aeshna caerulea (Strom.) was on the wing over the cotton-grass and Barbara found a
female black and yellow cerambycid beetle Strangalia quadrifasciata L. which laid
four eggs in a pill-box while awaiting confirmation. A large black slug, probably
Arion ater (L.), was frequent and one individual was found eating a Boletus-type
toadstool. In the field below, a male roe deer Capreolus capreolus L. courted and
escorted a female through the grass.
We walked higher up into heather moorland where several dark green fritillary
butterflies Argynnis aglaja (L.) were on the wing but searched without success for
basking hairy caterpillars as the sun was leaving the hill-side; we were probably too
late in the day.
Two buzzards Buteo buteo L. were mewing in the nearby birch trees when we
returned to the car-park, which we made our overnight camp. After a congenial
evening meal together we each set up our light-trapping gear. Barbara and I operated
a Robinson light-trap all night, set up wine-ropes and spent dusk netting amongst
the cotton-grass though it was at this point cool and clear and there was little on the
wing. Richard and Liz operated another Robinson trap until midnight and the
Clementsons manned a sheet till midnight. All the lights were spread along the bank
above the car-park.
A tawny owl Strix aluco L. called as darkness fell and a jay Garrulus glandarius L.
squawked at dawn. The temperature fell from 13 °C at dusk to a minimum of 9 °C at
some point during the night but it was cloudy most of the night and there were lots of
moths around the trap when we inspected it in the morning. The total catch was 261
macro-moths of 57 species, the nationally scarcest of which was a single barred
carpet Perizoma taeniata (Steph.) (Nationally Scarce category A). There are previous
records of the barred carpet for this site (e.g. S. Hind, 15 August 1989). Other moths
worthy of mention included the following, with the number of individuals recorded
at the all night Robinson trap in parentheses: dotted carpet Alcis jubata (Thunb.)
(Nationally Scarce category B, 9 individuals), plain clay Eugnorisma depuncta (L.)
(Nationally Scarce category B, 2), beech-green carpet Colostygia olivata (D. & S.)
(Local, 1), juniper pug Eupithecia pusillata (D. & S.) (Local, 1) and scarce silver Y
Syngrapha_ interrogationis (L.) (Local, 2). The following common but largely
northern species were recorded: antler (13), gold spangle (6), gold spot (2), northern
spinach Eulithis populata (L.) (5) and twin-spot carpet (2). The most abundant moths
were the dark arches (56) and the large yellow underwing (36). The dotted clay (11),
the large emerald Geometra papilionaria L. (9) and the lesser swallow prominent
Pheosia gnoma (Fab.) (8) were also frequent. The additional lights added the muslin
footman Nudaria mundana (L.), tawny-speckled pug Eupithecia icterata (Vill.), grey
pine carpet Thera obeliscata (Hiibn.) and a second generation engrailed Ectropis
histortata (Goeze) to the list.
A full list of the species we recorded has been sent to the RSPB, to Keith Bland,
the moth recorder for Perthshire, and to our BENHS archivists.
I would like to thank Michael and Betty Clementson, Richard and Liz Little and
Barbara Tigar for their company on a most enjoyable meeting. Liz Little deserves
special thanks for watching over the vehicles and equipment during the afternoon
which allowed the rest of us freedom from concern about the security of our cars and
generators. I thank the site manager Bruce Anderson and the RSPB Reserves
Ecologist for Scotland, David Beaumont, for their co-operation in the organisation
of this meeting and in supplying the necessary site maps.
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 167
NOTES ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF LEDRA AURITA (L.)
(HOMOPTERA: CICADELLIDAE) IN BRITAIN
A. J. A. STEWART and M. R. WILSON
School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BNI 90G and Department
of Biodiversity and Systematic Biology, National Museums & Galleries of Wales, Cardiff
CFI 3NP.
The cicadellid Ledra aurita (L.) is by far the largest of the leafhoppers found in the
Western Palaearctic region; adults are nearly two centimetres long and are certainly
unmistakable in appearance (see illustration in Chinery (1986) and front cover of this
issue). Both adults and nymphs are highly cryptic when resting on lichen and moss
covered stems of their host trees. The species is generally associated with oaks,
Quercus spp., but records occasionally come from other deciduous woodland trees
such as hazel, Corylus avellana, alder, Alnus glutinosa, and lime, Tilia spp.
The species appears to have a two-year life cycle (Schwoerbel, 1957), although
further work is needed to confirm this. Nymphs of all instars can often be found by
beating the lower branches of oaks. Interestingly, this method is rather less
rewarding for collecting adults; it is possible that they reside at higher elevations
within the canopy of the tree. This theory 1s further supported by the fact that many
records refer to adults attracted to light. Adults are present generally from July to
September.
L. aurita occurs through most of Europe (Nast, 1987) and major parts of the
Palaearctic region (Nast, 1972). Within Britain, it is sufficiently widely distributed
not to be awarded Notable or Red Data Book status (Kirby, 1992). However, it is
hardly a common insect judging by the comparative scarcity of records to date.
The purpose of this brief note is twofold. Firstly, we present the most up-to-date
distribution map for the species, based on records held by the Auchenorrhycnha
Recording Scheme (Fig. 1). This confirms Le Quesne’s (1965) observation that the
Ledra aurita
io rm here |
hy
; e
e °* . ee
- p18 i y elu A
ic e “iy se ;
(ep [en
0
2 3 4 5 6
reel,
168 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
species is widely distributed across central and southern England, with a
concentration of records towards the south-east of the country. Secondly, we draw
attention to two recent records that represent significant extensions to the previously
known range. The first of these refers to a single nymph collected in the course of
sampling for saproxylic invertebrates at Dinefwr Deer Park (near Llandeilo,
Carmarthenshire, Wales) by Brian Levey and Mark Pavett. It was caught in a flight
interception trap, operating between 12-21 June 1996. It is fair to assume that the
nymph was blown into the trap from the nearest branch! This appears to be only the
second record of L. aurita for Wales; the first record comes from mixed deciduous
woodland just north of Cardiff some 20 years ago (M. F. Claridge, pers. comm.).
The impression of a species that is predominantly southern and eastern in
distribution is thrown into doubt by the second interesting record that we highlight.
This is of a single nymph beaten from sessile oak, Q. petraea, at Gait Barrows NNR
in Lancashire on 18 June 1993 by Alan Stewart. This is over 200 km from the nearest
record in central England. It is impossible to say whether this represents a northerly
outlier or simply another record in what may yet turn out to be a much more
extensive distribution. More extensive surveying in this area would be useful. To our
knowledge, the species has not been recorded from either Scotland or Ireland.
Most recorded specimens of L. aurita have been collected from mature trees. It is
possible that the species may be a useful indicator of ancient, or at least old,
woodland. Certainly, many of the records are from long established sites that often
have high conservation value for other groups. Although not ancient woodland in
the usual sense of the term, Dinefwr is certainly one of the finest parkland sites in
Wales for invertebrates.
We would like to thank all those who have contributed records. We would
welcome any further records for this species, but especially those from Wales and
northern England. Is L. aurita scarce or absent from these latter areas, or is it simply
under-recorded?
REFERENCES
Chinery, M. 1986. Collins Guide to the Insects of Britain and Western Europe. Harper Collins,
London.
Kirby, P. 1992. A review of the scarce and threatened Hemiptera of Great Britain. Peterborough.
Joint Nature Conservation Committee.
Le Quesne, W. J. 1965. Hemiptera (Cicadomorpha) (excluding Deltocephalinae and
Typhlocybinae). Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects 2 (2a). Royal
Entomological Society of London.
Nast, J. 1972. Palaearctic Auchenorrhyncha (Homoptera): an annotated checklist. Polish
Academy of Sciences, Warszawa.
Nast, J. 1987. The Auchenorrhyncha (Homoptera) of Europe. Annales Zoologici 40, 535-661.
Ossiannilsson, F. 1981. The Auchenorrhyncha (Homoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark.
Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica 7(2).
Schwoerbel, W. 1957. Die Wanzen und Zikaden des Spitzberges bei Tiibingen, eine faunistisch-
Okologische Untersuchung (Hemipteroidea: Heteroptera und Cicadina= Homoptera
Auchenorrhyncha). Z. Morph. Okol. Tiere 45, 462-560.
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 169
BEMBIDION (PSEUDOLIMNAEUM) INUSTUM DUVAL,
(COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE) AN INTERESTING NEW ADDITION
TO THE BRITISH FAUNA
B. LEVEY and P. M. PAVETT
Department of Biodiversity & Systematic Biology, National Museums & Galleries of Wales,
Cardiff CF1 3NP.
Two specimens of this scarce European species were captured using flight
interception traps at two sites in Wales, while undertaking a survey of saproxylic
invertebrates on behalf of the Countryside Council for Wales.
A female was collected at Dinefwr Deer Park, (SN6122), Carmarthenshire, in the
period between 12—22.v1.1996. The interception trap was situated in dense shade
adjacent to a stony stream at the boundary between young ash/sycamore woodland
and open parkland. Further into the woodland the stream discharges into a densely
shaded sparsely vegetated marshy area at the edge of an oxbow. A male was collected
at Llanover (SO3108), Gwent, in the period 6—13.vi.1996. The interception trap was
situated under young ash with blackthorn, bramble and sycamore scrub at the edge
of close-grazed pasture. A stony stream was present about 70m away.
B. inustum is a rare and sporadically occurring, usually montane species, in
Europe. It has been found in Central and S.W. Europe, but has not been recorded
from Scandinavia. The habitat associations are not well known but it appears to be
most commonly reported from the vicinity of running water, perhaps with a
preference for shaded areas, which describes the area it was captured in at Dinefwr
very well. Limited hand searching at Dinefwr in mid-June 1998 and pitfall trapping
from 15.vi—10.vii.1998 near the point of the original capture failed to find the
species. The following Carabidae characteristic of damp and shaded habitats were
taken: Nebria brevicollis (Fab.), Elaphrus cupreus Duftschmid, Loricera pilicornis
(Fab.), Patrobus atrorufus (Stroem), Bembidion dentellum (Thunberg), B. nitidulum
(Marsham), Pterostichus anthracinus (Panzer), P. minor (Gyllenhal), P. rhaeticus
Heer, Agonum albipes (Fab.), A. assimile (Paykull), A. gracile Sturm, A. micans
Nicolai, A. viduwm (Panzer), Chlaenius nigricornis (Fab). There is only sparse
information on the activity period of B. inustum; adults have been taken in late May
and early June according to the published information, so it is possible that our
searching and pitfall trapping were too late to capture this species.
B. inustum appears to be nocturnal and possibly spends most of its time in
concealment, if it is not truly subterranean. It has been found near a strongly shaded
small stony stream in Luxembourg (Braunert, 1994), on the sandy margin of
mountain rivers and streams in S. Bavaria (Sowig, 1986), the boggy margin of a small
lake in the Black Forest (Renner, 1982) and on muddy banks under decaying leaves
of Petasites (Freude, 1976). It is also said to frequent caves, cellars, barns, sheds and
fissures in walls. It flies at night and is attracted to light (Freude, 1976; Magistretti,
1965; Jeannel, 1941).
IDENTIFICATION
The British specimens keyed readily to the subgenus Pseudolimnaum Kraatz, in
Trautner & Geigenmiiller (1987). Pseuwdolimnaeum can be distinguished from other
European subgenera of Bembidion in having the following combination of
characters: third elytral interval with two dorsal punctures touching the adjacent
170 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
5mm
Fig. 1. Bembidion inustum, male habitus.
stria, with the anterior puncture situated before the mid-length of the elytra; eighth
elytral stria complete and as well defined as the other striae; basal bead of elytra not
forming a sharp angle with the lateral bead at the shoulder; lateral margins of
pronotum straight near the basal angles; median line of pronotum widened and
deepened at base to form a well defined broad deep channel; head with distinct,
weakly convergent frontal furrows, which do not extend on to the clypeus. This
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) gil
subgenus contains only two species in western and central Europe, B. inustum and
B. doderoi Ganglbauer (a third species B. /ederi Reitter is known from the
Caucasus and Crimea). The genitalia of the male specimen compared well with
the figure given for B. inustum in Jeannel (1941). Comparison with two female
specimens from La Madeleine, Nice, in the collection of The Natural History
Museum, London, confirmed the identity of the species.
B. inustum is unlikely to be confused with any other species of British Bembidion. It
is perhaps most similar to B. stomoides Dejean in general appearance, but it would
key to B. prasinum Duftschmid in Lindroth (1974). The following description will
distinguish B. inustum from any other British species of Bembidion. Length 5.5—
6.0mm. Colour pitchy-brown with a slight blue reflection, suture and apex of elytra
paler; all appendages pale brown; eyes small; head constricted immediately behind
the eyes; median line of pronotum widened and deepened at base to form a well
defined broad deep channel; elytra rather parallel sided. the striae deeply incised, the
seventh stria not markedly weaker than the sixth, the strial punctures small.
It seems unlikely to us, given its rarity in Europe and its life style, that this species
has been imported into Britain accidentally. It seems probable, given its nocturnal
habits and presumably largely concealed life style, that it is a long established native
species that has evaded capture up until now. As it is largely montane in Europe, it
might be absent from the well collected lowland areas of southern England, which
would be another reason that it has not been found.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Chris Meechan for the habitus drawing, John Deeming for help with
German translation, Darren Mann for supplying recent references and Stuart Hine
of The Natural History Museum, London, for the loan of specimens.
REFERENCES
Braunert, C. 1994. Beitrag zur Faunistik und Okologie der Laufkafer Luxemburgs und
Lothringens (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Nachweis mehrerer interessanter Arten im Jahr
: 1993. Bull. Soc. Nat. Luxemb. 95: 331-345.
Freude, H. 1976. In H. Freude, K. W. Harde & G. A. Lohse Die Kafer Mitteleuropas, Band 2.
Krefeld: Goecke & Evers.
Jeannel, R. 1941. Faune de France vol. 39, Coléoptéres Carabiques, premiere partie. Paris:
Librairie de la Faculté des Sciences.
Lindroth, C. H. 1974. Coleoptera: Carabidae. Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects,
4 (2): 1-148. London, Royal Entomological Society of London.
Magistretti, M. 1965. Fauna d'Italia, vol. 8, Coleoptera, Cicindelidae, Carabidae, Catalogo
topografico. Bologna: Edizioni Calderini.
Renner, K. 1982. Bemerkenswerte Kaferarten aus dem Siidschwarzwald (Carab., Helod.). Ent.
BI. Biol. Syst. Kafer. 78(1): 38.
Sowig, P. 1986. Bemerkungen zu einigen Bembidiinen Siidbadens (Carab.). Ent. Bl. Biol. Syst.
Kafer. 82 (1-2): 122.
Trautner, J. & Geigenmiiller, K. 1987. Tiger Beetles Ground Beetles Illustrated key to the
Cicindelidae and Carabidae of Europe. 488 pp. Josef Margraf, Aichtal, Germany.
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
AULAGROMYZA LUCENS (DE MEIJERE)
(DIPTERA: AGROMYZIDAE), A SPECIES NEW TO BRITAIN
J. C. DEEMING
Department of Biodiversity & Systematic Biology, National Museums and Galleries of Wales,
Cardiff CF1 3NP.
Two males of an Aulagromyza species whose identity eluded me were found on the
Glamorgan coast, S. Wales in 1985. Further attempts over the years to find
additional material both at the original collecting site and at others have been
fruitless, though a single male specimen was found in a large number of trapped
samples from Dinefwr Deer Park, Carmarthenshire in 1996. The species, which is
undoubtedly most uncommon, was kindly identified by Dr M. von Tschirnhaus,
Universitat Bielefeld, Germany as being Aulagromyza (Rubiomyza) lucens (de
Meijere), described (1924:142) from the Netherlands, known from Germany
developing in Galium aparine, and recorded also from Finland. It being new to
Britain, a description and figures are presented for the convenience of those involved
with the British fauna.
DIAGNOSIS
A black species with all hairs and bristles black, greyish hyaline wings, the
proboscis, cheeks and jowls yellow, the frontalia, upper hind eye margin, knees, fore
and mid tarsi dirty yellow, the haltere creamy yellow and the squamal! margin and its
fringe infuscate, the mesonotum strongly subshining through very weak dusting.
Head (Fig. 1): with jowls deeply extended at rear; jowlar margin straight, shining
black along its rim; length of frons one half of head width, at level of ocellar
prominence its width slightly over half width of head, at fore margin narrowed to
0.375; orbital plates sparsely pruinose, raised above level of interfrontalia, rather
broad, at mid length of frons one half of width of interfrontalia, bearing 2 inferior
and 2 superior orbital bristles; ratio of length of internal vertical to external vertical
bristles = 11:8; postocellars slightly shorter than external vertical; most ventral two
setae of the postocular row very long and forwardly-directed: vibrissa and jowlar
bristles fine; face (Fig. 2) strongly subshining black with antennal grooves more
heavily grey dusted, medially with a distinct triangular epistomal cleft occupied by
white membrane; antenna black throughout but base of arista somewhat paler, the
third segment with strikingly long pubescence; palpus rod-like, black.
Thorax: Mesonotum strongly convex and strongly subshining through weak grey
dust, more heavily dusted on humerus, notopleuron and remainder of pleura; 3
postsutural dorsocentral bristles, which become progressively longer posteriorly, and
a single weak presutural dorsocentral; setulae of mesonotum sparse, between the
dorsocentral lines in 4 irregular rows; 1 humeral, | posthumeral, 2 notopleural, |
long upwardly-directed propleural: 3 long bristles on hind margin of mesopleuron, |
long bristle on upper margin of sternopleuron, this preceded by 2 much shorter and
weaker setae; scutellum with the usual 2 pairs of marginal bristles, of which the more
apical are slightly longer, the distance between their bases two-thirds of that between
their bases and those of the more lateral.
Wing (Fig. 3): with somewhat greyish-suffused membrane and brown veins,
though stem vein and base of costa obscurely yellowish; posterior crossvein absent
on both wings of all 3 specimens examined.
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 173
l :
oh pie
Figs 1-5. Aulagromyza lucens. Male. |. Head in profile. 2. Lower part of head in oblique view.
3. Wing. 4. Hypandrium in dorsal view. 5. Aedeagus in ventral view.
Abdomen: subshining with setae of uniformly fine development; surstylus discrete,
almost semicircular in outline and lacking distinctive chaetotaxy; epandrium simple;
hypandrium (Fig. 4); aedeagus (Fig. 5); gonite deeply cleft apically. Length about
2mm, of wing 2mm.
Material: 2 3 Wales: Glamorgan, E. Aberthaw (ST0465), diverse lush vegetation
bordering beach, 8.vi.1985, J. C. Deeming; 1 ¢ Carmarthen, Llandeilo, Dinefwr Deer
Park (SN6122), Malaise trap, 31.v.—5.vi.1996, B. Levey & P. M. Pavett. All dry
mounted and deposited in National Museums and Galleries of Wales.
174 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
AFFINITIES
The genus Aulagromyza Enderlein, 1936 is better known under the name of its
synonym Paraphytomyza of the same author and date but published in a separate
paper. Papp (1984:309) followed other authors in giving priority to Paraphytomyza,
but von Tschirnhaus (1991:305) formally reversed this priority. In Spencer’s
(1972:64) key to British Paraphytomyza this species (/ucens) would trace to
discrepans (Wulp), but differs from it in having the presutural dorsocentral bristle
very weakly developed, the aedeagus of a very different structure from that figured
by Spencer (/oc. cit. p. 62, Fig. 207) and in having all knees yellow. The aedeagus here
figured for /ucens appears very different from that figured for the same species by von
Tschirnhaus (1969:285, Figs 8-10) and reproduced by Spencer (1976:317, Fig. 570),
which shows greater detail, but my figure is of an unstained genitalia preparation in
euparal. In terms of general coloration and aedeagus structure /ucens most resembles
the holarctic cornigera Griffiths, which species appears in Spencer’s (1972:64) key
under the name of Jonicerae (Robineau-Desvoidy), of which species Spencer &
Steyskal (1986:434, Figs 1035 & 1036) figure the aedeagus, but there are significant
differences in the mesophallus and base of the distiphallus. The difference between
the two species in the presence (cornigera) or absence (/ucens) of the posterior
crossvein is not fully reliable, within this genus its presence being to some extent
erratic.
The discovery of a species of Agromyzidae on the coastal strip of south Wales and
which appears not to be found elsewhere in Britain is not as strange as might at first
sight appear, this being an area which remained free of ice during previous
glaciations.
REFERENCES
Enderlein, G. 1936a. 22. Ordnung. Zweifliigler, Diptera. In Brohmer, Ehrman & Ulmer (eds.)
Tierwelt Mitteleur. 6(2), Insekten, Teil III, Leipzig: 1-259.
Enderlein, G. 1936b. Notizen zur Klassifikation der Agromyziden (Dipt.). Mit. dt. ent. Ges.
7(3): 42.
Meijere, J. C. H. de 1924. Verzeichnis der hollandischen Agromyziden. Tijdschr. Ent. 67: 119-
155.
Papp, L. 1984. Family Agromyzidae. pp. 263-343 in Soos, A. & Papp, L. (eds.) Catalogue of
Palaearctic Diptera. 9: 1-460. Budapest.
Spencer, K. A. 1972. Diptera, Agromyzidae. Handbk Ident. Br. Insects 10(5g).
Spencer, K. A. 1976. The Agromyzidae (Diptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Fauna ent.
scand. 5(2): 305-606.
Spencer, K. A. & Steyskal, G. C. 1986. Manual of the Agromyzidae (Diptera) of the United
States. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook No. 638, 478 pp.
Tschirnhaus, M. von 1969. Zur Verbreitung und Systematik einiger Paraphytomyza
(Rubiomyza)-Arten (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Faun.-Okol. Mitt. 3: 278-285.
Tschirnhaus, M. von 1991. New Results on the Ecology, Morphology, and Systematics of
Agromyzidae (Diptera). pp. 285-313 in Proceedings of the Second International Congress of
Dipterology, SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 175
PALLOPTERA ANDERSSONI SP. N. FROM SCOTLAND
AND FINLAND (DIPTERA: PALLOPTERIDAE)
GRAHAM E. ROTHERAY
National Museums of Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh EH1 1JF.
IAIN MACGOWAN
Scottish Natural Heritage, Battleby, Redgorton, Perth PHI 3EW.
In April 1995 one of us (IM) reared a pallopteran species similar to Palloptera
ustulata Fallen from under bark of fallen branches of lime, Tilia europaea L., at
Battleby, Perthshire, Scotland. A conspicuous difference between P. ustulata and this
material was the lack of shading which 1s typically present at the tip of the wing in
P. ustulata (Figs. 255-7 in Morge (1967)). In April of the following year, clear-
winged specimens were again encountered, this time reared from under bark of
fallen oak branches, Quercus sp., at Meikleour, Perthshire. Finally, in March 1997
at Balnaguard, Perthshire, we found acalypterate larvae within bark of fallen birch
branches, Betula sp. From these larvae we reared more examples of a clear-winged
Palloptera species.
The consistency of clear wings in all this material was striking, and shading did not
develop as specimens aged, suggesting that lack of shading was not a teneral feature,
as 1s Sometimes the case with Palloptera (Morge, 1967; Stubbs, 1969; P. J. Chandler,
pers. comm.). Andersson (1990) recognized female clear-winged specimens from
Sweden similar to but possibly distinct from P. ustulata, referring to them as var. b.
Earlier, Malloch in Malloch and McAtee (1925) described P. claripennis, a clear-
winged species similar to P. ustulata, from California, USA, to which European
clear-winged material might be referrable. However, on comparing our clear-winged
material with P. ustulata from Sweden and P. claripennis from California, we were
able to determine that an apparently unrecognized species exists. The adult and
puparium of this new species is described here.
PALLOPTERA ANDERSSONI SP. N.
Type Material. Holotype, 3: SCOTLAND, Perthshire, Balnaguard, larva in bark
of fallen Betula sp. branch, collected 20.11.1997, emerged vi.1997, G. E. Rotheray.
Paratypes, 113, 119 as follows: 23, 12: SCOTLAND, Perthshire, Battleby, larvae
under bark of fallen lime, Tilia europaea L., collected April 1995, Iain MacGowan;
63, 109: SCOTLAND, Perthshire, Balnaguard, larvae in bark of fallen Betula sp.
branch, collected 20.iii.1997, emerged vi.1997, G. E. Rotheray; 1g: SCOTLAND,
Perthshire, Killiecrankie, larva under bark of Acer pseudoplatanus L., emerged
6.vi.1997, Iain MacGowan; 13: SCOTLAND, Angus, Glen Clova, larva under bark
of Betula sp., emerged 3.vi.1997, Iain MacGowan; 13: FINLAND, near Lempola,
3.x.1979, P. J. Chandler. Holotype and all but one male paratype in the National
Museums of Scotland, Edinburgh. One male paratype in the private collection of
P. J. Chandler.
Etymology—Palloptera anderssoni is named after Hugo Andersson, who first drew
attention to the taxonomic distinctiveness of clear-winged specimens similar to
Palloptera ustulata.
176 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
DESCRIPTION
Male.—length (tip of frons to tip of abdomen) 2.25—3.00mm; thorax including
humeri black and almost completely grey-dusted except for the anterior margin of
scutum and bases of bristles which lack dusting and the scutellum which is yellow;
abdomen mottled yellow and brown; head with black, grey-dusted occiput and
ocellar triangle; front of frons yellow, cheeks yellow with white dusting; legs, palpi
and halteres yellow; wings clear without shading; bristles black, antennae orange and
brown with dark arista bearing short setae (Fig. 1); mesopleuron bare; anterior
crossvein meeting discal cell before the middle; dorsal margin of sternopleuron with
an isolated row of 4 setae anterior to sternopleural bristle (Fig. 2); aedeagus
with curled stipe and setal fringe longer than stipe is wide; glans sclerotized black
with equally long accompanying vesicle; apical filaments consisting of an elongate
oval section and a longer section widening towards a bifurcated tip of which one arm
is longer than the other (Fig. 3a).
Female.—similar to male except humeri tending to be black and grey-dusted but
sometimes vaguely paler and yellowish; ovipositor black, stout and lightly sclerotized
with dorsal and ventral rows of setae; cerci with 4 pairs of dorsal and ventral setae
(Fig. 4); two spermathecae.
Puparium.—length 2.75—3.25mm, width 0.75—1.25mm; subcyclindrical in cross-
section becoming more rounded posteriorly; tapering anteriorly and posteriorly;
surface smooth except for thorax which is coated in transverse ridges and the end
segment which is heavily wrinkled (Fig. 5); no evidence of spicules on the prothorax;
locomotory welts on first seven abdominal segments consisting of 6-7 complete or
interrupted transverse rows of similarly-sized, backwardly-directed spicules with
medial spicules of second posterior row larger; anterior spiracles fan-like with 6
lobes; posterior spiracles surrounded by wrinkles and mounted on short projection,
about as long as wide; pale to dark brown (Fig. 6), three short spiracular openings;
cephalopharyngeal skeleton with robust mouth-hooks (Fig. 7); accessory teeth
absent; mouth-hooks with a vague anterior window; dental sclerite comma-shaped;
intermediate sclerite elongate and tapering posteriorly with slight ventral projections:
parastomal bar elongate and pale posteriorly; pharyngeal sclerite with a dorsal
apodeme and diffusely darkened; dorsal bridge with a narrow, dark ventral margin;
pharyngeal ridges present.
DISCUSSION
Most Palloptera have patterns of shading on the wings which can be used to
recognize many species (Morge, 1967). However, P. anderssoni is one of a small
group of Palloptera species which lack shading on the wings. The male of
P. anderssoni can be distinguished from males of other clear-winged species by the
following combination of characters: mesopleuron bare; bristles black; wing with
costal fringe consisting entirely of dark setae (pale at base in P. claripennis); sterno-
pleuron with an isolated row of 4 setae anterior to sternopleural bristle (Fig. 2a), this
row of setae not isolated from other setae in P. ustulata (Fig. 2b); male genitalia with
a forked filament at the tip of the glans (Fig. 3a), apical filaments arranged
differently in P. claripennis and P. ustulata (Figs 3b.c respectively).
At present female P. anderssoni cannot be reliably separated. One problem is the
probability that some teneral P. ustulata lack shading at the tip of the wing and
teneral P. anderssoni have yellowish humeri. The three females of P. ustulata var. b
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 177
aw
x 4
Cs
2a 2
:
3a 3b 3c
Figs 1-4. Palloptera spp. 1: Palloptera anderssoni sp. n. 3 holotype, head, lateral view. 2a:
P. anderssoni holotype, sternopleuron dorsal view. 2b: Palloptera ustulata 3, sternopleuron,
dorsal view. 3a: P. anderssoni holotype, tip of the aedeagus, lateral view. 3b: P. ustulata 3, tip of
the aedeagus, lateral view. 3c: P. claripennis 3, tip of the aedeagus, lateral view, g= glans,
v=vesicle, a=apical filaments. 4: P. anderssoni 2, ovipositor tip, lateral view.
2b
178 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
Figs 5—7. Palloptera anderssoni. 5: puparium, ventral view. 6: end segment of puparium, apical
view. 7: cephalopharyngeal skeleton, lateral view.
from Sweden and females reared from under bark of Quercus at Meikleour,
Perthshire appear to be problematic in this way. They are clear-winged, as in
P. anderssoni, but have yellowish humeri which is more like P. ustulata. For this
reason they cannot be identified. The puparium of P. anderssoni is very similar to
that of P. ustulata. There are differences in the wrinkling of the end segment and the
extent of dark areas of the cephalopharyngeal skeleton, but these are tentative with
only one puparium of P. ustulata examined.
We found considerable variation in the glans and associated filaments between
P. anderssoni, P. claripennis and P. ustulata, and these are apparently different to
other Pallopteridae such as Palloptera usta Meigen (Czerny, 1949; Morge, 1956) and
Toxoneura superba (Loew) (McAlpine, 1987). The investigation of these characters
appears to be neglected but they may assist in recognizing and defining species limits
in other Pallopteridae.
P. anderssoni is a univoltine species breeding under or within the bark of Acer,
Betula, Tilia and possibly Quercus. It is probably not, however, confined to these
three species. Currently it is only known from Perthshire in Scotland, and Finland. It
is possibly a species with a northern distribution in Europe. We found larvae actively
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 179
developing in March where they occurred with larvae of various Lonchaea spp.
(Diptera, Lonchaeidae) and Stegana (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Morge (1956)
observed the larvae of P. usta and P. ustulata attacking beetle and Stegana larvae
respectively. However, we did not observe predatory behaviour in the larva of
P. anderssoni. Morge (1956) also records pallopterid larvae in the absence of prey
where they were probably feeding saprophagously on materials associated with
decaying bark. They are probably facultative predators (Ferrar, 1987). Furthermore,
the cephalopharyngeal skeletons of P. usta and P. ustulata were figured by Morge
(1956) and are similar to P. anderssoni. They do not seem to be specialized for
predation, but are of the usual saprophagous form with well developed pharyngeal
ridges; neither do they posses accessory teeth which are a feature of the larva of
Palloptera quinquemaculata (Maquart) which is phytophagous (Nye, 1958).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank David Robertson, Chris Thompson and Peter Chandler for discussion
and help at various points in the writing of this paper. We are grateful to Peter
Chandler for loaning us specimens from his private collection, to Roy Danielsson for
loan of specimens of P. ustulata and P. ustulata var. b from the Museum of Zoology,
Lund University, and to Chris Thompson and Allen Norrbom for the loan of a male
of P. claripennis from the Smithsonian Institution, Washington. The work reported
here was part of a wider project on saproxylic Diptera in Scotland carried out by the
Malloch Society. We gratefully acknowledge the contribution made by members of
the Society to this work of which the present study is a part, and for the financial
assistance provided by the Worldwide Fund for Nature and Scottish Natural
Heritage.
REFERENCES
Andersson, H. 1990. De svenska prickflugorna (Diptera, Pallopteridae), med typdesigneringer
och nya synonymer. Ent. Tidskr. 111: 123-131.
Czerny, L. 1949. Lonchaeidae. In: Linder, E. (ed.), Die Fliegen der Palaearktischen Region.
5(43): 1-40. Stuttgart.
Ferrar, P. 1987. A guide to the breeding habits and immature stages of Diptera Cyclorrhapha.
Entomonograph. 8(1): 1-478. Leiden.
Malloch, J. R. and McAtee, W. L. 1925. Keys to flies of the families Lonchaeidae,
Pallopteridae, and Sapromyzidae of the Eastern United States, with a list of the species
of the District of Columbia Region. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 65: 1-26.
McAlpine, J. F. 1987. Pallopteridae pp. 839-943. In: McAlpine, J. F. (Ed.), Manual of Nearctic
Diptera 2, vit 675-1332.
Morge, G. 1956. Uber Morphologie und Lebensweise der bisher unbekannten Larven von
Palloptera usta Meigen, Palloptera ustulata Fallen und Stegana coleoptrata Scopoli
(Diptera). Beitr. Ent. 6: 124-137. .
Morge, G. 1967. Die Lonchaeidae und Pallopteridae Osterreichs und der angrenzenden
Gebiete. Nat. Jahrb. der Stadt Linz. 13: 141-211.
Nye, I. W. B. 1958. The external morphology of some of the dipterous larvae living in the
Gramineae of Britain. Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. 110: 411-487.
Stubbs, A. E. 1969. Observations on Palloptera scutellata Meig. in Berkshire and Surrey and
a discussion on the larval habitats of British Pallopteridae (Dipt.). Ent. Mon. Mag. 104:
157-160.
180 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
THE INHERITANCE OF A MELANIC FORM OF THE 7 SPOT
LADYBIRD, COCCINELLA SEPTEMPUNCTATA L. (COLEOPTERA:
COCCINELLIDAE)
MICHAEL MAJERUS. TASMIN MAJERUS and ALAN CRONIN*
Department of Genetics, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK and *1 Chrisdory Road,
Mile Oak, Portslade, Brighton BN41 2WQ, UK.
Melanism is common among coccinellids, many species having black forms as part
of genetic polymorphisms (sensu Ford, 1940). However, the 7 spot ladybird,
Coccinella septempunctata L., the commonest species of ladybird in Britain, is not
among these. Melanism does occur in this species, particularly in Asia, but the
variation is continuous, resulting primarily from increasing spot size and fusion
between spots (Varma, 1954; Rao, 1962; Iablokoff-Khnzorian, 1982) and is
controlled multifactorially (Dobzhansky, 1933). Indeed, this species is relatively
invariant in its colour pattern in Britain (Majerus, 1994). It has been argued that
melanic forms of this species would be disadvantageous because, given its size, such
forms would be liable to raised heat levels as a result of the greater heat absorption
characteristics of dark compared to pale colours (Stewart & Dixon, 1989). However,
a black form, referable to the name f. anthrax, has been recorded in Britain as an
extreme rarity, and Stephens (1839) noted that the elytra of this species could be
‘wholly black’. In this paper we give details of the finding of a melanic form of C.
septempunctata that appears to be novel, a breeding program based on this
individual, the genetical control of the form and we discuss reasons for its rarity.
INITIAL RECORD
On 4 September 1996, an abnormal C. septempunctata was noticed among many
others on a lawn at North Hangleton, Sussex. It was boxed, and retained for later
examination. Initial impression was that the ladybird was all black. On closer
examination, several hours later, the ladybird was seen to be dark maroon, inclining
to black, with the black spots just discernible. The ladybird was retained in Sussex
until 14 October 1996 when it was sent to Cambridge. Microscopic examination
showed the ladybird to be a male. The ground colour was very dark purple (similar
in colour to ‘black’ tulips), with the black spots still just discernible under a dissecting
microscope, but not with the naked eye. The normally white marks at the anterior
outer margins of the pronotum and flanking the scutellary spot, were suffused with
red, as just visible in Fig. 1, from a photograph taken on 18 October 1996.
We refer this ladybird, and other phenotypically similar ladybirds produced in
crosses originating from this male, as f. purpuralis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In Cambridge, the ladybird was fed pea aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), and
after two days was placed in a Petri dish with six virgin F, female ladybirds from a
Cambridge stock. The male subsequently mated with all of these females over the
next four months, the females being isolated as they were mated, with the male being
rotated around the six females on a three week cycle. Eggs produced by these females
were removed from their parents, and reared. Numbers of eggs laid and egg hatch
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 181
Fig. 1. The original melanic male Coccinella septempunctata mating with a typical female.
rates were recorded for all crosses. The adults and progeny were maintained and
reared following procedures described by Majerus et al. (1989).
The F, progeny were scored for phenotype 48 hours after eclosion, and again five
days later. They were fed for a week on pea aphids and then on an artificial diet
(Majerus et al., 1989) for two days before being initially placed in an unheated
insectory for two days, and then transferred to a refrigerator, at 4 °C, for six weeks
‘to simulate winter conditions and induce diapause. After six weeks the ladybirds
were gradually transferred back into the laboratory (21 °C), where they were fed an
artificial diet for two days to allow replenishment of fluid, and thereafter pea aphids.
They were rescored for colour and pattern on removal from the refrigerator, and at
six weeks intervals thereafter. The original black male, which had been retained at
21 °C throughout, was still alive, and was used in a back-cross mating with
daughters of two females that he had been mated with. Other F, progeny were mated
together. Resulting offspring were reared as before and notes were made of their
colour patterns during the first 48 hours after eclosion, and at regular intervals for
the next three months. Matings were also made between some of the F, adults
produced, their progeny being scored as before. Three attempted pairings between F,
purpuralis individuals failed to produce progeny. The longevity of all ladybirds was
recorded.
RESULTS
The results of phenotypes of progeny from the various crosses are given in Table 1.
Individuals designated as typical were normally coloured throughout adult life.
Individuals assigned to f. purpuralis appeared normal on eclosion. However, within
182 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
Table 1. Details of crosses of Coccinella septempunctata, involving f. purpuralis.
Cross number Male parent Female parent Progeny
f. purpuralis typical Total
| purpuralis, Sussex typical, Cambridge 12 12
C2 purpuralis, Sussex (as 1) typical, Cambridge 27 ea
3 purpuralis, Sussex (as 1) typical, Cambridge 15 15
C4 purpuralis, Sussex (as 1) ex Cl, typical 5 8 13
C5 purpuralis, Sussex (as 1) ex C3, typical 3 7 10
C6 ex C2, typical ex C2, typical l Z 8
ey ex C2, typical ex C3, typical 2 10 12
C8 ex C3, typical ex C2, typical 3 17 20
cS ex C2, typical ex C2, typical 2 1] 13
C10 ex C3, typical ex C2, typical 5 rad! 32
Cll ex C8, purpuralis ex C10, typical 5 8 13
ey ex C7, typical ex C9, purpuralis 8 8
C13 ex C6, typical ex C7, purpuralis 6 12 18
C14 ex C9, typical ex C7, typical 4 PA 25
CIS ex C6, typical ex C10, typical 17 17
C16 ex C8, typical ex C9, typical 26 26
24 hours, the orange-red pigmentation on the elytra appeared noticeably dull
compared with typical individuals of the same age, and by 48 hours could be
described as ‘dirty’. Dark pigment continued to be laid down over the first week
following eclosion, so that by day seven, the ground colour of the elytra was purple.
Thereafter, the elytra continued to darken, and by day 42, the black spots were
indiscernible by eye.
Three of the original matings between the purpuralis male and Cambridge females
produced issue, 54 progeny being produced between families Cl, C2 and C3. In all
cases the colour and pattern of the progeny was normal 48 hours after eclosion, and
remained so at other scoring intervals until death. Progeny from the two back-
crosses (C4, C5) produced results consistent with the hypothesis that the melanic
form is controlled by a single recessive allele, in both cases a 1 : | ratio of normal:
purpuralis progeny being produced. This hypothesis seems to be confirmed by the
results of the five test crosses between F, progeny (C6—C10 inclusive), each of which
gives some typical and some purpuralis progeny in a ratio not statistically different
from 3: 1. Of the F, crosses, some produced all typical progeny (C12, C15, C16),
suggesting one of the parents was homozygous typical. Another (C14) produced a
3: 1 typical: purpuralis ratio. Two of the three crosses involving purpuralis parents
(C11, C13) produced both purpuralis and typical progeny in a ratio that was not
significantly different from 1 : 1.
In most families segregating both typical and purpuralis progeny, the proportion of
purpuralis progeny is lower than expectation, although not significantly so in any
specific family. When all crosses which should segregate | typical: 1 purpuralis (C4,
C5, Cll, C13) are summed, the deficiency of purpuralis is significant (y7=4.74,
d.f. = 1, p<0.05). The same is true of crosses expected to segregate into a 3 typical : 1
purpuralis ratio (C6—-C10 inclusive, C14) (y7=5.35, d.f.=1, p<0.05). These
deficiencies suggest that the purpuralis allele confers significant disadvantage on its
carriers when homozygous, and is sometimes lethal, even in captivity when reared
under favourable conditions. The stock of ladybirds appeared to have low
reproductive success throughout the program. Rate of oviposition was low
compared to other C. septempunctata stocks in culture at the same time. Egg hatch
BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999) 183
rates were consistently low, rarely exceeding 50% for any clutch, and with a mean of
only 23.7%. This may have been a consequence of inbreeding depression within the
stock, in the F, and F, generations, (inbreeding depression is known to be severe in
some coccinellids (Lusis, 1947; Majerus, 1994), but cannot account for the low egg
hatch rates in the initial crosses involving the original purpuralis male.
Larval mortality was high in most families. Little of this mortality was due to
cannibalism because larvae were reared at low density per dish.
The original male survived in captivity at about 21 °C until 17 May 1997. Thus, he
lived, in an active state, for at least 255 days. The normal longevity expectation for C.
septempunctata males kept in the laboratory in Cambridge, at 21 °C, is 80-130 days
(MENM, pers. obs.). The longevity of the F, and F, f. purpuralis, and the known
heterozygotes carrying the purpuralis allele were 156 days (n=36; S.E.=8.41) and
129 days (n=97; S.E.=4.56) respectively. Cambridge stock individuals being kept
under the same conditions during this period had a mean longevity of 113 days
(n—=28: S.E-= 9.74).
DISCUSSION
We conclude from the results of the breeding program described here, that C.
septempunctata f. purpuralis is controlled by a single recessive allele, with reduced
viability. Another, and unnamed, melanic form of C. septempunctata has been
described from inbred Finnish stocks (HamAaldinen & Clayhills, 1972). Although this
form was shown to have a recessive genetic basis, we recognise that it is not f.
purpuralis as only part of the elytra turned black. However, interestingly, in crosses
between ‘black’ individuals, most eggs laid proved to be infertile. This may indicate
low fitness of the ‘black’ form, although it is also possibly a consequence of the severe
inbreeding depression shown by many coccinellids (Hodek, 1973).
Consideration of the mode and rate of pigment laydown in f. purpuralis leads to
the deduction that this form is not a melanic of the type found commonly in species
such as Adalia bipunctata (L.) (e.g. f. sexpustulata and f. quadrimaculata) or
Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) (e.g. f. conspicua and f. spectabilis) where the black
pigment is laid down rapidly following eclosion (see Majerus & Kearns, 1989).
Rather, the black colour develops relatively slowly, the elytra gradually being
suffused with dark pigment. In this, the form appears somewhat analogous to A.
bipunctata f. purpurea (Majerus et al., 1987), and to those forms of Adalia
decempunctata in which dark pigments develop slowly (Majerus, 1994). In both cases
the forms are controlled by a single recessive gene. It is possible that the pigment laid
across the elytra of f. purpuralis is a phaeomelanin, rather than a eumelanin which is
responsible for the black spots in C. septempunctata, and the common melanic forms
of A. bipunctata and H. axyridis. However, tests will have to be performed to confirm
this.
The cause of the lack of melanic polymorphism in C. septempunctata remains
obscure. The tenet that this species of coccinellid is too large to be melanic due to
potential heat stress is difficult to sustain, given that other species of coccinellid of a
similar size show such polymorphism in a diverse array of climates, including some
which are very much hotter than those inhabited by C. septempunctata. However, the
reason why the form described here remains an extreme rarity, is undoubtedly its low
intrinsic fitness. The egg hatch rates and larval survival from typical females mated to
purpuralis males, and the oviposition rate of purpuralis females were all low
compared to females from normal stock families given the same feeding and
diapause regimes.
184 BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 11: 1998 (1999)
As the f. purpuralis stock appeared to be generally weak, it is perhaps surprising
that the longevity of f. purpuralis individuals, once they reached adulthood, was not
adversely affected. Indeed, if anything, the converse was the case. No differences in
the feeding or mating behaviour between the purpuralis and typical forms were
observed. We can offer no explanation for the exceptional longevity of adult f.
purpuralis.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are indebted to Dominique Betrand for maintaining aphid cultures in
Cambridge, and to the Wolfson Trust for funding the building of the ladybird
laboratory, at the Department of Genetics Field Station in Cambridge.
REFERENCES
Dobzhansky, T. 1933. Geographic variation in lady-beetles. Am. Nat. 67: 97-126.
Ford, E. B. 1940. Polymorphism and taxonomy. In The New Systematics (ed. J. S. Huxley),
493-513. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
Hamaldinen, M. & Clayhills, T. 1972. An interesting colour form of Coccinella septempunctata
L. (Col., Coccinellidae). Ann. Ent. Fenn. 38: 158-159.
Hodek, I. 1973. Biology of Coccinellidae. Junk: The Hague: Academia: Prague.
Iablokoff-Khnzorian, S. M. 1982. Les Coccinelles. Societe nouvelle des editions Boubée: Paris.
Lusis, J. J. 1947. Some rules of reproduction in populations of Adalia bipunctata:
heterozygosity of lethal alleles in populations. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSR 57: 825-828.
Majerus, M. E. N. 1994. Ladybirds, No. 81, New Naturalist Series. Harper Collins, London.
Majerus, M. E. N. & Kearns, P. W. E. 1989. Ladybirds, No. 10, Naturalists’ Handbooks Series.
Richmond Publishing: Slough.
Majerus, M. E. N., Ireland, H. & Kearns, P. W. E. 1987. Description of a new form of Adalia
bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) with notes on its inheritance. Entomologist’s Rec. J.
Var. 99: 255-257.
Majerus, M. E. N., Kearns, P. W. E., Forge, H. & Ireland, H. 1989. Ladybirds as teaching aids:
I: Collecting and culturing. J Biol. Ed. 23: 85-95.
Rao, V. S. 1962. The status of Coccinella septempunctata L. and its varieties divaricata Oliv. and
confusa Wied. Canad. Ent. 94: 1341-1343.
Stephens, J. F. 1839. A Manual of British Coleoptera or Beetles. Longmans: London.
Stewart, L. A. and Dixon, A. F. G. 1989. Why big species of ladybird are not melanic.
Functional Ecology 3: 165—77.
Varma, B. K. 1954. Evolution of colour pattern in Coccinella septempunctata Linn., var.
divaricata Oliv. Ind. J. Agric. Sci. 24: 133-136.
Past Presidents
1872-4 J. R. WELLMAN (dec.) 1943 R. J. BurTON, L.DS., R.C.S.ENG. (dec.)
1875-6 A. B. Farn, FES. (dec.) 1944 STan.ey N. A. JAcoss, F.R.ES. (dec.)
1877 J. P. BARRETT, FES. (dec.) 1945-6 Capt. R. A. JACKSON, R.N., F.R.ES. (dec.)
1878 J. T. WitiiaMs (dec) 1947 L. T. Forp, B.A. (dec.)
1879 R. STANDEN FES. (dec.) 1948 Col. P. A. Carpew (dec.)
1880 A. FIcKLIN (dec.) 1949 J. O. T. Howarp, . A. (dec.)
1881 V. R. Perkins, FES. (dec.) 1950 Air-Marshal Sir Ropert SAUNDBY,
1882 T. R. Bitvups, Fes. (dec.) KBE, CB. M.C., D.F.C., A.F.C. F.RES. (dec.)
1883 J. R. WELLMAN (dec.) 1951 T. G. Howarth, MBE., FRES., F.ZS.
1884 W. WESsT, L.Ds. (dec.) 1952 E. W. CLaASSEY, F.R.ES.
1885 R. Sout, F.Es. (dec.) 1953 F. STANLEY-SMITH, F.R.ES. (dec.)
1886-7 R. Anpkin, F-ES. (dec.) 1954 STANLEY N. A. Jacoss, S.B.ST.J., F.R-E.S. (dec.)
1888-9 T.R. Bitiups, F.Es. (dec.) 1955 F. D. Buck, AM.1LPTGM., F.RES. (dec.)
1890 J. T. CARRINGTON, F.LS. (dec.) 1956 Lt-Col. W. B. L. MANL_Ley, F.R.E:s. (dec.)
1891 W. H. TuGwe.t, pu.c. (dec.) 1957 B. P. Moore, B.sC., D.PHIL., F.R-ES.
1892 C. G. BarreTT, FES. (dec.) 1958 N. E. Hickin, PH.D., B.SC., F.R.ES (dec.)
1893 J. J. Weir, F.LS., etc. (dec.) 1959 F. T. VALLINS, A.C.LL, F.R.E.S (dec.)
1894 E. STEP, F.LS. (dec.) 1960 R. M. Mere, F.RES. (dec.)
1895 T. W. Ha t, FE. (dec.) 1961 A. M. MassEz, O.B.E., D.SC., F.R.ES. (dec.)
1896 R. Soutu, FES. (dec.) 1962 A. E. GARDNER, F.R.ES. (dec.)
1897 R. ADKIN, FES. (dec.) 1963 J. L. MESSENGER, B.A., F.R.ES. (dec.)
1898 J. W. Tutt, FES. no 1964 C. G. RocuE, F.C.A., F.RES.
1899 A. Harrison, F.LS. (dec.) 1965 R. W. J. UFFEN, F.RES.
1900 W. J. Lucas, B.A., FES. (dec.) 1966 J. A. C. GREENWOOD, 0.B.E., F.R.ES (dec.)
1901 H. S. FREMLIN, M.R.CS., L.R.CP., F-ES. (dec.) 1967 R. F. BRETHERTON, C.B., M.A., F.R.E.S. (dec.)
1902 F. Noap Ciark (dec.) 1968 B. GOATER, B.SC., F.R.E.S
1903 E. Step, F.L.s. (dec.) 1969 Capt. J. ELLERTON, D.s.c., R.N. (dec.)
1904 A. SIcu, FES. (dec.) 1970 B. J. MACNULTY, B.SC., PH.D., F.R.LCS., F.R.ES. (dec.)
1905 H. Main, Bsc. F-ES. (dec.) 1971 Col. A. M. EMMET, M.B.E., T.D., M.A.
1906-7 R. Apkrn, FES. (dec.) 1972 Prof. H. E. Hinton, PH.D., B.SC.
1908-9 A. Sicu, F.Es. (dec.) F.RS., F.RES. (dec.)
1910-1 W. J. Kaye, Fs. (dec.) 1973 J. M. CHALMERS-HUNT, F.R.ES.
1912-3 A. E. Tonag, F Es. (dec.) 1974 C. MACKECHNIE JARVIS, F.LS., F.R.ES.
1914-5 B. H. Smrtu, B.A., FES. (dec.) 1975 M. G. Morris, M.A., PH.D., F.R.ES.
1916-7 Hy. J. Turner, FES. (dec.) 1976 W. G. TREMEWAN, M.LBIOL.
1918-9 StanLey Epwarps, F.LS., ETC. (dec.) 1977 R. Tusss, 0.B.E., F.RIB.A., F.RES. (dec.)
1920-1 K. G. Bram, Bsc. FES. (dec.) ° 1978 G. Prior, F.LS., F.R.E.S (dec.)
1922 E. J. BuNNETT, M.A. (dec.) 1979 Rev. D. J. L. Acassiz, M.A.
1923-4 N. D. RILey, Fzs., FES. (dec.) 1980 R. FAIRCLOUGH, F.R.ES.
1925-6 T.H. L. Grosvenor, F.ES. (dec.) 1981 A. E. Srupss, B.SC., F.R-ES.
1927-8 E. A. CocKAYNE, D.M., F.R.CP., FES. (dec.) 1982 J. HEATH, F.R.ES. (dec.)
1929 | H. W. Anprews, FES. (dec.) 1983 B. R. BAKER, B.SC., A.M.A., F.R.ES.
1930 F. B. Carr (dec.) 1984 P. A. SOKOLOFF, M.SC., M.IBIOL., F.R.E.S
1930 C. N. Hawkins, FE. (dec.) 1985 P. J. BAKER, CENG., FRHS.
1931 K. G. BLair, BSC., F.ZS., FES. (dec.) 1986 J. M. CHAtMers-HUunt, F.R.ES.
1932 T. H. L. Grosvenor, FES. (dec.) 1987 Prof. J. A. OWEN, M.D., PH.D., F.RES.
1933 C. G. M. De Wors, M.A., PH.D., 1988 I. F. G. McLean, PH.D., F.R.ES.
ALC. F.R.ES., M.B.O.U. (dec.) 1989 Mrs F. M. Murpny, ssc. (dec.)
1934 T. R. Eacies (dec.) 1990 C. W. PLANT, BSC., F.R-ES.
1935 E. E. Syms, F.r.Es. (dec.) 1991 A. J. HALsTEAD, MSC.
1936 M. Nisiett (dec.) 1992 J. MUGGLETON, MSC. PH.D. M.I. BIOL., F.R-ES.
1937 F. J. Coutson (dec.) 1993 D. LonsDALE, PH.D, B.SC.
1938 F. STANLEY-SMITH, F.R.ES. (dec.) 1994 P. M. WarING, M.A., PH.D., F.R.E.S.
1939 H. B. WILLIAMS, LL.D., F.R.ES. (dec.) 1995 M. J. ScosLe, B.SC., M.PHIL., PH.D., F.R-ES.
1940 E. A. CocKAYNE, D.M., F.R.CP., F.R-ES. (dec.) 1996 C. Hart, BSC.
1941 F. D. Coote, F.REs. (dec.) 1997 Rev. D. J. L. AGassiz, M.A., PH.D., F.R-E.S.
1942 S. WaKELY (dec.) 1998 B. C. EveRSHAM, BSC., F.R-ES.
HQ aMNH LIBRARY 7
Britieh journal LWIA
tural history HI |
AM, MUS. NAT. H 100173893
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ENTC.. Received oD: 22 8> qa LORY
VOLUME 11, PARTS 3/4, JANUARY 1999
ARTICLES
129 An estimate of the range and population levels of Fisher’s estuarine moth (Gortyna borelii
lunata Freyer), (Lep.: Noctuidae) in Essex, July and October 1996. C. HART
139 A ‘bee-louse’ Braula schmitzi Orési-Pal (Diptera: Braulidae) new to the British Isles, and the
status of Braula spp. in England and Wales. J. R. DOBSON
S 149 A breeding experiment with Maniola jurtina L. ab fracta Zweiglt (Lep.: Satyridae)
a i R. BARRINGTON
a 153 The food-plants of the browntail moth Euproctis chrysorrhoea L. (Lep.: Lymantriidae) in East
cK London. G. E. KING
160 New moth records for the Isle of Lewis. A. P. LEFTwWICH & W. R. ELLIOT
163 Frost survival by Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Muls. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in an outdoor
situation. A. J. HALSTEAD
167 Notes on the distribution of Ledra aurita (L.) (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) in Britain.
A. J. A. STEWART & M. R. WILSON
169 Bembidion (Pseudolimnaeum) inustum Duval, (Coleoptera: Carabidae) an interesting new
addition to the British Fauna. B. LEvey & P. M. PAVETT
172 Aulagromyza lucens (De Meijere) (Diptera: Agromyzidae), a species new to Britain.
J. C. DEEMING
175 Palloptera anderssoni sp. n. from Scotland and Finland (Diptera: Pallopteridae).
G. E. ROTHERAY & I. MACGOWAN
180 The inheritance of a melanic form of the 7 spot ladybird, Coccinella septempuncata L.
(Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). M. MAJERUS, T. MAJERUS & A. CRONIN
SHORT COMMUNICATIONS
138 Troilism in Sicus ferrugineus (L.) (Diptera: Conopidae). R. A. JONES
148 Ulopa trivia Germar (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) in Wales. M. R. WILSON
PROCEEDINGS AND TRANSACTIONS
151 Field Meeting Report: Sydney Wood, Surrey.
164. Field Meeting Report: Killiecrankie RSPB reserve, Perthshire.
BOOK REVIEWS
162 The natural history of moths by M. Young. R. A. JONES