0
0.0
Apr 30, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice sotomayor, ms. johnson parks her car oftentimes at a friend' so she is not violating the law at those times. justice sotomayor: just answer my question. ms. evangelis: -- parking everywhere is not prohibited. in certain areas, private areas, you can. justice sotomayor: is sleeping in your car prohib ms. evangelis: if you are sleeping in your car in a park, where you're not allowed to park overnight -- justice sotomayor: have any of them -- ms. evangelis: -- then yes. juste tomayor: -- indicated intent to sleep in a park, or have they just said they want to pa sewhere in the city? and can they park somewhere in the city and sleep? ms. evangelis: yes, they have said that they have the intent to continue their conduct and that they wille,herefore, subject to the city's laws and subjec- justice sotomayor: i don't understand that answer. okay. f justice roberts: justice kagan? justice kagan: you'vered couple of times to the necessity defense, so could you tell me how that would work? ms. evangelis: yes.
justice sotomayor, ms. johnson parks her car oftentimes at a friend' so she is not violating the law at those times. justice sotomayor: just answer my question. ms. evangelis: -- parking everywhere is not prohibited. in certain areas, private areas, you can. justice sotomayor: is sleeping in your car prohib ms. evangelis: if you are sleeping in your car in a park, where you're not allowed to park overnight -- justice sotomayor: have any of them -- ms. evangelis: -- then yes. juste tomayor: --...
0
0.0
Apr 1, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice sotomayor? justice sotomayor: so you could havelost? [laughter] chief justice roberts: justice kagan, anything further? stice kavanaugh? justice barrett? e jason? okay. thank you, counsel. ms. stetson, rebuttal? rebuttal argenof catherine e. stetson on behalf of the industry applicants ms. stetson: three quick points, your hons,irst on emissions, second on the other fault lines and the ru tt i mentioned, and the third on equities. the fit what you heard ms. vale just say is that the puose of the good neighbor provision is to protect downwind states from emissis upwind states. no. the purpose t good neighbor provision is to reduce the signifancontribution that upwind states make to downwind states. and that why -- that's why 11, chief justice roberts, versus 23 matters. that question about how many is a collectivehomany hundreds of egus, how many hundreds of non-egus that are being regulated here for the first time, by the way, how many of those feed into the alis is exactly the problem. we didn't have to seek reconsideration, justice go
justice sotomayor? justice sotomayor: so you could havelost? [laughter] chief justice roberts: justice kagan, anything further? stice kavanaugh? justice barrett? e jason? okay. thank you, counsel. ms. stetson, rebuttal? rebuttal argenof catherine e. stetson on behalf of the industry applicants ms. stetson: three quick points, your hons,irst on emissions, second on the other fault lines and the ru tt i mentioned, and the third on equities. the fit what you heard ms. vale just say is that the...
0
0.0
Apr 23, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice sotomayor: tme back. mr. kneei think they might have been sent back by the -- stice sotomayor: so then they passed this law. and d't the city council make it so uncomfortable hereto that they'll move down the road, meaning out of town, correct? mr. kneedler: that state -- that statement was made at a -- at a ic meeting of the city council. justice sor: all right. so let's assume what you're saying or accepting, that -- do hope one of you knows, how many beds there are in grant pass, shelter beds? mr. kneedler: i believe the only shelter beds, st at the -- at the time the record in this case was compiled,ast the gospel mission. there has been at times a detox e. there has been a warming c that has been maintained. but, in terms of -se me -- shelter beds -- justice sotomayor: well,e're talking about portionate -- mr. kneedler: -- i think it's apoxately a hundred. there -- there are men's, women' justice sotomayor: yeah. i thought it was much less than that. mr. kneedler: yes. justtomayor: all right. so we go ba
justice sotomayor: tme back. mr. kneei think they might have been sent back by the -- stice sotomayor: so then they passed this law. and d't the city council make it so uncomfortable hereto that they'll move down the road, meaning out of town, correct? mr. kneedler: that state -- that statement was made at a -- at a ic meeting of the city council. justice sor: all right. so let's assume what you're saying or accepting, that -- do hope one of you knows, how many beds there are in grant pass,...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i think -- justice sotomayor: all right. that -- let me stop u ere because all of your legal theories rely on us holding that federal law doesn't require -- cannot preempt state law on these issues and so, when i asked you the quti if a state defines likelihood of death more stringently than ida ds, you would say there's no federal law that would prohibit them from doing that? mr. turner: well, i would say that emtala does not contain a standard of -- justice sotomayor: so there is no -- no standard of care. inour briefing, you make the sg's position here, a y almost argue that now, that -- that their position that federal law requires stabilizing treatment and not equal eaent of patients, which was a position you took in your brief, you seem to have backed off from it here, you seemo agree that federal law requires some stabilizing conditi whether or not you provide it to other patients. but i have countless briefs that say that bh that hhs has filed -- that pre-dobbs, pre-2009, this is not an unprecedented position, aths i
i think -- justice sotomayor: all right. that -- let me stop u ere because all of your legal theories rely on us holding that federal law doesn't require -- cannot preempt state law on these issues and so, when i asked you the quti if a state defines likelihood of death more stringently than ida ds, you would say there's no federal law that would prohibit them from doing that? mr. turner: well, i would say that emtala does not contain a standard of -- justice sotomayor: so there is no -- no...
0
0.0
Apr 2, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice sotomayor: buthy not? meaning i -- i think all of the play in disagreement is around the word "ambiguity." i know that there have been some earlier cases that suggested if there were two plausible meanings, you went with the agency meaning. i think we've gone far beyond that. it has to be two reasonable meanings. assuming -- you -- you make an assumption that there is a best answer. i don't know how you can say there's a best answer when justices of this court routinely disagree and we routinely disagree at 5/4. is the best answer simply a majority answer? i don't think so. martinez: but, your honor, if -- justice sotomayor: i happen, when i dissent, think the others got it wrong. [laughter] justice sotomayor: and they often do. [laughter] justice sotomayor: but putting that aside -- but putting that aside, in those situations, there are two plausible -- not nearly plausible. there are two best answers. and the question is who makes the choice or helps you make the choice. and if the court can -- can disag
justice sotomayor: buthy not? meaning i -- i think all of the play in disagreement is around the word "ambiguity." i know that there have been some earlier cases that suggested if there were two plausible meanings, you went with the agency meaning. i think we've gone far beyond that. it has to be two reasonable meanings. assuming -- you -- you make an assumption that there is a best answer. i don't know how you can say there's a best answer when justices of this court routinely...
0
0.0
Apr 11, 2024
04/24
by
COM
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
sotomayor is 69 years old, which is, by definition, "nice." it's a little ironic that democrats are trying to push her out at the exact same time they are trying to elect a president who can tuck his testicles into his sock. but on the other hand, it's just smart politics. and i know people are saying this isn't fair to sotomayor, but have a bit of perspective. it's not like they're gonna melt her down to make the new justice. she gets to retire! she's gonna make money! she's gonna sit by the pool. she won't have to spend her days pretending to like her coworkers anymore, she can spend them pretending to like her family. and i don't care if she retires or not. i just hate that we have to go through this every few years. and like everything else in america, this is the founding fathers' fault. they decided for some reason that the supreme court justices get lifetime appointments, and now they're basically the forever chemicals of democracy. it's not great for the rest of the country, and it's certainly [cheers and applause] yeah. it's not great
sotomayor is 69 years old, which is, by definition, "nice." it's a little ironic that democrats are trying to push her out at the exact same time they are trying to elect a president who can tuck his testicles into his sock. but on the other hand, it's just smart politics. and i know people are saying this isn't fair to sotomayor, but have a bit of perspective. it's not like they're gonna melt her down to make the new justice. she gets to retire! she's gonna make money! she's gonna...
0
0.0
Apr 19, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
here, respondent -- justice sotomayor: and what -- mr. cole: the threat implicit and explicit, my friend agree they can be implicit and exquisite, of course of -- implicit and exquisite, of course, of government action, that is coercion. and here she exquisitely threatened that to lloyd's, she says "i will go easy on you if you cut ties on the nra," same as i will go hard on you if you don't cut ties to the nra. she invoked her authority to punish organizations, financial institutions, with respect to failure to manage reputational risk, and made it clear that what she meant by "manage reputational risk" was cut your ties with the nra. and then she very shortly thereafter announced these consent orders with three of the nra's principal insurance providers in which she not only punishes them for insurance infractions, but imposes an extraordinary ban, a lifetime ban in perpetuity. these organizations can never provide affinity insurance to the nra even if every t's crossed and every i is dotted under new york law. with respect to chubb, on
here, respondent -- justice sotomayor: and what -- mr. cole: the threat implicit and explicit, my friend agree they can be implicit and exquisite, of course of -- implicit and exquisite, of course, of government action, that is coercion. and here she exquisitely threatened that to lloyd's, she says "i will go easy on you if you cut ties on the nra," same as i will go hard on you if you don't cut ties to the nra. she invoked her authority to punish organizations, financial...
0
0.0
Apr 9, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
sotomayor is fine, obviously she is great mentally ane is fine physically. oliver wendell homies was on the court until he was 90. >> laura: how about thurgood marshall. >> i can only imagine what sotomayor is thinking gee, i just think. >> laura: she is 69. i think it's ageism, jonathan. my goodness. i don't think these people actually understand how they sound and the arguments they are making given what is happening on their side of the political aisle. it's just absurd. i never thought i would stick up for justice sotomayor but i'm sticking up for her because i don't think it's fair. jonathan, thank you. the fbi arresting an 8-year-old from idaho this weekend in what they are describing as a truly horrific and violent plot to attack churches. on behalf of isis. joining me now with all the details, fox news senior national correspondent kevin corke. kevin, what can you tell us. >> incredible story, frankly, laura. 18-year-old by the name of scott mercurio 20 years in prison allegedly pledging allegiance to isis and intent to commit acts of terror on the g
sotomayor is fine, obviously she is great mentally ane is fine physically. oliver wendell homies was on the court until he was 90. >> laura: how about thurgood marshall. >> i can only imagine what sotomayor is thinking gee, i just think. >> laura: she is 69. i think it's ageism, jonathan. my goodness. i don't think these people actually understand how they sound and the arguments they are making given what is happening on their side of the political aisle. it's just absurd. i...
0
0.0
Apr 10, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but i never thought i would stick up for justice sotomayor but i'm sticking up for her because i don't think that is fair. china come good to see a puritan fbi arresting an 8-year-old from fbi and truly describing horrific and violent plot to attack churches on behalf of isis. joining me with the details fox news senior correspondent kevin corke ma what can you tel. usyou ? an incredible frankly, laura alexander scott facing 20 years in prison for allegedly pledging allegiance to isis spirit and intent to commit acts of terror on the group's behalfy attacking people and coeur d'alene, idaho, texas.atio this is an investigation by the fbi joint terrorism tax force j.t. tf here in and arrested saturday just a day before he allegedly planned to attack a local church. according to court documents, those plans included attacking his father, stealing his guns, and then carrying out a suicide attack on churches quarreling. the feds allege his plans involve using a flame sword, explosives, knives, and machete, a pipe, ultimately firearms. the feds began looking into the 18-year-old after alleg
but i never thought i would stick up for justice sotomayor but i'm sticking up for her because i don't think that is fair. china come good to see a puritan fbi arresting an 8-year-old from fbi and truly describing horrific and violent plot to attack churches on behalf of isis. joining me with the details fox news senior correspondent kevin corke ma what can you tel. usyou ? an incredible frankly, laura alexander scott facing 20 years in prison for allegedly pledging allegiance to isis spirit...
0
0.0
Apr 12, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so just so you know here, sotomayor is 69 years old. and richard blumenthal from connecticut is saying we need to learn a lesson. he is 78. the president is 81. obama tried to get ruth bader ginsberg to retire. she lived another seven years and said go pound sad in mer way. the average age of congress 57.9 years in the house. senate 64 years. what's going on here? >> there is a little panic about the fall and democrats wondering whether they'll both hold the senate and the white house. justice sotomayor i saw her in arguments seemed to me like she always does. fully engaged. she is diabetic. she took precautions. but she doesn't seem to be losing a step at all when it comes to doing her job. i would imagine privately she is looking at the birthdays of some of her critics saying you first. you have me beat by ten plus years. no indications she is going anywhere. a number of democrats also saying it is insulting. leave her alone. don't pressure her. this is a lifetime appointment. when you pressure people is when they dig in their heels.
so just so you know here, sotomayor is 69 years old. and richard blumenthal from connecticut is saying we need to learn a lesson. he is 78. the president is 81. obama tried to get ruth bader ginsberg to retire. she lived another seven years and said go pound sad in mer way. the average age of congress 57.9 years in the house. senate 64 years. what's going on here? >> there is a little panic about the fall and democrats wondering whether they'll both hold the senate and the white house....
0
0.0
Apr 4, 2024
04/24
by
KDTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
sotomayor es la de mayor edad en su partido en la corte suprema, tiene 78 aÑos. la faa estÁ investigando el incidente en que un aviÓn de sowwest casi choca, debido al mal tiempo, y debido al mal tiempo, se desviÓ de su ruta cuando se aproximaba, y habrÍa sobrevolado la torre de control, casi rozÁndola, increÍble. borja: tremendo susto. cambiamos el tema, son supuestamente mÁs de tres cientos casos de abuso sexual, en illinois, uno abogados que representan a las antiguas pacientes del ginecÓlogo obstetra fabio ortega, lo estÁn demandando por presunto abuso sexual. ahora, le piden a las autoridades estatales que lo investiguen penalmente, asÍ como a los sistemas de salud en los que trabajo. esto coincide con los primeros testimonios pÚblicos de sus vÍctimas, una de ellas es ericka matos, aquÍ su sentir. >> yo tengo mucho coraje, porque ¿por quÉ me arruinÓ mi vida? cuando tÚ estÁ siendo usada, tÚ no sabes, tÚ te confundes, no sabes si decir o no decir, si te van a juzgar que estÁs loca, site van a creer o no te van a creer yo pido justicia para
sotomayor es la de mayor edad en su partido en la corte suprema, tiene 78 aÑos. la faa estÁ investigando el incidente en que un aviÓn de sowwest casi choca, debido al mal tiempo, y debido al mal tiempo, se desviÓ de su ruta cuando se aproximaba, y habrÍa sobrevolado la torre de control, casi rozÁndola, increÍble. borja: tremendo susto. cambiamos el tema, son supuestamente mÁs de tres cientos casos de abuso sexual, en illinois, uno abogados que representan a las antiguas pacientes del...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that lack of a clear standard is exactly what both justice sonia sotomayor and amy coney barrett tried to wrestle out of the attorney representing idaho today. listen. >> this particular patient had to deliver her baby. the baby died. she had a hysterectomy, and she can no longer have children. all right. you're telling me the doctor couldn't have done the abortion earlier? >> again, it goes back to whether a doctor can in good faith medical judgment -- >> that's a lot for the doctor to risk. >> it is very case by case. >> that's the problem. >> i'm kind of shocked, actually, because i thought your own expert had said below that these kinds of cases were covered, and you're now saying they're not? >> no, i'm not saying that. that's just my point, your honor. >> you're hedging. justice sotomayor is asking whether this would be covered or not, and it's my understanding that the legislature's witnesses said those would be covered. >> those doctors said if they were exercising medical judgment they could in good faith determine that life saving care was necessary, and that's my point is it
that lack of a clear standard is exactly what both justice sonia sotomayor and amy coney barrett tried to wrestle out of the attorney representing idaho today. listen. >> this particular patient had to deliver her baby. the baby died. she had a hysterectomy, and she can no longer have children. all right. you're telling me the doctor couldn't have done the abortion earlier? >> again, it goes back to whether a doctor can in good faith medical judgment -- >> that's a lot for the...
0
0.0
Apr 19, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
when you have those things together -- justice sotomayor: i can check the record. ok. mr. katyal: our position is the short -- is the court should look at both of these. all of the different conduct together. we think anyone individually does not add up to something coercive and together they did not add up to something coercive. the other point i would like to make, and this goes back to justice alito, dear points about the standard at the pleading stage. it is relevant to note there were two alternative explanations for what was going on with these big behemoth companies. one was they were conspiring and illegally agreeing to divvy up the market. the other is they made individual determinations to do that. >> you are right. it says you have to look at the whole of the allegations to determine whether it is plausible or not. here, doesn't that mean we have to look at all the allegations and complaints? mr. katyal: correct. the one we have not talked about is this reputational risk, these industry guidance letters. we think the industry guidance letters are so far removed
when you have those things together -- justice sotomayor: i can check the record. ok. mr. katyal: our position is the short -- is the court should look at both of these. all of the different conduct together. we think anyone individually does not add up to something coercive and together they did not add up to something coercive. the other point i would like to make, and this goes back to justice alito, dear points about the standard at the pleading stage. it is relevant to note there were two...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
KGO
quote
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
justice sonia sotomayor pressing trump's lawyer on where his argument could lead. >> there are some things that are so fundamentally evil, that they have to be protected against. if the president decides that his rival is a corrupt person and he orders the military, or orders someone to assassinate him, is that within his official acts for which he can get immunity? >> it would depend on the hypothetical. we could see that could well be an official act. >> it could and why? because he's doing it for personal reasons. >> reporter: justice elena kagan pointed to history. >> the framers did not put an immunity clause into the constitution. wasn't the whole point that the president was not a monarch, and the president was not supposed to be above the law? >> reporter: and justice ketanji brown jackson asked if there is no accountability, what would stop a president from "turning the oval office into the seat of criminal activity in this country." >> if the potential for criminal liability is taken off the table, wouldn't there be a significant risk that future presidents would be emboldened to
justice sonia sotomayor pressing trump's lawyer on where his argument could lead. >> there are some things that are so fundamentally evil, that they have to be protected against. if the president decides that his rival is a corrupt person and he orders the military, or orders someone to assassinate him, is that within his official acts for which he can get immunity? >> it would depend on the hypothetical. we could see that could well be an official act. >> it could and why?...
0
0.0
Apr 13, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so lulu should justice sotomayor resigned before the election? >> absolutely not. i mean, she's the first latina justice. first of all, so i think that would be an awful enter her legacy and the second thing i would say is, i don't know, 70 is the new 50. i mean, why are we trying to push these people out and what is the next step we're going to put them in when they're 30 he's so that they can be there for 50 years. i mean, i just find this if you want term limits than enact term limits, but trying to push out the justices early because of this whole race to get younger and younger i think is not the elliana progressives. and this is i'm not arguing for or against it. i'just stating their argume, progressivesave two things gng for theri nohey have joe biden and the whe ho and they have democratic control othe senate. now, eitr or both of thosthings could change in november after that, does a eater chanceither if something we to happen, just sonia sotomayor that the or you' a conseative, so the ur y'd likehat.ut can y undetand the argument? yes. yes. underand thr a
so lulu should justice sotomayor resigned before the election? >> absolutely not. i mean, she's the first latina justice. first of all, so i think that would be an awful enter her legacy and the second thing i would say is, i don't know, 70 is the new 50. i mean, why are we trying to push these people out and what is the next step we're going to put them in when they're 30 he's so that they can be there for 50 years. i mean, i just find this if you want term limits than enact term limits,...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> it is, justice sotomayor and i also think that there are additional checks in the system. of course the constitutional framers designed a separated powered system in order to limit abuses. i think one of the ways in which abuses are limited is accountability under the criminal law for criminal violations. the ultimate check is the goodwill and faith in democracy. and crimes that are alleged in this case that are the ant -- >> encouragement to believe words somewhat put into suspicion here that no man is above the law, either in his official or private acts. >> i think that is an assumption of the constitution. >> justice kagan. >> i want to go through your framework and make sure i understand it. first on the small category of things that you say have absolute protection that they are core executive functions, what are those small categories? >> pardon power, veto, foreign recognition, appointments, congress cannot say you can't appoint a federal judge who hasn't received a certain diploma or hasn't achieved a certain age. there are a few other powers. >> commander-in-chie
>> it is, justice sotomayor and i also think that there are additional checks in the system. of course the constitutional framers designed a separated powered system in order to limit abuses. i think one of the ways in which abuses are limited is accountability under the criminal law for criminal violations. the ultimate check is the goodwill and faith in democracy. and crimes that are alleged in this case that are the ant -- >> encouragement to believe words somewhat put into...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice sotomayor said the difference is what donald trump did is for personal gain. >> yeah. >> what the other presidents did was to lead the country. unfortunately that distinction got no traction during this argument. perhaps it will but that which could have been a bright line could have been today. >> chay, we try to think about who we go to. sometimes we talk about who we think of as sources, meaning not the expert but involved, when we talk about cases we go to all lawyers to teach us about the law. you are here sir because it doesn't looked like having watched the argument which joyce and i said was far more meager in dealing with the actual coup and threats to the country than one might have thought especially to the lower court, you're here because i'm not sure we can understand this without understanding the politics of the justices. people who have to practice before the court almost can't say it out loud. you can't be a member of the supreme court bar and say they do anything other than follow the law, chay. you're here because i wonder if there's politics at play. >> i t
justice sotomayor said the difference is what donald trump did is for personal gain. >> yeah. >> what the other presidents did was to lead the country. unfortunately that distinction got no traction during this argument. perhaps it will but that which could have been a bright line could have been today. >> chay, we try to think about who we go to. sometimes we talk about who we think of as sources, meaning not the expert but involved, when we talk about cases we go to all...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
so if you add those to the sotomayor, kgan and jackson, you come up with five which is sufficient to rule in favor of the united states here. and so won't things that i thought that justice barrett was particularly pointed at was really pushing the lawyer for the state of idaho about the daylight that exists between idaho law and federal law. and as you heard there, the difference really is this idea between health risk and a death risk. and that they would have to wait until a person's situation deteriorated so much that they were on death's door before an abortion could be performed. and that is just not tenable. the whole idea of federalism and the supremacy clause is that federal law can preempt state law under certain circumstances. and so even though justice alito did push the idea of state's rights and returning abortion decisions for the states, they can't do it if it conflicts with a federal law and emerging merely treatment and labor act says it is part of the bargain for receiving medical care funds, hospitals have to agree to comply with those rules. and those include pro
so if you add those to the sotomayor, kgan and jackson, you come up with five which is sufficient to rule in favor of the united states here. and so won't things that i thought that justice barrett was particularly pointed at was really pushing the lawyer for the state of idaho about the daylight that exists between idaho law and federal law. and as you heard there, the difference really is this idea between health risk and a death risk. and that they would have to wait until a person's...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and that's after justice sotomayor decided she just was sort of done. it was clear. she's frustrated. i look, this is turner's first time arguing in front of the justices, and i think it's it's showing especially for example and what we're justice sotomayor, she has diabetes and she shared a hypothetical about someone with diabetes, the type of care that they could be prevented from receiving she gave a hypothetical and he he had a moment there. we could have maybe acknowledged the humanity there. so maybe he just moved on to his legal arguments. so that was not wanting him any friends with the liberal bloc. but one of the things that we weren't able we'll do here on air, but our colleagues are following this. i'm gonna read it. >> it's the questioning from justice amy coney barrett, and it's interesting because she pushed the idaho attorney joshua turner over when doctors could be criminally prosecuted for performing an abortion under state law. >> and she's making an interesting point here, because really it was the liberals who dominated most of turner's arguments
and that's after justice sotomayor decided she just was sort of done. it was clear. she's frustrated. i look, this is turner's first time arguing in front of the justices, and i think it's it's showing especially for example and what we're justice sotomayor, she has diabetes and she shared a hypothetical about someone with diabetes, the type of care that they could be prevented from receiving she gave a hypothetical and he he had a moment there. we could have maybe acknowledged the humanity...
0
0.0
Apr 5, 2024
04/24
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that's regardless of whether it's sotomayor or any other justice on the bench. >> but sources close to her say she has no plans to step down. >> what choice do you have? >> but to fight the good fight. you can't throw up your hands and walk away. >> age matters but only to some, it seems. senator blumenthal has endorsed biden. the median average is 65 years old and supreme court justices 63 years old. >> thank you. the labor department says the economy added 303,000 jobs in march. it was march above the 200,000 that had been forecast. the unemployment rate dipped from 3.9% to 3.8. some analysts suggest that strong numbers could potentially delay federal reserve interest rate cuts expected this year. today the jobs report sent stocks up. the dow gained 307. the s&p 500 rose 57. the nasdaq jumped 199. for the week the dow lost 2.25 percentage points. the s&p 500 was down about one. nasdaq lost about .8 of a point. up next, we'll look at the best spots to view monday's total solar eclipse. here's what some of our fox affiliates are covering. in los angeles, firefighters deal with a blaze
that's regardless of whether it's sotomayor or any other justice on the bench. >> but sources close to her say she has no plans to step down. >> what choice do you have? >> but to fight the good fight. you can't throw up your hands and walk away. >> age matters but only to some, it seems. senator blumenthal has endorsed biden. the median average is 65 years old and supreme court justices 63 years old. >> thank you. the labor department says the economy added...
0
0.0
Apr 16, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
but here's an example of justice sotomayor, who said that no. otherwise should it? give a new kind of claim here? i think we have the sound from her. yeah. that's run joseph justice sotomayor >> let me give you an example >> there >> is a sign on the theater. you will be kicked out of the theater if you photograph or record the actors or otherwise disrupt the performance if you start yelling, i think no one would question that you can be expected to be kicked out under this policy even though yelling has nothing to do with photograph, we're recording but actually jake, her view was the minority most of the justices, the conservative justices felt like there had to be a linkage that you had to have if you use justice sotomayor's example, you had to have some server in this what the conservative justices were saying that if anybody is going to be charged under this law. it would have to involve some sort of evidence as in the first part of that statute. now, let's listen to brett kavanaugh, who spoke in a way that i think captures what allowed the conservatives felt a
but here's an example of justice sotomayor, who said that no. otherwise should it? give a new kind of claim here? i think we have the sound from her. yeah. that's run joseph justice sotomayor >> let me give you an example >> there >> is a sign on the theater. you will be kicked out of the theater if you photograph or record the actors or otherwise disrupt the performance if you start yelling, i think no one would question that you can be expected to be kicked out under this...
0
0.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the thing is, there have been all of these calls for justice sotomayor to step down. i give president biden an opportunity to appoint someone to the court. what we are hearing this week is it's not as simple as it seems. >> anyone who listened to the supreme court trier -- trial and listen to justice sotomayor, this is a woman that need to be on the court. her intelligence and questioning on the way she walked us what immunity through the president would mean, we are proud of her and we need her voice and she drove the conversation. i think we are proud of the work she is doing. >> and stop telling latinos what to do. >> you are not allowed to leave. congressman. thank you for being with us. >>> we have more ahead. this is "the weekend" right here on msnbc. bombas makes absurdly comfortable underwear. made to move with you, not on you. because your basic things should be your best things. one purchased equals one donated. visit bombas.com and get 20% off your first order. [cars honking] i'm a guy who lost a bet. and my dignity. get out of the way! as if watching my te
the thing is, there have been all of these calls for justice sotomayor to step down. i give president biden an opportunity to appoint someone to the court. what we are hearing this week is it's not as simple as it seems. >> anyone who listened to the supreme court trier -- trial and listen to justice sotomayor, this is a woman that need to be on the court. her intelligence and questioning on the way she walked us what immunity through the president would mean, we are proud of her and we...
0
0.0
Apr 3, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >>> coming up, justice sonja sotomayor, why some want her to step down when we come back. so step down when we come back. co to college football last year, the game rivaled only by the sec championship game and the college football playoff matchup between michigan and ohio state. only one men's ncaa tournament game this year had a bigger viewership. iowa now faces uconn this friday in the final four. joe, that game delivered on every front. great teams, great talent on the floor and it turns out the country was glued. >> i mean, unbelievable. again, you look at the quality of basketball that was played, it was so exciting, and, yeah, of course she's just -- >> phenomenal. >> she is -- you know, there is a reason she passed pete maravich who is just one of the greatest of all time in total points scored. but, willie, this was such a great matchup in so many ways, there's so many plot lines. it's so great for women's basketball, which has been the butt of jokes, family guy and so many men sports writers in the past. i say no more. this is extraordinary athleticism and i just
. >>> coming up, justice sonja sotomayor, why some want her to step down when we come back. so step down when we come back. co to college football last year, the game rivaled only by the sec championship game and the college football playoff matchup between michigan and ohio state. only one men's ncaa tournament game this year had a bigger viewership. iowa now faces uconn this friday in the final four. joe, that game delivered on every front. great teams, great talent on the floor and...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice sotomayor described a real-life case of a woman in florida who was 16 weeks pregnant when she went to the er and felt water leave her body. that is a premature rupture which puts you at risk for serious uncontrolled infection. she was refused treatment because the fetus which would not survive was still alive and eventually the woman bled out and was given an abortion. these were the cases the justices were bringing up. the justices were focused on the harm and permanent harm, loss of fertility that women face with pregnancy. at one point it was surprising. justice amy coney barrett who is a staunch opponent of abortion rights was taken aback by what she was hearing happening at hospitals in iowa -- idaho and elsewhere. >> i'm kind of shocked actually because i thought your own expert had said below that these kinds of cases were covered. and you're now saying they're not? >> no, i'm not saying that. that's just my point, your honor, is that -- >> well, you're hedging. i mean, justice sotomayor is asking you would this be covered or not, and it was my understanding that the le
justice sotomayor described a real-life case of a woman in florida who was 16 weeks pregnant when she went to the er and felt water leave her body. that is a premature rupture which puts you at risk for serious uncontrolled infection. she was refused treatment because the fetus which would not survive was still alive and eventually the woman bled out and was given an abortion. these were the cases the justices were bringing up. the justices were focused on the harm and permanent harm, loss of...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
determine what is an official act, and when we're talking about the kinds of scenarios that justice sotomayor brought up, one could say that when the president is using the trappings of his office to achieve a personal gain, then he's actually not acting officially, even if the doctrine was absolute immunity. so what do you say about that? >> two things in response to that. in the last point, that allegation that this was motivated by an improper private purpose could be made in every single case. >> i understand that, but it would have to be made -- i'm just trying to assess, even if we had the doctrine of absolute immunity, that same allegation and the facts related to it would come in because the person would be arguing that he was not acting in his official capacity. he wasn't doing something official. he was doing it personal, correct? >> i agree. the object ifr -- i'm not sure i agree, but the point i would make in response to that is in fitzgerald against nixon, this court emphasized that would result in an intrusive discussion or determination of the president's personal motives for e
determine what is an official act, and when we're talking about the kinds of scenarios that justice sotomayor brought up, one could say that when the president is using the trappings of his office to achieve a personal gain, then he's actually not acting officially, even if the doctrine was absolute immunity. so what do you say about that? >> two things in response to that. in the last point, that allegation that this was motivated by an improper private purpose could be made in every...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
that was supreme court justice sotomayor at oral arguments earlier today summing up where we are not just in idaho, but as a country, as americans. the nation's highest court in the land is forced to reckon and rumble with the world donald trump created for women in this country, now, today, that's happening right now. the case before the justices today was about whether a federal law that requires hospitals to provide stabilizing health care to any patient whose life or health is in serious jeopardy covers abortion health care in states where the procedure is heavily restricted or banned. the state of idaho is suing because it wants to deny abortions to women having a medical crisis in the moment. it's a direct result of a majority in the court that included three hand-picked justices from donald trump stripping away the protections enjoyed in in country for 50 years under roe v. wade. here is justice sonia sotomayor laying out the real world situations where women in america have been denied care. >> imagine a patient who goes to the er with pprom, 14 weeks. again, abortion is the
that was supreme court justice sotomayor at oral arguments earlier today summing up where we are not just in idaho, but as a country, as americans. the nation's highest court in the land is forced to reckon and rumble with the world donald trump created for women in this country, now, today, that's happening right now. the case before the justices today was about whether a federal law that requires hospitals to provide stabilizing health care to any patient whose life or health is in serious...
0
0.0
Apr 6, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice sotomayor brought up at sea. etsy has a feed recommended for you but also has handmade goods. it looks more like a brick-and-mortar marketplace or fleamarket than a place for hosting speech. if this is a facial challenge and florida's law is broad enough to cover a lot of this conduct which is farther away from expression than the standard social media platform, why didn't you than in your brief defend it by pointing out that there is all this other stuff perfectly fine that florida covers, we don't want a person wants to sell her goods on etsy to be suppressed, because it is handmade goods that express a political view for example? >> i think we did defend the application of the law to etsy -- >> i can sit there and think of all kinds of applications of the law that would not hit expression, but i don't understand you to have been defending the law in that way as opposed to countering the argument that the platforms are not engaged in expression. >> we are making both arguments to be clear. we view etsy as not h
justice sotomayor brought up at sea. etsy has a feed recommended for you but also has handmade goods. it looks more like a brick-and-mortar marketplace or fleamarket than a place for hosting speech. if this is a facial challenge and florida's law is broad enough to cover a lot of this conduct which is farther away from expression than the standard social media platform, why didn't you than in your brief defend it by pointing out that there is all this other stuff perfectly fine that florida...
0
0.0
Apr 5, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> justice sotomayor. justice kagan? >> there seems to be a fair bit of division and confusion about what bruen means and requires in the lower courts. i'm wondering if you think there is any useful guidance in addition to resolving this case, but any useful guidance we can give to lower courts about the methodology that bruen requires being used and how that applies to cases even outside of this one. >> yes. i think there are three fundamental errors in methodology the case exemplifies and we are seeing repeated and other lower courts and this provides an opportunity for the court to clarify bruen should not be interpreted in the way the respondent is jesting -- suggesting. the first error is the respondent asserted here and other courts embrace the idea that the only thing that matters under bruen's regulation. in other words, you can't look at other sources of history that usually bear on original meaning. i don't think that can be squared with this court's precedents which consulted a wide variety of historical sourc
. >> justice sotomayor. justice kagan? >> there seems to be a fair bit of division and confusion about what bruen means and requires in the lower courts. i'm wondering if you think there is any useful guidance in addition to resolving this case, but any useful guidance we can give to lower courts about the methodology that bruen requires being used and how that applies to cases even outside of this one. >> yes. i think there are three fundamental errors in methodology the case...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice sotomayor asked exactly the same question of what happens and he said, you know, the same answer. like the president would have to be impeached and convicted first. basically, at that point, we were talking about this before. i thought this guy has made a bet. he's made a bet that if he just survives in the district court and the appellate court, he's going to be in front of a much more friendly audience and he can make that argument and they'll buy it or/or throw him a life line. justice alito says that hypothetical is complicated biez s.e.a.l. team six has to obey the law. so that was what was alarming to me, you have the highest court in the land entertaining hypotheticals and having a serious argument that really normalizes extremism. this is how extremism manifests itself in nation states, we're going to go more and more to the extreme and ordinary institutions of justice are going to accept that. >> none of us at this table believe that they believe any of these rules apply to joe biden. i'm going to hold you until we come back on the other side of the break. they're coming
justice sotomayor asked exactly the same question of what happens and he said, you know, the same answer. like the president would have to be impeached and convicted first. basically, at that point, we were talking about this before. i thought this guy has made a bet. he's made a bet that if he just survives in the district court and the appellate court, he's going to be in front of a much more friendly audience and he can make that argument and they'll buy it or/or throw him a life line....
0
0.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
justice sotomayor you heard the frustration in her voice as she engaged in the questioning. and you also heard from the conservatives maters that are competely inconsistent with the viewpoint on textualism. what's at stake is a federal law called the emergency medical treatment and labor act. very specifically 40 years ago congress anticipated that poor women, women in distress who are pregnant, deserve to be stabilized and to be able to live and otherwise they would be dumped. the point that justice sotomayor is not isn't it another version of dumping when you have to get on a helicopter and be airlifted because you will not receive care at this hospital? >> one of the things that's interesting when dobbs came down everybody in the reproductive access space i spoke to that all the colleagues spoke to they say these things were will happen they said not just the airlifting, but also that the cases would pop up. >> yes. >> the laws would be there that the court would have to reap what they sew. >> yes, the criminallation. one piece that has not been acknowledged in any of thi
justice sotomayor you heard the frustration in her voice as she engaged in the questioning. and you also heard from the conservatives maters that are competely inconsistent with the viewpoint on textualism. what's at stake is a federal law called the emergency medical treatment and labor act. very specifically 40 years ago congress anticipated that poor women, women in distress who are pregnant, deserve to be stabilized and to be able to live and otherwise they would be dumped. the point that...
0
0.0
Apr 28, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
here's an exchange between justice sonia sotomayor or and idaho were lawyer, joshua turner, and amy coney barrett. >> when idaho law changed, to make the issue whether she's going to die or not or whether she's going to have a serious medical condition, there's a bit of daylight, by your standards, correct? >> it is very case-by-case. >> i'm kind of shocked, actually, because i thought your own expert had said below that these kinds of cases were covered and you are now saying they are not? >> those doctor said if they were exercising the medical judgment, they could, in good faith, determined that life- saving care is necessary and that's my point, a -- >> some doctors couldn't. some might reach a contrary conclusion, i think is what justice sotomayor is asking you. >> justice barrett said she was shocked by turner's answer but as a laid out before the break, is it really surprising? isn't this what actavis said would happen after the overturning of roe v wade? tina yeah. >> they are saying that doctors in good faith should be covered but there are some cases were clearly, doctors practi
here's an exchange between justice sonia sotomayor or and idaho were lawyer, joshua turner, and amy coney barrett. >> when idaho law changed, to make the issue whether she's going to die or not or whether she's going to have a serious medical condition, there's a bit of daylight, by your standards, correct? >> it is very case-by-case. >> i'm kind of shocked, actually, because i thought your own expert had said below that these kinds of cases were covered and you are now saying...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
KDTV
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
que tiene inmunidad cuando era presidente, que por lo tanto, no puede ser juzgado, incluso, la jueza sotomayor preguntÓ si Él organizaba un intento de golpe de estado y sus abogados dijeron que no y que no se le podÍa juzgar, el fiscal especial, jack smith dice que esto no tiene sentido, que en este paÍs todo el mundo es igual ante la ley y que una de sus funciones es intentarÁ revertir el resultado de las elecciones, ¿quÉ puede pasar?, la corte suprema puede tomar el caso o de volverlo a la corte de apelaciones. carolina: seguimos pendientes. un dÍa muy ocupado para el expresidente y para su equipo legal. aileen: una familia hispana de texas estÁ reviviendo la dolorosa muerte de arlene Álvarez, una niÑa de 9 aÑos que fue asesinada a tiros en 2022, despuÉs de dos aÑos, la fiscalÍa acusÓ oficialmente de asesinato a tony junior de 33 aÑos. carolina: este caso estuvo en la "ediciÓn digital" cuando ocurriÓ y conmoviÓ a toda nuestra comunidad, el dÍa del incidente el agresor fue asaltado y disparÓ contra el ladrÓn que huÍa de Él, una de esas balas matÓ a la niÑa en pantal
que tiene inmunidad cuando era presidente, que por lo tanto, no puede ser juzgado, incluso, la jueza sotomayor preguntÓ si Él organizaba un intento de golpe de estado y sus abogados dijeron que no y que no se le podÍa juzgar, el fiscal especial, jack smith dice que esto no tiene sentido, que en este paÍs todo el mundo es igual ante la ley y que una de sus funciones es intentarÁ revertir el resultado de las elecciones, ¿quÉ puede pasar?, la corte suprema puede tomar el caso o de volverlo...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
you had justice sonia sotomayor asking the attorney for the state of idaho, what do you make of those situations? how does that fall into this law that is supposed to have an exception for the life of the mother? >> idaho's attorney general said the state does allow exceptions for lifesaving abortion. what exactly is the biden administration suing on here? >> the difference that everyone was talking about today is between an exception for the life of the mother and exception for the health of the mother. those are two very different things when it comes to the hospital and the decision doctors have to make. there our letter pregnancy complications that fall in a gray area. they know that if a woman's water breaks early, she will be exposed to increased risk of hemorrhage, sepsis. maybe that is not quite qualify for her life being at risk but certainly her health is at risk. these doctors are in emergency rooms trying to wrestle with how sick the someone have to be to qualify under this ban? that is the issue here. the biden administration is arguing any a woman's health is at risk tha
you had justice sonia sotomayor asking the attorney for the state of idaho, what do you make of those situations? how does that fall into this law that is supposed to have an exception for the life of the mother? >> idaho's attorney general said the state does allow exceptions for lifesaving abortion. what exactly is the biden administration suing on here? >> the difference that everyone was talking about today is between an exception for the life of the mother and exception for the...
0
0.0
Apr 23, 2024
04/24
by
KSTS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> en la audiencia, la magistrada sonia sotomayor cuestiono cual es el objetivo objetivo de esta ley. >> ¿donde los colocamos? >> en cada ciudad, cada pueblo, cada ciudad, no tiene every town lacks compassion and passes a law identical to this. >> where are they supposed to this. >> ¿donde se supone que duermen? >> normalmente pensamos think about whether state law que duermen? >> de usually state law, local law already achieves those purposes so that the federal courts aren't micromanaging homeless de 650 mil personas en indigencia en todo el el pais. >> california destaca con 181 las calles mas personas viven sin refugio, segun el departamento de vivienda. >> es triste verlos ahi, pero igual es un peligro tambien, como para los ninos que van a la escuela escuela temprano. >> la verdad es que esta ropa organizaciones que ayudan a los desamparados insisten que no se debe criminalizar a la gente que duerme al intemperie, pero si poner orden. >> porque hay campamentos que estan escondidos en la ciudad y ahi mueren las personas, ahi pasan sobredosis, ahi hay personas que abusan. >> co
. >> en la audiencia, la magistrada sonia sotomayor cuestiono cual es el objetivo objetivo de esta ley. >> ¿donde los colocamos? >> en cada ciudad, cada pueblo, cada ciudad, no tiene every town lacks compassion and passes a law identical to this. >> where are they supposed to this. >> ¿donde se supone que duermen? >> normalmente pensamos think about whether state law que duermen? >> de usually state law, local law already achieves those purposes so...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> some doctors reach a contrary conclusion is what sotomayor is asking you. if they reach the conclusion that the legislature's doctors did, would they berocuted under idaho law? >> no. if they reached the conclusion that dr. reynolds and dr. white did >> whatf the prosecutor thought differently thinking that no good faith doctor could draw that conclusion? >> that is the nature of prosecorl discretion and it may result in a case. >> has put out any kind of guidance? hhs puts out guidance about what is covered b law and what is not. do idaho? >> there are regatns. i think that the guiding star is a lon detailed treatment by the idaho supreme court of taw. it made clear, the court made clear there is no medical certainty requirement. you don't have to wait for the mother to be facing death. >> thank you, counsel. wh happens if a dispute arises with respect to whether or not the doctoras within the confines of idaho law or wasn't? is the doctor subjected to review by a medical authority? exactly how is that evaluated it is an obvious con if you have an individu
. >> some doctors reach a contrary conclusion is what sotomayor is asking you. if they reach the conclusion that the legislature's doctors did, would they berocuted under idaho law? >> no. if they reached the conclusion that dr. reynolds and dr. white did >> whatf the prosecutor thought differently thinking that no good faith doctor could draw that conclusion? >> that is the nature of prosecorl discretion and it may result in a case. >> has put out any kind of...
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the justices really, ketanji brown jackson, elena kagan, justice sotomayor, they're also pushing the lawyer for idaho on this issue saying aren't there cases where a woman's health needs to be treated where she's not at death's door? and a number of times they pointed out what about when a woman might lose her reproductive organs, the lawyer at idaho saying there isn't a case where your health is at risk but your life isn't at risk. but i talked to some doctors who say that's definitely the case. you have a case where women may have to have hysterectomies, fallopian tubes removed, but may not be at death's door. there is a real issue there. i also know just in the last few seconds, listening to justice alito, a conservative justice, he was really pressuring on this idea of whether or not this idaho law conflicts with federal law and he was in some ways leaning toward dealing with idaho law as being the superseding here. just listening to these arguments, it sounds as though the court is leaning toward saying this federal law, that it supersedes idaho law. this is a court, you can't p
the justices really, ketanji brown jackson, elena kagan, justice sotomayor, they're also pushing the lawyer for idaho on this issue saying aren't there cases where a woman's health needs to be treated where she's not at death's door? and a number of times they pointed out what about when a woman might lose her reproductive organs, the lawyer at idaho saying there isn't a case where your health is at risk but your life isn't at risk. but i talked to some doctors who say that's definitely the...
0
0.0
Apr 18, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
we think that sotomayor's statement is actually going to make it impossible to enforce what the circuit did. we also felt confident that we're going to actually win my case when we actually go to court, and that people should not be nervous to protested these three states. the aclu has said that they will represent people if somebody, if another officer does try to invoke the fifth circuit decision, but we are thankful that sotomayor's note actually does sort of make it really hard to apply it. we wish that it had been a more forceful, like -- >> i mean, the court should have stepped in and been like this is wildly out of line -- >> five times. this is a wild case. >> is a wild case, and, i mean, eight years on the notion in the face of all president and all logic about the first amendment, and, and, and the importance of civil disobedience and protest in this country's history, to create this liability standard is just, i mean, the implications of it are bizarre. >> and to get caught up, you know, i think though that the aclu supported me, david goldberg, billy, all the lawyers have be
we think that sotomayor's statement is actually going to make it impossible to enforce what the circuit did. we also felt confident that we're going to actually win my case when we actually go to court, and that people should not be nervous to protested these three states. the aclu has said that they will represent people if somebody, if another officer does try to invoke the fifth circuit decision, but we are thankful that sotomayor's note actually does sort of make it really hard to apply it....
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
KQED
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and then this from justice sonia sotomayor. >>>> we would be creating, a situation in which we would be saying this is what you are asking us to say. which is that a president is entitled, not to make a mistake, but more than that. a president is entitled for total personal gain to use the trappings of his office. that is what you are trying to get us to hold. without facing criminal liability. christian: the attorney for special counsel jack smith who is prosecuting the attempt to overturn the election, pushed back against claims that donald trump's efforts amounted to access president. . the chief justice did push back on him, reminding the special counsel how easy it is for a prosecutor to get a grand jury to bring an indictment, relying on the good faith of the prosecutor may not be enough, in some cases. we will talk about events in new york. our correspondent will bring us up to date on the hush money case, and the evidence we have been hearing today. let's focus on the supreme court. gary o'donoghue has been carrying that angle for us. as we have st out, the justices appeared
and then this from justice sonia sotomayor. >>>> we would be creating, a situation in which we would be saying this is what you are asking us to say. which is that a president is entitled, not to make a mistake, but more than that. a president is entitled for total personal gain to use the trappings of his office. that is what you are trying to get us to hold. without facing criminal liability. christian: the attorney for special counsel jack smith who is prosecuting the attempt to...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
KSTS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> y un comentario clave de sonia sotomayor que dijo hasta ahora hemos confiado en una democracia que funciona en que los funcionarios y los oficiales de la democracia de este pais han actuado pensando mas en el pais que en ellos mismos. >> ella claramente se estaba estaba refiriendo a donald trump, que era el ataque que le tenia que dejar. >> para cerrar, para cerrar, ¿hacia donde crees tu que se va a inclinar la corte y tambien un elemento central, y que no se hablo ahi, es cuando dar a conocer esta decision. >> ese es el elefante en el cuarto, que necesitamos que la tomen rapidamente, estamos en temporada electoral esa decision define los otros juicios de trump, entonces se necesita con urgencia, numero uno. >> ¿con que me quedo? >> van a tener que definir la inmunidad total hasta donde llega, que es un acto oficial y que es una diferencia y tambien las motivaciones de un presidente en funciones que tambien es ademas un candidato, cuando esta actuando como candidato, cuando esta actuando como presidente y como deciamos al principio, cualquier decision no es solamente para nosotro
. >> y un comentario clave de sonia sotomayor que dijo hasta ahora hemos confiado en una democracia que funciona en que los funcionarios y los oficiales de la democracia de este pais han actuado pensando mas en el pais que en ellos mismos. >> ella claramente se estaba estaba refiriendo a donald trump, que era el ataque que le tenia que dejar. >> para cerrar, para cerrar, ¿hacia donde crees tu que se va a inclinar la corte y tambien un elemento central, y que no se hablo ahi,...
0
0.0
Apr 3, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> thank you justice sotomayor. a partnership is a fundamentally different form of ownership center corporation. the law has always recognized a corporation is a person separate from the shareholders in that corporation and there is not a separate personhood that applies to partnerships. the partnerships are group of people that come together to undertake a business activity and when they do so the income is there income directly. >> what do you do with the ways in which we have attributed corporate income to individuals? you don't challenge the constitutionality. >> that is not an issue in this case. >> in your brief you don't appear to be challenging it. >> we think a of follows the commonly accepted method congress has used to address changes when a taxpayer has interposed a corporate structure between themselves and income. >> that is the entire purpose of a corporate structure. people do that all the time particularly for that purpose. you don't incorporate unless you want the corporate shield. you don't incorp
. >> thank you justice sotomayor. a partnership is a fundamentally different form of ownership center corporation. the law has always recognized a corporation is a person separate from the shareholders in that corporation and there is not a separate personhood that applies to partnerships. the partnerships are group of people that come together to undertake a business activity and when they do so the income is there income directly. >> what do you do with the ways in which we have...
0
0.0
Apr 17, 2024
04/24
by
KSTS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
los magistrados más liberales como sonia sotomayor dieron señales de apoyar al gobierno. the fact that you've abstricted isn't that the structure of this provision. el caso podría también impactar a donald trump, quien enfrenta también cargos de obstrucción. la corte podría fallar sobre el caso en junio de este año. se trata de una de varias decisiones de alto perfil que emitirá la corte suprema a escasos meses de la elección en noviembre en washington, randy serrano, telemundo. gracias randy. de regreso con información local hoy martes nuevas manifestaciones en contra de la guerra en gaza se reportaron aquí en el área de la bahía en esta oportunidad todo ocurrió en las instalaciones de google en sunnyvale, donde con pancartas en mano, un grupo de trabajadores del gigante de la tecnología manifestó su apoyo a palestina y su descontento contra los ataques en gaza. pidieron un alto al fuego las manifestaciones han sido similares también en otras sedes de google y el departamento de justicia de estados unidos tiene previsto presentar una demanda contra live n
los magistrados más liberales como sonia sotomayor dieron señales de apoyar al gobierno. the fact that you've abstricted isn't that the structure of this provision. el caso podría también impactar a donald trump, quien enfrenta también cargos de obstrucción. la corte podría fallar sobre el caso en junio de este año. se trata de una de varias decisiones de alto perfil que emitirá la corte suprema a escasos meses de la elección en noviembre en washington, randy serrano, telemundo....
0
0.0
Apr 22, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i'm asll of this because in response to justice sotomayor, you were pointing out that we have history and tradition of not saying you can unt homeless people or the poor out of your jurisdiction and on to others. so, or out of your community and on to others i think how you phrase it. so i'm askw do we know whatse lines are and you're saying it doesn't have to be jurisdictions. >> no, i think jurisdictions matters cae that tells us the lines in which whatever ordinance or statute applies. when shelter is availab, the ordinance are e psible because nay punish the conduct of not goi t shelters. for the reasons that you say, a lot of municipalits not allow people from outside of the jurisdicti tuse their shelters. >> is that cruel and unusual punishment? >> no, that wouldn't be punishment. is t iliction of suffering for a crime. we have a stus based punishment scheme that is inflicting punishment within the meaning of the ehtmendment. >> counsel -- i'm sorry, chief nishnt. >> no, i'm good. >> do you want to address so of the line drawing problems? justice go pointing out eating is a basi
i'm asll of this because in response to justice sotomayor, you were pointing out that we have history and tradition of not saying you can unt homeless people or the poor out of your jurisdiction and on to others. so, or out of your community and on to others i think how you phrase it. so i'm askw do we know whatse lines are and you're saying it doesn't have to be jurisdictions. >> no, i think jurisdictions matters cae that tells us the lines in which whatever ordinance or statute applies....
0
0.0
Apr 24, 2024
04/24
by
KSTS
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> y las voces que mas se escucharon fueron las de las magistradas liberales, sonia sotomayor, elena aca digan que tangy brown jackson, que fuera quienes practicamente dominaron el debate con duros cuestionamientos al abogado representante del estado de idaho, pero incluso la magistrada conservadora amy coney barrett tambien mostro frustracion por algunas de las respuestas de este abogado. >> por parte de la administracion biden estuvo ahi la procuradora general quien dijo que esta prohibicion en aida pone en una situacion practicamente imposible a los medicos y a las mujeres de ese estado, una postura que tambien escuchamos aqui afuera del m maximo tribunal donde en algun momento llego a haber mas de 100 manifestantes que intercambiaron tambien opiniones, puntos de vista de manera apasionada sin que pasara a mayores, por s supuesto, la presencia tambien de la policia. >> pareciera que la corte parece estar dividida en lineas ideologicas veremos que es lo que ocurre, habra que esperar al termino de la sesion de la corte, que esto es a finales de junio, inicios de julio, tipicamente,
. >> y las voces que mas se escucharon fueron las de las magistradas liberales, sonia sotomayor, elena aca digan que tangy brown jackson, que fuera quienes practicamente dominaron el debate con duros cuestionamientos al abogado representante del estado de idaho, pero incluso la magistrada conservadora amy coney barrett tambien mostro frustracion por algunas de las respuestas de este abogado. >> por parte de la administracion biden estuvo ahi la procuradora general quien dijo que...