0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
if we look at the merits of what the fda did in 2021, the fda relied on two things. they relied first on the -- >> i can understand your impulse there, and i went back and looked and there are zero universal injunctions issued during franklin roosevelt's time in office, and pretty consequential ones, and over the last year or so the number is something like 60, and maybe more than that. it's a relatively new thing, and you are asking us to extend and pursue this remedial course, and this court never adopted that itself, and lower courts run with this and i want to give you one more shot at that? >> the fda incapsulates inequitable equities, and in you have nonregulated parties, those parties could be farmers or ranchers, and their only availability for relief is if the court does something to the fda order or regulation at issue, otherwise the parties are out of luck and that's inconsistent with equity. >> may i ask you about your basic theory of standing, and just as a clarification question as much as it is anything, when you did your 1, 2, 3 in your opening statem
if we look at the merits of what the fda did in 2021, the fda relied on two things. they relied first on the -- >> i can understand your impulse there, and i went back and looked and there are zero universal injunctions issued during franklin roosevelt's time in office, and pretty consequential ones, and over the last year or so the number is something like 60, and maybe more than that. it's a relatively new thing, and you are asking us to extend and pursue this remedial course, and this...
0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
why shouldn't the fda have addressed that? >> i think the only way that that would be true would be if the three changes are interconnected and mutually reinforcing, guarding against the same kind of safety risk. so, i agree that if there were reason to think that the reason why mifepristone is safe up to ten weeks gestation is because it is being prescribed by doctors instead of nurse practitioners, for example, then those changes would be interconnected because one change would effectively by the safety net for another. there was nothing like that in this record. it demonstrated the changes, an exhaustive examination, were safe, not because there were other different safe guards in place to guard against risks, but rather because if you go up to ten weeks of gestation there is no observable increase in serious adverse events, no matter who is prescribing. in the absence of that kind of effect, it cited multiple studies that combined multiple changes because the standard of care evolved over the 15 years mifepristone had been
why shouldn't the fda have addressed that? >> i think the only way that that would be true would be if the three changes are interconnected and mutually reinforcing, guarding against the same kind of safety risk. so, i agree that if there were reason to think that the reason why mifepristone is safe up to ten weeks gestation is because it is being prescribed by doctors instead of nurse practitioners, for example, then those changes would be interconnected because one change would...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> do you think the fda is infallible? that was justice samuel alito's question today in the supreme court case that could determine the future of medication abortion and also the future of drug approval in this country. the fda after all is the federal regulatory agencies that approves new drugs in the united states, and this case calls into question whether the courts should believe the fda when it says a drug is safe. justice alito's skepticism there tells us a lot about the court's conservatives, and it suggests that they may be thinking about something much bigger than even abortion, mainly whether conservatives are going after the regulatory state on whole. right now right-wing judicial activists have brought a series of cases that threaten to upend 40 years of supreme court precedent and hobble the federal government's basic ability to enforce laws. those lawsuits are trying to limit regulators ability to enforce everything from laws on insider trading to laws that protect the food we eat and the air we breathe. bac
. >> do you think the fda is infallible? that was justice samuel alito's question today in the supreme court case that could determine the future of medication abortion and also the future of drug approval in this country. the fda after all is the federal regulatory agencies that approves new drugs in the united states, and this case calls into question whether the courts should believe the fda when it says a drug is safe. justice alito's skepticism there tells us a lot about the court's...
0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
wade was overturned and you had an one side the fda as well who was represented by the u.s. solicitor general and a lawyer for danco, the maker of mifepristone. they were arguing the fda should have the regulatory rights to continue to regulate and to have the approvals processes and approval authority over this mifepristone medication and they were arguing that the fda used science-based evidence to continue to not only approve this pill and continue to allow it to be accessible, but also to make it more accessible in recent years. they were arguing on the other side they were arguing that there were hypotheticals and all the different things pitching back against the fda authority to do what they did in recent years was really not based in actual fact. on the other side, you had antiabortion groups who -- and their lawyers arguing that the fda did -- that the fda in expanding the access to this pill, but they made women unsafe and that they did so in a way that would hurt the ability of women to get critical care. they also argued in many ways that doctors including emerge
wade was overturned and you had an one side the fda as well who was represented by the u.s. solicitor general and a lawyer for danco, the maker of mifepristone. they were arguing the fda should have the regulatory rights to continue to regulate and to have the approvals processes and approval authority over this mifepristone medication and they were arguing that the fda used science-based evidence to continue to not only approve this pill and continue to allow it to be accessible, but also to...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
by second- guessing the fda's expert judgment? >> we have had a rash of universal injunctions. this case seems like a prime example of turning what could be a small loss into a nationwide legislative assembly on an fda rule or any other federal government action. >> it makes sense for the individual doctors to seek an exemption, but as i understand it, they already have that. so what they are asking for, here, is that in order to prevent them from possibly ever having to do these kinds of procedures, everyone else should be prevented from getting access to this medication. >> the court is expected to rule on the case by the end of this term, likely late june or early july. >>> while that was going on in d.c., president biden and vice president harris were in north carolina to highlight the administration's efforts to expand access to healthcare. biden spoke out about today's supreme court hearing and called out trumped by name for his role in overturning federal abortion right. >> trump probably says "after 50 years, i was able to
by second- guessing the fda's expert judgment? >> we have had a rash of universal injunctions. this case seems like a prime example of turning what could be a small loss into a nationwide legislative assembly on an fda rule or any other federal government action. >> it makes sense for the individual doctors to seek an exemption, but as i understand it, they already have that. so what they are asking for, here, is that in order to prevent them from possibly ever having to do these...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
watch this. >> the fda violated federal law to keep it safe. they are not left to receive these drugs in the mail or at their dorm room without ever having been checked by a doctor for life-threatening conditions. that is reckless. >> on its face if one did not know any better they could say that sounds a scary. young girls getting this drug that gives you and abortion. getting into their dorm room. what is your reaction? how does this actually work and how dangerous is it really? you actually know. you are not a dentist. >> i am prescribing this drug and i have been through the different phases of what they have done. 24 years ago it was approved by the fda. at that time we had to go through rigorous standards. you have to put in a lot of detailed reporting on talking to women about adverse effects and side effects and we could not even dispense it for a pharmacy. we had to have an office dispensing of the drug. it was as hard as possible to get one of the most safe and effective drugs. it has less adverse side effects than tylenol. fast-forwa
watch this. >> the fda violated federal law to keep it safe. they are not left to receive these drugs in the mail or at their dorm room without ever having been checked by a doctor for life-threatening conditions. that is reckless. >> on its face if one did not know any better they could say that sounds a scary. young girls getting this drug that gives you and abortion. getting into their dorm room. what is your reaction? how does this actually work and how dangerous is it really?...
0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the fda or somebody else. some, you know, some undetermined person. and it was very interesting to me that they, this was not a conversation that you would have had at the supreme court before 1981 when justice o'connor became the first woman on the court. some of those questions simply would not have occurred to people on the bench. who knows, they might not have occurred to me because it was such a different and male dominated era, but this is a five-four court when it comes to gender. and it really did reek of a difference. i thought. so i thought that was very interesting. and i thought it was pretty clear from the get go. of course, you can always be proven wrong in this stuff, but nobody except perhaps justice alito and to a lesser extent, thomas, was even interested in exploring in how the fda did its job. they all seemed to sort of take as a given that god knows we don't want to have to do that. we're not scientists. we shouldn't be deciding that then justice alito saying you know, is the fda infallible? won't somebody essentially, can't someb
the fda or somebody else. some, you know, some undetermined person. and it was very interesting to me that they, this was not a conversation that you would have had at the supreme court before 1981 when justice o'connor became the first woman on the court. some of those questions simply would not have occurred to people on the bench. who knows, they might not have occurred to me because it was such a different and male dominated era, but this is a five-four court when it comes to gender. and it...
0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
we're asking this court to look at what fda said. the fdca says you have to have -- >> didn't the lower courts go beyond that? representations were made that the lower courts relied on studies that have been found discredited and removed. so they were obviously look at not just what the fda was looking a t. >> that wasn't quite the right sound bite. that was jackson arguing why should the courts get into this. mark joseph stern, how did that go? >> very poorly for the anti abortion advocates here represented by erin hawley. she said we've proved time and again it poses a threat to women but as judge brown pointed out, it's a very safe drug. safer than viagra and tylenol. they sited these studies that purported to show it was actually dangerous and caused excessive bleeding but in between those decisions and today, those studies were retracted for being insufficiently rigorous and sponsored by abortion groups that had an ax to grind against abortion. i think when the justices did reach the merits, there was very little that erin could
we're asking this court to look at what fda said. the fdca says you have to have -- >> didn't the lower courts go beyond that? representations were made that the lower courts relied on studies that have been found discredited and removed. so they were obviously look at not just what the fda was looking a t. >> that wasn't quite the right sound bite. that was jackson arguing why should the courts get into this. mark joseph stern, how did that go? >> very poorly for the anti...
0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
guidance for its 2016 updates and second guessing the fda's medical advice. it would limit access to the abortion pill, even in states where abortion is legal. every box would need to be pulled and labels updated. a decision in support of abortion opponents could jeopardize every fda approval on all other drugs, potentially extending to certain vaccines and birth control. this is the first major challenge to abortion access since the court's conservative majority overturned roe v. wade two years ago in the dobbs decision. a decision is expected by june at the height of the presidential campaign. with all that, joining us now is yamiche alcindor, andrew weissmann and dr. patel. yamiche, to you. what are the questions in the court? what are the crowds saying in this first test of an abortion -- certainly, abortion-related procedure since dobbs? >> that's right. this is really the most consequential abortion case to come before the supreme court since this court overturned roe v. wade in 2022. we have been outside all day. there's a large crowd. mostly people wh
guidance for its 2016 updates and second guessing the fda's medical advice. it would limit access to the abortion pill, even in states where abortion is legal. every box would need to be pulled and labels updated. a decision in support of abortion opponents could jeopardize every fda approval on all other drugs, potentially extending to certain vaccines and birth control. this is the first major challenge to abortion access since the court's conservative majority overturned roe v. wade two...
0
0.0
Mar 25, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
a decision against the fda will have far-reaching implications nationwide including impacting access to the drug in states that do not restrict reproductive rights. joining me now, the president of reproductive freedom for all, as always welcome to the sunday show. the plaintiffs in this case are antiabortion doctors that argued in the lower courts that the drug is not safe to be on the market. it is 97 point for effective with low complication rates so this is not about the science is it? >> it never has been and another interesting fact about the doctors, not one of them is a prescriber, none of them are abortion providers. everything from a dentist to a family physician, it is a wild case and it is why this has been a political tactic to institute a backdoor national abortion band by undercutting fda authority to authorize the drug. >> if i am remembering correctly, this is all about the fda's power to approve a drug for sale >> it gets a little messy. the trump appointed judge, the district court that was the only court that allows for judge shopping, none of the plaintiffs were
a decision against the fda will have far-reaching implications nationwide including impacting access to the drug in states that do not restrict reproductive rights. joining me now, the president of reproductive freedom for all, as always welcome to the sunday show. the plaintiffs in this case are antiabortion doctors that argued in the lower courts that the drug is not safe to be on the market. it is 97 point for effective with low complication rates so this is not about the science is it?...
0
0.0
Mar 24, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
to approve a drug for sale. >> authorization by the fda. the fifth circuit gets messy. matthew kaczmarek in amarillo is the appointed judge. the district court that was the only court that allows for essentially judge shopping. these plaintiffs were not from amarillo to be formed an umbrella organization and filed in amarillo to get into this one judge's court. is the same judge who is not a lot of crazy decisions that we have heard of, including the recent birth control case. including a gun case and domestic violence you have covered. you have this cooked up group was filed in this case to get into his court kaczmarek rules against the fda saying that authorization was problematic. you just read all the facts the fifth circuit, ordinarily to get the case and that is why is up in court is here to. the fifth circuit is questioning the telemedicine ability for doctors to prescribe over telehealth. we know it is a big deal.. elite with abortion bans. and the opportunity for brick- and-mortar folks to dispense like cvs and walgreens versus goi
to approve a drug for sale. >> authorization by the fda. the fifth circuit gets messy. matthew kaczmarek in amarillo is the appointed judge. the district court that was the only court that allows for essentially judge shopping. these plaintiffs were not from amarillo to be formed an umbrella organization and filed in amarillo to get into this one judge's court. is the same judge who is not a lot of crazy decisions that we have heard of, including the recent birth control case. including a...
0
0.0
Mar 24, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it is an extraordinary question because the fda are the experts in food and drugs. instead we have a court substituting its own judgment to say they have exceeded their authority in doing this. the other thing that is extraordinary about this case is two courts so far, the district court and the intermediate court of appeals found standing with a group of doctors who say on some day, i may be on call and someone may take mispristine and as a result, it may get botched and not work effectively and i will have to perform an abortion against my own religious beliefs. the idea that creates standing is a real stretch, for the statute that is actual harm. two courts have allowed this and indulged the theory. we will see if the supreme court does the same. >> dr. hesler, what do you fear happens the most for the reproductive rights in this country if the court rules against mifepristone? >> i will say as a physician, it is scary to think that a safe, effective medication that the fda approved in 2000, earlier than stattens for heart conditions, certainly much earlier than
it is an extraordinary question because the fda are the experts in food and drugs. instead we have a court substituting its own judgment to say they have exceeded their authority in doing this. the other thing that is extraordinary about this case is two courts so far, the district court and the intermediate court of appeals found standing with a group of doctors who say on some day, i may be on call and someone may take mispristine and as a result, it may get botched and not work effectively...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
any court has restricted access to an fda approved drug by second-guessing fda's expert judgment about the conditions required to assure that drug's safe use. is it still the only time? >> that is still to our knowledge, the only time that a court has done that. >> there's a lot to get to. the former acting us solicitor general who has argued 50 cases in front of the supreme court, and be a legal analyst and host of the podcast courtside. thank you for being here. there are a couple of very interesting legal issues. one is standing. why is that issue-- let's start with that. what is the issue around standing? because it doesn't speak to anything underlying about mifepristone or abortion necessarily and it's about whether this case is valid. >> good to see you and before answering that i just want to disclose that i am unabashedly against this lawsuit and indeed, my law partner argued the case brilliantly today. the one great thing about the oral argument today is that all of the applicants were women, all three of them doing-- for the religious doctors. there are two issues. one is thi
any court has restricted access to an fda approved drug by second-guessing fda's expert judgment about the conditions required to assure that drug's safe use. is it still the only time? >> that is still to our knowledge, the only time that a court has done that. >> there's a lot to get to. the former acting us solicitor general who has argued 50 cases in front of the supreme court, and be a legal analyst and host of the podcast courtside. thank you for being here. there are a couple...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
did the fda think of science and safety. much of the argument as you highlighted was about standing. and, basically, they said there are these seven doctors that have conscientious objections and it might be the case that at some point one of the doctors' patients will take mifepristone and it might be that might cause a side effect like a headache and that might cause that person to go to the emergency room. and if that person goes to the emergency room, it might be that that person will need to be treated and if that treatment is necessary, it might be that one of these seven doctors is the person treating it. that is a ridiculous chain of causation. i don't think it worked in the supreme court today. justices on both the left and the right wings of the court just expressed massive skepticism about this. and so i think that is where the case will be decided. >> to the second part, the issue of judges and science. mr. is an exchange on this. and i want to play for our viewers this exchange that begins. begins with justice k
did the fda think of science and safety. much of the argument as you highlighted was about standing. and, basically, they said there are these seven doctors that have conscientious objections and it might be the case that at some point one of the doctors' patients will take mifepristone and it might be that might cause a side effect like a headache and that might cause that person to go to the emergency room. and if that person goes to the emergency room, it might be that that person will need...
0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the justices heard arguments today from one side, really arguing about whether or not the fda should have the authority to continue to have approval over this abortion pill and should have the ability to expand that access. on the other side, they heard from antiabortion groups through their lawyer arguing that this, that the moves by the fda here to expand access to this abortion pill, that it really put women's lives at risk. and also put doctors in a situation where they would have to go against their conscious. >> without question, the fda's actions have made taking chemical abortion drugs less safe. today, i argue before the united states supreme court on behalf of doctors and medical associations who have witnessed these harms firsthand. the fda violated federal law in its ability to keep women safe. >> second guessing the scientific data-driven judgments of an independent agency is an extreme position that could inject uncertainty across american life. >> reporter: so there you really heard both sides laying out their arguments. the stakes here are the access to mifepristone.
the justices heard arguments today from one side, really arguing about whether or not the fda should have the authority to continue to have approval over this abortion pill and should have the ability to expand that access. on the other side, they heard from antiabortion groups through their lawyer arguing that this, that the moves by the fda here to expand access to this abortion pill, that it really put women's lives at risk. and also put doctors in a situation where they would have to go...
0
0.0
Mar 23, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the fda has reviewed the extensive record of safety against the two decade record. mifepristone is safe and effective and can be available to people through telehealth . it is widely available to people. the fifth circuit ruling if the supreme court allows it to stand, he would take us back to a time when this medication was restricted. >> what is important is the fifth circuit trying to replace the judgment and wisdom and experience of the fda. that is a federal agency. what do you predict will happen with the supreme court when they hear these arguments and make a decision later on. >> the important thing to remember is that there are so many experts from the american medical association, the college of obstetricians and oncologist, the pharmaceutical industries, all weighing in here to urge the supreme court to reject the baseless arguments that the fifth circuit has adopted from extremists. what we do know is if the court declines to reject the holdings and if they adopt the views of these extremists, it would be devastating for women across the country who are
the fda has reviewed the extensive record of safety against the two decade record. mifepristone is safe and effective and can be available to people through telehealth . it is widely available to people. the fifth circuit ruling if the supreme court allows it to stand, he would take us back to a time when this medication was restricted. >> what is important is the fifth circuit trying to replace the judgment and wisdom and experience of the fda. that is a federal agency. what do you...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> shouldn't the fda have considered the application of that? >> the comstock provisions do not fall within fda slang. >> i am sure you heard the answers of the solicitor general, and counsel, with respect to the comstock act. i would like you to comment on their answers. >> sure, justice thomas. we don't think there's a case in this court that empowers the fda to ignore other federal law, with respect to the comstock act, is relevant. the comstock act is drugs e should not be mailed, through the mail or through common h carriers so we think the plaintext is pretty clear. >> one of the points is that in this case, you've got the judicial branch sort of looking at the architecture of federal bureaucracy. if trump or any republican president comes in the office, they would then control that federal bureau and you can imagine them putting someone ing the fda or as attorney general, that would try to take the comstock act over all kinds of lovers of powers that are being hinted to to stop this from happening. like absolutely, but i think one of the
>> shouldn't the fda have considered the application of that? >> the comstock provisions do not fall within fda slang. >> i am sure you heard the answers of the solicitor general, and counsel, with respect to the comstock act. i would like you to comment on their answers. >> sure, justice thomas. we don't think there's a case in this court that empowers the fda to ignore other federal law, with respect to the comstock act, is relevant. the comstock act is drugs e should...
0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the fda has approved that as safe and effective. and that's what's on the line, among other things in this case that will be argued tomorrow in the supreme court. >> i know this is folly to ask, and you don't have to answer if you want, but what are you expecting the court to do here? everything i have read is that the underlying ruling, the district court ruling is so bananas that it would be unthinkable for them to side with that district court judge. that said, the appeals court did uphold some of what he was trying to do. so that makes it a little bit more of a wild card. what are you actually expecting? >> i don't want to predict what the supreme court is going to do, but i want to make really clear to your viewers that there was no basis in law and fact, use pointed out in the district court's opinion, and there was no basis in law and fact in the very conservative fifth circuit decision. so there is only one right outcome on the facts of the law in the supreme court, and that is to uphold all of the agency decision making. th
the fda has approved that as safe and effective. and that's what's on the line, among other things in this case that will be argued tomorrow in the supreme court. >> i know this is folly to ask, and you don't have to answer if you want, but what are you expecting the court to do here? everything i have read is that the underlying ruling, the district court ruling is so bananas that it would be unthinkable for them to side with that district court judge. that said, the appeals court did...
0
0.0
Mar 19, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
this isn't just one day the fda woke up in 2000 and said this is safe. this deemed it safe and effective from clinical trials and added in multiple levels. for a court of any kind to call into question the agency's decision, that's not an opinion. that's actually a decision -- an opinion made by science. honestly, there's -- then i would say to you that the court should call into question some of the science around cancer drugs, drugs i use to treat hypertension, because that's exactly what we are calling into question, the very common standards that we have been not only used to but we have expected of the fda under many administrations. to be clear, they are making this sound like it's the biden administration. it's not. this has been both through democrats and republicans. it's about safety, efficacy and the bottom line, it's about women's health care. >> dr. patel, online sales have gun for an over-the-counter birth control pill. what do you see is that impact? >> i can go on amazon.com. i tried this before my segment. yes, i can order a specific typ
this isn't just one day the fda woke up in 2000 and said this is safe. this deemed it safe and effective from clinical trials and added in multiple levels. for a court of any kind to call into question the agency's decision, that's not an opinion. that's actually a decision -- an opinion made by science. honestly, there's -- then i would say to you that the court should call into question some of the science around cancer drugs, drugs i use to treat hypertension, because that's exactly what we...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it short-circuits the entire fda approval process, including for vaccines. one of the reasons i'm confident actually going to win is i don't think the judges like cavanaugh and gore stitch want to see a world where people can sue viagra makers because they suffer the aesthetic injury of seeming overly excited text from 50- year-old men. they don't want that to happen. and so i think that this argument is going to fail, and that was not a field before today. >> that just means the bar is in . if that's the victory were claiming, that were not going to bring down the entire pharmaceutical industry and its regulation because the justices finally realize this may be a bridge too far, this really shows that the bar doesn't help. >> it got to the court. yes, agreed. it never should've gotten here, but once it had turned, i didn't know. >> we still could do it. and this is a very unpredictable court. but again, this is a court that wants to look moderate right before this election. they've already killed roe versus wade and planned parenthood versus casey. they've
it short-circuits the entire fda approval process, including for vaccines. one of the reasons i'm confident actually going to win is i don't think the judges like cavanaugh and gore stitch want to see a world where people can sue viagra makers because they suffer the aesthetic injury of seeming overly excited text from 50- year-old men. they don't want that to happen. and so i think that this argument is going to fail, and that was not a field before today. >> that just means the bar is...
0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it was first approved by the fda more than two decades ago. this texas judge, a trumpet appointee, a lifelong antiabortion activist, he ruled the fda was wrong to approve this drug. i have to tell you, his ruling was not a monument to intellectual heft. i'm not a lawyer but i know it is a bad thing when you're ruling relies on two studies that have since been retracted by their publisher. also, another "study" that pulled its data from anonymous blog posts posted on an antiabortion website. also, according to a brief filed by the aclu, the ruling also cited testimony from a person purporting to be a doctor who is not actually a doctor, unless you are okay to make people call you dr. because you have a masters degree in theological studies. like i said, not exactly a model ruling. nevertheless, a republican heavy appeals court upheld that texas ruling. we don't know what the supreme court is going to do in response. today, in a post roe v. wade world, two thirds of abortion are done through medication and in this case, the court will deliberate
it was first approved by the fda more than two decades ago. this texas judge, a trumpet appointee, a lifelong antiabortion activist, he ruled the fda was wrong to approve this drug. i have to tell you, his ruling was not a monument to intellectual heft. i'm not a lawyer but i know it is a bad thing when you're ruling relies on two studies that have since been retracted by their publisher. also, another "study" that pulled its data from anonymous blog posts posted on an antiabortion...
0
0.0
Mar 30, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
is it the only time any court restricted access to an fda approved drug by second guessing fda expert judgment. >> no doctors can be forced against their consciouses to perform or assist in an abortion, correct? >> hey, hey, abortion pill has got to go. >> i had understand the conscious harm as justice barrett does but you suggest a broaded one. >> while some new supreme court justices may be weary whatever their reasons, he is running floating a national abortion ban that would kick in at 15 weeks. if you are listening in a blue state or a place that has consecrated the rights, kansas, this would override that if there is a federal ban if he is elected. politically democrats welcome the topic and the clear stance. biden is leading into a campaign strategy hammering this in the general election in the months ahead. they see it but the biden campaign is a clear contrast and way to mobilize women and younger voters. this is a strategy biden was touting on the roads yesterday. democrats think they can flip the state as same gop positions collide with extreme candidates. there are voters
is it the only time any court restricted access to an fda approved drug by second guessing fda expert judgment. >> no doctors can be forced against their consciouses to perform or assist in an abortion, correct? >> hey, hey, abortion pill has got to go. >> i had understand the conscious harm as justice barrett does but you suggest a broaded one. >> while some new supreme court justices may be weary whatever their reasons, he is running floating a national abortion ban...
0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 3
we could see this unfold very soon with a different kind of fda commission. that is all it takes to change. >> i want to turn to that. i want to turn to what the landscape looks like and put this into larger perspective. i have to sneak in a quick break. nowhere is going anywhere. we'll all be right back. we'll all be right back. so go ahead, live unfiltered with the one and only sotyktu, a once-daily pill for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, and the chance at clear or almost clear skin. it's like the feeling of finding you're so ready for your close-up. or finding you don't have to hide your skin just your background. once-daily sotyktu was proven better, getting more people clearer skin than the leading pill. don't take if you're allergic to sotyktu; serious reactions can occur. sotyktu can lower your ability to fight infections, including tb. serious infections, cancers including lymphoma, muscle problems, and changes in certain labs have occurred. tell your doctor if you have an infection, liver or kidney problems, high triglycerides, or had a vaccine
we could see this unfold very soon with a different kind of fda commission. that is all it takes to change. >> i want to turn to that. i want to turn to what the landscape looks like and put this into larger perspective. i have to sneak in a quick break. nowhere is going anywhere. we'll all be right back. we'll all be right back. so go ahead, live unfiltered with the one and only sotyktu, a once-daily pill for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, and the chance at clear or almost clear...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> now m. >> the first time it's the only time any court has restricted access to an fda approved drug by second guessing fda's expert judgment. >> no doctors can be forced against their consciences to perform or assist in an abortion, correct? >> i had understood the conscience harm as justice barrett does, but you suggest that there's a broader one. >> that is the state at play. and while some of trump's newly appointed supreme court justices may be wary of going further whatever their reasons, trump himself is running for office floating a national abortion ban that would kick in at 15 weeks. federal abortion ban, if you're listening in a blue state or a place that has as i mentioned concentrated these rights, kansas, well, this would override that if there's a federal ban if he's elected. politically democrats welcome that topic and the clear stance. biden is leaning into a campaign strategy hammering this in the general election in the months ahead. and they see it at the biden campaign as a clear contrast and a way to mobilize women and younger voters. this is strategy biden was
>> now m. >> the first time it's the only time any court has restricted access to an fda approved drug by second guessing fda's expert judgment. >> no doctors can be forced against their consciences to perform or assist in an abortion, correct? >> i had understood the conscience harm as justice barrett does, but you suggest that there's a broader one. >> that is the state at play. and while some of trump's newly appointed supreme court justices may be wary of going...
0
0.0
Mar 24, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the fda, saying it was approved. it had taken three times the length of time to approve it versus other drugs at that same time. mifepristone has been on the market for 23 years. the statute of limitations is three years. people claiming to be doctors, one of whom has a master's degree in theology, is itself absolutely absurd that these individuals even have standing, claiming they would somehow be able to call to perform abortions for people dissatisfied or who are harmed. the question as to whether mifepristone is harmful. also something that is absolutely false. it is safer than tie tylenol. you ask a great question. what about other drugs on the market? what ability people who don't like covid vaccines? could they find a judge that would do the same? what about parents who are antivaxxers, finding a judge that might agree with them as well. that is what is dangerous in this and of course, calling on a law that is more than a centuries old, which had been pushed to the side by the very fact we have contraception t
the fda, saying it was approved. it had taken three times the length of time to approve it versus other drugs at that same time. mifepristone has been on the market for 23 years. the statute of limitations is three years. people claiming to be doctors, one of whom has a master's degree in theology, is itself absolutely absurd that these individuals even have standing, claiming they would somehow be able to call to perform abortions for people dissatisfied or who are harmed. the question as to...
0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i mean, there's the technical arguments here, and there's, you know, the fda drug approval process. not just for this drug but for every drug, which this ruling at the district court level in texas and the fifth circuit would put at risk. if they got their way, it wouldn't just potentially challenge the approval of mifepristone. it would challenge the approval of thousands of drugs. so there's sort of the technical side of this. but then, what you point out, the real lived experience of american women who need abortion care, who need to get abortions. and having the option of getting a medication abortion, it's not appropriate for everybody and in every circumstance, but it is for a lot of abortions. actually now for a majority of abortions. and what they're trying to do is take it away. not just in the states where they have already banned abortion. they're trying to take it away nationwide. they want a nationwide ban. california, illinois, massachusetts, everywhere. and the science and the reasoning in these lower court arguments that they're considering is so out there and so bey
i mean, there's the technical arguments here, and there's, you know, the fda drug approval process. not just for this drug but for every drug, which this ruling at the district court level in texas and the fifth circuit would put at risk. if they got their way, it wouldn't just potentially challenge the approval of mifepristone. it would challenge the approval of thousands of drugs. so there's sort of the technical side of this. but then, what you point out, the real lived experience of...
0
0.0
Mar 31, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
on the idea that you start with mifepristone and it could have implications for other pieces of the fda approval process, but this about the calm stack act and the fear that alito and thomas will zone in and see an opportunity. what was your big take away? >> very similar. justice ketanji brown jackson's point underscored why the pharmaceutical industry was filed an amicus brief because they understand the ripple effect around innovation, this disruption that can happen and medications that we need and depend on having them litigated by the courts, takes it out of the purview of the experts. that was a critical thing. as well as the calm stack act. it was a question in the conversation. what i thought was interesting is the court was forecasting or they could come back. find someone who has harm and come back so standing is not off the table. it's personhood away to come back around this conversation as well as harkening back to a 150-year-old law that is saying, we are not done. i think what alabama showed us in this moment is that the south has something to say, places we had written
on the idea that you start with mifepristone and it could have implications for other pieces of the fda approval process, but this about the calm stack act and the fear that alito and thomas will zone in and see an opportunity. what was your big take away? >> very similar. justice ketanji brown jackson's point underscored why the pharmaceutical industry was filed an amicus brief because they understand the ripple effect around innovation, this disruption that can happen and medications...
0
0.0
Mar 25, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the fda has not found that. and as always, you have to look past the claims, which are designed to confuse, trick, or lie. there is not evidence, according to the fda, a nonpartisan medical community research that this is an issue of safety. it's an issue of power and whether this supreme court will again use its power to further infringe on women's rights. we'll be watching that case tomorrow, and we'll be right back. , and we'll be right back held me back... now with skyrizi, i'm all in with clearer skin. ♪ things are getting clearer...♪ ( ♪♪ ) ♪ i feel free... ♪ ♪ to bear my skin, yeah that's all me. ♪ ♪ nothing is everything ♪ ( ♪♪) with skyrizi, 3 out of 4 people achieved 90% clearer skin at 4 months. and most people were clearer even at 5 years. skyrizi is just 4 doses a year, after 2 starter doses. serious allergic reactions... ...and an increased risk of infections... ...or a lower ability to fight them may occur. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms,... ...had a
the fda has not found that. and as always, you have to look past the claims, which are designed to confuse, trick, or lie. there is not evidence, according to the fda, a nonpartisan medical community research that this is an issue of safety. it's an issue of power and whether this supreme court will again use its power to further infringe on women's rights. we'll be watching that case tomorrow, and we'll be right back. , and we'll be right back held me back... now with skyrizi, i'm all in with...
0
0.0
Mar 25, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
ask a retina specialist about fda-approved treatments for ga and go to gawontwait.com oooh! i can't wait for this family getaway! shingles doesn't care. shingles is a painful, blistering rash that can last for weeks. ahhh, there's nothing like a day out with friends. that's nice, but shingles doesn't care! 99% of adults 50 years or older already have the virus that causes shingles inside them, and it can reactivate at any time. a perfect day for a family outing! guess what? shingles doesn't care. but shingrix protects. only shingrix is proven over 90% effective. shingrix is a vaccine used to prevent shingles in adults 50 years and older. shingrix does not protect everyone and is not for those with severe allergic reactions to its ingredients or to a previous dose. an increased risk of guillain-barré syndrome was observed after getting shingrix. fainting can also happen. the most common side effects are pain, redness, and swelling at the injection site, muscle pain, tiredness, headache, shivering, fever, and upset stomach. shingles doesn't care. but shingrix protects. ask yo
ask a retina specialist about fda-approved treatments for ga and go to gawontwait.com oooh! i can't wait for this family getaway! shingles doesn't care. shingles is a painful, blistering rash that can last for weeks. ahhh, there's nothing like a day out with friends. that's nice, but shingles doesn't care! 99% of adults 50 years or older already have the virus that causes shingles inside them, and it can reactivate at any time. a perfect day for a family outing! guess what? shingles doesn't...
0
0.0
Mar 14, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the fda is expected to consider a bloods test which shows that 83% effective in detecting colorectal cancers, the hope this could increase the number of people, because it only draws blood. it could be recommended starting at age 45. >>> in a small town of enid, oklahoma, a big decision. >> reporter: it's an unusual meet-up. the location is secret. somebody minds the door for security. a small group determined to change their city. >> everybody in this room played a role. >> reporter: among those her are 69-year-old connie vickers. >> i was born and raise here. >> reporter: and 74-year-old nancy pressnel. they're democrats in a deeply conservative county. how many doors did you knock on? >> i don't know. >> reporter: enough to get a recall election. this is judd blevins. tiki torch in hand in charlottesville, virginia. >> i saw a picture of jed blevinss. i was shocked. >> reporter: he had been an active leader in the white nationalist group europa. he hid behind the moniker conway, in private online forums, blevins as conway posted racist messages. yet when the former marine ran for
the fda is expected to consider a bloods test which shows that 83% effective in detecting colorectal cancers, the hope this could increase the number of people, because it only draws blood. it could be recommended starting at age 45. >>> in a small town of enid, oklahoma, a big decision. >> reporter: it's an unusual meet-up. the location is secret. somebody minds the door for security. a small group determined to change their city. >> everybody in this room played a role....
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
and you have courts and lawyers now arguing about what the fda does. the fda, scientists, who are making these decisions, making these calls. that's why we need to do everything as states to ensure protection for medication abortion and also make sure that we are being clear with the court as we were, joining other states in a brief in this very matter to say how harmful it would be if we return to a day when medication abortion weren't available. >> your state is one of a handful with laws to protect health care providers prescribe and send abortion pills to patients in states that have banned abortion. are you worried activists will target those laws next? >> they may try to do that. we will stand firm on this. this is about women's health and women's health care. the thing that's so upsetting to me, andrea, is that what the plaintiffs here are trying to do is going to cause substantial harm to women. we would have a situation where women -- it would be substantially harder for women to access a way to terminate their pregnancy. it's also the case th
and you have courts and lawyers now arguing about what the fda does. the fda, scientists, who are making these decisions, making these calls. that's why we need to do everything as states to ensure protection for medication abortion and also make sure that we are being clear with the court as we were, joining other states in a brief in this very matter to say how harmful it would be if we return to a day when medication abortion weren't available. >> your state is one of a handful with...
0
0.0
Mar 9, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
botox® cosmetic is fda approved to temporarily make frown lines, crow's feet, and forehead lines look better. the effects of botox® cosmetic may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness may be a sign of a life-threatening condition. do not receive botox® cosmetic if you have a skin infection. side effects may include allergic reactions, injection site pain, headache, eyebrow, eyelid drooping, and eyelid swelling. tell your doctor about your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, and medications, including botulinum toxins as these may increase the risk of serious side effects. see for yourself at botoxcosmetic.com. whoa, how did you defeat them? as these may increase the risk of serious side effects. with a little kung fu strength and by connecting my devices to the most powerful force of all. skadoosh. hah, huh? cool right? amazing. harness the power of xfinity internet and stay connected to the things you love. ah, they'll be like this for hour
botox® cosmetic is fda approved to temporarily make frown lines, crow's feet, and forehead lines look better. the effects of botox® cosmetic may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness may be a sign of a life-threatening condition. do not receive botox® cosmetic if you have a skin infection. side effects may include allergic reactions, injection site pain,...
0
0.0
Mar 2, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
then we learned about bulkamid - an fda-approved, non-drug solution for our condition. it really works, and it lasts for years. it's been the best thing we've done for our families. visit findrealrelief.com to find an expert physician near you. ask if bulkamid is right for you and discuss potential risks. results and experiences may vary. move beyond the leaks. >>> thousands of mourners defied heavy security as the body of alexei navalny, vladimir putin's most vocal critic, was laid to rest inside a moscow church. relatives and friends said their final good-byes to the man who fired up a generation of young russians with his slogan, russia will be free. outside, thousands of mourners paid respect to the 47-year-old navalny, who died mysteriously last month in a siberian penal colony. sparking worldwide condemnation. this scene is nothing short of remarkable. russia's opposition out in the open, risking arrest or worse. to say farewell. meanwhile, here in the u.s., house republicans are blocking further aid to ukraine, a democracy and a u.s. ally that putin invaded. and
then we learned about bulkamid - an fda-approved, non-drug solution for our condition. it really works, and it lasts for years. it's been the best thing we've done for our families. visit findrealrelief.com to find an expert physician near you. ask if bulkamid is right for you and discuss potential risks. results and experiences may vary. move beyond the leaks. >>> thousands of mourners defied heavy security as the body of alexei navalny, vladimir putin's most vocal critic, was laid to...
0
0.0
Mar 24, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the fda reported 28 deaths of the 5.6 million people who have taken the drug. so, how can the plaintiffs argue the dangers of mifepristone, if that is at the root of their case? >> the plaintiffs are doing a combination of things. essentially they are saying, there isn't enough research, the fda didn't look closely enough. this is a strategy that we've seen, groups have used this for a while saying there is uncertainty and if there's uncertainty, scientists didn't.all their eyes, and the courts can come in and second- guess what scientists have determined, it's striking, mifepristone is so much more studied than other drugs. it's been controversial for decades so it's not as if scientist having been careful, concisely because of this controversy. it means if this could happen with this drug, it could happen with any drug. >> so, an ap poll found that 64% of adults inc. that abortion should be legal in all or most cases, meanwhile the former president trump say that he supports a 15 week national abortion ban. what happens with the courts and the public politici
the fda reported 28 deaths of the 5.6 million people who have taken the drug. so, how can the plaintiffs argue the dangers of mifepristone, if that is at the root of their case? >> the plaintiffs are doing a combination of things. essentially they are saying, there isn't enough research, the fda didn't look closely enough. this is a strategy that we've seen, groups have used this for a while saying there is uncertainty and if there's uncertainty, scientists didn't.all their eyes, and the...
0
0.0
Mar 14, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
then we learned about bulkamid - an fda-approved, non-drug solution for our condition. it really works, and it lasts for years. it's been the best thing we've done for our families. visit findrealrelief.com to find an expert physician near you. ask if bulkamid is right for you and discuss potential risks. results and experiences may vary. move beyond the leaks. >>> i said to one of my colleagues the other day, i imagine at the time if the captain of the titanic could go back six hours ahead of time and warn himself like hey, this isn't going to work out well, he would have probably adjusted the ship. we have that chance now as republicans to say we know what's happening, we know how this is going to end. why would republicans pick the one person joe biden can beat? that is stupid. >> why would they do that? according to that world view, looks like the titanic very much sank. donald trump is officially the nominee of the republican party. the man you just heard from is an important figure. wisconsin's assembly speaker, a republican. a rare republican who stood up to trum
then we learned about bulkamid - an fda-approved, non-drug solution for our condition. it really works, and it lasts for years. it's been the best thing we've done for our families. visit findrealrelief.com to find an expert physician near you. ask if bulkamid is right for you and discuss potential risks. results and experiences may vary. move beyond the leaks. >>> i said to one of my colleagues the other day, i imagine at the time if the captain of the titanic could go back six hours...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 2
fda's approval and expansion of the drug by mail. they said rules around the use could be relaxed, and a lower court disagreed and reimposed restrictions on the pill including requiring women to make three in-person visits to a doctor to receive a medication abortion. a group of seven doctors and anti-abortion groups challenged the efforts to lift restrictions and said the agency did not adequately look at the risks. the group does not perform abortions or prescribe mifepristone, and they are not legally required to do so. under well-established precedent, when people file a lawsuit they have to show that they have been injured and that their injury could be redressed by the entity they are suing. the court questioned why existing laws for doctors -- >> yes, we think that federal conscious protections provide broad protection. >> they don't have to participate in this procedure, and you said and said several times that federal law already gives them that. i guess what they are asking for in this lawsuit is more than that. they are sa
fda's approval and expansion of the drug by mail. they said rules around the use could be relaxed, and a lower court disagreed and reimposed restrictions on the pill including requiring women to make three in-person visits to a doctor to receive a medication abortion. a group of seven doctors and anti-abortion groups challenged the efforts to lift restrictions and said the agency did not adequately look at the risks. the group does not perform abortions or prescribe mifepristone, and they are...
0
0.0
Mar 16, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the first fda-cleared at-home skin tag remover clinically proven to remove skin tags safely in as little as one treatment. when i was your age, we never had anything like this. clinically proven to rwhat? wifi?tags wifi that works all over the house, even the basement. the basement. so i can finally throw that party... and invite shannon barnes. dream do come true. xfinity gives you reliable wifi with wall-to-wall coverage on all your devices, even when everyone is online. maybe we'll even get married one day. i wonder what i will be doing? probably still living here with mom and dad. fast reliable speeds right where you need them. that's wall-to-wall wifi on the xfinity 10g network. suzy somuah: it was just alarming when we heard that he hadn't shown up for work. wow. i mean, that's not like eric at all not to show up for work. >>> it kiwas just alarming when we heard he hasn't showed up for work. wow. i mean that's not like eric at all not to show up for work. >> as his sister cynthia and other family members arrived at eric somuah's building their fear level was off the charts. they s
the first fda-cleared at-home skin tag remover clinically proven to remove skin tags safely in as little as one treatment. when i was your age, we never had anything like this. clinically proven to rwhat? wifi?tags wifi that works all over the house, even the basement. the basement. so i can finally throw that party... and invite shannon barnes. dream do come true. xfinity gives you reliable wifi with wall-to-wall coverage on all your devices, even when everyone is online. maybe we'll even get...
0
0.0
Mar 9, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
botox® cosmetic is fda approved to temporarily make frown lines, crow's feet, and forehead lines look better. the effects of botox® cosmetic may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness may be a sign of a life-threatening condition. do not receive botox® cosmetic if you have a skin infection. side effects may include allergic reactions, injection site pain, headache, eyebrow, eyelid drooping, and eyelid swelling. tell your doctor about your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, and medications, including botulinum toxins as these may increase the risk of serious side effects. see for yourself at botoxcosmetic.com. sometimes, the lows of bipolar depression feel darkest before dawn. with caplyta, there's a chance to let in the lyte™. caplyta is proven to deliver significant relief across bipolar depression. unlike some medicines that only treat bipolar i, caplyta treats both bipolar i and ii depression. and in clinical trials, movement disorders
botox® cosmetic is fda approved to temporarily make frown lines, crow's feet, and forehead lines look better. the effects of botox® cosmetic may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness may be a sign of a life-threatening condition. do not receive botox® cosmetic if you have a skin infection. side effects may include allergic reactions, injection site pain,...
0
0.0
Mar 2, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
fda-approved for 16 types of cancer, including certain early-stage and advanced cancers. one of those cancers is early-stage non—small cell lung cancer. keytruda may be used with certain chemotherapies before surgery when you have early-stage lung cancer, which can be removed by surgery, and then continued alone after surgery to help prevent your lung cancer from coming back. keytruda can cause your immune system to attack healthy parts of your body during or after treatment. this may be severe and lead to death. see your doctor right away if you have cough, shortness of breath, chest pain, diarrhea, severe stomach pain, severe nausea or vomiting, headache, light sensitivity, eye problems, irregular heartbeat, extreme tiredness, constipation, dizziness or fainting, changes in appetite, thirst, or urine, confusion, memory problems, muscle pain or weakness, fever, rash, itching, or flushing. there may be other side effects. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions, including immune system problems, if you've had or plan to have an organ or stem cell transplant,
fda-approved for 16 types of cancer, including certain early-stage and advanced cancers. one of those cancers is early-stage non—small cell lung cancer. keytruda may be used with certain chemotherapies before surgery when you have early-stage lung cancer, which can be removed by surgery, and then continued alone after surgery to help prevent your lung cancer from coming back. keytruda can cause your immune system to attack healthy parts of your body during or after treatment. this may be...
0
0.0
Mar 8, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
it was originally expected to be approved this month, now the fda wants an independent panel of experts to come in and look at its safety and efficacy. a late stage trial had shown that the drug can significantly slow the progression of alzheimer's but the treatment along with similar drugs carry safety concerns related to brain swelling and bleeding. >>> still to come, the new jobs report blows past expectations. is the economy headed for a soft landing despite all the recession fears? >>> plus, girls just want to have fun. fundamental rights, that is. a look at the powerful celebrations around the world to mark international women's day. , all in one. don't take if allergic to nurtec. allergic reactions can occur, even days after using. most common side effects were nausea, indigestion, and stomach pain. ask about nurtec odt. [stomach growling] it's nothing... sounds like something. ♪when you have nausea, heartburn, indigestion♪ ♪upset stomach, diarrhea♪ pepto bismol coats and soothes for fast relief when you need it most. hi, i'm sally. i'm from phoenix, arizona. i'm a flight
it was originally expected to be approved this month, now the fda wants an independent panel of experts to come in and look at its safety and efficacy. a late stage trial had shown that the drug can significantly slow the progression of alzheimer's but the treatment along with similar drugs carry safety concerns related to brain swelling and bleeding. >>> still to come, the new jobs report blows past expectations. is the economy headed for a soft landing despite all the recession...
0
0.0
Mar 11, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
fda-approved for 16 types of cancer, including certain early-stage cancers. one of those cancers is triple-negative breast cancer. keytruda may be used with chemotherapy medicines as treatment before surgery and then continued alone after surgery when you have early-stage breast cancer and are at high risk of it coming back. keytruda can cause your immune system to attack healthy parts of your body during or after treatment. this may be severe and lead to death. see your doctor right away if you have cough, shortness of breath, chest pain, diarrhea, severe stomach pain, severe nausea or vomiting, headache, light sensitivity, eye problems, irregular heartbeat, extreme tiredness, constipation, dizziness or fainting, changes in appetite, thirst, or urine, confusion, memory problems, muscle pain or weakness, fever, rash, itching, or flushing. there may be other side effects. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions, including immune system problems, if you've had or plan to have an organ or stem cell transplant, received chest radiation, or have a nervo
fda-approved for 16 types of cancer, including certain early-stage cancers. one of those cancers is triple-negative breast cancer. keytruda may be used with chemotherapy medicines as treatment before surgery and then continued alone after surgery when you have early-stage breast cancer and are at high risk of it coming back. keytruda can cause your immune system to attack healthy parts of your body during or after treatment. this may be severe and lead to death. see your doctor right away if...
0
0.0
Mar 16, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
botox® cosmetic is fda approved to temporarily make frown lines, crow's feet, and forehead lines look better. the effects of botox® cosmetic may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness may be a sign of a life-threatening condition. do not receive botox® cosmetic if you have a skin infection. side effects may include allergic reactions, injection site pain, headache, eyebrow, eyelid drooping, and eyelid swelling. tell your doctor about your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, and medications, including botulinum toxins as these may increase the risk of serious side effects. see for yourself at botoxcosmetic.com. looking for a smarter way to mop? try the swiffer powermop. ♪♪ an all-in-one cleaning tool, with a 360-degree swivel head that goes places a regular mop just can't. ♪♪ mop smarter with the swiffer powermop. can neuriva support your brain health? mary, janet, hey!! (thinking: eddie, no frasier, frank... frank?) fred! how are you
botox® cosmetic is fda approved to temporarily make frown lines, crow's feet, and forehead lines look better. the effects of botox® cosmetic may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness may be a sign of a life-threatening condition. do not receive botox® cosmetic if you have a skin infection. side effects may include allergic reactions, injection site pain,...
0
0.0
Mar 26, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
the fda originally approved this medication several decades ago, but it has expanded access making it available by telehealth and mail. the fda has a long process for approving drugs, but anti-abortion groups soon after roe v wade was overturned sued the fda in an effort to restrict access to this medication. 63% of women, 6 out of 10 abortions that happen in this country happen through medication abortion. we're talking about thousands of women whose access to this pill would be affected if the supreme court were to rule against the fda here. there are a number of drug companies that have written friend of the court briefs to the supreme court because they're very worried if the fda loses this case, that not just mifepristone will be impacted but its authority to regulate drugs will be impacted. one other thing is there is the politics. i've covered the supreme court. this is one of the biggest crowds. it really underscores what's at stake. >> neal katyal, is there a way to foresee how they may decide on this, or are there details you might need to explain to us? >> i think this resu
the fda originally approved this medication several decades ago, but it has expanded access making it available by telehealth and mail. the fda has a long process for approving drugs, but anti-abortion groups soon after roe v wade was overturned sued the fda in an effort to restrict access to this medication. 63% of women, 6 out of 10 abortions that happen in this country happen through medication abortion. we're talking about thousands of women whose access to this pill would be affected if...
0
0.0
Mar 27, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
if you believe that a woman has the right to choose, then an fda approved drug should be good enough for you, and you wouldn't have a lawsuit pursuing that. if you thought it was okay for women to, you know, do family planning and ivf, then you wouldn't say that an embryo is a person. i'm sorry. watch what they do, not what they say. they know now it's politically unpopular. they're trying to mealy mouth their way through it. watch what they do. >> congresswoman, elissa slotkin, thank you very much. >>> and coming up, what migrant women are doing to get health care. we'll take you to the underground network. >>> and keir simmons take you to the skies over paris. what the french are telling him about security for the olympics. about security for the olympics. and we'll come to you to fix it. >> tech vo: this customer was enjoying her morning walk. we texted her when we were on our way. and she could track us and see exactly when we'd arrive. >> woman: i have a few more minutes. let's go! >> tech vo: we came to her with service that fit her schedule. >> woman: you must be pascal. >> te
if you believe that a woman has the right to choose, then an fda approved drug should be good enough for you, and you wouldn't have a lawsuit pursuing that. if you thought it was okay for women to, you know, do family planning and ivf, then you wouldn't say that an embryo is a person. i'm sorry. watch what they do, not what they say. they know now it's politically unpopular. they're trying to mealy mouth their way through it. watch what they do. >> congresswoman, elissa slotkin, thank you...
55
55
Mar 30, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 55
favorite 0
quote 1
then we learned about bulkamid - an fda-approved, non-drug solution for our condition. it really works, and it lasts for years. it's been the best thing we've done for our families. visit findrealrelief.com to find an expert physician near you. ask if bulkamid is right for you and discuss potential risks. results and experiences may vary. move beyond the leaks. these underwear are period-proof. and sneeze-proof. and sweat-proof. they're leakproof underwear, from knix. comfy & confident protection that feel just like normal. with so many styles and colors to choose from, switching is easy at knix.com >>> former bryce tara of the january 6th committee, liz cheney, is urging the supreme court to promptly resolve donald trump's claims that he is immune from criminal prosecution in his d.c. federal elections interview case, which is right now and definitely delayed. >> i trust that they will deal in a responsible and expeditious fashion with this appeal, and recognize that taking action that will result in further delay in preventing the american people from seeing that evid
then we learned about bulkamid - an fda-approved, non-drug solution for our condition. it really works, and it lasts for years. it's been the best thing we've done for our families. visit findrealrelief.com to find an expert physician near you. ask if bulkamid is right for you and discuss potential risks. results and experiences may vary. move beyond the leaks. these underwear are period-proof. and sneeze-proof. and sweat-proof. they're leakproof underwear, from knix. comfy & confident...
0
0.0
Mar 10, 2024
03/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
opzelura is the first and only fda-approved prescription treatment for nonsegmental vitiligo proven to help repigment skin over time. restoring what's yours. it's possible with a steroid-free cream that you can apply yourself. opzelura can lower your ability to fight infections including tb or hepatitis b or c. serious lung infections, skin cancer, blood clots, and low blood cell counts occurred with opzelura. in people taking jak inhibitors, serious infections, increased risk of death, lymphoma, other cancers, and major cardiovascular events have occurred. the most common side effects were acne and itching where applied. repigmentation is possible. ask your dermatologist today about starting or refilling opzelura. pursue it. huh. how long have you been tracking our car's value with carvana? about starting or refilling opzelura. just, like, 7 months. should we sell it? we hold... hold... silver vans are going for more right now, should we... hold... our low mileage is paying off. you think we should... hold... depreciation is really heating up you think... hoooold!!! hooold! hooold. ho
opzelura is the first and only fda-approved prescription treatment for nonsegmental vitiligo proven to help repigment skin over time. restoring what's yours. it's possible with a steroid-free cream that you can apply yourself. opzelura can lower your ability to fight infections including tb or hepatitis b or c. serious lung infections, skin cancer, blood clots, and low blood cell counts occurred with opzelura. in people taking jak inhibitors, serious infections, increased risk of death,...