x must be like a fist, a freedom that knocks out tyranny so that it may never stand up again. we can do this over more on other western supplied weapons does have a quick look at how some of the heavy um can be eliminated. there without even firing a shot. the challenge it to prioritize is begun protection, so it's not the fastest time out there, but it is one of the most powerful claims to have the record for the longest range of killing destroying another time. just this challenge is for me to be precise, actually they've had real problems with it here and ukraine because of its lability as well there in the program. we were talking with the political consultants and human rights defend the oven. they'll definitely be highlighted the southern states of o basically failed to predict how the military gear would before mean real combat conditions . or they already made a mistake initially by uh,

not taking into account that the she a weight of those air rooms bags and is not compatible with the soft black soil of ukraine. and so they are easy to get bogged down and uh on top of it, as you mentioned, uh the wrong department that allows those, uh, those things to become sitting ducks essentially without having um, you know, any kind of, uh, peer to peer, a confrontation with washing thanks. so its a disaster. uh 61 uh, the 31 things were announced to be deployed. it is reported that between $5.00 and $8.00 of them were already taken out. i think the decision for now has been put on hold to deploy them. it's obviously a blow to the american onto industry because it shows that the equipment is not performing in the war theaters and it makes it difficult to sell the system to

put actual we'd be buyers. so it continues online right now or the oxy dot com, we can also catch it for anything else we're doing here at all t on job of modesty road across the telegram as well as a well archie is world wide for sure. appreciate you. joining us here at ology international welcome back to the, the,

the, the hi everybody. this is a bailey show because well, it's different. we hold no punches, so look for it every day. well, yeah, truth bomb number one, mike johnson. he gets boomed by students at columbia university trip on number 2, johnson goes on to lecture those students accuse and try to humiliate them. they are protestors who are calling for a cease fire that they deserve that just, i'm number 3. us secretary state anthony blanket arrives in china after giving tie $18000000000.00 and they the chinese that is they don't like it. i'm rick sanchez. this is direct impact. the,

i want to start with the question, why just why, why would you do something like this? unless it's just a pure power play. an almost romanesque move among peasants. because you know, or you think you have all the power the i mean what the house even doing their speaker suddenly showing up at a college campus to take on protesters asking for a ceasefire. and did you notice the smile? did you notice the smirk on his face there at the end?

and imagine, imagine how smug and self important you have to be to show up at a place where people are angry, that you are sending money to condone and continue a massacre of the people that they are protesting about the people that they are caring about. any show up there to make sure them and to ridicule them. how does that seriously does that speak or the house? my john? so that's who a man who like most of us politicians and this crazy system of ours, is simply a guy we pay, we pay him a salary, so he can steal from us. last, i checked to the tune of $9000000.00 in, in donations from, from political donors. i mean, here's mike johnson reading a statement to the students to these print testers like he's trying to get them go

right. he's trying to make them mad at me that it works, by the way, the statement almost sounds like it's written by these really war cabinet. as soon as he tells the students what he basically is looking at them and saying, you're all terrible, terrible people here, listen. the chairs, traditions of this university are being overtaken right now by radical and extreme ideologies. they place a target on the backs of jewish students in the united states. and here on this campus, a growing number of students have channels in support of terrorist. they've chase down jewish students. they have mocked him and the revised them. they have shouted racial ethnic epithets. they've screened at those who bear the star of david. enjoy your free speech. wait a minute, enjoy your free speech. what does that sound like?

what, what does that enjoy your free speech? is that a threat? is that a threat? is he suggesting that he can take it away from them, like our parents would say to us, i hope you like that, that, that, that you know, that ice cream you're having cuz you're not going to get any more of it. i've actually sort of i mean is that what is doing? is it going to take it away from them? as in fact he may, is he suggesting that's freeze. they just, it's something that comes from him and it comes from the government and they are on great say for not thanking him for giving them this, this opportunity to say these crazy things that they think or what, what, by the way, free speech as an inalienable right, right, it's guaranteed to us as human beings or so we thought, at least that's what jefferson said, right? i mean, that's what john locks at. if you go back and read where the find,

you know, where, where, where are constitutional thinking came from. by the way, no less the constitution, but us constitution guarantees. i felt like some politician could go somewhere and say you better be careful. you like what you're doing because i can pick that away from you. what's it doing? i mean, i'm sorry, but when i watch this as an american, i was just, i was actually angry and wondering what the hell is going on here. i can help, but ask myself if, as i watch this moment, i'm not looking into the future and seeing what a us religious the accuracy is going to look like at some point. i mean look i, i happen to be a christian. i grew up catholic. you know, proud to have grown up catholic, still practice catholicism, but i don't use it against other people or other religions. mike johnson has told us that his position on gaza and what he's doing here there at. busy columbia

university comes from the bible, his interpretation of the bible by the way. and so that's about my take on it. he said it appeared as the biblical admonition of staying with his ro, we will and, and they will prevail. it's a big the go out, much to watch. did you hear when he just said, let me hear it again. the biblical admonition is staying with his ro, we will and, and they will prevail. it's a bit biblical admonition and that's so he's basing my country, maybe your country's foreign policy on his reading of the bible, which most christians would, by the way, disagree with that reading that he has of the bible. there's something just so horribly troubling about this speech about johnson doing this as he lectures, protesters for saying mean things that quote might cause others to place

a target on the backs of jews. one can help then, but think especially me cuz i happen to have a last name that ends in easy right. like sanchez gomez rodriguez. you know, those folks 60000000 of us who live here in the united states. so when we hear that, we can think of how hypocritical this is coming from a man was done that exact same when it comes to mexicans. and other immigrants from latin america coming into the united states. i mean, because of him and his very ugly words on that topic, which he has a right to by the way. he has a right to his ugly words. we all have right to ugly words. but it's because of his ugly words in part. these folks from mexico and other immigrants, or as he would call them all illegals, probably including me, that somehow that's the reason. so many of those folks are hated by millions of

americans. look, that's just a fact. go look at any pole that's been done on this and this is not a political point. i'm not making a political argument here. i'm not trying to be pro, this are pro that this isn't about the right. this isn't about the left and absolutely american jews shouldn't be respected for their accomplishments. i should, you know, american immigrants, or hispanic immigrants who are americans. and so again, i mean, this is not about politics. it's about the ugly and very on american. let me repeat that, the ugly and very american look of self righteousness, the over waning attitude, that we're seeing from wayne to many of our leaders these days, but seem to suggest they can tell us what to do. while they take millions of dollars from defense contractors and then millions more in this case from israel.

by the way, johnson is not alone here. the. yeah. see that guy right there. i can say the same about him. that's the secretary state anthony blinking who flies around the world telling. busy countries what they must do, what they must do, it's as if as easy is it the rest of the world exists only at the pleasure of what he and president biden mandate at any given time. a speaking of the president, as we watch blinking, arriving in china in the place of president biden. it's kind of hard not to wonder what most americans must be thinking. and that is why isn't mister by meeting with the president of china? is he too old? is he too feeble? just asking, look for when we should probably know out of decency and diplomatic protocol,

but chinese did not meet the secretary of state the way the speaker was met with those right. like we saw in columbia university. i mean, those are students, though the chinese probably thought about it. the chinese are set to be in sensed by what the secretary of state blinking has just pushed through congress a payment of $8000000000.00 to taiwan, so that taiwan can build up its military for a possible war with china. now, let me put you in their place. if you're a china, right, you are china. that has to be calling, right? because as, as they see it, taiwan is one of their provinces with which they have some differences, no doubt it to them. it's not another nation with which it wants to have a war. in fact, china is, is not holding back after what they have seen occur in the last week with

especially the 8000000000 dollars that was, that's, that was because the soon after you saw blinking arrived there, they released this statement saying and no on certain terms of china does not appreciate the meddling in their affairs when it comes to taiwan. here it is to hello and teach initial jungle and make the taiwan issue as time has internal affairs, which tolerate to no external interference. the assertion of taiwan related content and to the us congressional bill seriously violates the one china principal and the free joint communiques of china in the us. and since a wrong signal to the separate is forces in taiwan. we're formerly opposed to it. we urge the us side to honor his commitment of not supporting taiwan independence with concrete actions and stop arming taiwan in any way want. joining us now to talk about this is george us. i'm really is research. busy fellow. busy at the global policy institute and the author of the book, bombs for peace,

nato's humanitarian war on yugoslavia. um, well, i can only imagine what it would be like if texas, who has suggested at certain times sometimes seriously, sometimes not so seriously. but they want to separate from the united states because they don't like the liberals in the white house. they don't like the fact that the united states is screwing up their border and they probably wouldn't be big enough and do well enough alone. and suddenly, soon after they say that here comes china or russia or a ron and says fine. since you don't like washington, we're going to help you. we're going to give you $8000000000.00 plus we're going to give you some more planes and some tax. i just cannot but wonder how what that's what those george as well, right. as it was said, sorry, well, the united states would act with great deal of force and would be quite brutal in the way it applies as far as there's no comparison with china,

china has been extremely holler. and um, oh, well this is, he is ivory. let's imagine the shanghai community was issued in 1972 during president nixon's visit there, china, in which the united states officially accepted that there was one china. and the time one was a box of china. since then, china has not made any move to use force against i wanna now, when china then comes of weights, these massive military packages, that's $9000000000.00. i mean, they see that what the united states is doing and i want is what it was doing in ukraine, leading up to 2022. it kept boring in alms. um and uh, military rising. the place to the point at which rupture was said, well, we can't allow this is to go on but much longer because it's endangering all russia nationals or millions of russian nationals in ukraine. if they make

a move against them, there's not going to be very much we can do about it. sure all a total was and i think that's the case that with china as well because china has drawn a line in the sand and said, well, if i won the glass independence back will be a cost was bailey. then we would use force. well, the more you put in arms into taiwanda, more likely it is. at some point i want will declare a defendant to say, hey, do your best because look at how well we are. echo the pool, keep looking strategy. and there's another part to that, right? but what we saw in ukraine, for example, heck, what we've seen and all over the world every everywhere from uh, central me go to, you know, uh, parts of latin america and places like, uh, guatemala. the key is to find some people within whatever country you want to change the order in and find a minority group or

a separate this group or somebody whether they are actually already there. and then you below them up or you create them through the c. i a and then you blow them up and then you get those folks to start having demonstrations and then you start having front desk them before you know, and somehow they end up with some guns and then suddenly there's violence on the street. and before you know, when you're close to having, what is the perfect civil war in that country, which has been fed by our government. and it wouldn't surprise me if china doesn't think the sons of guns are trying to do the same thing. they've done. busy over the world, and they just didn't ukraine in that fashion. inside taiwan. you say what? and yeah, no question. that's exactly what us nato strategy has been. which is you go to the countries that are deeply divided. there are, you know, a serious fracture lines in the country, and then you essentially back one faction against another was sooner or later,

it's going to explode. so it was, you know, the people here was ukraine. ukraine was a sorry, divided country when you was very divided, you have the east, which was where your russian and oriented was roughly, you had the west, you know, the lot of polls. there was this kind of an antagonistic towards russia. so what did the united states in nature do they moved in and back one faction? mm hm. well, when you back one, and then the other faction once say, well, we don't want any positive because uh, you know, you potentially back, i hop the country that we really don't get on with any level here. we don't want to give a, be a problem. it's because this was executive strategy, the united states and nato. was you in you this lobby? it's a, it's the, during the 1990s when he crushed was suffering kinds of nationalism including supporting terrorism. and then of course they, they still back and say, hey, look, it's exploded. we now need to, in intervene to rectify the mess that we made. and of course,

i would record 30 years on there as bad as they always were. that's in the united states, mostly doing it in georgia as well. yeah, no, no, let's listen and, and you know, um, but i think they've done it in latin america columbia. they did it in for road. they did it recently in bolivia, they did it. and as i mentioned in guatemala, obviously they did it in cuba. they did it in the dominican republic. uh they did it in a row. it's like we can't, we wouldn't be here all day and we were going to name all the times of this. and what's funny is, we're living at the time now with the united states seems to be very sub for rated, and we need to guard against that. but how sad it would be if someone did that to us. because right now we are a divided country, and yet i know, you know, most smart americans know that we have done that around the world and hopefully we don't do it in china to the point we're trying to get. so brussel, but they start maybe some kind of conflagration there,

which could result in world war 3. let's just be honest about it, george. let's do this. i'm going to take a break. when we come back, i want to ask you about this guy johnson. i mean, i am just, i, i don't even know what to say about the things this guy has been doing lately. i'm taking a back and, and, and i want to get your sense of it. uh, his saying he makes foreign policy decisions based on the readings is going to scroll and humiliate students who are protesting says they have no right to say mean games will be right back the

on the market back to direct impact on re sanchez. by the way, i was just talking to george about the situation in latin america and liquid pops up. we've got some video coming in. these are scenes from the streets of bolivia. look at this, the fairly what's going on here. once again in bolivia, hundreds of teachers took to the streets of la pas are protesting against forced retirement. the teachers also demanded the government of president luis, our se, allocate more money to their increased class hours. seems routine butler don't be surprised if there's a story behind the story here. in other words, the us, as i was just discussing a little while ago with george, our leaders, not our country. we're good people, they're not. they have had

a history of interfering a lot in america. bolivia, specifically, sources inside the country have revealed that in 2019 the us assisted in the removal of the democratically elected president, evo morales. morales was overthrown by the military helped by the c. i, a, despite the fact that he had led the bolivian economy to incredible record heights . i mean, morales was the country's 1st indigenous president. his government was able to reduce property by 42 percent extreme poverty by 60 percent. the november cool was led by the country's leads, seeking to revert state power to the people who and monopolized it before. morales is election in 2005, and guess who helped them do that. you guess that you only get one guess and you're right. we did state department, the c i a we didn't like the guy even though the people liked them, even though he was doing well. and we decided to do exactly with george suggest we're kind of doing right now in china, but i'm going to move away from that for

a minute because i don't want to run out of time without giving you an opportunity to speak to our speaker of the house, a gentleman from louisiana named mike johnson. the things he has said and done lately have even chuck probably, you know, george as well. um, you know, he hasn't really shocked with, i mean like the, his, um uh, staggering incompetence is possible. the calls for uh, republicans sir, let's think of a, his immediate, previous as a nancy below c, she relentlessly pursued a democratic party agenda. she have a majority as small as johnson's you, who's that dining majority of doing that. a democratic body agenda. now let's see

what john johnson has just signed off on every single pod of bikers agenda that 25000000000 is everything. it's an a wish list for the by the ministration. you think you have a bypass of the different policy? why you helping the president all the different bobby, you know the election. yeah. bring up in him. essentially enact is agenda that 95000000000. 61000000000. so you take the israel, i'm 1000000000, but i want and then of course, the thing done today and, and everything else. so it is, is bizarre. and then he goes to columbia, which again, is really quite bizarre because, you know, if you're a republican, the, you know, you're in something he got the liberals. and once i did the liberals on the other, they don't show that at columbia. you know, you've got the liberal design. yes. one side, and then you've got the gun. a woke supporters of the uh,

for the palestinians. okay. by the way, for the benefit of our viewers to hold off for the benefit of our viewers, georgia, talking about columbia university, not columbia of the country, but continue to columbia. the us. exactly. so you say, okay, it's, it's an intramural fight. it's hosting the democrats. i mean, the republicans knowing how, how it's incumbent and they usually are in elections. this is a godsend, you know, have been finding out, don't get yourself involved. but instead, he goes that he becomes the object of hatred. his thoughts issuing threats with the suggestion now is that the government cutting off all kinds of phones from colombia in the bus, and that's a serious business. i mean, all of the i yeah, universe just depend on government drugs. i mean, you know, you go to the national science foundation, defense have gone to the national institute of health sciences centers for disease control. they give a lot of money to universities. i think based off the making universities largest

are going to close down, you know, basketball court. so just what do we just think of the principle of what he's saying? he's saying that in america as a government official, he doesn't like what people are saying. not because what there is, by the way, i don't necessarily agree with what the port testers are saying, but they have a right to say it. people have, or i happen to be cuban. people have a right to say, i don't like cubans, they have a right to say which enters. i can't stand you. i hit your sho, george. i don't like you don't like your people. i don't like where you come from. i don't like your parents. i have a right to say all of those things. is it smart? is it nice? is it kind? no, it doesn't matter. you still have a right to save it. i don't want people to cut his eyes, jews. i don't want people to cut his eyes. anybody but the fact that he's going there and saying you can say these things about this group of people. my god, that sounds auto american is how it is on the cell and it goes to it what, what's happening here is an unfortunate phenomenon,

which is that criticism of his ro, oscar, this is what it is, right? which much we did. this is being compounded with something different, which isn't the same. it is. yeah. so the 2 usually used interchangeably. whereas it's quite clear that in all of these universities the, the protest i protest director that is relevant. but israel is doing right now in gaza, but instead, when you listen to johnson and you listen to many of the politicians to everybody else, of course the media design just committed juice, feel threatened. there's no evidence whatsoever. the any jewish students all threatened as no that was being said. now if you're a jewish student and you all waving these re the flag, the jobs is that the bill will be voice raise against you. but that's a separate issue of the idea that your jury student. yeah, joe, is that something you get beat? not that's nonsense. that has not happened. there's no evidence that anything like that is that's good. yeah. look, i'm skokie, illinois, folks,

for those of you watching us right now, go and look up what happened in skokie, illinois, a decision that was made that essentially said, you can't do that kind of things that the speakers doing, but it looks like we're going somehow back in time and we didn't even get a chance to talk about his biblical readings, which causes him to have these foreign policy decisions. cuz we're out of time, but i'll get you back george, i'll get you back. thank you, george. so i'm, well, what, what a pleasure to talk to you. what an interesting turn of events this week, and we'll be looking for more discussion on that again before i go, i want to remind you of what we try to do here is i think you can tell we try to simply the silo the world, you know, i mean, think of things perhaps from another point of view, because we don't think troops should live in little boxes, whether the run by the state department or the c i a or anybody for that matter. i'm rick sanchez. i'll be looking for you again with directed the the,

the already impose sanctions on more than a 100 chinese entities export controls, etc. and we're fully prepared to, to actually take additional measures. yeah. black mailing in beijing, the us secretary of state, direct named china, over at the support of russia, saying if it continues uncle sam's sanctions are ready to strike. nestle faces, criticism for pushing sugar pact, baby for miller, and developing nations offerings, healthy aversions to western market. all the green fields sold by in this thing. so it's an on our without any added sugar while you know, when you didn't confuse you find 2 routes on that bridge and that product to clear those found on the sugar here, no sugar there.