as to fight for freedom and they're still fighting against president for him as for union as long that it is a similar story. i mean, after her husband's death, it was a another reason for the west, essentially to point the finger at moscow and about how of pressing the regime is in russia. and since that extent of all of these, this, everyone's been trying to connect the 2 matters together. so alex, there's no volume, it says and ukraine. let's take a look. he was brave. he was principal, who's dedicated to building a russian where the rule of law existed. and i'm worried applied to everybody involved in believe in that russian, that russia, he knew it was a cause worth fighting for. and obviously even died for his tragedy reminders of the stakes. and this moment we had to provide the funding so ukraine can keep defend himself against pollutants, vicious on slice and war crimes. i strongly agree that the best way to own the

memory of alexis nev on it, is to ensure that it doesn't fit and it doesn't win on the battlefield about about the ukraine. today's now of course, the mainstream media doesn't catch a break from parity in the masters agenda. it's the russian evil regime versus freedom fighters. and of course, how vital this frozen american a bill is to your point, especially after and i've always best. let's take a look. the timing of who's death was notable given it took place during the munich security conference when you had so many people from around the world, they are gathered to show their support for ukraine to discuss that. it seems like it might be a signal potentially a lot of are put in critical life. thing of all me is dead by and says pollutants responsible. do you agree and how should the us respond? yeah, there's no question. absolutely. he's responsible. the best thing that we can do right now is to pass the the a bill that the ukrainians need a so urgently to help them continue what they're doing to defeat hooton's, army and ukraine. what else possibly could we do right now to holes?

whatever fruit and accountable the most important thing the united states could do right now is to pass the supplemental by and pass the aid of for ukraine. i mean, what was biden's goal in inviting them? how was he going to try and resuscitate his approval ratings by picking back 2 of these on to russian? here is, i mean, given how unhappy americans all with biden's foreign policy doesn't really seem like a winning strategy. of course, what they're trying to do. it doesn't really make sense now and the volume his wife is being of some sort of opposition here. they don't really care if it, this title was given to her by the people, or was it just inherited from her late husband? as long as his paint in russia as a bad evil entity in this world, it works for them. but to put it some simply trying to show no volume, his wife, as villains keys allies just simply doesn't work. because when you don't really like no volume in that is because of his sense on crime. you know, back in 2014, they claim that he did not oppose. uh the good with the creation of crimea with

a rush i back then. so ukrainian 1st lady just probably didn't feel comfortable being in the same presence isn't of only his wife. and this, this really is not going to work out for the us officials because i think their home here was essentially to have this weight picture, a photon of, on his wife and uh, the for ukrainian 1st lady together to show some sort of powerful image the joe bite and state of the union. so i think it's just not going to work. the plan seems like a failure lot. so we have time for this. uh, but do you stay with us the international brick sanchez's next with direct impact fees looking at the one slide the election of george galloway to the tape holloman's galloway of course, galvanized support by criticizing you. pay lead is above best support for it is well and it's for, oh gosh, the,

the, the fiber, buddy, i'm rick sanchez. and i'm here to tell you that after being a journalist and a news presenter for, for the biggest television networks in the united states, i think it's time for some context and for some truth telling. and in that vein, here's what we're going to be talking about today. number one, the most important election today that determines who will be the nominees for president of the united states is done surprises. not really. number 2, china makes a major announcement about its economy and it's military surprises. yes, really. number 3 wives, donald trump meeting with you on mosque. the answer will not surprise you. there is a video of video of george galloway. busy puts the corporate news media exactly where it belongs. this is a moment, folks,

i'm telling you. sure. as i'm sitting here, this is a moment that you have to watch. if you're ready. this is direct impact. the for those of you watching us all over the world, it's called super tuesday. i know courtney this is when more states that at any other time or. busy low to decide who will be there, parties picked to run for president. as expected, the democrats who are controlled more than anything else by the will of their party apparatus, x. then the will of the voters. let's face it, have chosen president biden to remain as their nominee, and also as expected republicans who generally are afraid to take on the trump mistake. they are choosing the former president. that's their domini. there's one bit of news from all of this stuff. one bit of news that comes out of super tuesday,

by golly, and it's this at the time, has now come to suspend my campaign. i said i wanted americans to have their voices heard. i have done that. i have no regrets. and although i will no longer be a candidate, i will not stop using my voice for the things i believe in there. you know, she's out a last mr. trump, for his part, is reportedly looking for money. big money, you know, obviously needs donors the shore of his campaign and they also have some legal bills and now some find that stand that about half a $1000000000.00. there's a lot being made of this meeting that apparently has taken place between the former president and eva on mosque who is said to be worth some $200000000000.00. the 2 man sitting there in a previous meeting apparently met so that mr. trump could ask him for some financial assistance with his campaign with well, well,

we don't know the answer to that question. we do know that the law mosque has now taken to the thing he owns twitter, x, whatever you want to call it. and he has put out the following, quote, just to be clear, just to be clear, i am not donating money to either candidate for you as president the, the pomp and ceremony. let's talk china. how about the nation that will likely be the world's leading economy, surpassing the us by the end of the decade is emitting to undergoing some financial difficulties at the present moment. however, it is still setting a goal to grow their economy this year by 5 percent. that's their number, that's their target 5 percent. which by the way,

i don't know if you've thought about this. i have it, that's a percentage of those countries in the world including ours would die for. but the big news out of this meeting from the chinese parliament is a declaration that when it comes to taiwan, this is important when it comes to taiwan. it's no more mister, nice guy. speaking at the great hall of the people in gentlemen square, premier league train said china will again increase its defense spending and apparently is no longer it says, apparently no longer talking about a peaceful reunification with its wayward province. also in monday, lea flagged another roys in defense spending and toughened directory toward taiwan . police report to parliament dropped all mention of peaceful reunification with the island which phasing views as a breakaway province. instead,

it promised to resolutely oppose any move towards taiwan independence. so we have to ask ourselves, as we listen to that is china using this opportunity, this pomp and circumstance to send the west a warning one that is in response to the military exercises that the united states and others have been undertaking off of their coast. see that is what george galloway would say that they are doing but you know what might be an even better question right now. i know you're wondering why you're talking about george galloway, cuz this is a question that they're asking. busy now in the british isles, and the question is these days? what is george galloway doing? yeah, the former british m, p and frequent guessed here on the show for many years appears to be turning the country's political establishment upside down. galloway is, as i see, the truth teller that his troops appear to be making both politicians and reporters

uncomfortable over their motors in a place called rochdale. have voted to send galloway back to panama. as a member of the pro workers party, he beat the institutional regulars by openly criticizing. among other things, the country is support for israel's continual bombing of gaza. members wasting to take the seats, please come to the table. the i swear to god that i will be faithful and bear to allegiance to his majesty king charles his heirs and successes according to law. so help and go wow. so there is, as george galloway without the for dora being sworn in as

a new m. p. again, and since that's where, again, a, even before the corporate media and england, i mean really the corporate media all over the world has been attacking the sky at a true to form. the scottish hell raiser has been firing back. in fact, there may be no better example of this exchange, which is going absolutely viral. this guy, tv interviewer, this is what i was telling you about that i want to see this guy tv interviewer seems to be a defender of the prime minister peppers galloway with a with prepared questions. and galloway just, that's right back. this is really something pay attention here it is. the prime minister is saying busy was got, we're talking about little receipt, so not in the frag end of his prime minister should. don't talk to me is that he's

coming down from the mount with tablets of stone. the things that he says are some are meant to for me, they may. oh you, they don't whole me. a lot of people have just thoughts what the prime minister said. this is your opportunity to respond and so what he sides. well, he says that there are forces here i'm trying to tear us apart. he is applying view of devices will take a well you have to run the election campaign. this is, this is trying to appeal, particularly on hold on charlie from the one section, the committee, one of the election, me or issues. so now i've got the democratic mandate here. not really so not, he didn't even come 2nd. there's lucky to come start. so don't talk to me, statements made by the sure not because if i'm supposed to be impressed by them, we don't, you don't impress me much we. it's got his spend some time today on the streets of rock styles. and they're all people who say that they feel intimidated by people

are right. like like you and the people are supposed to have just on the daytime they have the do you have come straight to jo campaign on foreign affairs and they worry that route. i will not, i don't, that's miles up to you. i was just elected with a something majority by the electra and rochdale, that's all the mattress to me to why the people in the streets of the day worried to people voted yesterday. i think voted for me. why is that difficult for you to dress? why the people on the streets baris? there may be people who didn't vote for me for what it, but the majority, the something majority voltage for me. i've got the monday. i'm going to the house of commons with it, and it's a monday you think to do well, because there are people that listen to me, what you say, what you say about whether or not israel has the right to exist, what you say about what many jewish peoples in college need threatening. we have to like go fish and last night. why are they heating it?

because in the life of the prime ministers and don't feel like telling me about the prime minister as if he was moses. you don't respect the members. do i respect the prime minister? i despise the prime minister and get millions and millions and millions of people in this country despise the prime minister. i don't respect the prime minister at all. oh, what a moment there is there's. there's so much to take away from that conversation and i think it fits a global perspective. not just a british perspective. when we come back, we're going to be joined by our panel to discuss mr galloway's studying this victory. there is uh steve gill, c of gill media along with the executive director of being wrong. paul institute daniel mcadams. we will be right back

the yeah, watching is why isn't why in this country, what if i give vote plenty of the store in this shed and i sure don't want to, but i'm not going to say lots of green scale. you know when i am, what are your desktop session? let's just sean. your just is when you bought this one you said what is the the, the, the of the same rom. just don't have to shape

house because the engagement equals the trail. when so many find themselves will support we choose to look for common ground the the welcome back. i'm rick sanchez and we are joined now by steve g o. c o go media. an executive director of the ron paul institute. barry is one of my favorite guests, daniel, mike adams. steve, i gotta start with you cuz you're kind of a ra politician kind of guy. and, and i just watched that exchange with galloway and i thought that was one of the best take downs i've seen in a long time on the part of a politician for a corporate media type. you say what? i'm just sorry, the super tuesday has already passed, so i can't write him in,

but i mean, that's the kind of straight talk that we get from a donald trump and, and he is going to be beloved, not despised in, in england by cic significant share of the population, some of them will despise him too, but he doesn't necessarily, you know, donald trump is a guy who placed the one side. okay. let's face it like him or hate him. he plays the one side. he knows what, where his bread is buttered. this guy doesn't this guy just as much of left, easy as a writing in many ways that i think that's fascinating. by the way, the consortium of votes that he got was just that it was people on the left and people on the right came together to put him in to office while it, and most of us are not in a block of what we believe, you know, we have things that are considered progressive, we have things that are considered conservative, and there's a lot that are in the middle that are trying to balance, you know, i feel this way, but i think this way, balancing emotion and, and, and facts. let me bring dan and den. um when i watch, galloway i think of ron paul. i think that and maybe i'm going a little overboard here. i think ron paul is a manifestation pardon me,

galloway or actually both ways that can work. but let's go with galloway i didn't. galloway is in many ways a manifestation of what the wrong. paul institute stands for a bit of libertarianism, with a sense of common sense and of an effort to put the brakes on nations like the british isles. and the united states effort to continually want to run the world. my view was yours will break, as you know, the mainstream media has tried to put americans in the rest of the world, especially what americans inbox is. you either a left to you and you watch rachel or your writing and you watch fox and that is your religion. it's almost a substitute for religion in the united states. yeah. so someone like a one paul, what george gallery comes along and that breaks the mole completely because most of us are no longer like that. most of us are just as happy to watch. glen greenwald, as we are tucker carlson, has judged depaula toner for as rick sanchez. you know,

we don't fit into these nice boxes anywhere anymore. so that's what one paul grasped in 2008 when he broke out in this in this candidacy. and that's what george galloway has has up in price for years. i've watched him for years, but at this moment when we're seeing the horrors going on in the world right now, he has the merge to shine the light on the do awfully both in the u. k in the us and those were in the world. so it's a real, you know, confluence of amazing forces. what we're going to talk about is that a minute and i know, and i know what they are, it's china, it's gaza, it's russia ukraine. right? and we're going to get there, but 1st let me focus a little bit on what steve and i were talking about. and that is the sense of anti establishment that you get from a guy like george galloway. and he was able to do it by clicking right at the center of force, the centrifuge, if you will, in what it shows. and that is the prime minister and essentially side to this

reporter who seemed dumbfounded when he told him he's the prime minister. he's not got something about that for a v ology that we can say in any one of our democracies that i think guard so much democracies anymore. i think really hits home. i think that's where he got people to want to make that video viral. do you agree as well? i think one aspect of it was was galloway focusing on, i was elected, we don't know really. sure not. so that was not elected by his father at all. and so you have this rhetoric, well our democracy is threatened by a guy who was democratically elected. and i think that was really the, the great point he was making in that exchange, among others. do you believe steve, that when he pushes back and says, because you know this guy, tv and the bbc are la, i think, and i may be wrong, and i may get some mail from england on this. they're kind of our version of cnn,

and fox and nbc and all these institutional, you know, corporate networks that we have here too. they, they abide by certain means. and i think this from porter was saying i'm here to defend the prime minister. and he kind of put them in his place. yeah. and they follow the the in the box thinking. i think what you're seeing from, from galloway i think what you're seeing with the election of mail you. i think what you saw with the boss a narrow end, you've got some of the european countries that are following that same track. you're seeing this rise of populism and it is being embraced. and it is a trend that, that the bureaucratic deep states are not gonna lie to what it can't be here. all right, i'm going to push back on you for that. it can't be populism for the sake of populism . no, i can't believe you know, but let me, let me push back a little more on that. you can just go out and say, i hate mexicans, therefore vote for me knowing that 40 percent of americans are mad about what's going on in the border. that's populism. used in an a serious way. populism used in

a positive intellectual way. the way i believe, galloway does. it is a good way of using populace and tell me how well it. and i'll talk to the, to the libertarian view, we talked earlier, our founders were small l. libertarians get off my back it out of my way, get out of my pocket, leave me alone. that's the kind of populism of saying, you do what's right. use some common sense, it is, it is an intellectual, but also visceral population. back to you dan, this, this did this little of back and forth, i just had with, with uh, steve populism for the 2nd populism as opposed to intellectual. are you populism? so, you know, i've always thought when i listen and i disagree with a lot of what ran pulse as from time to time and ron paul. but i think they always come at it from a very smart position. and not just trying to say things because they know they've got a bunch of white guys with beers to go along with them or for that matter. african americans or latinos. what do you think? well, i know ron paul, better. i've worked with him for 24 years now,

so i know and much better and his position is always been. you must 1st have a set of principles and that's one thing completely lacking in washington. i, my guess is, i'm not an expert, but my guess is it's lucky in the u. k. certainly, you know, the cure storm or en route you to like both support the wars they both want to go to war with russia. they both want to support israel and slaughtering more gardens . they don't buy both one to take on china. so there's this do obsolete. and so they don't run on any principles. they run on their affection for power, money, and power, and we know very well, right? that's what striving the war and ukraine, the billions of dollars really getting skimmed off of the military industrial complex and all of its denizens in washington dc. where you are. is it fair? especially? is it a specially unfair to attack a man and call him an anti semite? just because he has, as i think, galloway would say, a position on what israel's foreign policy is, which is negative a well i,

i've seen a clip of gallon where he was very, very clear. i mean, he's a man of a left and as you say, rick, i'm sure there are plenty of things i wouldn't agree with him on if we want to get into the weeds. but i've seen him very clearly defend his options, for example, against a partridge in south africa, about his jewish, you know, with the african national congress was made up of the north africans were predominately george. and he's talked about a warranty as an underground worker opposing a part dates in south africa, not close the he worked with you is the idea that if you are against israel's current policies that you're somehow anti jewish is absurd and he makes that excellent point. but of course there's, there's no way there's no parallel between these. we've gotten to a point though, steve, in this country where it does seem like this apparatus, i know people on the right like to call it the deep state. i stay away from those words because it brings, it makes it sound like it's some type of conspiracy and i don't think it's as much conspiratorial as it is problem matic. and that this thing inside our country that we have kept seating because it makes money. same thing happens with the bank and

a lot of other institutions, but defense has become this monster apparatus that we keep feeding at eventually it wants to eat. so it may have another base and ukraine. it means another base in germany. it moves more soldiers, it may have more money if it needs a war, literally needs a war for it to be able to make money. that's a problem. and i think that is kind of what we were talking about. and that's the kind of thing the galloway seems to despise every time you listen to him talk, that's important. we used to hang war profiteers in this country during the civil war when they were providing boots that would wear out while they're while they're walking. and you're right, we had the direct war and then moved to the afghanistan. when we got there, we had to have another one to sell more bombs and missiles and look, i'm the son of an air force fighter pilot. i have great respect for our military, but not those who are profit tearing from it. and when you see this kind of ongoing, even the, even the promises you have, tim scott's,

i know we're or given them the stuff we're to loaning the crazy is the yeah, we're going to get paid back to that. or then they say, well, there's the 60000000000 they're asking for for ukraine now, is actually going to go to the big business military industrial complex, the dirty little secret. so we're doing this to pay people here who'll give us donations. how do we, how do we get to george galloway in the united states? i know you're going to argue that trump may be that, but i watch the trump administration name a new president in the bed as well. i like, how are you the name of president that as well? i saw the trump administration kissed baby nathan. yeah. who's behind in ways that i've never seen anybody kids, anybody's born in foreign policy. so to save a trump is a galloway, i think is a little bit of a stretch. but then again, let me give the opportunity to disagree. well, israel's unique, it is a fine line to say i could have disagree with their policies as a country and not be branded as an anti semite, if it's a unique counsel. but what is it, what, what, that would be? nothing, you know, throughout his administration and most people would say to abraham accord is what

let us to where we are today. but i can disagree with the british policy and not be accused of being anti church of england. garage degree of food and not be accused of attacking the russian orthodox church although. so let's, he's actually doing that if you're expecting. well, and then here's the, here's the point. that's as we look at of foreign policy, we can help but see 3 general areas where our, our, our, our, what is the proper word that i should use to describe this. our defense mechanism is making sure that those places stay fully with enough for them to be able to draw funding from them. one of them is china, no doubt. the other one is uh, is wheel, gaza, no doubt. the other one, of course, is ukraine. if they can keep those 3 things, going not necessarily to win anything, but just to keep them going. it seems to me what they really want is the resources from it. isn't that the i'm good as well. i'm not even trying to hide it anymore.

rick. i mean, we saw victoria newland about a week ago just before she for the result. i retired from the state department open the st. louis, you guys don't realize 95 percent of the money we're spending on your credit stays right here in dc. you know, bank weight, i mean, and i think tony blinking said it himself means they're not trying to hide it anymore. this used to be called money to defend the united states. it's not anymore . they're open. we saying, look, we go to fashion system. we've got corporate isn't here, we gotta keep lockheed martin the life. yeah. and that's just how it goes. and then maybe a couple of jobs that trickle down to the, you know, to the p on somewhere. but this is about mean this is late, empire, stuff for it. i mean, this is late, empire funding, money stuff. that's the stuff that's happening in there. it's open the admitting it . thank god for all his faults for the george galloway's in the wrong pauls and the people out there who are willing to say we can continue in this direction because it's going to lead to. busy we're on doing and we have to be able to ask the right questions, and unfortunately there are very few in the media who are doing that. i think you

both gentlemen for helping us do just that steve go and daniel mike adams, thank you both. this is a great conversation before we go. i do want to remind you of something about our mission here. really, it's pretty simple. we want to kind of do silo the world. we don't want to live and little boxes where i only think what my friends think or hate what the other guys think. no truth. don't live in boxes. truth, you're everywhere. public sanchez and i'll be looking for you right here where i hope to provide a direct impact. the

of the south africa lays clear what these were any. any game is latoria saxon, you may go great charges against tele, beep. poultry. it's genocide case encompasses the red cross says, edge offering a don't. garza was results with crisis dealing with the process that are in addition to sustainable supply, inquired quantities of turn a needed food to the vast majority of the population around named pounds in american oil kind of get in or talent, remove the gangs. us sanctions on this.