of the election to send version stealing of classified documents, how much money fraud found present. donald trump's legal troubles are not only costing him precious time on the campaign trail but could cost in his wealth as well. i'm say now here's it on this episode of 360 view. rarely, it's a 91 felony cases across tuesday, courts and 2 different federal districts against donald trump. and if they are politically motivated and attempted to rail, the former president presidential bid, or they solid cases, which demand the former president bankruptcy, or even worse in jail. let's get started. the

for president, donald trump is facing $91.00 and diamonds between 4 criminal cases. but the cases are not running smoothly and some might even believe beginning to fall apart. now 1st the verdict and trump's new york civil business fraud trial was delayed. i've been judge are there are under on where to find the details about alan weiss and berg, the trump organizations former cfo p d. o. and if he actually lied under oath. now attorney general leticia james 6 define shop more than $370000000.00 of her claim. she misses represented the value of the company's assets to insure more favorable business loans and insurance premiums. meanwhile, the cited march, 4th, the start date of trumps election interference trial in washington, dc no longer appears on the federal district course public calendar. us district judge atanya, she cons oversight of the case is on hold. as it trump was appealing her ruling

against his presidential immunity kites, and then start the scandal surrounding an affair between phone, the district attorney, fanny willis, their special prosecutor nathan wade, had put her place and the case also under investigation. now wade was paid $650000.00 of taxpayer money to prosecute the trump case, even though he was not qualified for such a high profile case. plus he use the money. he are sick. funny willis, on an extravagant vacations. so much that representative jim jordan exhibits a painting well as for records of her use of federal grant money. no reason whistle blowers actually alleged she misused funds and was fired by willis for brain concerns to her in 2021. that a will as a plan to use a portion of a $488000.00 federal grant for frivolous expenses. and these expenses, which included weighed billing the fulton county. da's office $4000.00 for 28 hour

meetings with white house officials. now all of these details plus are in hatton federal jury ordering mr. trying to pay in jean carol $83300000.00 in damages address. civil jury found the last year that trump had sexually abuse and a faint or which accuse of wrong doing. but her response to a few days later was this. you've talked about using some of trumps of money that you're about to get. to help shore up women's rights. do you know what that might be? what that might look like, rachel? yes, i think i had such such great ideas for all the good. i'm going to do with this money. first thing rachel, you and i go shopping for to get completely new wardrobe, new shoes, motorcycle. so crowley, new fishing rod for robin. rachel, what do you want to pay the house at you? rachel, pen house and a brand new one. france. you want to go fishing?

and france, no, no, that's a joke. that's a jo. i don't know if they have some nice fishing in france. couldn't something her women's. right. so i would take the, obviously time for the teams are let me, let me know as a, as if you need persuasion in that regard. the lawyers overtime. that's a joke. okay. i've got to bring in our panel for this. we have for democratic congressman from florida. alan grayson and g. wong, host of the federal countdown on sputnik radio and angela mccardle, chair of the libertarian party committee. i want to get to all of it, but i, i could not miss that clip right there. and i would start with you on this one, angie, shopping spree, this on top of say, your part interview with anderson cooper, that most people think of the word rape as sexy a while the jury is, are contrary to rule in or rule in her favor doesn't her behavior actually

strengthen the argument that in all of this, that this is political in the court of public opinion. oh, absolutely. she should not be on air bragging about how she's gonna spend the millions of dollars that she's just one of that's going into appeals. i mean this, you can tell that this is all just for playing up to her base, which is the love who loves the fact that she, you know, just $183000000.00. and it's, it's, you know, it's gross and it's just brass for her to go on air to discuss buying shoes and clothing with his money. and then buying penthouses. this is going to look very poorly for when she goes into appeals court. because then it shows that her intent was really just to really fast trump, and that's what this is about. and that's for a lot is case, are motivated angela on a judge and, and jerome, he basically wrote 11 weeks ago, the donald trump was guilty of committing fraud in new york before it even started . how can it be considered?

consider the banks for pay back and forth interest. banks are not even the ones are being the case. ford rather as a city of new york who would actually benefit 1st from receiving the $370000000.00 from the trump organization. and donald trump, and i think it's a giant circus. and what this does, it is you know, in addition to eroding the general public space in the, in the electronic process. i think that it completely arose the, the general public space in the judicial branch as well. and you know, that's, that's kind of where we're at here. i don't think that anybody's going to take anything that happens in court seriously going forward. how could you? well, but then i'm going to bring in donald trump number one fan. i say that kind of like asking because we have alan grayson on this and i want to get your opinion on this because i know you probably actually think that all of these cases are doing a lot of damage to trump and are justified. but i wanna look at the judge in this case because judge anger army has a long history of supporting democrats, a member of the american civil liberties union, long time,

liberal organization. if trump is indeed as guilty as democrats are saying, that would've been better to try this in a more politically impartial court room, at least from the optics point. i know every single, really, the case has been legally justified. i follow these things pretty closely. and i will tell you that there is a line, and the line is, is crossed sometimes by some judges. and that has not been cross so far in any of these cases that i can say they are making judgments on the merits. and by the way, what you're saying it in responses ramp and what about is what, what about to judge, what? what about the accuser? what about this? what about that? why can't we just focus on whether donald trump is guilty or not? whether he's liable or not, that would really be a welcome change from what i've been hearing from trump and from strong supporters . it doesn't really matter what happens to the money. what matters is that he falsely accuse somebody and eggs is also that he was held accountable of what i

hear when the kids goes to try all about why trump has classified documents next his toilet paper. are we going to hear all about what brand of toilet paper a buzz? can we just focus on what's important and what really matters is trump guilty or not? okay, so andrew said, boys for that a, why can't we just focus on whether trump is guilty or not? is that what the focus is and all of this? no, because he would never get a fair trial in new york or washington. right. it's just, it's funny because you put this very same case and any other jurisdiction, and you might have a very different outcome. remember the original, he was originally going, he was originally supposed to be, hey, $5000000.00. how did that multiply to $83000000.00, and it actually happened in new york court. right? and that's a but angela, how is this look from a libertarian point? because one thing is, libertarians are known for as they do not like the government involved, anybody,

whether it's of a politician on the left or the right. how are they viewing all of the judicial proceedings they're going against donald trump? it's come, it's politically motivated. energy additional branch has been completely captured by political activists. it's something that the left is very good at. conservatives are extremely behind the volume. so our libertarians with their being less of us. but the left has completely captured academia and where do attorneys come from? you know, colleges, universities, academia, they're completely captured. it's all politically motivated. really calls into question the integrity of other court proceedings as well. i, i hope that the average person starts to wonder and suspect and become more suspicious of other court proceedings and, and hearings that, that they think maybe that's not so fair either. alex jones is one of the 1st things that comes to mind like him or not. donald trump is a political canary and a coal mine right now. so, here's my question to you and then all these cases, every single time

a new case comes against donald trump. why do you feel like he continues to rise in the poll from? if you don't think that necessarily is about the case itself is not. you know, whether he's guilty or not. she keeps continuing to rise and appalls with each accusation that comes against them. a thing is actually going slack in the polls. easy rows against drive the santos, and that's because he's running against the steps there. in fact, that's been true. and the republicans who rad against truck in general. you can have a personality called white bread. dissatisfied to do without a personality that that's the result of the republican primary that you're seeing as the general election. it's been pretty flat for a very long time. and it is essentially likely to be a referendum on trump. the that's, that's the way he always wants it to be. and, and that's what we're going to see the results of the good about a referendum on trump. angie trump signed an office, usually you see the referendums on a guy who's currently sitting in the office. why do you agree that this is actually

more about a referendum on trump invited? well, this is certainly of the same playbook from 2020, which is, i'm not trump, that's the only thing to avoid and can run on is i look how awful trump is, but i'm not as awful. so vote for me. instead, you know what it did, work in 2020, and they're doing exactly the same playbook. it's not a referendum on trump necessarily, but about the culture of trump, and they're building that as a hollywood script for all folly for it. again, i just hope that, you know, people see right through their tactics. ok, so angela, you brought up the idea of the concept that this is actually a weakening people's trust. possibly the judicial system. political that, this is actually something that in this is to angela, that this is actually, you know, weakening people's trust they have in the justice system a, an issue at this plays out. i mean, we obviously have various politicians right now. there are trials with different scandals of. 3 land around the country, but you either get them to consider bob limit menendez or just came down with him. there's other things that are happening. do you think that you did ever have

a fair trial for a politician moving forward? i don't think so. i think the, the implications are really for reaching i think you're going to see potentially low voter turnout, more people voting 3rd party because they're just fatigue to buy the whole thing. um no trust in the political process, no trust in the judicial process. either you might have people starting to look more towards arbitration, just becoming less emotionally invested in the entire there. and certainly wondering and digging into whether or not these laws are equally applied to people on both sides of the political spectrum. let's say, for example, that donald trump committed every single thing he was accused of all 90. 1 counts i do, you just can't convince me unless maybe you could put the evidence in front of me with the other way. you can convince me that joe biden and his ilk and you know, many of the people who came before him didn't come at all the same acts and the courts and pulled the political machine. they just,

they just turn their heads and look the other way. because the political class doesn't have to follow the same rules that we do. but donald trump isn't one of the political leads, right? he's an outside or so they're gonna throw the book at him. that's what it seems like to me. and i hope that that's what it looks like to the average american. do you agree with that congress and that the political that there is a, are being a part of former member, or maybe you still are of the, of the political class. do you see that from the democrats standpoint, that there is a treatment different from the common person in the politician as if anything it's, it's worse. but in donald trump's case, it's not worse than simply accurate. any human being who took classified documents and stuck them next to the toilet is going to get indicted. that's what's gonna happen, whether you're high, low or in the middle. okay. i mean, look what happened recently when it, when the iris found out that somebody had leaked, donald trump's tax returns a sense the 4 years in prison. that's the way it goes. and that's true of all of trumps cases. none of these cases are cases where he's being singled out,

mistreated. he's simply a grievance politician. he wants to why? that's the way he's always been going back to 40 years in new york. he's still doing it. it's worked pretty well for him so far. not so much of just system. we're going to take a break right now cuz we're going to get back to the secret documents that are besides the to like there's a little bit of details i got asked about alan. because when we come back, i'm gonna dive into the cases in georgia, which went from looking like cases against trump, for election or affairs. but newly released records show several meetings between the attorney general prosecutor. the case is lever in the white house. during exact time the cases were being filed. is it just a coincidence? we'll discuss of the old line was can be started by line. these can be expanded by true

importance of we can never be kind of a station type. transparency is next for to rejoin mystic trees, then just succeeded in finding documents that exist state and making them available to the world public. i mean, what could be more moving box by publishing information and sharing information with the public? he was exercising the right to free speech. he did so in the public interest, watched us or mom realized pen smith and tell him to sleep of late continuously. i know why advice may know who is the guy that illegal anymore wisely bought. adjustments for to be on box weighing a 175 used to go through. do you have sense of all we going to lift that stay

the way are in moscow, standing in front of one of russia's most iconic symbols and embodies greece, elegance and articles on a grandiose scale theater, the welcome back, plastic love story, boy, nice girl girl falls in love with boy girl highers boy, girl files case against for president boy meets with current president staff. just a coincidence. i bet story for the,

for the romance novels and for disney. but it's actually not so simple. and while we could discuss all the scandalous details of the georgia attorney general's affair with her staff member, which resulted in the divorce, the bigger question is this. all the scandalous side details have anything to do with the actual case being brought against donald trump in georgia. which more than any other case attempts to prove trumps actions and words when the thoughts on democracy following his last in the 2020 election. so let's continue our discussion with our panel. we have former democratic congressman from florida, alan grayson. angie wong has did the final countdown on sputnik radio and engine mcardle chair of the libertarian party committee. thank you so much for this. you know, and you've been a big one on this and do you think anyone else realist and her personal romance has anything to do with the case against trump? well absolutely because it's clearly a conflict of interest. she hired her of legit lover. oh, sorry, no longer legend,

she's proven to be her lover to be the special prosecutor. and here's the problem with all this. he's not a very good black ops guy. he's actually broke down in his legal buildings that he's met with the white house council. he's met with the j 6 committee in congress, and each other there seems to be some things there. and now, you know, there's, when there was even an air or the parents of conflict of interest, you have to refuse yourself. we're now also seeing that the judge may have some problems as well. he used to work judge scott mac, a fee. who is part of the who's presiding over the rico case. he used to work for funny willis back between 2015 to 2018. how come that didn't come out? i mean, is, this is like all my family. well, it is a self. it is george or something i'd be the river, but may i ask about this to you? um, let me allen desponding to her romance or personal affairs. does that actually hurt the case? and the eyes of democrats, or again, the not is the question is,

is it appropriate or really appropriate for the present or it states? it's called the chief bone counter. and a contested states and ask them in a recording that we will all hear over and over again. can you get me another 11000 votes? that's what the case is all about. now if you're asking me what will as have brought the case, except for her relationship with this other attorney, i think the answer is yes, but it doesn't matter. what matters is that by reasonable objective standards, trump is guilty of election interference, and we all know it. i mean, wait, it unfolded in front of our eyes. so it's so that i'm not gonna say that 2 wrongs make a right. i'm not going to defend willis, i'm not going to send the judge cuz i know to the case, i'm not going to do that. what i'm telling you is that unless 2 wrongs make a right, donald trump is guilty. a. so angela racketeering, which is what is being charged to be a very broad and if trump is not guilty,

why did 3 of his co defendants do you think strictly deals with the georgia attorney general? i think that people feel terrorized by the judicial system right now and they're, they're genuinely frightened and they're doing anything and everything they can to to escape the whole thing with our lives intact. you see, and a set defendants get put through the meat grinder of you know, criminal courts all the time and make plea bargains and their attorneys push them to take plea bargains because it's so risky. i think that, you know, i don't know for sure whether or not they're going to send or guilty, but i do know for a fact that a lot of innocent people take please deals because they're just trying to escape with their lives intact in their money. it can also be expensive, even be hot in front of congress for it could be a couple $100000.00, the attorney bills. now we're going to get to the top a gallon that you've been waiting to. i read those documents besides at the potty why, when is that donald trump was using when i guess when he was frustrating is knows what about the removal those documents from the white house which has occurred 37

felonies. i'm trying to figure out how president trump could do this without anyone knowing. like, how did he get them from the white house to his bathroom in mar logo without the secret service s b i the butler asking questions or they do. i don't, i don't agree with the premise of the question. what happened was that there are other people who've helped him. i can't really picture trump carrying boxes around . he probably hasn't done that every time but his entire lives. and what happened is that an investigator was launched once again became clear to initially the archives and then to d. o jerry, that he had kept documents, and overtime they interviewed all these people and the security cameras, and they rated monologue. so i don't think you could say that, but nobody knew about this. the, the justice system grinds slowly, but it grinds fine as sunset. but once again, angie, somebody had to physically carry those boxes. i know if i'm carrying

a box out of the white house that has top secret on it, i'm probably not going to carry that box out regardless of who commanded me to carry it out. that was getting me on this. how come you did not find this out until after present for basically was announcing his re election bid. busy bid for the president. why did that come out after? is that not just kind of change the whole situation? well look, leaving off uh, an exiting president always takes everything with him, his files, whatnot. you know, in preparation for the presidential library, this is not uncommon for them to take documents from the white house. you know, it. what's really frustrating is that you had special prosecutor robert her, who just said we're not going to. we're not gonna press any charges on joe biden for doing the same thing when he was vice president. right when he didn't have the presidential community with within his file. so it's just, it's just 2 tears injustice again. and now, you know, the public's really tired of this president,

trump could declare any document he wants to be, you know, released to the public. that's what he has the right to do as a former president alan, do you agree with that? now that's just completely wrong. and in fact that there, there is a record that all the presidents, whatever you've office, since the archive that i asked was past, which is like 6 presidents ago. whenever they leave office there, instructed by their legal counsel, they have to leave everything behind. so the premises not correct as, as to whether it's normal or appropriate. no, it's not. i mean, even members of congress who we are are instructed on on this more and, and, and you know, honestly, let's use a common sense. does it make sense that donald trump would have boxes and boxes of highly confidential material classified documents actually labeled classified? is bathroom, come on? well, that's what i bring to you on agile. when you look at those, because they did find documents in jo biden's garage, i think, and one of his cars,

the trunks that he had, his vice president now you've got donald trump had in for they also went through, i guess the 1st and the former 1st ladies, underwear drawer as well. it, wow, this lots of libertarians to independents watching both of these situations. does this have any, this does turn people away saying that it's just too much to invest even bother with. and it looks entirely typical. i'm not really quite sure why we feign shock and horror politicians taking things out of their offices that they're not supposed to. i mean, this is, this is probably been going on since the beginning of the presidency. i'm completely nonplussed. i really, you know, can't stand joe biden and i'm sure that he has them. that doesn't shocked me. and i don't clutch my pearls at the thought of joe by doing it either. i just think, oh, this is just what politicians do. they take documents home and stick them in their bathrooms. i mean, we got world, we got the wars going on overseas. those are the things that i'm concerned about.

the whole thing is just a circus and a mockery. we're, we're talking about donald trump's toilet. i just, i'm embarrassed for americans who are thinking about this on a daily basis. so then angie, i have to ask you if donald trump is elected, what do you think happens to all of these cases that go against them? well, i think, and a federal case will get knocked out because he'll just who does wave as one and it goes away. the state cases are going to be a little bit more difficult. he doesn't have jurisdiction over those. so it does have to get knocked out, but it looks like the georgia case is on its way because i can't see funding willis continuing on with this. and certainly her office is entirely compromised now. so until another jurisdictions takes over that could happen. but i don't know if any other day who want to take on this mess. same thing in new york city, right. the alvin racks case. that's clearly not in the news anymore because it's one of his weakest cases. anyway, i think you're going to start seeing every case slowly dissolving and i,

we're starting to see signs of that now. so i'm very helpful. well, i definitely have the a team here, so angie allen and angela. thank you so much for joining us with this conversation . venezuela. leah paul though lopez and opposition leaders, cherry, a 14 year prison sentence on charges which a former prosecutor says was fabricated for the current government in taiwan for present century beyond was jailed for corruption charges after his party last political power. 2008. a gusto peter shay assume the power after you let a coo and 1973 and arrested all of his political opponents and as well. the current president of egypt has been accused of orchestrating a crew which led to the rest of the sentencing to former president mohammed morsey, who was democratically elected. but as god come as in matthew, you hypocrite 1st take the log out of your own eye and then you will see clearly to take a speck out of your neighbors. i following candidate trumps comments during

a 2016 presidential bait that he would have hillary clinton investigate, arrested if he was like the president, democrats and republicans alike were quick to point out. even the attorney general underneath richard nixon resigned when he was ordered to investigate nixon's political opponents. former attorney general under obama eric hold her quickly pointed out the jailing hillary clinton. what constitutes an abuse of his power? well, what a difference! just a few years that a change of power can make in the united states, because here we go, here's and this has been your 360 view as a news affecting you. thanks for watching the the

the every spring and summer, the melting optics move reveals a band of machinery, millions of rusty barrels, and the detritus left by human expansion into this most inaccessible of territories . yes, i used to move shortly. a customer on both of us. that was someone from the lewis at the bus to be joining us. an issue. calling to us from clean optic travel to heis island home to the biggest opponent station on the front of joseph land capella. go here. really asked me for our laws and that was the more you should. so it means if you have, when you feel when we see lots of money and i'm but some of the, some will stay on the old stuff last time. i feel like very embarrassed, almost a little know see mean membership. when you to,

i've got the serial no boys to the middle of please to join me instead of the optic pioneers main objective was to explore and comcast, these harsh lands. they had no time to think about waste management now and, and then because they could remain for centuries. that's my of my choice. the film pretty at the course you system is a multiple in your deal to issue the

the disturbing images from the don't yet, for the sense of where least one civilian has been killed and 9 wounded as ukraine strikes residential areas. again, hundreds of like campaigners and supporters of which he takes part found a duty and a phone of gavin here outside the cool statements and to the coding i x we bring you the latest updates on julian a songs is final thoughts or suggest is kicking off in london, as a jail was super low assigned us expedition on espionage charges and whose family is at this phone treatment. and just kind of close the case of julian has the and the us i mean there's put it on the world say.