of tonight on expos a joe biden and benjamin netniahu turn up the heat in their staged public feud over zinist israel's genocidal war in gaza. as netanyahu vows to defy any call for cancelling the rafah invasion. now leftest politicians and media figures go into a complete social media meld down after former president donald trump said there would be a blood bath if he is not elected in november. and finally, a political ipsos new poll shows that half of the country in the united states of america believes trump is a guilty man and should go to trial before the 2024 presidential election. welcome to expos.

the show that leaves no stone unturned. science prime minister benjamin netanyahu is said to defy us president joe biden's warning not to lunch major military invasion in rafah with houses millions of palestinian displaced civilians, but is joe biden even warning him for real, or is it just part of a useless shade for electoral purposes? let us hear from fuad itayim, our broadcast expert in fake news expose. all what we heard last week on western broadcast media was that us president joe biden is deeply concerned about the prospect of israeli entity prime minister benjamin netanyahu ordering major. on

operation in gaza's southern city of rafah and we were supposed to take those concerns for real, just like we were supposed to believe that this was not staged. that was good. foad, was this something really that we were not supposed to hear coming out of biden after his state of the union address? definitely, i guess we're supposed to believe that this was totally unplanned hot mic moment by us president joe biden and we're supposed to believe that biden is uh suddenly extremely frustrated with the genocidal war that netanyahu is waging. i'm not sure what he thinks he's trying to prove. i mean, seems like he wants to have heart to heart with vb about the genocide that's being waged with the weapons that he's sending from his own administration. um, the public isn't stupid though, and they see this for what it really is, which is attempt to garner. political

support and it's electoral propaganda essentially, uh, his actions are nowhere near his words. in an interview with jonathan capart on msnbc, biden was asked about this hot mic moment, said, let's take a look. um, you were caught a hot mic after your save the union address, talking to secretary of state anthony blincan and senator michael bennett saying, quote, "i told him bb, and don't repeat this, but you and i are going to have a come to jesus meeting". what do you mean by that? what i meant was, it's an expression used in the southern part of my state, me a serious meeting, and uh, it was, i've known bb for 50 years and he knew what i meant by it. so what's the what's the come to jesus part? what tough love do you are you going to give to the prime minister? what's happening is he has a right to defend israel, a right to continue to pursue homas, but he must, he must, he must pay more attention. to the

innocent lives being lost as a consequence of the actions taken, he's hurting, i my view, he's hurting israel more than helping israel by making the rest of the world, it's contrary to what israel stands for, and i think it's a big mistake. as you can see, biden's plan is to sit netanyahu down and have strict talk with him about how the us sponsored genocide in gaza is actually starting to counter zionist interests and that he should be more careful to stop of killing innocents. oh my god, this is not only an election charade, but it's also naive take on the slaughter that's taking place in gaza, and honestly it's an insult to the over 35000 palestinians who have been killed and the over 60,00 who have been injured, so nothing will stop netanyahu except uh the us demanding a ceasefire at the unsc, not just saying seizfire is a good idea, but actually demanding one, and they actually passed one of uh on monday afternoon and... was without the

us even voting with veto, and yet the israelis continued with the massacres. uh, biden was even asked by msnbc if he had any red lines for the zionists who plan on invading. rafah, which is a desperately overcrowded city that's filled with displaced over one 1.2 million displaced palestinian civilians and his answer perfectly demonstrates why benjamin netanyahu will not listen to anything that the biden administration has to say, whether it's real or whether it's electoral propaganda. so let's take a look. let's hear that. what is your red line with prime minister netanyahu? do you have a of a red line? for instance, would invasion of r what you have urged him not to do, would that be a red line? it is a red line, but i'm never going to leave israel, the defense of israel is still critical, so there's no red line, i'm going to cut off all weapons so they don't have the iron dome to protect them, they don't have, but there's red lines that if he crosses in

the cannot have 30,00 more palestinians dead as a consequence of going out, there's other ways to deal, to get to, to deal with, the with with the trauma of the call. by hamas, so there is no red line for israel, is there? uh, it doesn't seem so. it's outrageous that western media is actually spouting this stuff. biden repeats that he will never stop sending arms and funds to the zionists. he says is a red line, and then three seconds later he says, there are no red lines. so what is it that's finally going to end this genocidal war? because it's certainly not a come to jesus meeting, or whatever it is that he said. netanyahu watched the same interview that we all watched, and he saw it as a card lunch to continue his genocide and continue butchering palestinians and decimating what's left of rafa and the hopes that egypt is going to take in all these displaced civilians. in an interview with fox news, knowing that there's going to be zero accountability, netanyahu refused to bow down to international pressure and vowed to move forward with the invasion of rafaah. let's

take a look. we're going to do it while we enable the civilian population and rafat to leave as we've done up to now, but we have to finish the job. netanyahu knows that. is using the defah invasion red line for electoral purposes and he basically claps back at biden and says that um he has the support of the israeli people in doing so this is what happens when you say you'll never cut off weapons to israel. netanyahu is now openly defying biden and the rest of the international community, not just with rafa. so an interview with politico he openly states we do not want a palestinian state, and this comes right after his card blanch from the us president. politico also reported recently citing us officials that washington has already. accepted limited operations in the rafa, once again proving that there are no red lines and the zionists can do it and audaciously say that they abstain from uh vetoing the uh so-called ceasefire, the temporary cease fire in the unsc. this is such a sharade happening at the moment, exactly, exactly. well, i completely

understand where the people come from when they say they no longer trust biden and they no longer want to vote for him because his words are not where his actions are, but at the end of the day. thank you very much for at for letting us know what has been happening in the broadcast media, especially in the west and zianist media concerning this very pressing issue, thanks million. now ladies and gents, we move to digital mainstream media. so the result of us president joe biden's week foreign policy towards simonus israel has led to the zinus israeli prime minister to overertly show complete defiance when it comes to invading. rafah, stopping the genocide or simply allowing food aid and medical supplies into the largest concentration cap on earth known to the world as gaza, so much so that master media ran stories claiming that biden is now considering conditioning military aid to zionist israel if they invade rafah. with us

is our digital mainstream media expert miss julia qasim to tell us how much of this is actually true. thanks ma, so well let us begin by saying that none of that is true, so you see the biden administration is... preparing to send more bombs and other weapons designas israel that would add to its military arsenal, even as biden keeps publicly pushing for sease fire in gaza. so this marwa is according to the wall street journal which reported uh last week citing current and former us officials, so the proposed arms delivery includes mk82 bombs and kmu 572 joint direct action munitions that add precision guidance to bombs and fmu-139 bomb fuses a value estimated to be in the tens of millions. dollars, oh, tens of millions of dollars and still no condition on that, no condition and no strings uh, so it's true that the congressional committee leaders would have to approve this transfer first, but you know, as we remember in december 2023, the biden administration skipped congressional re uh review of israeli weapon

sales to israel, not once but twice, so what's going to stop them from doing it a third time? absolutely, so not congress essentially uh, it's enough that the biden administration continues to unconditionally supply. arms to israel, as evidence piles up that the us made weapons have been used in strikes that have killed or injured palestinian civilians, but now the biden administration has the audacity to lie in the face of american taxpayers. who are fully bearing the consequences and the financial burden of these free transfers to israel by claiming that they will condition military aid going to israel, so where do they think these weapons will end up uh in a weapons depot somewhere underground? no, i mean, obviously they'll be used to expand the cop the scope of the ongoing genocide in gaza and rafa, i mean where else? they will end up on the heads of innocent civilians, kids, women, elderly, just like they have been so for the past six months, right? start when the zin entity was declaring that they would invade rafah um the biden administration had its

empty words but they immediately approved like arms transfers and mind you marwa the whole rhetoric is false because even back in november biden then said that uh conditioned aid to israel was was a worthy thought as per this report by political but he never actually followed up on it of course so an article entitled no conditions on future israel aid despite biden's worthwhile thought quip written by alexander ward and jonathan lemier who said that days later after biden's statement senior us officials hit the sunday shows to rule out the proposal hinting but not outright saying that there wouldn't be a shift in the administration's israel policy. so political reported that one of biden administration official suggested that biden's a side made in response to a reporter's question was less about siting with progressive sentiment and more of a window into his private frustrations with israel. daily prime minister benjamin netanyahu, so this reflects of course the us

administration's frustrations after five months of israeli us-back genocide and having nothing to show for it militarily, but at the same time it's practically the same old script that biden recycles every two months uh to quote and quote pressure netanyahu into a ceasefire, but it would just be easier at the time for them to just hold off on their consistent vetos at the un security council votes and even yesterday. when they did hold off on their vote, nothing really changed on the situation on the ground, yeah, the international body was not able to you know stop this genocide, as we could see from the scenes are not ready to comply, that's it, of course, so to add insult to that injury, marwa, natanyahu not only openly defied biden's demand to stop the planned invasion of rafa because the us knows that they're going to lose um he also lashed out at senator chuck shumer democrat. uh senate majority lead, calling shumer's recent criticism of netanyahu and call for early

elections, there are totally inappropriate. so according to the new york times, netanyahu said an interview with cnn that trying to replace the government of a sister democracy was not appropriate. that's something that israel, the israeli public does its own, he said, we're not a banana republic. i find that hard to believe. anyways, yes, yeah, so netanyahu knows that he just takes tens of millions of dollars worth of. tax payer dollars for weapons all for free from the us uh with his other hand, he flips the bird with any american party, including the biden administration officials who criticize his basically failures in gaza. yeah, yeah, i completely understand where that's going, and i completely am very interested and invested in how things will uh work out, given now that netanyahu is now defying unsc, the us and every ally that ever stood beside him by not complying. to that uh latest un resolution for a temporary cease fire but anyways thank you very much julia for your

contribution to this segment now ladies and gents will move to social media expose. comments made by former us president donald trump during rally in dayton ohio warning that there'd be a blood bath for the country if he lost the upcoming elections has taken the us and social media for that matter by a storm. let's remember what he said before we hear all about the hysteria from those words that were festered on social media by our social media expert sayim let's hear what he said if i get elected now if i don't get elected it's going to be a blood bath sema he said it's going to be a blood bath and those words sparked widespread condemnation given that uh recently when he lost the elections there was violence that ensued in the streets the u.s. so how did social media react to this? hi, thanks for having me. so if we if we know trump well, which we do, we already

know that he cried fake news after the wide spread condemnation he received as backlash to these comments, and he claimed it was taken out of context. yeah, so in a tweet on truth social, since trump's not on twitter again yet. he wrote, the fake news media and their democrat partners in the destruction of our nation pretended to be shocked at my use the word blood bath, even though they fully understood that i was simply referring to imports allowed by crooked. joe biden, oh my mandate being pushed by biden. there soon god, which are crooked capital c, which are killing the automobile industry, the united auto workers, but not their leadership fully understand what i mean, with the electric car won't be any cars made in the usa unless i'm elected president, in which case auto manufacturing will thrive like never before, maga 2024, all capsluck, all upper case hysterical, so if you zoom out and you listen to the clip, you see that he really was talking about the automobile industry, it was a broader discussion within that context, but it's not as cut and dry as he wants us to believe, mean i'm not entirely sure what he

was trying to say, but it didn't go down well at all with the democrats and the liberals, i can see that for instance, uh robert reich berkley, professor and former us secretary of labor, went as far as calling trump fascist. oh my god, we've heard that many times before. he tweeted the following, this week trump has warned of a blood bath if he's not elected, promised again to release violent jan six criminals, claimed immigrants aren't people, and called for the prosecution of liz cheeney. these are warning signs of fascism, if we ignore them, here's what happens next. what happens next? reich posted five-minute video explaining his views about this. incident, so let's just watch a small part of that. let's see that. i want to talk to you about the f word. no, no, not that f word. i'm talking about fascism. is donald trump really fascist as some would say? or is the word authoritarian sufficient? the term fascism is often used loosely, but you can

generally identify fascists by their hate of the other, vengeful nationalism, and pression of descent. so he proceeds to list five steps in which trump can turn america into a fascist state, and this shows the alarming level of fracture amongst us politicians when it comes to the upcoming presidential elections, buse i mean it's never really based in anything grounded, like he cited the jan six capital hillstorming, like that was it's a circus, oh my god, it was stage, there was footage of them letting them in, and that's still like his main thing, like that's anyway. so moving to occupy democrats who sounded the alarm after both trump's blood bath comment and the promotional video he published right after, they tweeted a screenshot from the video with an extreme close-up of trump's eyes in black and white, not a pretty site, i know, but let's see what they tweeted. breaking, fascism experts sound the alarm after donald trump releases a jaw-dropping video in which he ominously

threatens democrats directly and promises to do horrible things to us, with his criminal problems mounting, trump... is ripping a vial new approach straight from the fascist playbook. the indicted ex-president released a disturbing video of an extreme close-up of his eyes and black and white that visually evokes 1984 and other dystopian works of fiction. god, that's so american. what he said was even worse. if you around with us, if you do something bad to us, we're going to do things to you that you've never that have never been done before. trump says in the video. the video doesn't expand on exactly what the things are that. trump and maga want to do to us, but given the long and violent history of fascism, one can imagine just how horrible they might be. trump has already incited one violent insurrection. oh my god, if he wins the white house again, he will seek retribution against all who opposed his previous cu attempt, this man belongs in prison, lives are at stake. oh my god, the

democrats are using this as leverage against trump, just grasping at straws, whatever they can, it's overdramatic though, yeah for the upcoming. elections, but we have to acknowledge that, what trump really meant was, if i don't win this election, it won't just be a bloodb for the auto industry, but it will be a bloodb for the entire country. i mean, i don't know, people must maybe took it a bit out of, but either way, i mean it seems the us is headed for like some interesting times, uh, to say the least, we're watching, we have the popcorn ready, and we're seeing how this will unfold, especially in the upcoming few months, thank you very much, sima, i really enjoyed this segment with you because... uh america and its social media is just on another planet, especially when it has to do uh with trump, so thank you uh for showing that uh, this was amazing ladies and gents, but we have more for you on figures, expose. in the aftermath of the trump blood bath comment, a political magazine ipsos paul

found that most americans think trump should go to trial before the 2024 presidential election. three in five americans say they think the federal trial on donald trump's 2020 election subversion case should take place before the presidential election in november levels that held steady since august 2023. now the poll also finds that a plurality of americans believes that trump, if convicted should face imprisonment over just propation, financial penalty or no penalty whatsoever. when asked if they believe trump is guilty of the alleged crimes, americans were split by partisanship. roughly half of the respondents believe trump is guilty of the alleged crimes in the sensitive documents case with 52%. falsifying business records case with 50%, federal 2020 election subversion case with 49%, and georgia election subversion case with 49%.

now believe that trump is guilty is split by party, while majority of democrats say they believe trump is guilty in all four cases with 86%, 86%, 87% and 86% respectively. now few republicans. think the same with 16%, 14%, 12% and 12% respectively, and the majority of independents believe trump is guilty in the four cases with 58%, 54%, 54% and 53%. now let us move to the most notable expose voices for this week, so we heard during our episode: today voices outraged at trump's blood bath comment condemning the presidential candidate as a fascist and a future dictator if elected, but to be fair, there were also lot of voices who found that

this is just the way donald trump speaks and that he genuinely meant no harm in the context he was using the term. for one look what carl emric had to say about this on tiktok. did donald trump just threaten violence if he loses in november at a recent rally? well... let's play the tape in question, now if i don't get elected, it's going to be a blood bath for the whole, that's going to be the least of it, it's going to be a blood bath for the country, that'll be the least of it. now i find it really funny that lot of republicans are saying you need to look at the full context of this clip to see he's talking about the auto industry. the reason i find that funny is immediately before the blood bath remarks, trump calls for a 100% tarif on cars imported from mexico, which is horrible policy. putting that aside, even without the additional context, trump is obviously not calling for violence in that clip. anyone that is using even sliver of good faith interpretation can see he's clearly using

figurative language. the reason i find this frustrating is donald trump says wild stuff all the time. for example, he recently called the january 6th prisoners hostages that he would very, very seriously consider pardoning. talk about that, or the hundreds of other crazy things he says, there is no reason. person to hone in on nothing burgers like these blood bath statements and we end off with jim walsh on tiktok who said it really doesn't matter if trump was literal or rhetorical in his threats what scares drim apparently is something else completely let us find out what it is so our friend donald the mango mussolini has promised quote a blood bath unquote if he doesn't get back in this november and of course the question is does he mean literally is he inciting violence? or is he just pandering to the brain dead faithful? to me, the answer is, it doesn't matter, we just don't want this guy

back in office. we got to do what we got to do to make sure he doesn't get back in. that's the worst possible scenario. oh, he said something though in the speech that concerned me a lot more, when he said that he was going to go crazy with the terrats on foreign cars. tariffs suck, they serve very limited special interest, but they're awful, they they they set the stage for depressions and wars and have many times in our history, that's what scares me, and with this frienzy ladies and gents, we end off our expose for tonight right here on press tv, please do follow us on our handle at exposeptv on x instagram, youtube and tiktok, stay tuned for more eye opening investigations on expose. the truth is just the revelation away.

this is forest. in today's show, we'll be revealing the role of the diamond. business in sustaining israel's economy, how it supports zionist extremists, its links to illegal settlements and the way in which it's bankrupting genocide in gaza. what israel is able to do is sanitize blood diamonds, but not only that, the proceeds of diamond cell, but those who are engaged in it, are supporting uh the illegal settlements in palestine. the whole issue here is that, if you have biden, you have a deeply... pro israel genocidal policy, if you have trump, you have a deeply pro israel genocidal policy, there are differences of course in particular in financial relationships, but

but but the the differences are small. the dispute between iran and kuwait over the rs gas field grabs the headlines from time to time. but what's the whole story about? is just another tension underway in west asia? what's the significance of rh gas field? what is kuwait's position? what is tehran's position? why is saudi arabia engage in dispute out of the blue and has there been an attempt to reach deal? these and more on this edition of iran today.

the headlines, new footage emerges showing on on palestinian men waving white flags of surrender are fatally shot by israeli troops and buried by doser near gaza city. jordanians gather outside the israeli embassy in the capital amon for the third consecutive night, calling on their government to cancel all treaties with israel, and ireland strongly condemns israel's crimes against palestinians in gaza, saying it will intervene in south africa's genocide case against the regime at the icj.