you can make money the hard way as a bullfighter or a human cannonball... or save money the easy way, with xfinity mobile. existing customers can get a free line of our most popular unlimited plan for a year! not only will you save hundreds but you'll also be joining millions who have connected to america's most reliable 5g network. sure is a lot safer than becoming a stuntman for money. get a free line of unlimited intro for a year when you buy one unlimited line. visit xfinitymobile.com today to learn more. good evening, and welcome to ayman tonight. high cases and contest, the supreme court says it will drop a decision in the morning, speculated to be colorado's 14th amendment case, asked the court agrees to hear trump's immunity claim, and polls just

closed in the d.c. republican primary. did we mention it is almost super tuesday? plus, the vice president calls for an immediate six-week cease- fire, as a u.s. diplomatic failure arrived by sky in gaza. and facing the facts, at what point will james comer and house republicans finally give up their big dreams of impeaching joe biden? i am ayman mohyeldin, let's do it. ♪ ♪ ♪ all right, so as we mentioned, we expect results in today's republican primary in washington d.c., at any moment. and we will of course let you know when that happens, and what it actually means for the race. but we must begin tonight with the high drama surrounding the nation's highest court. today, in an extremely unusual announcement, the supreme court stated that it will issue at least one decision on monday. while we do not know which case it will be, it is strongly believe that this ruling will

be on former president donald trump's eligibility to appear on colorado's primary ballot. if you decision will almost certainly affect ongoing legal disputes in more than 30 states, with trump's eligibility to run has been challenged. and during oral arguments in early february, a majority of the justices expressed deep skepticism of colorado's 14th amendment case, which likely means a massive win for the former president. but they are trump water carrying extents will go well beyond a matter of ballot eligibility. on wednesday, scotus dropped a bombshell, announcing that it will take up the question of whether or not donald trump has immunity for prosecution, in jack smith's january 6th election interference case. and regardless of the fact that trouble almost certainly lose the case, this is nonetheless a -- to the former president. the court has effectively sanctioned trump's strategy of delay, delay, delay. trump's legal team reportedly popped champagne, when they

heard the news. because not only will jack smith's case now be on hold through april 22nd, when the court will hear the oral arguments, but he won't be able to move forward until the court actually hands down a decision, which in fact may come as late as the end of its term in june or july. that means a possible trial would be pushed even further, back until the fall, perhaps even after election day. and, it is increasingly clear that's exactly what the court and donald trump want. -- writes for the guardian the delay is of the courts own making. jack smith first went to the supreme court in december, and asked the justices to quickly take up the issue, so that the trial would not be delayed. and you know what the court did, they declined to do so. then, after the u.s. court of appeals found a d.c. circuit rule, that front was not immune in february, smith again urge the court to act quickly in a brief filed on february 14th. and you know what the court

did? instead, waited two weeks to announce that it would take the case. well it's now clear, it's only the american people that can save american democracy. not joe biden, not the democratic party, and while the supreme court could, it obviously does not want to do so. president obama's attorney general, or president -- eric holder, excuse me eric holder, president obama's attorney general, some of the current state of affairs quite well. there is no -- no miracle solution, no saviors. in the end, we, the american people, not any of our institutions, have to save our democracy, by voting in defense of that democracy this fall. we are the cavalry. the responsibility is hours. joining me now, charles coleman, an msnbc legal analyst, host of the charles coleman podcast, a civil rights attorney and former brooklyn prosecutor. also joining me is christina greer, a political scientist and a moynihan public scholars fellow at ccny. it is great to have both of you

with us. charles, let's start with the supreme court decision that is expected to come down tomorrow. what do you think it is going to be? or what do you think it portends for the rest of the challenges to try to keep donald trump off the ballot? and how significant of a decision is it? >> well i'll go in reverse, i do think came in that it is going to be a and incredibly significant decision, because it is going to put to bed whatever the questions are around the 14th amendment challenges that donald trump is facing, in -- jurisdictions. i fully anticipate, quite frankly, that the supreme court is going to allow him to remain on the ballot. what i'm most curious about is its reasoning, i am going to -- assuming that this is the one that we are expecting tomorrow. and for what their rationale, us and why they are losing in the way that they. are there are a number of different grounds of which they could make the decision, and i'm curious as to how they will. because that could potentially result in challenges down the line, depending on how this opinion is crafted. >> so it still matters, not just the decision, but how the decision is presented, as to whether or not there is going to be opportunities for other

cases to emerge as a result of it? >> absolutely, that could be a very big thing. i think that depending on how they craft the decision, and where they find fault, you will likely see different courts, lower courts, try to maneuver around whatever cases are brought. because this is not going to be the end of the issue. depending on how the supreme court rules. but it is very clear, and one of the things that i think people need to understand, sam levine talked about it in his piece, this is something that is of the courts own doing. they have the power to delay this, they have the power to move forward. and its timing, particularly -- before super tuesday, it indicates that they understand the significance of the timing, and where this falls in the election cycle. that point cannot be overstated. because, the supreme court, if you look at some of their decisions of late, they have been on a power grab. and it's clear that they are not stopping, with respect to their ability to influence the outcome of this election. >> christina, to charles's point, this is a supreme court that has been on a power grab, to say the least. our colleague and friend of the

show -- wrote for the nation, saying that we need to stop treating this supreme court as a legal institution, and start treating it and covering it as the political institution that it is. and certainly one that it has become, in the last couple of years. your thoughts on that assessment? >> yeah, -- has been spot on from day one. you know, unfortunately, the attention of the framers was such that we had direct democracy when it came to congress, in direct democracy when it came to selecting our president, vis-@-vis the electoral college. and then, we would have this hodgepodge -- of people who weren't elected, but because we had senators who nominated them, and a president that confirmed, or the president that sort of -- in the senate to confirm them, not the entire congress, just the senate. there was this indirect way that we can have these quasi- nonpartisan representatives, that were not elected specifically and explicitly. and that was the intent. and we are so far away from that, that if you all member in 2016, donald trump campaigned

pretty explicitly about changing the, court and getting supreme court justices for far- right christian fundamentalists. many democrats didn't take that as seriously, as we have in the past. the courts have never been democratic strongholds in recent history. and so, we see, now we have a solid 63 court. to charles's point, i am really curious to see the opinion. you know, there is the vote, and there is the opinion. and i wonder if it will be something that we saw in 2000, with bush v. gore, where they essentially sided with, bush and they say this isn't a precedent, don't ever do it again. it's a very clear that these justices who feel as though they worked for donald trump, most likely will give him the results that he wants. but will it continue into the future for other instances that are similar? and what does that really bode for american democracy, if donald trump does get a second term, he has been very clear but what he wants to do with set a second term. >> but do you think, charles, just following up on that in the reading of these developments, that the supreme court is intentionally trying to delay the trial in the start

of that trial, for donald trump. because they know maybe in the end, they will not grant him the immunity that he seeks. but in some ways, they are kind of giving him what he wants, which is enough time to delay this, trial perhaps with the election being the ultimate getaway card? >> i am loathe to disagree with christina, because that's who i'm going to hear from her father -- but, in that vein, i do think that they are very much so, playing to the audience of donald trump. in the sense that they can get away with doing this under the guise of their level of autonomy, or the perception of autonomy that they enjoy as the court. . i think that they understand that whatever the ruling is that they come out with regarding immunity, as well as the 14th amendment, it will have significant implications on this election? . and they know that, and i think to the point of who votes for, and who votes against it, there is also a sense of

understanding that responsibility, and reveling in the. i think that there is a faction on the supreme court that takes a great deal of pride in knowing that we are going to be able to influence this. and yes, we are going to push it back beyond the election. now that the guys, the pretext, if you will, is that we are doing this because we don't want to influence the election. but the reality is, the opposite is what's true. they are doing it because they do want to influence the election, and they understand that by doing it, they are going to actually influence the election, in favor of donald trump. >> christina, this week, my colleague rachel maddow said that the supreme court is effectively setting up a trap for america. she suspects they will not grant trump presidential immunity, but they will wait to do so by delaying the other trials. and if trump then wins in november, he is going to fight tooth and nail to never leave office, because he knows if he does, he will be prosecuted. >> yes, and we are not being histrionic when we lay out that scenario. i mean, donald from has been a master of delay, delay, delay.

even -- know is that that's how he has circumvented the law several times, is by pushing things down the road, and oftentimes the people that are suing him either run out of money, or run out of energy. this is very clear, he has said he wants to be a dictator just for a day. i've never heard of a dictator who wanted to be a dictator just for a day. he said he's going to go after his political opponents, he said he is going to change, fundamentally, the way institutions have operated. he's going to get rid of particular institutions, and he is going to let these far- right, what he said, republican party is the party of maga. it's very clear and explicit, i do not understand what people are -- and fully hear him. i don't understand why people aren't going to their family members, who just are in different, or tend to like donald trump. and really explain to them, just how far off track this man wants to get this country. this is not a perfect country, we are well aware of it. joe biden is not a perfect president, i defied someone to find the a purse a -- perfect present that's ever existed in this nation. however, donald from has been very clear that he is definitely afraid of what will

happen if he ever leaves office. and so, he is going to try to get into office, and never -- he has been very clear if that, i don't understand how there's any confusion as to what his future plans are, well beyond 2028. >> all right charles and christina, please stick around, i got a lot more to discuss. because while trump is thrilled that -- there is another case before the justices that trump should be sweating over. that's next. should be swtieang over. that's next. [street noise] ar door s] [paparazzi taking pictures] introducing, ned's plaque psoriasis. ned, ned, who are you wearing? he thinks his flaky red patches are all people see otezla is the #1 prescribed pill to treat plaque psoriasis. ned? otezla can help you get clearer skin, and reduce itching and flaking. with no routine blood tests required. doctors have been prescribing otezla for nearly a decade. otezla is also approved to treat psoriatic arthritis. don't use otezla if you're allergic to it. serious allergic reactions can happen. otezla may cause severe diarrhea,

nausea, or vomiting. some people taking otezla had depression, suicidal thoughts or weight loss. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. with clearer skin movie night, is a groovy night (♪♪) live in the moment. ask your doctor about otezla. (ella) fashion moves fast. live in the moment. setting trends is our business. we need to scale with customer demand... in real time. (jen) so we partner with verizon. their solution for us? a private 5g network. (ella) we now get more control of production, efficiencies, and greater agility. (marquis) with a custom private 5g network. our customers get what they want, when they want it. (jen) now we're even smarter and ready for what's next. (vo) achieve enterprise intelligence. it's your vision, it's your verizon. when i was diagnosed with h-i-v, i didn't know who i would be. but here i am... being me. keep being you... and ask your healthcare provider about the number one

prescribed h-i-v treatment, biktarvy. biktarvy is a complete, one-pill, once-a-day treatment used for h-i-v in many people whether you're 18 or 80. with one small pill, biktarvy fights h-i-v to help you get to undetectable—and stay there whether you're just starting or replacing your current treatment. research shows that taking h-i-v treatment as prescribed and getting to and staying undetectable prevents transmitting h-i-v through sex. serious side effects can occur, including kidney problems and kidney failure. rare, life-threatening side effects include a buildup of lactic acid and liver problems. do not take biktarvy if you take dofetilide or rifampin. tell your healthcare provider about all the medicines and supplements you take, if you are pregnant or breastfeeding, or if you have kidney or liver problems, including hepatitis. if you have hepatitis b do not stop taking biktarvy without talking to your healthcare provider. common side effects were diarrhea, nausea, and headache. no matter where life takes you, biktarvy can go with you. talk to your healthcare provider today.

$547 million is roughly how much money donald trump owes in new york. it is a lot of, money but not necessarily for a man who continuously boasts about his billionaire status, right? well apparently, he is in fact feeling the squeeze, in an effort to pause the civil fraud trial on wednesday, -- to allow him to post only 100 million dollar bond, because they set securing one for the full four under and 50 million dollar amount was impossible. the appellate court judge turned him down. this comes, after trump's team filed a separate motion, urging a judge to pause the 83.3 million dollar payment he owes to e. jean carroll, for a defamation. that request was also denied, and he now has less than a week to pay. it investigative reporter david cay johnston shed some light on trump's efforts to pause these legally binding payments. writing in an op-ed for msnbc, and trump's pleading is the latest indication that his wealth is not nearly as fast as

he claims. charles coleman, christina greer, are both back with me again. christina, your reaction to this 12 punch trump this week, financially speaking. because, the question is, does this push to delay these payments, -- david cay johnston's point that trump's wealth may not be what he actually says it is? >> right, well we all know as new yorkers, that the wealth was never what he said it was to begin with. several bankruptcies, he has consistently gotten loans from banks, but it was largely because he owed them so much they had no option but to sort of go along with his various schemes. his name on several buildings, which is just a leasing agreement. he doesn't own the building, he just leased his name. so it's been a shell game, and -- a deal that's gone amok -- i am curious to see with the new york attorney general tish james will do. she has been very clear that if donald trump tries to hide behind the, i'll pay when i get to, it or i was very convinced that he would never pay up. she was very clear that they would start seizing assets.

i think it will be a really interesting ones show intel, time to see what assets donald trump actually has. we know that his children enrich themselves quite a bit during his administration. we know that he had his hotel in washington d.c. during his administration, made a lot of money there. but is it enough to cover $450 million in damages, when he also has several lawyers suing him constantly, because he fails to pay? that's always been his m.o.. i don't think that he is ready to change it up. but it is a little different, when the new york attorney general is saying if you don't start paying this money, we will actually start going through your receipts, explicitly, and actually we are not like banks, that let you off the hook consistently. we will actually start taking things for the state of new york. >> so charles, trump is expected to request a delay again next month, for the civil case, with the panel of the five appellant court judges. if he gets rejected again, what are his options? >> he is going to have to start to figure out which of his -- he's going to part with first. at the end of the day, he is not going to be able to avoid

not liquidity some of his properties, as a way to avoid this actual judgment that has been -- and both of them actually. and i think that the larger interesting thing about this, ayman i, is this notion of accountability. we have looked been look at donald trump, and this notion of accountability -- particularly as it pertains to his criminal cases. but when you are talk about his civil judgments, you are talking at a man whose reputation is about his net worth. and so, this is a level of accountability that we have not expected to see, but that has been first, and maybe the most long-standing notion of accountability that the public perceives from the different things that he has done. so, while it may seem anti climatic, rest assured that this is something he is not going to be able to do anything about. let's say for example, november comes, he ends up being the president again. he can replace the a.g., and get these cases dismissed. let's say he saw figures out a way, i don't know how, to get out of what he is dealing with in the fulton county and fani willis. let's say he gets done with that. he still cannot do anything

about these judges that have been -- number one, because they aren't at the state court level, where he has no jurisdiction, even if he is the president. and number two, because these are already -- judgments, and he won't be able to touch them. so he is going to have to find a way to get himself out of the situation. and get into the white house, that's not going to do it. >> our, are they anything more than a nuisance for a guy who loves money? meaning like i understand all the other ones actually carry prison time. but this one is just, it hits him in the pockets, right? it's gonna for some, it may be foursome into liquidity, but not any kind of serious -- >> normally, i might, say yes. but in this situation, i disagree with you. because of the political implications that are involved. you are talking about someone whose image, their political brand is around them being this business mogul. and now, at least for the next three years in the state of new york, he won't be able to do business at all. you're also talk about somebody who has been very evasive about his actual net worth. and now, he is in a space where he is saying effectively, i

can't pay it, i ain't got it. i might have -- but i don't have all of it. and that is something that is a reputational hit, at a time when he is campaigning, and attempting to project this strongman image to the public. so i think that there is a level of damage that exceeds just the notion of it being a nuisance, for a guy who has to pay out money. because we are not talk about the typical business portion, here we are talking to a guy who has ran for president, or has run for president, and part of run from president requires people believing and buying into this idea that he has this alter successful businessman. >> christina, we talk in the last walkabout from has been able to evade accountability on the criminal side of things. so far at least, with the help of the supreme court. but these payments are, in fact, a real punishment. as charles just laid out. is it a consolation prize for those who want to see him held accountable, in a real way? >> well, i know a lot of people want to see donald trump held accountable. but don't forget, this is a man who has had several bankruptcies over his career. he's been in our political imagination for about four

decades. i agree with charles's very detailed layout. but this one key variable that we are forgetting, when we are dealing with donald trump when it comes to these civil cases where he has to pay out and have a show until. he has no shame. so if we were dealing with someone who actually had shame, we might feel embarrassed, he might say this is my, image and have to go in front of people and, i'm a little bit damaged. but this is someone who doesn't care. i mean, he will essentially create a narrative. he has consistently been the victim and the hero of his own story. so what he will do is go to his supporters, we know they are unmoved, they are unbothered. they are only activated by things that donald trump says and does. so he will say, i don't have to show it, i am circumventing the system. he has said that he has broken the law, he has told him that, they cheered. so when we are dealing with someone who doesn't have any shame, i don't think that there is an abyss that he won't go into. i don't think that he will go with his tail between his legs and say i have all this money, and i just don't have a. he will create a new narrative and his supporters will stand right by him, as we have seen time and time again.

and sadly, so republican elected. >> all right christina, charles coleman, thank you to the both of you, greatly appreciated as always. next up, we're gonna talk a democratic congressman -- , he was in the room for hunter biden's private testimony, as house republicans fail, over and over again, to make a case that is simply not there. that is simply not there. bad n be hard, even with a statin. diets and exercise add to the struggle. the effort can feel overwhelming. but today, it's possible to go from struggle to cholesterol success with leqvio. taken with a statin, leqvio is proven to lower bad cholesterol by 50%. so, if you feel like you're getting nowhere go with 2 doses a year of leqvio and keep bad cholesterol low. common side effects were injection site reaction, joint pain, and chest cold.

when you're ready to go from struggle to cholesterol success talk to your doctor about twice-yearly leqvio to help you lower your cholesterol. lower. longer. leqvio®

i brought in ensure max protein with 30 grams of protein! those who tried me felt more energy in just two weeks. -ugh. -here, i'll take that. woo hoo! ensure max protein, 30 grams protein, 1 gram sugar, 25 vitamins and minerals. and a new fiber blend with a prebiotic. (♪♪) with nurtec odt, i can treat a migraine when it strikes and prevent migraine attacks, all in one. don't take if allergic to nurtec. allergic reactions can occur, even days after using. most common side effects were nausea, indigestion, and stomach pain. ask about nurtec odt. this election is about who shares your values. nausea, indigestion, and stomach pain. let me share mine. i'm the only candidate with a record of taking on maga republicans, and winning. when they overturned roe, i secured abortion rights in our state constitution.

when trump attacked our lgbtq and asian neighbors, i strengthened our hate crime laws. i fought for all of us struggling to keep up with the rising cost of living. i'm evan low, and i approve this message for all of our shared values. what do i see in peter dixon? i see my husband... the father of our girls. i see a public servant. a man who served under secretary clinton in the state department... where he took on the epidemic of violence against women in the congo. i see a fighter, a tenacious problem-solver... who will go to congress and protect abortion rights and our democracy. because he sees a better future for all of us. i'm peter dixon and i the virus that causes shingles is sleeping... in 99% of people over 50. it's lying dormant, waiting... and could reactivate. shingles strikes as a painful,

blistering rash that can last for weeks. and it could wake at any time. think you're not at risk for shingles? it's time to wake up. because shingles could wake up in you. if you're over 50, talk to your doctor or pharmacist about shingles prevention. the house gop's push to impeach president biden is falling apart. republicans were hoping this week's private testimony from hunter biden would be the silver bullet in their quest to prove his father benefited from his financial dealings. instead, he never once pleaded the fifth, and offered a point by point rebuttal of the allegations leveled against his father. even the maga-verse is admitting hundred came out looking good, in the hearing. >> when the transcript comes out, it's going to read, it's going to read well for, and because they did a great job prepping for a read. >> oh, there was another embarrassing defeat for house

oversight committee chair james comer, who rose to prominence in the party as someone who insisted that he was going to stick it to the president, one way or the other. in fact, he made over 200 appearances on fox last year, and raised over 1 million dollars on the promise he'd get the goods on the biden. but, ali year later, comer has nothing to show for, no silver bullet, no star witnesses, nothing. and you remember the gop's witness, former fbi informant alexander smirnoff. well, he is currently in jail for falsely claiming biden and his son hunter took bribes. the very same line that republicans built their entire case on. democratic congressman -- of illinois sits on the house oversight committee, he joins me now. he has had to endure a lot of this from just being on committee. i hope you get hazard pay, congressman, i don't know if you get hazard pay in congress, but i certainly hope you get hazard pay to private but with all of this over the last two years or so. so, how badly did this backfire

on republicans? >> it didn't go well. and actually during the deposition, it was clear that hunter biden was prepared, he came off as credible. i think, probably his strongest moments were when he, quite frankly acknowledged his own flaws as an individual. and we all know about those. but he was very strong, in explaining himself, and i thought that there was not one shred of evidence that was revealed, implicating his father. and that's really what this was all about. it was going after president biden. and yet once again, and they failed. and as you mentioned, the quote unquote star witness, the key republican source behind an affidavit claiming that president biden had received bribes, was himself perjuring himself on an affidavit, and he was indicted criminally by the fbi for lying to them. >> interestingly enough, comer went on fox after the hearing, saying it was very damaging for

hunter biden. no surprise that he was going to say that. but interestingly, and this is according to your conch -- congressman eric swalwell, comer actually left early, didn't even ask any questions. how would he know it was damaging, if he wasn't even there for most of it? eight >> maybe he read the transcript after the fact, i don't know. i'm not really sure how he could ascertain that. but i don't blame him for leaving. it was boring, it didn't reveal anything, and it was particularly rich when matt gaetz starts questioning hunter biden about his illegal drug use. it's just, it's a waste of time. and as you know, this is in stark contrast to the work that the gop should be doing, which is passing a budget to fund the government. or, we are facing a looming shutdown on friday of next week. and so, instead of doing the

hard work of funding the government, or funding aid to ukraine and other big priorities, they are wasting time on this impeachment. >> what is the point of continuing this? what do they have to gain? he wants to keep holding public hearings, despite the fact that this case is completely melted away. >> i don't know. i think that every time they do any kind of hearing, or any kind of event, it seems to backfire, it seems to just, as tommy lauren, the fox news contributor said the other day, they keep falling flat. and, they need to stop. >> the other elephant in the room, sir, is certainly with the gop's impeachment, pushes their shrinking majority, now that democratic congressman tom suozzi has been sworn in to replace george santos. they can only afford to lose two votes, if they bring this case to the house for. considering they barely were able to impeach homeland security secretary alejandro

mayorkas, do you see them being able to pull this off against joe biden? matt >> i don't think so. and i know a bunch of my colleagues on the other side, privately tell me that this is a big waste of time. obviously, ken buck and others have publicly said this is a big waste of time. and again, at the last, i guess the only impeachment hearing that they've had, back in september, their expert witness actually said there is no evidence of impeachable conduct. and so, when you have that type of evidence, or lack of evidence i should say, it just, it causes more and more republicans to want this whole thing to go away. >> congressman, switching gears real quickly. earlier, we saw vice president kamala harris say there is an offer for a six-week cease-fire in gaza, on the table. some of the sharpest comments get from a senior administration official about

the humanitarian catastrophe unfolding in gaza. your reaction to the comments from the vice president? >> i think the party is going to have to seize on that offer, and except. we've got to have that pause in hostilities right now. the hostages have to be released, massive humanitarian aid needs to be flowing into gaza. i don't care what you call it, whether it's a cease-fire, a truce, a halt in hostilities. we have to have that, because civilians are suffering, and people are dying. i'm glad that the biden administration is now airdropping a food aid, but that's not going to be enough. you need to have aid flowing through trucks, which can take a lot more in then airdrops. finally, i would just say, i've been helping to lead, along with a couple of others, the notion that the two state solution must be simultaneously negotiated, even at the same time that we are talking about

this pause in hostilities, or this end to hostilities, wide scale hostilities. because if there is no light at the end of the tunnel, we are just going to keep going through this endless cycle of violence. and we can't afford that anymore. >> let me ask you about that, since you brought it up. how does that work when you have a prime minister of israel who is boasting, and saying there will be no palestinian state, so long as he remains in office. he boasts about it, and members of his own cabinet right, now some of the more extreme ones, they deny the existence of a palestinian state. and certainly don't want to see the creation of a palestinian state. on one hand, you have that. and the other, and you have an american administration that is not willing to use any of its leverage, not only to deal with the crises on the ground with trying to get more aid into gaza, but actually to try to get the israeli government to re-commit to previous agreements, and to a two-state solution. >> look, i am very, to say i am deeply distressed about bibi

netanyahu's leadership is probably an understatement. but for that matter, hamas is not willing to acknowledge a two-state solution. i think at the end of the day, whether it's the egyptians, the saudis, of course us as americans, the qataris and others, we are going to have to bring people to the table and say look, this is what you get in return for a two state solution. and what the israelis want, deeply, deeply, it is a regional peace. they want the saudis to ultimately recognize them, and to have a longer term agreement. but i don't think the saudis, or anyone, is going to allow that to happen, unless there is a two state solution. and certainly, that is our position as well. >> congressman -- it's always a pleasure sir, thank you so much for your time, greatly appreciated as always. >> thank you sir. >> next up, the vice president, as we mentioned, calling for an immediate cease-fire in gaza, for six weeks, as a u.s.

diplomatic failure hits the skies above gaza. hits the skies above gaza. mily moments better. especially when they're eggland's best. taste so fresh and amazing. deliciously superior nutrition, too. for us, it's eggs any style. as long as they're the best. eggland's best. las vegas grand prix choose t-mobile for business for 5g solutions. because t-mobile is helping power operations and experiences for hundreds of thousands of fans with reliable 5g connectivity. now's the time to accelerate your business. ♪ limu emu & doug ♪ ( bell ringing) customize and save with libberty bibberty. liberty bushumal. libtreally blubatoo. mark that one. that was nice! i think you're supposed to stand over there. oh am i? thank you. so, a couple more? we'll just...we'll rip. we'll go quick. libu smeebo. libu bribu. limu bibu...and me. doug: he's an emu! only pay for what you need. jingle: ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪

♪ students... students of any age, from anywhere. students in a new kind of classroom. ♪ using our technology to power different ways of learning. ♪ harnessing ai to plant new beginnings. ♪ so when minds grow, opportunities follow.

always dry scoop before you run. listen to me, the hot dog diet got me shredded. it's time we listen to science. one a day is formulated with key nutrients to support whole body health. one a day. science that matters.

just hours ago, vice president kamala harris called for a quote immediate cease-fire in gaza, and delivered perhaps the administrations sharpest condemnation of israel's bombardment yet. the vice president's comments just a day after the united states completed its first airdrop of humanitarian aid into gaza, with three military

c-130 planes, dropping 38,000 meals. the -- falls far short of meeting the populations desperate need for food and supplies, with many of gaza's 2 million residents currently facing starvation, as israel's five month bombardment shows no signs of letting up. saturday's drop was quickly criticized by eight experts, including amnesty international's senior crisis response advisor -- , who called the u.s.'s humanitarian effort, quote, absolutely incomprehensible, and completely insufficient. -- explain, nbc news airdrops are usually only seen as a last resort, in situations where it is impossible to deliver aid, either by other needs. the drops come, along with the risk of chaos on the ground, with starving civilians forced to fight one another for a limited amount of supplies. it's also impossible to ensure that aid doesn't end up in the hands of bad actors like hamas, in large military cargo planes like the ones used on saturday,

can only carry a fraction of the supplies that trucks can hold. but what happened yesterday isn't just about an insufficient amount of aid. instead, it exposes the complete deficiency of american power and conviction in the region. let's go back to the vice presidents comments from earlier today. >> the united states will continue these air drops. and we will work, on a new route by sea, to deliver aid. and the israeli government must do more to significantly increase the flow of aid. [applause] no excuses. >> no excuses. those are strong words from the vice president, no doubt. words that, so far though, have failed to actually matchup with the administration's actions. for a country that touts itself as a global superpower, the u.s. has hardly asserted that influence to help them -- in

gaza. in fact, this entire situation has been done almost exclusively on israel's terms. see, gaza shares borders with egypt and israel. they are two of the largest recipients of u.s. foreign aid. and yet somehow, the u.s. is incapable of compelling both of these countries to open their land borders, so that aid can get into gaza. again, as amnesty international surveyor expense, quote, the only reason why -- humanitarian aid is not getting in through the normal means, is because the israeli authorities are saying no. and if you think saturdays airdrop was somehow a show of force by the u.s., an attempt to circumvent the israeli governments continued refusal to allow sufficient and meaningful aid into gaza, think again. now while we don't know yet if the u.s. received explicit israeli agreement in advance of the airdrops, it is hard to imagine that the u.s. flew air force planes into a war zone,

without the israelis permission. in fact, according to the washington post, which had reporters on board, jordanian plans delivering aid earlier this week, the israeli government had to grant permission for that assistance to be flown in. so, it is really clear who is running the show here. this week, amnesty international called out israeli authorities over their failure, in -- enough aid reaching the people of gaza. since october 7th, israel's government has been clear that it would impose a complete siege on gaza. and over the last few weeks, the number of aid trucks entering gaza has decreased by about a third. from an average of 146 a day, to an average of 105 per day. eight workers on the ground highlighted israel's failure to take obvious steps, such as opening all available access points, and crossings to enable them to transfer aid more rapidly, and on a larger scale. and for its part, though the israeli government says it is

allowing in aid without restrictions. but america should take these reports very seriously because u.s. law actually prohibits security assistance to governments, that obstruct u.s. aid from being delivered. so instead of leveraging its immense power -- for example announcing it is not -- until >> reporter: israel complies with our own u.s. laws, the u.s. has twisted itself into a knot of hypocrisy. on one hand, we are paying for the bombs that are causing this humanitarian crisis. but on the other hand we are now hanging to feed the people being starved, as a result of those very same bombs. as the saying goes, an image tells 1000 words, so i'm just going to leave you with this political cartoon, showing bombs and bread falling on the people of gaza. if. people of gaza. if. (man) excuse me, would you mind taking a picture of us? (tony) oh, no problem. (man) thanks. (tony) yes, problem. you need verizon. trade-in that old thing and get a new iphone 15 pro

with tons of storage. so you can take all the pics! so many selfies. a preposterous amount of pano! that means panoramic. and as many portraits of me as your heart desires. (woman) how about none? (boy) none. (man) yea none feels right. (vo) trade-in any iphone in any condition and get a new iphone 15 pro and an ipad and apple watch se all on us. only on verizon. frizz. dryness. breakage. new dove 10-in-1 serum hair mask with peptide complex. fortifies hair bonds at a molecular level. helps reverse ten signs of damage in one minute. keep living. we'll keep repairing. you always got your mind on the green. not you. you! your business bank account with quickbooks money now earns 5% apy. (♪♪) that's how you business differently. intuit quickbooks. with nurtec odt i can treat and prevent my migraine attacks all in one. don't take if allergic to nurtec. allergic reactions can occur even days after using.

most common side effects were nausea, indigestion and stomach pain. talk to your doctor about nurtec today.

meet the traveling trio. the thrill seeker. the soul searcher. and - ahoy! it's the explorer! each helping to protect their money with chase. woah, a lost card isn't keeping this thrill seeker down. lost her card, not the vibe. the soul searcher, is finding his identity, and helping to protect it. hey! oh yeah, the explorer! she's looking to dive deeper... all while chase looks out for her. because these friends have chase. alerts that help check. tools that help protect. one bank that puts you in control. chase. make more of what's yours. - bye, bye cough. - later chest congestion. hello 12 hours of relief. 12 hours!! mucinex dm gives you 12 hours of relief from chest congestion and any cough, day or night.

mucinex dm. it's comeback season. now try mucinex instasoothe sore throat medicated drops. what if you could go from this to this. with just one step tresemmé silk serum. time for the ultimate humidity test. weightlessly smooth hair your turn. new tresemmé keratin smooth collection. who's the chameleon? the most powerful, shape- shifting, sorceress. nothing like anyone you've ever faced. [ evil laughter ] i eat powerful sorceresses for breakfast. what is it you're holding? a cookie. ah! one last dragon warrior smackdown. oh! ah! we're not so different, you and i. skadoosh. stand back. i'm gonna kick my butt. violence, violence. all right.

before the break, i explained how the united states aired airdrops this week in gaza are election of a much larger foreign policy failure. with me now -- a policy analyst and former middle east advisor at the u.s. department of defense during the obama administration. great to have you with us. before we get to the humanitarian crisis unfolding in gaza, and wanted to get your reaction to that breaking news from earlier today. the vice president calling for an immediate cease-fire. how significant is that? >> thank you so much for having me, ayman. the speech was significant for a few reasons and also fell short for a big reason. first of all, as you mentioned, this was some of the strongest language that we have seen coming out of a senior biden administration official. she talked about the need for an immediate cease-fire. not a temporary truce, even though, effectively, that's what it would be. but the language itself was the strongest we've seen so far. the second reason why it was so

important was because of the empathy that she spoke about the palestinians and the people in gaza, which we haven't really seen much of coming out of the administration. on secretary blinken's last trip, we saw him speaking about the number of children killed. but this is really the first time that somebody had a very high-level in the administration has spoken from minutes about people scrounging for food, having to eat animal feed, and also called the conditions and humane. that was really significant as well, in terms of the shift in tone. and the third part why it was so significant as because she actually refuted several statements from the israelis earlier today and yesterday that said they were doing everything they could to get assistance in, that they were not doing anything to hamper assistance going forward, and that they weren't responsible for anything that happened around the so-called flower massacre, which is what it's

being called right now. so she reject directly refuted that -- expects them to do more, to stop obstructing aid unnecessarily, and to do more to allow humanitarian assistance in. -- of course the reason it falls short is something that you mentioned, which is, and now what? so now that you've set all this, what are you actually going to do about it to make sure that it happens? >> so let me ask you, more broadly speaking, about the decision to airdrop supplies to gaza this week. we mentioned aid organizations say it falls far short of meeting the needs of gaza. do you think is i laid out earlier, it reflects a failure in u.s. policy? i mean, we're talking about two -- willing to open the border in a meaningful way to allow for aid to get in. and these whatever reasons they want to use, but ultimately,

the u.s. is not using any of the power leverage and has over these two countries to actually get aid in in the way that it should. >> absolutely, ayman. the way that the u.s. went about these airdrops was a huge mistake. because they're basically admitting that they're either unwilling or unable to use the lakers but they have vis-@-vis israel, the egyptians, to make sure that more assistance is coming in at a rate that is actually feeding people in gaza. if you look at the numbers, the sheer numbers, you have 2.2 million palestinians now who are on the verge of a famine. if you were to just give them two meals a day, not even three, then we're talking about over 4 million meals a day that need to be entering through whatever crossings, whether through the egyptians, or the israelis, into gaza. 4 million meals a day. the u.s. airdrop provided

38,000 meals. not only is it an adequate, but it also, coming from the u.s., which is the only country that can actually compile the israelis to open up more crossings and to let more humanitarian aid in, was an embarrassment, frankly. it's one thing for the jordanians to provide airdrops. the jordanians have no real power to get the israelis to change their tactics and their strategy and gaza. so actually providing food through airdrops was a positive thing coming out of the jordanians. it was what they could do. but coming from the americans, it was a real sign of, like i said, either an unwillingness or a lack of capability to get the israelis to change the way that they are operating in gaza. in the middle, obviously, up a massive humanitarian crisis. a famine that has led to now between ten and 15 children being killed of malnutrition and dehydration, which is a horrific figures, by any

standards. >> also in her remarks today, the vice president urge the israeli government to do more to increase the flow of aid, including opening up land and sea routes. as a global superpower, and as somebody who worked at the department of defense, what do you think the u.s. can do to ensure that happens? we talk about these things in kind of broad terms, using military aid as leverage, or financial aid as leverage. but how do you implement that day today? >> obviously, there are two big things that the u.s., two big pieces of leverage that the u.s. has over israel. one is the military assistance, and one is diplomatic cover on the world stage. so the u.s. will often shield israel diplomatically, for example, the u.n. security council, using its veto as a permanent member. and then when it comes to aid, there are variety of ways that the u.s. can express its

displeasure by either delaying shipments of aid, which we've done before, without even having to say that you're doing it. this is a bureaucracy. there are 1 million ways that aid can be delayed getting to a country without actually having to state it. you could also actually state it and say you're putting your foot down, we're not getting this assistance, or pausing the assistance, this is what we did with the number of arab countries, for example, during the arab spring. so why is it different now? the fact is that not only has the biden administration not blend that. it is actually expedited and bypassed congress twice to send assistance to israel as it was conducting these operations in gaza. so, the one thing i want to say about that, ayman, that also, from my experience, i was the lead of the syria team during the obama redline fiasco. you know, when he said this red line, and then assad used chemical weapons, and then we eventually did not end up doing

much about it. and i remember the conversations, both within the pentagon at the time, and within the international community, and with our allies. and adversaries, of course. not only was our credibility damaged by that. but also, it took a long time for our allies to forget that we just left them hanging. some of whom who are ready to moving to start going in and conducting operations against the assad regime. but also our adversaries. if you look at russia, if you look at the iranian regime, if you look at hezbollah, hamas, the houthis, you name it, these iranian blacked militias in iraq and syria, they were watching us than, and they're watching us now. they're watching what the u.s. is doing, how it's conducted itself, the amount of leverage that appears to either have or be willing to use with the israelis, and they're taking note, and it is affecting their actions as we speak. the houthis being a clear

example. >> all right, jasmine, thank you so much. i appreciate your insights and you joining us. a new hour of ayman starts after a quick break. quick brea. s to being healthier ♪ ♪ it's more than you do you and she does she... ♪ ♪ the real secret, baby, is how we do we. ♪ (♪♪) ♪ healthier's not something that happens all alone ♪ ♪ it takes greg and lydia, and josie on the phone. ♪ ♪ it's grammy getting checked on in her favorite chair. ♪ ♪ or dolling herself up to go ♪ ♪ handle all of her care. ♪ ♪ and when nia has so much to do ♪ (♪♪) ♪ she doesn't even know where to start ♪ ♪ there's a sweet surprise there to warm her heart. ♪ (♪♪) ♪ with doctors to nurses ♪ ♪ and all the people in between ♪ ♪ healthier happens in more ways than ray's ever seen. ♪ ♪ from mental health... to superpower stealth. ♪ ♪ or jumping on the line ♪ ♪ just to make sure they're fine. ♪

♪ healthier happens together. ♪ [♪♪] if you're only using facial moisturizer in the morning, ♪ just to make sure they're fine. ♪ did you know, the best time for skin renewal is at night? olay retinol24 renews millions of surface skin cells while you sleep. wake up to smoother, younger-looking skin with olay retinol24. my mental health was much better. but i struggled with uncontrollable movements called td, tardive dyskinesia. td can be caused by some mental health meds. and it's unlikely to improve without treatment. i felt like my movements were in the spotlight. #1-prescribed ingrezza is the only td treatment for adults that's always one pill, once daily. ingrezza 80 mg is proven to reduce td movements in 7 out of 10 people. people taking ingrezza can stay on most mental health meds. ingrezza can cause depression, suicidal thoughts, or actions in patients with huntington's disease. pay close attention to and call your doctor if you become depressed, have sudden changes in mood, behaviors, feelings, or have thoughts of suicide. don't take ingrezza if you're allergic to its ingredients.

ingrezza may cause serious side effects, including angioedema, potential heart rhythm problems, and abnormal movements. report fevers, stiff muscles, or problems thinking as these may be life threatening. sleepiness is the most common side effect. it's nice. people focus more on me. ask your doctor about #1 prescribed, once-daily ingrezza. ♪ ingrezza ♪

this hour on ayman, the results from d.c.'s republican primary -- faces her best and possible shot -- vice president calling for an immediate cease- fire in gaza. how to turn those words into action, and