welcome i'm rhiannon jones your top stories from the gb newsroom england manager gareth southgate confirmed his players will take the knee before their world cup opener against iran tomorrow. the tournament kicked off today with the hosts qatar beaten two nil by ecuador. it's the first time the event's been held in a muslim country in the middle east and the build up been overshadowed by a number of controversies. the football association's trying to get clarification action over whether captains will be booked if they wear the last if they wear the one last armband . if they wear the one last armband. nine if they wear the one last armband . nine countries, armband. nine countries, including england and wales, had planned to wear it to promote diversity inclusion . wales

diversity and inclusion. wales join england in kicking off their campaign tomorrow against their campaign tomorrow against the usa. it's their first world cup appearance in 64 years. captain gareth bale says he hopes his team's achievement will inspire a generation . gb will inspire a generation. gb news spoke to welsh fans in kassa about what it means to them. it's crazy. i mean, 64 years, i believe we finally made it and feel like this is one of our last opportunities years, really, of this take, taking the most out of this generation of players. so really excited. you ever think you'd see this day.7 no, no . never felt proud to be no, no. never felt proud to be welsh here. yeah, absolutely . welsh here. yeah, absolutely. yeah. yeah. we hope so. but we really do hope that wales do beat england . it wasn't a great beat england. it wasn't a great start for some fans, though, ahead of kick off tonight. there were chaotic scenes at the fifa fan festival . more than you can fan festival. more than you can hold up to 40,000 people. but at double tried to gain access and for a while organisers blessing to many into a holding area. it

took police around an hour to get frustrated supporters back out of the venue . a 31 year old out of the venue. a 31 year old man has been arrested on suspicion of murder following the death of two young children in a fire in nottingham. foreign rescue were called to a flat in farah close and clifton in the early hours of morning. the children, aged one and three were treated at the scene for smoke inhalation but later died in hospital . a woman in her in hospital. a woman in her thirties remains in a critical condition and in the us, the governor of colorado has described a shooting in a gay nightclub in which five people were killed and 18 injured. a sense this act of evil. police say the suspect, 22 year old anderson lee aldridge opened fire and that several people their own lives trying to stop him. he's currently in custody and receiving treatment for his injuries . the motive for the injuries. the motive for the attack is not yet known . so attack is not yet known. so you're up to date on tv, online

under the fast radio. this is gb news. now it's time for headliners . headliners. thanks, rhiannon, great to have you with us this evening. good evening and welcome to headliners. your first look at tomorrow's papers . i'm mark tomorrow's papers. i'm mark dolan and as always, we're joined by two top comedians, portsmouth , finest, paul cox and portsmouth, finest, paul cox and self—confessed genius legend nick dixon . let's have a quick nick dixon. let's have a quick scan through monday's main headunes scan through monday's main headlines before we take a closer look and monday's daily mail world cup threat to england's harry. don't betray us on brexit. two separate headunes on brexit. two separate headlines there . the daily headlines there. the daily telegraph, cancer toll surges in the wake of the pandemic , and the wake of the pandemic, and sunak totally rejects swiss style brexit deal with the eu.

the newspaper tory mps warn sunak over swiss deal with the eu. the guardian climate deal still leaves world on brink of catastrophe. experts warn . also catastrophe. experts warn. also revealed cancelled train hit record high. the financial times un climate summit ends in discord after help for poor nafions. discord after help for poor nations . the discord after help for poor nations. the times. discord after help for poor nations . the times. patients to nations. the times. patients to face long nhs waits for years . face long nhs waits for years. and millions of fans will watch the world cup from home. the daily express fury at absurd idea to go soft on brexit . and idea to go soft on brexit. and come on, england. put a smile on our faces. the sun . lions of our faces. the sun. lions of arabia . harry kane vows to lift arabia. harry kane vows to lift the nation card threads over rainbow armbands. and last but not, is it a bird? is it a plane? no it's super kane. let's hearit plane? no it's super kane. let's hear it for england. those are your front pages . there you go. your front pages. there you go. well, look, lots of stories to get through . where would you

get through. where would you like to start, richard ? that's like to start, richard? that's a look at the sun. and harry kane could be banned for wearing a band.paul could be banned for wearing a band. paul, what's happening ? band. paul, what's happening? well, yeah, that's exactly right. yeah. fifa threatened to ban harry. i don't think this is personal to harry kane for his one love armband, which i think a number the player is going to wear. but it's for the captains, essentially. it says the pride, colours and so harry said he's going to wear it. and as a result, i think the threat is a yellow card. so if he doesn't remove it at that point, i assume he gets another yellow card. well, i suppose so. look i know plenty of people would support the cause of. identify how you like and choose the kind of partner that you want. know, i'm ultra libertarian . do we i'm an ultra libertarian. do we need politics on a football need this politics on a football shirt ? no, probably not in shirt? no, probably not in opinion. i mean, you have to take in you have to take it in the context of where is what it is and why it is. qatar and everything around qatar is not

good. it's not good in terms progression is not good in terms of western culture. however it's not being played in the west. it's played in the middle east, in qatar and some of this is quite inflammatory , i think at quite inflammatory, i think at times deliberately so to try and poke at that because, you know, we believe that everybody should be as progressive as we are. yeah and therefore they must be up to pace. and, you know, there's little there's something a little arrogant that, but i i'm arrogant about that, but i i'm not suggesting for a minute that his wrong, but the idea his the idea wrong, but the idea that we would go there and impose it on them feels arrogant to me. yeah, i agree with that. what do you think, nick? well, i'm against the policy of imprisoning almost sexual to have their policy is at the same time it would be laws if harry kane got booked for this in way just for the virtue signalling think people don't think that's what people don't like virtue signalling like is the virtue signalling people actually people like a sort of actually an you know would an actual stand you know would actually has some peril to it perhaps if harry kane got sent off then just immediately off and then just immediately after a few ban on,

after a few match ban came on, got again, just got sent off again, it just really dedicated himself to and we striker we just lost our key striker there something that maybe there be something in that maybe started kissing the goalkeeper. yeah it's we use the yeah yeah yeah it's we use the empty gestures we like you know us change that logo . kane's us change that logo. kane's wearing an armour. although you could actually could argue if he's actually eating perhaps it does eating a book, perhaps it does cease become an empty cease to become an empty gesture. then you probably gesture. but then you probably won't wear really is going won't wear if he really is going to get booked it. is he to get booked for it. is he actually to wear it. actually going to wear it. that's question. i think that's the question. i think he'd because i think he'd be mad too, because i think the whole should about the whole thing should be about football. what this football. that's what this should be about. this whole tournament. not going tournament. that's not going to happen. only happen. hopefully it is the only thing make this thing that can make this worthwhile at the moment, isn't it? i saw about 45 it? i mean, i saw about 45 minutes of the first game, too, though sure that was though i'm not sure that was total football, but a hopefully football and not football will win. and we're not talking about armbands and all these are these other things that are surrounding the fifa world. well, we've this well, i know we've seen this politics our public politics suffuse of our public institutions . seen in institutions. we've seen it in the world corporate actions. the world of corporate actions. i mean, it was like show i show guy recently just to fill guy rage recently just to fill up my moped with petrol and they had like rainbow banner and

had like the rainbow banner and sure of these sure what sort of these petroleum have got do with petroleum have got to do with gay rights . but the world gay rights. but it's the world we're now . yeah. not a lot we're in now. yeah. not a lot imagines the answer to by imagines the answer to that by the definitely not got it. the way. definitely not got it. i thought they were super, super groovy and pc . let's have groovy and very pc. let's have a look the express and are look now at the express and are arguing a swiss style eu arguing for a swiss style eu deal which is making many brexiteers want to call dignitas nick and yeah they've got furious absurd idea to go soft on brexit and. this is the hunt suisse brexit that's sort of being mooted now or parts of the tory party saying that it's not mooted. steve barclay's been out to say . no, no, no, no this mooted. steve barclay's been out to say. no, no, no, no this is actually happening. sunak says it's not really happening, but of course people concerned. of course people are concerned. hunfs of course people are concerned. hunt's about why hunt's already started about why immigration's of immigration's necessary and of course are worried about course people are worried about brexiteers worried they're brexiteers are worried they're going back going to end gradually back into europe . our very own nigel europe. our very own nigel farage is even said the tories need to be crushed off the back of this. they're talking about frictionless, itself frictionless, which in itself sounds right. yeah, sounds all right right. yeah, frictionless most frictionless sounds good in most endeavours. you're like, okay, that right. of course

that sounds right. but of course what probably is paying what it will probably is paying more mean dhl having more in it will mean dhl having more in it will mean dhl having more influence, it will mean more influence, it will mean more immigration. that's why more immigration. and that's why people go, hang people start to go, hang on. this not what voted for. this is not what we voted for. if was the case, we would be if it was the case, we would be there now, wouldn't we? at the end of the day, right now. but what happened? we left. we were exited. this is just exited. and i think this is just very much of the moment, because what this what we're seeing now is this perfect of, crisis after perfect storm of, crisis after crisis after of which crisis after crisis, of which can in pected brexit can all be in pected by brexit amongst whole raft of other amongst a whole raft of other things. it's opportunity things. and it's an opportunity now at brexit again and now to look at brexit again and say, well, what can we do differently? well, you know what we can do differently is we can just stand by our guns, i think, and through because and see this through because these mean, these storm i mean, there's a crisis other day. crisis every other day. so there'll be a new crisis that maybe won't be impacted by brexit, hasn't been given chance yet. it's been yet. i don't think it's been given opportunity i didn't given an opportunity. i didn't vote but here and vote for brexit but is here and i'm glad that we stuck i'm quite glad that we stuck with the vote. it was a democratic, we're not going democratic, so we're not going to again. i'm glad to go over that again. i'm glad we with it and we got to we stuck with it and we got to see through now. it's the only

way we're going to figure out if we make it work for us. we can make it work for us. i wish, i wish you were the minister for brexit opportunities mean, opportunities because i mean, i always difficult because opportunities because i mean, i alwibig difficult because opportunities because i mean, i alwibig di1butlt because opportunities because i mean, i alwibig di1but i'd ecause opportunities because i mean, i alwibig di1but i'd like se opportunities because i mean, i alwibig di1but i'd like to the big desk, but i'd like to hug you now. and i also hug you now. well and i also voted remain. i we've got voted remain. i think we've got that common where i accepted that in common where i accepted the result and i anticipated that if reverse brexit there that if we reverse brexit there would democratic crisis, would be a democratic crisis, a constitutional crisis and disorder streets. think disorder on the streets. i think it have it could literally have destroyed country. and destroyed the country. and thank god seen through and god it's been seen through and whole whole point. right. whole the whole point. right. i don't about but when i don't know about you, but when i voted remain, i just thought, well, for well, there's arguments for brexit remain, it brexit as all gives remain, it was marginal for me and i went for remain and that means the brexit it can be a success. the worst we can do is limp on worst thing we can do is limp on with this debate for the next ten absolutely will ten years. absolutely it will paralyse political system paralyse our political system as it did in 2019. and look what happened then. right now, there's lots of polls at the moment to say things like 65% of people who voted for vote people who voted for brexit vote brexit. because the way brexit. now it's because the way the questions are and the context in which the questions a lot of women would like marry their husbands. now, it doesn't

mean going have mean they're going to have a divorce. i'm sure mrs. duncan would twice. i mean , would think twice. i mean, almost rubbish once almost everything's rubbish once you it. exactly. but we you get it. exactly. so. but we i don't think we've actually given a fair crack of the whip, but. yeah, exactly. but but. yeah, well, exactly. but are we going to be allowed to have brexit because the blob is going let us have anything going to let us have anything that the blob, that the markets, the blob, whoever is, we won't allow. whoever it is, we won't allow. what blob? that's what is the blob? well, that's the is the blob? the question. what is the blob? is the treasury? is it the is it the treasury? is it the civil service? is it the bank of england all of it isn't england is sort all of it isn't it. oh, you want to put it. have you a i'm nothing to you put a seven. i'm nothing to do with that but i'm anti blob because. are you a person with periods. no periods. we weren't allowed. no i'm i'm a i'm the worst thing like i'm a straight christian heterosexual male. mean i'm heterosexual male. i mean i'm basically how did you get telly? i we're on tv, but i know we're only on tv, but here's the thing about the blob. it's not going to let us have a proper brexit, you know, they're not let's have not going let's have a liz truss. the divertissement is really won't let us really what they won't let us have taxes. they won't let have low taxes. they won't let us and not at any us have growth and not at any point. is why the tory point. this is why the tory party has to be destroyed. i'm now thinking now that

now thinking i'm now on that level i'm thinking it has now thinking i'm now on that leigo i'm thinking it has now thinking i'm now on that leigo becausen thinking it has now thinking i'm now on that leigo because i'm inking it has now thinking i'm now on that leigo because i'm even; it has now thinking i'm now on that leigo because i'm even thinking to go because i'm even thinking might need proportional might even need proportional representation, don't representation, which i don't even good system. but even think is a good system. but we something to tell we have to do something to tell these politicians that we are protesting against that protesting against the fact that we who are both we have two parties who are both green socialist party. so you don't even enact the policies that want this country that people want in this country and. think? sound that people want in this country and.i'm think? sound that people want in this country and.i'm running think? sound that people want in this country and.i'm running that nk? sound that people want in this country and.i'm running that and sound that people want in this country and.i'm running that and youmd like i'm running that and you announce i voted a very key. you they want to do this. you've got to say a lot people are going to say a lot of people are going to say a lot of people are going to very happy with my not to be very happy with my not very happy. i'm not going to say what so this numbers what i see. so this numbers people happy if people are to be very happy if we a proportional system. we are a proportional system. what think outcome what do you think the outcome would chaos. because look at would be? chaos. because look at you've got 19 parliamentary parties. but what you have parties. but what you would have is least have people like is at least have people like reform but reform represented. yeah but yeah, course yeah, the danger is, of course you'd a coalition what you'd have a coalition what is it, coalition chaos. it was it, a coalition of chaos. it was loaded at lib dems and labour and the snp. and so what do you end up with, up with just end up with, end up with just more because if you more division because if you look conservative party look at the conservative party now, one of the reasons this is a again is because a topic again today is because the are split. we've now

the party are split. we've now got at of the got at the top of the conservative party, some pretty strong camp strong reminders. i think camp was absolutely hardcore ultra remainer. remain remainer. yeah you remain so i don't think it's a surprise that we're having this is the rhetoric right now and you know when next week's when we get next week's prime minister change again, minister it might change again, but i think all about but we'll i think it's all about the moment. i think everything we do at the is about the we do at the moment is about the moment we look at how we moment we never look at how we arrived never look at arrived there. we never look at where be in three steps where we might be in three steps time a thousand steps time. time or a thousand steps time. it's about right. what do it's all about right. what do you now? know, you think right now? you know, if asked carter if you'd asked me about carter oval ago. what i said oval 3 hours ago. what i said i'm never travelling in the car again. although it took me forever to get the tories forever to get it. the tories have had years. that was a have had 12 years. that was a great from dominic great piece from dominic sandbrook what sandbrook on this today. what are tories done in 12 years? are the tories done in 12 years? they've migrant they've given us. the migrant crisis woke very high taxes. and that's i say they've got to that's why i say they've got to go because had years and go because they've had years and i across to opinion i am coming across to opinion briefly. nick whisper it's brexit a success, but brexit could be a success, but given the faces is a given that the eu faces is a sovereign crisis within the sovereign debt crisis within the eurozone and huge problems within , individual nations that within, individual nations that aren't happy with their membership of the bloc .

aren't happy with their membership of the bloc. i think many remainers look over to the eu and think the grass is greener. not sure it is, no. and i've also got the energy price problem now as well. and as party pointed out, we were able to the vaccine roll out because we were in the whatever you think the vaccine i don't like it but quick logistically it but we're quick logistically in yeah, exactly. in ukraine. yeah. yeah, exactly. we able to do these things we were able to do these things and say, many might and like you say, many might follow. but the question is, they're our they're going to following our lead in this, finding out how painful it is. the problem of painful it is. the problem of painful paul painful it. interesting, paul there people don't there said that people don't like frictions. like friction or frictions. the bad paul, bad thing i would say, paul, don't knock till you've tried don't knock it till you've tried it . next stop, the guardian with it. next stop, the guardian with . a loss and damage fund , which . a loss and damage fund, which is what i have to contribute to every time my black in a hotel pool was happening, loss and damage. a reparations term isn't it. oh, i think so, yes. not in some isn't it for that this is this is the this is the soul outcome of cop27. so every cop,

it's like the worst film franchise of all time. every cop no matter what, the number has got the same narrative is that no one wants to go. everyone turns up decides nothing. then at the last they come out with something ridiculous to take away, forget that we nothing away, to forget that we nothing dunng away, to forget that we nothing during that week and i'm not suggesting that reparations or loss and also called loss and damage loss and damage a i'm talking about this from a high level. so to conflate the two because that's what it is, it feels me. that's what it is. they're changing the language because changing language helps you the narrative, helps you change the narrative, helps you change the narrative, helps you a different and at you see a different way. and at the of the day, it's about the end of the day, it's about wealthy countries paying for poorer to work against climate change essentially. now, i'm not sure where this leads us because i'm sure we are part of the wealthy company group, wealthy country group. but we don't feel very wealthy at the moment . and very wealthy at the moment. and what are we paying for and where is and why are we is it going? and why are we doing nobody on it. doing it? nobody agrees on it. not lots of people not nobody. lots of people don't disagree why climate change

disagree on why climate change is happening. disagree on why climate change is happening . so, i mean, what is happening. so, i mean, what do we pay? why do we pay total? i don't think we've learned anything. yeah, well, the guardian's climate climate deal still leaves world on the brink of catastrophe. warn of catastrophe. experts warn there day that there was a poll the day that 41% climate scientists don't 41% of climate scientists don't believe a climate believe there's a climate emergency . and we this on emergency. and we cover this on the sceptic podcast, if the weekly sceptic podcast, if you a different angle. but you want a different angle. but podcast, called, the podcast, as it's called, the weekly and it's so weekly sceptic and it's so sorry, weekly scale, sorry, the weekly scale, the weekly sceptic with me weekly sceptic podcast with me and and, we look at and toby and, we look at a different angle on what you're going to say over the weekend. yeah, one. if like yeah, that's one. if you like it, do. are you a fan or the it, you do. are you a fan or the weekly sceptic with to be weekly sceptic with you? to be honest? nick nixon it was highly relevant 41% of climate relevant because 41% of climate scientists wasn't an scientists said there wasn't an emergency. going cause emergency. was it going to cause a are there is. a claim in there? are there is. and this cop show, it's all about we're not reducing fossil fuels we're not fuels quick and we're not phasing them out enough. but isn't all nonsense? not isn't it is it all nonsense? not nonsense, think there's nonsense, but i think there's a different the story it's different side. the story it's the nearly all these the same in nearly all these stories. they're not nonsense. it's not nonsense, it's just it's not nonsense, but it's just way. up and way. it's dressed up and politicised ation, politicised catastrophize ation, if is it is now.

if that is a word, is it is now. exactly. so you're saying do themselves no favours with this very sort of dramatic response to what is a concerning situation amongst the british public? because what i would say one thing about the british pubuc one thing about the british public that all agree on public that nearly all agree on is tells us to do is if someone tells us to do something or us something is the way is, we're going to refute way it is, we're going to refute it and going on, this is way it is, we're going to refute it catastrophe.]oing on, this is way it is, we're going to refute it catastrophe. well on, this is way it is, we're going to refute it catastrophe. well on. this is way it is, we're going to refute it catastrophe. well on a his is way it is, we're going to refute it catastrophe. well on a minute. a catastrophe. well on a minute. well, how do you define a catastrophe? this doesn't feel like catastrophe. why is it like a catastrophe. why is it a catastrophe? three hot catastrophe? we had three hot days the summer. well, that's days in the summer. well, that's not strong argument and not strong enough argument and so sorry if feel like so on. i'm sorry if feel like it's got parallels the it's got parallels with the pandemic know was pandemic and you know covid was a nasty virus it took too many from us again was the from us but again it was the state high and it was state from on high and it was global wasn't it to say oh my god this is armageddon and you've to stay home you've got to stay home or you're going instantly you're just going to instantly drop know, i think drop dead? you know, i think that that the authorities that i that the authorities brought themselves into disrepute messaging disrepute with the messaging around covid, because people have now looked damage of have now looked at the damage of two years of covid two and a half years of covid policies thought, wait policies and thought, well, wait a infection fatality a minute, the infection fatality rate virus was low rate of the virus was pretty low by standards and wonder

by viral standards and wonder whether same whether they risk making same mistake climate , i mistake now with climate, i think mistakes ought to be made. the cried wolf many the boy that cried wolf too many times, because we're not going to now. to you know, it's too far now. it's overzealous. it's too overzealous. interesting stuff . brilliant. interesting stuff. brilliant. well, a great debate. that's it for part one. join us in part for part one. join us in part for a trump twitter fest and the rest of tomorrow's stories. see you shortly .

i'm mark toner. and this is headuneis i'm mark toner. and this is headline is your first look at tomorrow's papers. so we're always joined by two top comedians. i'm delighted to welcome the surprisingly available well priced paul cox and nick. great to have both of you with us. let's go the telegraph now discussing the society of authors, which is what paul calls , his harry what paul calls, his harry potter fan fiction club. that's right. that's absolutely right,

mark. i didn't realise, you know. yeah a society of authors official. tim tate has quit after claiming the union is undermining the complaints agenda. critic for reuters. some members of the writers union have also raised concerns that he felt that he fails to defend those who are sceptical about ideology. can you imagine that, nick? so my first reaction to this is why do we insist ever every day that everyone to think the same? if this feels this again to me, what is this obsession with everybody having to feel? we use the word ideology for a reason because it's the absolute ideal of any particular situation . and we're particular situation. and we're constantly aiming for that. and the only way we can ever reach any sort of harmony is through debate. right. this just doesn't this all stuff doesn't allow. i'm going off on one now and i'm just. sorry. go and if this actually, nick and i are going to get a coffee, you go. sorry, but i want to read

but sorry, but i want to read a novel. no, no, listen, this. do not self—edit. not on headliners. no thanks very much. but you decides what but you know who decides what we think? we have to think think? why do we have to think the same way? how we reach the same way? how can we reach any debate? any conclusion without debate? and we. if told and if we don't? if we. if told what to think. we can't have debate, can we? no. but this is i the ongoing battle i mean, it's the ongoing battle is between the gender is not between the gender critical side trans critical side and the trans rights act. i tend to side with the gender critical side because it about safety it concerns about safety for women, although i still think actually really the actually if you really take the red pill, they'll realise that feminism is also full. but we can only there today. but can only go there today. but don't in general don't you think in general publishing anyway? publishing has gone woke anyway? it's of dead woke it's another kind of dead woke industry also novel, hate industry and also novel, i hate to i've got a name to say, because i've got a name in literature. paul, as you probably know, two waste of taxpayers money. that was absolutely. but that's that's cash we won't get the novel. cash we won't get by the novel. the novel of dead the novel is kind of dead anyway. only how many good living michel living writers on this, michel welbeck getting that? welbeck who's getting on that? jim there's hardly anyone jim cosier there's hardly anyone else. koontz else. and therefore. dean koontz yeah, jilly cooper else. and therefore. dean koontz yeah, point jilly cooper else. and therefore. dean koontz yeah, point is jilly cooper else. and therefore. dean koontz yeah, point is paul.y cooper else. and therefore. dean koontz yeah, point is paul taylor,er so my point is paul taylor, bradford publishing descended bradford publishing is descended into like so many into wokeness like so many industry spills and been thrown.

my industry spills and been thrown. my story even discussed . sorry my story even discussed. sorry and it's not but you and you know it's not but you also write about this push for groupthink. i actually how groupthink. oh, i actually how does that make the day? people used to think different things and that was okay? exactly and that was okay? it's exactly . just feels really . and this just feels really anti progressive to me how you have to be able to challenge absolutely everything because today's writing today's especially in writing when writer. well, when you're a writer. well, exactly what my point was going to . if everybody for to be. if everybody writes for newspapers or writes fiction or non—fiction is saying the same thing, i'm not going to read it anymore. well, the wonderful novelist kazuo ishiguro, who won the booker for the remains of the booker for the remains of the day , said that what's really the day, said that what's really nasty about cancel culture , how nasty about cancel culture, how invisible it is because what's happening is writers and they're actually cancelling themselves at the laptop so that the wonderful creativity is actually limited , curtailed before limited, curtailed before they've even started . yeah, it they've even started. yeah, it used to be that, you know, if you created something it was no longer yours after you let it go and it was somebody else. by the

time people are creating things now, by the they've it go, now, by the they've let it go, they've already decided what the viewer already is going to make of it because they've finished it themselves and we're just getting they believe the getting what they believe the reader want to see. can reader would want to see. can i also an objection, dixon, also raise an objection, dixon, with expression gender with the expression gender critical because that what gender critical means is anybody that to point out what they that like to point out what they were school gcse were taught at school in gcse biology , which is that there are biology, which is that there are two biological sexes. right. that's something that's actually, something that we're school parenting we're taught at school parenting and that's controversial. you're called critical. that's called gender critical. that's the point you make. can we just change that to gender factor. you're right. it's one of those cases of making that sound like the rather than the the deviation rather than the norm. like cis man is like, norm. much like cis man is like, i'm not cis man. and then people say cis exist in parts of say over cis exist in parts of chemistry. apply chemistry. yeah. but don't apply it to human sexuality. it's ridiculous. word needs to ridiculous. the word needs to go. you're right. maybe gender critical should go as well. yeah. what you replace it yeah. what would you replace it with just. with just. just gender? just. just woman . yeah. just gender. just woman. yeah. quite human female. yeah. quite nice. human female. yeah. you're not, you know,

assessment. i know absolutely not. under no circumstances , i not. under no circumstances, i think. i think you're a sissy . think. i think you're a sissy. how dare you? it's not like a homophobic term of abuse . and homophobic term of abuse. and you know what? you've earned it . nick dixon actually worth getting cancelled for such a thing. he runs like a girl now to monday's mirror to kick off on twitter. he is donny . on twitter. he is donny. absolutely. elon musk has reinstated trump on twitter. i'm sure you've seen it's one of the greatest days in the culture war that we've ever seen. so in you somehow missed it most ran a poll. he said vox populi vox de meaning of course the voice of the people is the voice of god. let's find out what the people say. do they want to reinstate trump? now, trump was winning easily the poll. his number then started a bit and it started to go down a bit and it turned out that probably turned out that was probably because it and because bots attacked it and musk the quite musk used the poll quite cleverly kind bot trap cleverly as a kind of bot trap to find out who was who was bots and who was real. trump ended up winning 52% 48. we've heard

winning 52% to 48. we've heard before somewhere won't into before somewhere i won't go into where down about where he broke down is about 51.9. you really got down to 51.9. if you really got down to it. and he then trump. now trump hasn't tweeted because he's on to social. and he says social was doing tremendous numbers. its engagement is tremendous. he's not going back to twitter. he's not going back to twitter. he claims he'd be mad not to because he's running for election. he needs twitter. i don't i'll to don't think i'll be able to resist for he resist twitter for now. he hasn't been hasn't. and it's also been interesting to people's interesting to see people's response particularly and by response is particularly and by the i don't think have the way, i don't think must have done a poll. he might done it with a poll. he might have been doing the poll have just been doing the poll for fun. it was always going to be stay. course, he should be stay. of course, he should have reinstated from have always reinstated from the former president of united states. absolutely sadiq states. absolutely insane. sadiq khan and called khan has come out and called trump far right politician. trump a far right politician. incredibly insulting to america's americans america's 75 million americans voted absolutely voted for him. absolutely disgust also disgust thing. and he's also said banned from said he should be banned from social did that social media and did that classic thing. khan, he said free. his freedom of speech is vital then the but is my vital but and then the but is my enemies be censored and enemies should be censored and crushed don't know crushed. absolutely i don't know how is still. it's a how this guy is still. it's a great, great day. trump is back. thank you. there's a great i

mean, it's an outrageous tweet from but now from konstantin kissin, but now that cancelled myself, i'll that i've cancelled myself, i'll just i'll read paul and. just i'll read it out. paul and. comedian said, comedian konstantin kissin said, shut up, you tyrannical dwarf , shut up, you tyrannical dwarf, and go back to ruining london . and go back to ruining london. yeah, that's burn, isn't it ? yeah, that's a burn, isn't it? yeah. and jacob rees—mogg is now condemned what's condemned as well. and what's khan about ? condemned as well. and what's khan about? it's condemned as well. and what's khan about ? it's pathetic. khan on about? it's so pathetic. this trump has to be. this idea that trump has to be. oh, incited violence. then oh, he incited violence. then you look his tweets and he was saying, be peaceful saying, let's be peaceful just before was taken off twitter. before he was taken off twitter. be don't is be peaceful. don't do is absolute if sam harris absolute nonsense. if sam harris watch , run with him. sam harris watch, run with him. sam harris i think apparently intelligent person saying that we shouldn't reinstate trump and we have to. we have to because it's spreading hate or some sort of subjective nonsense. i think i think trump should be reinstated . should be on . i think he should be on twitter. think because twitter. i know. i think because i believe in free speech, which i believe in free speech, which i think elon musk was doing this for fun. i don't think there should have been a referendum. i swear that get we the same swear that we get we the same result every referendum. result with every referendum. but should but i think everybody should have voice on that. just bring have a voice on that. just bring them correct right. them all back. correct right. and then you can choose whether

you want to read it or not. that's the whole isn't that's the whole point, isn't it. crazy idea. it. well, here's a crazy idea. you we've got the laws. if you know, we've got the laws. if you libel somebody or if you say, please kill this particular group actually group of people, then actually you'll a visit from you'll receive a visit from plod. but above and beyond the law, knock yourself . that's law, knock yourself. that's exactly point , isn't it? exactly the point, isn't it? thatis exactly the point, isn't it? that is exactly the point . and that is exactly the point. and that's what's changed subtly, i think, in the last of years, where you've got non crime incident incidents which i know they're trying to they're doing some good work to try and get rid of, but what is that? that's just that's just people saying things, raising their eyebrow. it's anybody can take offence at anything so it's not a crime. the police shouldn't be involved at all. and we shouldn't be policing twitter. yeah and incitement already into the american first amendment. so that's not a question you guys had one more thing just to get myself in trouble as well. musk should reinstate alex jones so he's reinstated jordan which is amazing. reinstated the amazing. he's reinstated the babylon bee, which is brilliant. he's . kathy griffin

he's reinstated. kathy griffin which is annoying, but, you know, be on that know, she has to be on that because we've said, she's because as we've said, she's going rubbish, but going to spout her rubbish, but of put her on spout of course put her on that, spout her nonsense. absolutely. he's reinstated a.k.a reinstated andrew tate, a.k.a top brilliant and top jail, which brilliant and hilarious, he's said no hilarious, but he's said no explicitly to bringing back alex jones. now, alex jones has responded with an on typically moderate said actually moderate video and said actually give him time. he's still trying to gain control of twitter. he's got all these forces against him so have at him about so don't have a go at him about that and i understand that i agree we've to take our agree we've got to take our victories where they come. getting back. it is a win getting trump back. it is a win for free speech. reason. he for free speech. the reason. he has back on in has to put alex jones back on in the long even if you hate him is because it has be free speech or nothing because have nothing because we can't have this nothing more like this centrist nothing more like because against these because we were up against these woke who just want to woke ideologues who just want to completely destroy freedom of speech, destroy american culture. take a culture. so you have to take a firm stance and everyone firm stance and put everyone back given. i'm sorry, not back on given. i'm sorry, not know were giving more know that you were giving more power trump banning him. power to trump by banning him. that's me. that's that's the irony for me. i mean, the moment we've got i mean, at the moment we've got this long way and. we think both nick i were kind of hoping

nick and i were kind of hoping that when to introduce that when quizzed to introduce this see the first this story, we'd see the first donald trump tweet. now, i don't follow trump, i can't follow donald trump, but i can't wait see first one. it's wait to see the first one. it's like these things like with all of these things i know want to see absolutely know i want to see absolutely everybody and everybody say their piece and then we can make our own decisions. correct. amen to. that. next up in the guardian, they going to the they say we're going to the moon. also said that moon. but they also said that about all i've eaten about crypto and all i've eaten in is pot noodle in three days is a pot noodle paul yes. astronauts and paul yes. astronauts to live and work the moon by 2039. nasa's work on the moon by 2039. nasa's officials say. paul cox says no they won't. i don't think they will actually. 5 hours to get from portsmouth to london this afternoon. so i'm not sure we're going to be able to live on the moon. but of orion moon. but the head of orion lunar programme says artemus one mission, which is the one that's just recently, just just taken off recently, just about the first to about is the first step to a long term deep space exploration . yeah, well it'll be good going to live on the moon. well, we never even been there right? i wonder what the politics are like up there. yeah, i mean. yeah, how many think we went to the moon? july 2030. well yeah.

film dodgy fake . see, i mean, film dodgy fake. see, i mean, i don't know what. you think about the moon landings now. do the moon landings now. what do you the tape is dodgy. you think? the tape is dodgy. look, dozens of rock stars dodgy you think? the tape is dodgy. locthat. zens of rock stars dodgy you think? the tape is dodgy. locthat. lens of rock stars dodgy you think? the tape is dodgy. locthat. i mean, 'ock stars dodgy you think? the tape is dodgy. locthat. i mean, ick stars dodgy you think? the tape is dodgy. locthat. i mean, i reallys dodgy you think? the tape is dodgy. locthat. i mean, i really want gy on that. i mean, i really want us have gone to the moon . we us to have gone to the moon. we keep talking about going back, so we're to we're to so we're to we're going to disprove way and this disprove this now way and this is really exciting about is what's really exciting about this business me is this awesome business for me is that fishing theory should dismiss and moon dismiss flatter and the moon landing in one program whether we going to live there by 2030 i think is massively unrealistic like when we're going to be in recession in 2030. yeah, it's a goodi recession in 2030. yeah, it's a good i might be a bit cheap to buy on moon maybe that's where we go. is this the best use of our resources at the moment? well no, absolutely it's not. it never me. but i think the never is me. but i think the problem for is that i've problem for me is that i've never been massively excited by and spaceships and space man and all that sort of stuff. it spaceflight, space, men don't do it for me. i'm sorry. women maybe i could get in. yeah, yeah.i maybe i could get in. yeah, yeah. i don't i'm not going to

say that, but i sandra bullock i'm going to read it back a but for me, no, it doesn't. but it is a distraction i can see. and the reason i the reason it myself there is because there will be many of all genders that will be many of all genders that will really relish and it will be an exciting distraction for them. but space based man aliens is the cloak of time for they're not men, they're little aliens. you know, i was involved in a tv show where they put me in a zero gravity situation . and do you gravity situation. and do you know how you achieve zero gravity without going to space? no. to do something in no. you have to do something in an aeroplane called a parabola. oh right. and that or that send . horrific. so you go . it's horrific. yeah. so you go up really, really sort of steeply and rapidly and then the plane points down with like a parabolic path . a graph like. parabolic path. a graph like. exactly. yeah and you're going to be sort of weightless for about maybe 10 seconds each time. i'm not entirely sure there's a of science behind this because it says we are going to because it says we are going to be sending people down to the surface and they are going to be on that surface and science,

nine, nine year old boy, i saw that just doing science. that's a worrying language and lots more to get through after the break. we have female footy fans, comedians shredding money and aladdin. aladdin's being cancelled . whatever next. see? cancelled. whatever next. see? surely .

i dolan and this is headline headliners your first look at tomorrow's papers tonight in the company of paul cox and nick dixon . let's get to our next dixon. let's get to our next story and this is in monday's metro. comedian joe lycett has spent thousand pounds on self—promotion . money well self—promotion. money well spent, paul. well joe lycett has appeared to shred spent, paul. well joe lycett has appeared to shre d £10,000 after appeared to shred £10,000 after david beckham refused to pull out of his reported david beckham refused to pull out of his reporte d £10 million out of his reported £10 million world cup . now, have you seen

world cup. now, have you seen the video , mark? i have. i'm not the video, mark? i have. i'm not convinced that. the video, mark? i have. i'm not convinced that . £10,000, i convinced that. £10,000, i think, is a stunt . convinced that. £10,000, i think, is a stunt. i convinced that. £10,000, i think, is a stunt . i know why think, is a stunt. i know why he's doing it. i know what someone in joe loves. his position would do it, and he probably rightly should take a stand. but don't david stand. but don't think david beckham to listen. and beckham is going to listen. and i was just a bit disappointed with the video in the end. it was i mean, was a flamboyant was i mean, it was a flamboyant and it to by the end all and it felt to me by the end all joe was really was showing joe was really doing was showing off was fabulous, off that jacket was fabulous, by the way. but i don't think i'd like to think i really would like to think i really would like think that he didn't like to think that he didn't that like to think that he didn't thaft £10,000, do think that £10,000, because i do think in climate that in this particular climate that it's of slap in the face it's a bit of a slap in the face to many of us . yeah. yeah. i to many of us. yeah. yeah. i mean, i think the first video when he explained what he was going to do hilarious, going to do was hilarious, wasn't it. yeah think it was a shame. final video shame. i think the final video wasn't it probably wasn't and it probably deliberately joe deliberately sombre. joe lawless. the decision lawless. it made the decision that this is a very serious thing so i can thing to him. so i can understand that. but i've just seen funnier than just seen it a bit funnier than just big nick dick, someone this big nick dick, someone who this when it's actually when the comedians it's actually been nice to me in an industry

snakes actually a nice guy snakes he's actually a nice guy so address jokes but the so don't address jokes but the other about him is seen other about him is i've seen people in attack him people steaming to in attack him on saying, oh, on twitter and stuff saying, oh, it's distasteful, but you want to be careful joe because to be careful with joe because will something up will always have something up his it'll to be his sleeve. it'll turn out to be fake or he'll then fake money or he'll then actually to something. actually donate to or something. have is clever. have some plan that is clever. so wouldn't i wouldn't too so i wouldn't i wouldn't be too hasty. think it was quite hasty. i also think it was quite a good point to expose beckham's hypocrisy. i mean, why not? gary neville very neville has been very hypocritical. lineker hypocritical. gary lineker it's incredibly annoying. so not actually do something savage, expose actually have expose it. i don't actually have any these people any problem with these people taking that money. what i have a problem particular taking that money. what i have a problepeople particular taking that money. what i have a problepeople yearsrticular killer people for years preceding the money, preceding and taking the money, telling we think can do telling us what we think can do and then just take in the dollar anyway. yeah , yeah. that's anyway. yeah, yeah, yeah. that's the problem for me and if was the problem for me and if i was in this position, i'd make this stand as well. now i think he's coming it from a slightly different angle than are. however i tend to agree with nick. i can see this doesn't feel like the end of this. i'm pretty sure that joe lies. it's a very good comedian. i can see else coming of but you

else coming out of it. but you would shred about ten credibility. yeah, that would be about similar statement about the similar statement actually, was ten grand to actually, ratio was ten grand to joe and ten to me is the joe and ten quid to me is the same money. mean more. same money. yeah it mean more. who knew a millionaire socialist like gary neville become a like gary neville could become a hypocrite. i believe hypocrite. who knew? i believe in we live and learn and got it i'm just going to process that as we move on to our next story. and monday's i and there and this is monday's i and there are no longer any world cup widows tell that to the wives of the qatar stadium builders. nic, what dark. what this story was dark. yeah, some this is that 49% of women plan to watch the qatar world cup. and obviously , as cup. and obviously, as a feminist, i approve of this and know they're saying it used to be that you can these adverts where you sort of have the idea of world cup widows men would be the game and then women have to find something to do or the bloke finds a way be allowed bloke finds a way to be allowed to the game etc. and to watch the game etc. and they're saying that's over. actually have actually i mean women have always watched, well, my mum's a big fan, so i wasn't big football fan, so i wasn't particularly i'm not totally shocked or, know, triggered

shocked or, you know, triggered the idea of women watching football. a huge football. mrs. cox is a huge football. mrs. cox is a huge football fan, always has . before football fan, always has. before amateur and is so now we'll be enjoying the world and enjoy the game today . i actually enjoying the world and enjoy the game today. i actually rang her on the way here, find out what the score was because they know what the score was in the first game. so i don't actually see this from perspective in this from this perspective in the nick talks about the same nick talks about his mum football . you know mum enjoying football. you know i think you were to ask 100 i think if you were to ask 100 women what the problem i women what the problem was, i don't he's the football. don't think he's the football. it's probably that it's probably the fact that the men down the and men are going down the pub and not coming for hours on end not coming back for hours on end and getting lashed up and a good time. have experience. we've time. we have experience. we've all sort of all experienced women sort of not a football not interested in a football game, talking bit it. game, talking a bit during it. but not. don't. but it's but i'm not. i don't. but it's not all women, paul. it's just like i some women football like i some women are football fans. you fans. some are it's just, you know i mean? i'm very know what i mean? i'm very progressive. i can see it's not you on it. it's not it's all of them. it'sjust you on it. it's not it's all of them. it's just it's the individual or individualism is not very progressive that's not very progressive and that's good me. good point. you checkmated me. where we go and where we going? where we go and where indeed? well where are we going indeed? well to next and white men to the male next and white men

just can't get it right, can what have they done this time, paul? again. white paul? white man again. white men, white men demonstrating against violence towards women on nations . and on on the united nations. and they been slammed slammed they have been slammed slammed by campaigner for stealing the occasion white men you know against against women getting violently i mean i don't think sick of them exactly. i mean, i don't know where we go from here because i mean, that's violence itself, isn't it, the fact that this if you read this story, which i've done because that's my job here, mark. if you my job here, mark. but if you read story, this is story read the story, this is a story about male female standing up against violent men . you know, against violent men. you know, the more i read this, the more like it's what i done wrong here. i don't understand. it's just it's just a date, isn't it? that's what i don't know. it's two competing variants of male feminism. they've still got it wrong. get it wrong. you can never get it right. male feminist, because right. a male feminist, because you you'll always it you know you'll always get it wrong in the end. and they've said white men's, said white canadian men's, they've and they've managed to be racist and sexist while condemning this. so

they it on the wrong day. they put it on the wrong day. they're against violence against women, with women, but it's competing with another violence against women day. they've had go day. it's like they've had to go them because usurped the them because they've usurped the other absolutely other day. it's absolutely mental. i mean, what about i mean, violence obviously mean, violence against obviously very serious. what about violence against that's not violence against men? that's not evenin violence against men? that's not even in the article, whereas that a real thing as well. if that is a real thing as well. if you movie, that's a big you watch movie, that's a big thing subject just thing it's a taboo subject just to that slightly, to counter that slightly, i don't all this don't disagree at all but this is about never mentioned white is about i never mentioned white ribbon day i was getting lost here is white ribbon day and what all about it's just what it's all about it's just you they moment, you know, they get a moment, a moment, they get some time to say and we all say this is and i think we all agree bad and i think agree it's bad and i think i know that there's an element of this that's specific to hispanic, which i think is why white men mentioned. but other than i see why it's than that, i can't see why it's relevant. it's what the relevant. it's all what the colour are. yeah colour of the men are. yeah yeah. t the world is yeah. no t right. the world is definitely mad. let's get on definitely mad. let's now get on to the telegraph and young people are volunteering their political views. thank god for that. had only been 30 that. it had only been 30 seconds since last did. seconds since they last did. what were they going to say? nick founded nick well, britain was founded on . what they've to

on racism. what they've got to say, say almost half of say, mark, say almost half of young in a now, young people in a poll. now, this from yougov. so this comes from yougov. so obviously immediate question this comes from yougov. so 0 but usly immediate question this comes from yougov. so obut inly immediate question this comes from yougov. so obut in 18 immediate question this comes from yougov. so obut in 18 to immediate question this comes from yougov. so obut in 18 to 24 mediate question this comes from yougov. so obut in 18 to 24 year ate question this comes from yougov. so obut in 18 to 24 year old question this comes from yougov. so obut in 18 to 24 year old age ;tion , but in 18 to 24 year old age group, the majority is saying that britain was founded on racism. they agree with that statement it remains statement and that it remains structurally racist today , 38% structurally racist today, 38% of 18 to 24 year olds favourite removing churchill statue from parliament , 59% even said parliament square, 59% even said that that hurts some sort of critical race theory type language. and even 29% of 18 to 24 year olds also want to ban rowling from publishing because of her views. so young people don't believe in free speech. what's happening here? clearly an indoctrination of young people via useful idiot teachers into critical race theory ideas . and this is what this is what revolutionary movements do. they try indoctrinate the youth. try and indoctrinate the youth. and we've had a kind of stealth cultural in cultural revolution in this country. douglas points country. and as douglas points out, go to churchill, you out, if you go to churchill, you are to our national hero. are going to our national hero. and almost our mythological and it's almost our mythological hero. now, of course he had some flaws in his character, but that's not really the point. it's about an emblematic figure who's and don't

who's our hero. and they don't do with own side. if you say, do it with own side. if you say, well, what about karl marx's rampant antisemitism, they go, oh, an oh, different. so it's an attack. churchill it's attack attack. churchill it's an attack on and the on our culture. and the conservatives lot to conservatives have a lot to answer again, because answer for again, because they've happen. they've allowed this to happen. they've about, oh, they've talked about, oh, a divisive culture wars. like divisive culture wars. it's like the wars happened . the culture wars happened. you've been asleep at the wheel the culture wars happened. you' now aen asleep at the wheel the culture wars happened. you' now for asleep at the wheel the culture wars happened. you' now for the zep at the wheel the culture wars happened. you' now for the toriesthe wheel the culture wars happened. you' now for the tories being1eel and now for the tories being told because they've lost, you know, lost know, conservatives have lost the unless the future generation unless they become an own they grow up and become an own brainwashed themselves, the future bleak . if future looks very bleak. if these are in charge, it's these people are in charge, it's absolutely surprise. mean, absolutely no surprise. i mean, young stupid . i was a young people are stupid. i was a young people are stupid. i was a young was young, stupid young i was a young, stupid person. that's the whole point about it i'm about being young as it i'm actually surprised, though, actually not surprised, though, that young people think this way. what they're that young people think this way. told what they're that young people think this way. told day at they're that young people think this way. told day out1ey're that young people think this way. told day out .ey're that young people think this way. told day out . soz being told day in, day out. so but got to stop asking people but we got to stop asking people in a way, why do we keep asking people things, especially young? you just to get stupid on you are just to get stupid on this. but you know, i don't want to be too unfair. on 18 to 24 year olds, we got to stop asking them stuff. enough already. exactly. listen, young people should seen and not heard. should be seen and not heard. let's and panto

let's go, victoria and panto problems in the mail. where problems in the mail. and where has nafion problems in the mail. and where has nation of humour gone? has this nation of humour gone? well, it's behind you. oh, yes. like the career of most doing pantomime, i'd imagine, pantomime, marc, i'd imagine, but far cultural insensitive , but far cultural insensitive, witty in inverted commas , wishy witty in inverted commas, wishy washy is the wishy rossi. i can't even say it wishy washy reason that charity aladdin panto got the chop so essentially this is you know this is a small village that has a pantomime has done 41 years looking at this raising money for charity raising money for charity which is the really part here because all the stuff isn't important. aladdin is a story that we can debate right ? but that we can debate right? but really they're doing is really all they're doing is putting old story that putting on an age old story that children the we'll probably saw is a pantomime or watched as a disney movie growing up and a result they were because of that they are cancelling that this is and steve and steve in in dorset think i want to say stephanie the works here that's not in

southwest i wasn't i thought it was in work so yeah well it could be what it was. oh no you're right. you're right. maybe there's another one. maybe i've got i got the wrong enemy now coming away. but i think i think i think the just this one just this one show the whole problem it's woke gone problem with is it's woke gone mad again for me it doesn't make any sense to me to cancel this. well one person complained, by the way , but that's it. and the way, but that's it. and i have to question was the race of that one? wasn't that just a white woman complaining ? let's white woman complaining? let's be really honest, but she's probably it's the mother of one of the young actors in a village in dorset village, yes, exactly. she's written in said it is she's written in and said it is a problem. so whole a problem. so the whole thing's got down all the actors. got to shut down all the actors. it pointless for them. everyone involved in abduction charity loses money and all because the idea sensitivity loses money and all because the idea a sensitivity loses money and all because the idea a problem ansitivity loses money and all because the idea a problem with vity loses money and all because the idea a problem with jokes in this is a problem with jokes in a a multicultural global. a in a multicultural global. well shared well jokes depend on shared references assumptions the references and assumptions the best are between your best jokes are between your school . and the school friends. and then the wider gets, more it gets wider it gets, the more it gets not offend someone. and so

not to offend someone. and so now if you call someone, chop, chop, has anyone actually has anyone chinese actually anyone like chinese actually complain about it? i would i would question that. it sounds like it's just a busybody being pc ruining a play pc and ruining a play for charity. right. is that and you know, they can make small changes and at the end of i will not debate it that this is one letter that's coming as a complaint might even be a valid complaint. not being complaint. it's not being debated, just been debated, it's just been dismissed. bothers me with debated, it's just been disrorganised bothers me with debated, it's just been disrorganised is bothers me with debated, it's just been disrorganised is and1ers me with debated, it's just been disrorganised is and1edon't with the organised is and i don't wish to of be told them wish to sort of be told them down because they've obviously, you know, this great this you know, set this great this great but you know, just great panto. but you know, just how fearful and cowardly the of these it's these events often are. and it's these events often are. and it's the same with corporations the same with these corporations we earlier. you we talked about earlier. you know massive like ben and know massive brands like ben and jerry's and sainsbury's and all the it. they're just the rest of it. they're just terrified, terrified, you know. and think at some point it's and i think at some point it's got to go the other way. it's, it's got pendulum must swing it's got the pendulum must swing pull ever will there pull but will it ever will there be anti woke backlash because be an anti woke backlash because i've enough and i think i've had enough and i think millions of people have as well. there certainly will there almost certainly will be. i fashion

i just because it's fashion someone's going to have to be brave , won't they will brave, won't they? they will think it's going to take it's going to take more than someone's to take someone's going to take collective people, but it's going people going to take collective people from the argument. from both sides of the argument. what is, you know, from from what is, you know, from the from the left outwards towards the centre left outwards towards the centre left outwards towards the right everybody's going to have together , say, what have to come together, say, what is we actually want ? because is it we actually want? because what people refer to the dark old by which now they mean 70, 89 days, they seem really progressive to me now. they were times when lots of different types of people existed. yes, there were riots in brixton. yes, there were lots of problems , but everything was on the table be debated. and you know what? we did is we took a problem and we tried to fix it. and when it was fixed, i felt it was, you know, getting towards a where the colour of your skin didn't to matter as much and you orientate and didn't seem to matter much. this was in the matter as much. this was in the nineties in the 2000. exactly and tv, cares and just saying on tv, who cares if you'd that. 20 years ago if you'd said that. 20 years ago that that would people of course we you know, british we care. you know, we're british or it be. those

or whatever it might be. those problems fixed, but we've problems are fixed, but we've taken percent huge taken it percent huge percentage, from percentage, percentage on from that mark people just that mark because people just aren't satisfied . let's not aren't satisfied. let's not quote want it. we didn't want quote we want it. we didn't want people the that people to come to the party that quickly. stuff. well, quickly. brilliant stuff. well, that's for part three. coming that's it for part three. coming up in part four, we've got to tend ramsay's kitchen tend to ramsay's kitchen nightmare regional words nightmare and the regional words need saving shortly .

they call me mark dolan. and this is headline as your first look at tomorrow's papers tonight in the company of the brilliant comedians, paul cox and nick dixon . first up, the and nick dixon. first up, the stew food is on the other foot in monday's independent. and gordon ramsay is the one being shouted out. what's he done , shouted out. what's he done, nick? well, gordon ramsay's restaurant brands animal rebellion, protesters as disrespectful. so animal

rebellion, which is another in these weird groups, you've got just stop oil, just stop whatever the hell they're all founded by the same weird cult leaders seen clips of them leaders i've seen clips of them on twitter. sort of scare on twitter. they sort of scare young thinking the young people into thinking the future die it's future is a do or die it's horrible anyway. so now they protested gordon ramsay restaurant and they forced their way in there. they ruined it for the people there on the night. and they were saying things like, you know, the food costs under like, you know, the food costs unde even under £55 per person. even though are relying on though the people are relying on food kind of food banks, which is kind of always the case. but they always been the case. but they talked the effect on talked about the effect on climate and all that kind of usual stuff. and these people are terrorists. are basically terrorists. i think someone said, just stop are worse because it's more what they disruptive but they do is so disruptive but normal say they are normal to say what they are they're terrorists most they're posh terrorists most of them. hold country to them. they hold the country to now they hold them. they said, these are our demands. if these are our demands. and if you to them, we you don't adhere to them, we will this very destructive will do this very destructive thing. you thing. that's a terrorist you absolutely nailed there, absolutely nailed it there, nick. they don't feed the nick. they don't don't feed the monster . i nick. they don't don't feed the monster. i think it was all right. he's getting and right. he's getting more and

more upper middle class by every protest these. but i mean, gordon ramsay's mitchell star restaurant. what are they going to do next to get a protest? a long a spa retreat ? i mean, long a spa retreat? i mean, what's the point in this? yeah, what's the point in this? yeah, what i thought i mean, i want to give it time because we have to discuss it, but it just it's another load of nonsense to me. and since i grew up in a restaurant and my dad was a chef, i find it particularly offensive because it's a very tough working a kitchen. tough job working in a kitchen. okay, ramsay's doing okay, gordon ramsay's doing well, is well, but everyone else that is struggling the kitchen and struggling in the kitchen and you why their lives you know why disrupt their lives as growing up of as well has growing up of a restaurant demystify restaurants for it a treat going for you is it not a treat going out? well it's very work out? well it's very hard work and everyone people always say, oh, so cool to have oh, it must be so cool to have your own. that's meaning my dad, who chef, but it's actually who is a chef, but it's actually just hard work you just such hard work that you even it is sort cool. it is even know it is sort cool. it is impressive, very unsociable. yeah, realise yeah, but people don't realise this, you work in the this, you know, you work in the morning and at night. yeah, like the off. very tough the afternoon off. very tough chefs, jobs. chefs, very, very hard jobs. respect yeah okay, respect all chefs. yeah okay, well, know. now well, good to know. now endangered it's endangered dialectic. it's next

in and paul hear in the guardian and paul i hear you're a bit of a didn't skinny is that true that's clever skate of irony deny screening anyone can a minute if you can on that in a minute if you like goat podcasts like but that's goat podcasts plan to save endangered dialect . so the durham term for gossip , which apparently is blood disguised. i didn't know that was a brilliant word isn't it was is a brilliant word isn't it is just one of those reasonable words which campaigners happened hoping to breathe new life into a court like the idea this it's a court like the idea this it's a bit of a you know it's just a bit of a fun is a fun thing isn't it it's is you know it's not adding any value to anyone's life. i think. well, how dare you but keeping exactly i mean mark told me it in low squinty. well i've always said that and that word squinty doesn't travel very far . it that word squinty doesn't travel very far. it just it means someone to whinge is a lot is very, very specific to portsmouth. have good portsmouth. but we all have good dialects. i mean, in cumbria we say little say langland, meaning little things this. the people things like this. the people have no idea what we're talking about losing all about and i regret losing all that to london and that coming down to london and losing losing losing my accent and losing a lot of in these terms,

lot of these in these terms, although i sometimes draw the although i do sometimes draw the line you go to wales and line when if you go to wales and they want anything to be in wales, i suppose it's up to wales, but i suppose it's up to them that's, that's them because that's, that's a language, dialect. language, not just a dialect. that's this is make my that's where go this is make my life difficult. the life more difficult. the difference the difference between the two things this is talking things is this is fun talking isn't susie dent. let that one go. how dare you see? susie dent has very popular handle, which has a very popular handle, which is all about quirky words. is all about these quirky words. so should the so i think we should enjoy the fichness so i think we should enjoy the richness of our language. let's now a look at. monday's now have a look at. monday's guardian tinder dead. guardian and it's tinder dead. nick, know. got nick, i wouldn't know. i got kicked years ago . kicked off there years ago. collection erotic collection of highly erotic profile pictures. yes, i saw some those and i can't wash some of those and i can't wash my yeah because i had to my eyes. yeah because i had to use a angle camera lens. use a wide angle camera lens. really? yeah yeah. and i also had one. well, yeah, a little bit . they actually had to back bit. they actually had to back away from me just to get it all out. yeah it's my ego, by the way. that's okay. that's what i to see if there's any more jokes in that series of this is in the guardian and i've said, why am i talking to ten guys something? mark was also asking me just before the show and the rise and

fall of dating apps. it's of think the fall of think piece about the fall of dating to me it misses the dating apps. to me it misses the main point. it does that people are moving back more towards real which good. real life, which is good. but yeah, apps worked yeah, dating apps haven't worked for they for anyone. basically they create a percent tiny create a few percent as tiny percentage top. they're percentage at the top. they're sort exploited. 80% of men sort of exploited. 80% of men are not getting anyway, of are not getting anyway, 80% of women because women are unhappy because they're top five they're going for that top five percentage, like 10% or 5% percentage, more like 10% or 5% of it's created potato of men. it's created a potato distribution the global distribution of the global dating that dating marketplace. i said that phrase battle of ideas. phrase at the battle of ideas. it looked to me like i was meant to look it up. and it's been bad for everyone and hopefully they will. hopefully fall will. i hopefully they will fall apart to real apart and we'll go back to real life. yeah. i mean i met my wife long apps and long before dating apps and it's just as well did and she'd known there were other men out there out had no chance so i'm glad out of had no chance so i'm glad they but always they weren't but always a village. exactly. the only village. exactly. i was the only man but choice isn't man in the but choice isn't always a good thing. no to rights. me. rights. full disclosure to me. so paul. did not meet his so paul. paul did not meet his wife online as you say the day before that. and it was trafficking this. absolutely let's let's not legitimise let's not let's not legitimise that he chose it from a

catalogue. is he good person or engushis catalogue. is he good person or english is not strong , but she's english is not strong, but she's learnt the words help and get me out. yeah that's not funny. but listen , i got what can you do? listen, i got what can you do? look, where should we finish? let's on monday's metro , frank let's on monday's metro, frank makes a goal. keep it. treat urine this is brilliant, isn't that i think it was . can you say that i think it was. can you say that? i didn't know if you could. well, you know what renegade is. say those last day. jonathan cogan. right yeah, right. so what sorry. yeah. goalkeeper drinks after fan swaps bottle when he's not looking. so essentially a fan swapped the goalkeepers because you know if you if you watch a non—league game you're actually quite close to the goalkeeper. i'm not sure if this was non—league or not, he was non—league or not, but he was able swap the goalkeeper's able to swap the goalkeeper's water the back of the water ball in the back of the net filled with his net with one filled with his own, the water own, but he squirted the water back fan, but then he got back at the fan, but then he got sent off. it's woke, cancel culture gone mad poll. exactly as exactly you squint as exactly you called squint you're tried to make

you're a fan. he's tried to make you're a fan. he's tried to make you drink what you do? you drink it. what can you do? who the victim. it was who was? the victim. it was goalkeepers. was goalkeepers. thank you. i was the victim that anecdote. the victim of that anecdote. thanks, come back soon. thanks, boys. come back soon. the is returns the headline is returns tomorrow. 11 nine back on friday nine .

at nine monday thursday on gb news it's bev turner today from am. we're going to be here for you gb news family to keep you but also make you smile. the guy went from puberty to adultery and i can't wait to . bring a few of my own wait to. bring a few of my own opinions. i have no time for cultural totalitarian will engagein cultural totalitarian will engage in passion but always polite debate with your thoughts and. opinions at the centre of whole monday to thursday pencil 12 on tv on radio and online me every sunday at 6 pm. for gloria meets in exclusive interviews i'll be finding out who are politicians are and what they really . i think i've seen they really. i think i've seen probably quite enough of this

matt hancock to last me a lifetime.