Skip to main content

tv   Fox News at Night  FOX News  March 19, 2024 8:00pm-9:00pm PDT

8:00 pm
silent retreat? hold up - yeeerp? i can't talk right now, i'm at a silent retreat. cashback on everything you buy with chase freedom unlimited with no annual fee. how do you cashback? chase. make more of what's yours. >> time for one final thought. got any dates you want to plug? >> thursday to sunday i'm at the comic strip in all paso, texas. april 5th the southpoint hotel in las vegas, the dirty at 12:3. may 9th to 12 them at the house of comedy in scottsdale, arizona. >> fun! the dirty at 1230. >> old stomping ground. >> yeah. thank you to everyone in the studio audience. i love you, america. >> trace: good evening, entrées gallagher, 11:00 pm on the east coast, 8:00 in los angeles and this is america's
8:01 pm
late news, "fox news @ night". breaking tonight, top generals now testifying that warnings were ignored, decisions were delayed and the afghanistan pullout was a strategic failure the generals also say it's unclear how many americans were left behind because they don't know how many americans were there to begin with. president biden, who has always refused to except blame, is once again pointing fingers. we are live with more on what the generals had to say and what the administration is now saying. >> reporter: good evening trace. these were two top generals who oversaw the evacuation of afghanistan back in 2021 and they both told lawmakers during their testimony that it was all poorly planned, ill-timed, unorganized and really was the biden administration's fault for the chaotic exit. now retired, the former joint chief chairman and u.s. central command general told the house foreign affairs committee not only was the evacuation
8:02 pm
inadequately planned but it was not ordered in time. >> the fundamental mistake, fundamental flaw was the timing of the state department. >> it's a second thing to do the coordination on the plan. >> too little, too late. >> my judgement that it was far too little, far too late. >> trace: the -- insisted while the military told the biden a ministration to keep at least 25 hundred servicemembers on the ground to keyboard or, that did not happen. they also pointed out the state department did not move fast enough to evacuate those who needed to get out. as a result we saw thousands of afghans and american citizens crowding u.s. military planes in a desperate attempt to escape the country. >> i will be candid, i don't know the exact number of americans left behind because the starting number was never clear. >> in no instance do we ever fully know what americans are on the ground in any situation, is that correct?
8:03 pm
>> i think that's 100% correct and you will see it playing out today in haiti. >> in the final days of the withdrawal, 13 u.s. service members were killed by a suicide bomber equable airports abby kate. you might remember one of the soldiers father interrupted biden during the state of the union about two weeks ago shouting both his sons name and abby kate. he was arrested that night and later charged but we are learning the dc adjourn -- attorney general has dropped charges telling fox they decided not to prosecute this case just as they have been cases of protesters in the past. >> trace: a good decision, a little overdue. let's bring in the founder of polar is national security. and hudson institute sound mack thank you for coming on, we appreciate this. i thought this was general mackenzie's most startling comment. let's play it and i will get
8:04 pm
your response. >> the president's decision was to maintain an embassy to not require our citizens to leave and of course do not expedite the extraction of at risk afghans. this was not a military decision >> trace: the embassy, our citizens, our allies, all left hanging. what do you think? >> it could not have been more damning. it is so frustrating. it really brings back i think the horror of that 2-three-week period for so many of us who had served in civilian and military intelligence in afghanistan for over 20 years. to see that chaotic and disastrous withdrawal brought back to life today by both of these generals testimony confirms what we all knew. basically that biden and his team completely mishandled the crisis. they did not trust the military leaders, they thought they were smarter than them. they made political decisions and biden ended up paying a political price. he's never really recovered in
8:05 pm
the polls but i think most importantly as somebody who was in the state department, when we had to evacuate 100,000 americans from around the world in a matter of weeks during the start of covid, 100,000 americans we had to get from all around the world, to learn today in this hearing that the state department reportedly could not even under the word neo, the phrase used when you are evacuating people out of a war zone or catastrophe, they could not even under that phrase, the biden administration, biden himself did not have a plan to get civilians, to get our afghan -- afghan allies out. i think the biggest shame is that nobody was really held responsible for this. is much as i appreciate both of the generals testimony today, what i don't understand is where was their boss? the secretary of defense? why wasn't he communicating all of this to the secretary of state and the national security advisor and to the president.
8:06 pm
>> and it's important to note that biden has not taken responsibility. back to 2021, here's an interview. watch. >> your military advisers did not tell you we should just keep 2500 troops, it's been a stable situation for the locks up -- last several years and we can continue to do that? >> president joe biden: no, no one said that to me that i can recall. >> trace: the strategy has always been denied, deny, tonight. >> this was i think the most devastating point made. both of the generals said that all of this could have been mitigated, that there would still be some risk but the risk would have been worth it if they'd kept that residual force, though special operators there to make sure that the civilians got out and that this came to a peaceful diplomatic conclusion rather than rushing the military out first, leaving the civilians behind and then essentially outsourcing the security at the perimeter of the evacuation to the taliban and over and over again. i really think that was the worst point, that this could've been avoided had the president
8:07 pm
listen to his military advisors and left 2500 troops there. >> quickly i want to get to this because we talked about afghanistan and let's move on to haiti. we spoke with a man who was helping americans get out of haiti. he said this... >> every american stock in haiti is absolutely at risk, no matter where they are. there's people on the isolated side of the island and there are people that are stock surrounded by kids with machine guns. so it's incredibly dangerous, it's very scary. >> trace: as it goes on, americans are getting in deeper in peril. >> yeah, there's a pattern of leaving americans behind. it started in afghanistan as the generals talked about today, we still don't know the number of americans left behind there. we still have five americans left behind that are held hostage by a terrorist group in gaza and now in haiti we have americans that christian missionaries that can't get out. this is a pattern and there's clearly an execution problem at the state department that has to be dealt with. >> trace: 15 seconds to you.
8:08 pm
>> well listen, i would say that haiti was like an open air prison but it's not doing a service to prisons. they have more order. this is a catastrophe and, you know, if you don't have control ofhe u.s. border, you are going to have all of the problems that are in haiti coming to americans sure's. just like organ said. if there was a slogan for the obama administration, which is leading from behind, for the biden a ministration it leaving americans behind. >> trace: great to have you both on, thank you. meantime defense attorneys for former president trump say that securing an almost half billion dollar bond for his civil fraud case is a practical impossibility which means there is now a possibility that the new york attorney general could begin seizing properties next monday. the senior national correspondent kevin corke is live with the latest on this. >> reporter: good evening trace. to here the new york attorney general tell it, former president trump is a potential -- you must be held at bay by way of more or less half a billion dollar bond.
8:09 pm
as incredible as that sounds, that's what passes for law in the state of new york at this time. "there is significant risk that absent a full bond or deposit, defendants will attempt to evade enforcement of the judgement, or to make enforcement more difficult after an appeal." so there's that. and with that, what some critics have called a legal travesty continues to play out in realtime for the country to see. but it's a fight not only worth fighting according to the former president, he's fully prepared to stake his future on it. >> this was a rigged trial by a crooked judge and crooked attorney general and we are fighting it out. we have a lot of cash, a great company but they wanted to get away or at least take the cash away. >> they do want to take it away. the former president's lawyers say he can't secure the nearly half billion dollar bond in his civil fraud case, writing that it was a practical impossibility
8:10 pm
under the circumstances presented. this of course could mean the ag who brought the case could seek to freeze some of his bank accounts and as you pointed out, perhaps even sees some of his properties. for those of you watching the calendar carefully, the bond is due next monday. mr trump has of course asking appeals court to pause that judgement. $454 million worth. or to accept a 100 million-dollar cash bond. >> trace: kevin corke live in dc, thank you. let's bring in criminal a tents -- event the attorney. andy mccarthy made the argument that trump might have a remedy. he said this... >> as long as there -- they are confident he does not divest himself of what holdings he has, and it's not like there are other victims who are holding the bag here who need to be compensated, the court order be satisfied that, you know, trumps appeal can go through.
8:11 pm
>> trace: what do you think about that? >> the court ought to be satisfied, yes, but under the law the judgement amount that was rendered in this period of court by the judge needs to be honored and paid. the reason for this in the background is we don't want people to appeal judgements just because they can't pay. and so there has to be some evidence of ability to pay first. >> trace: does it all have to come in? do you have to get the whole 476 million? >> you have to have someone who's willing to post it. therefore we have the bond and the insurance underwriting company is saying if i can see you have a certain number of millions of dollars, i will post the rest because you are good for it. the problem is, there's both a factual dispute in this case, whether it was true, reasonable or an abuse of discretion as to the amount of the 350 million plus interest. and also there's a constitutional issue. is this unreasonable under the law? does that have a bearing or resemblance to the "fraud" that
8:12 pm
did not hurt anyone? therefore you may have a federal issue and you may have a concurrent state issue. >> trace: wall street journal says, whatever his transgressions, defendants are entitled to due process which includes the right to appeal. miss james is trying to short-circuit the justice system to get mr trump, as you promise she would during the 2018 campaign. i mean is it time for another court to step in and may be make their presence known? >> beyond a shadow of a doubt, absolutely. when you have a district attorney who's running for an elected position saying i'm going toet x, y and z, imagine being x, y, z if you are innocent or criminally culpable, but imagine if you can relate do x, y and z. these people have said i'm going to elect you so she needs to make good on her promise. win, lose or draw. if it's a weak case you can bet she will still live through without a jury and only a judge. yes, another court will get involved in this case. i believe we will see action
8:13 pm
even from the new york state supreme court but especially from the federal circuit courts. >> trace: quickly, here's george stephanopoulos and nancy back on march 10th. >> you've endorsed trump or president. judges and two separate juries have found him liable for rape and defaming the victim of that rape. how do you score your endorsement with the testimony we saw? >> it's a shame you'll never feel, george. >> does trump have a case to sue him? >> when you have individuals who are public figures or celebrities, there's a real high level, a threshold. you have to show over and above what you would normally have to show for a normal citizen, like you and i perhaps. he has a tough, tough claim. actually yes, under the law he should prevail. that was so unreasonably careless, to project that on public news. but in reality, i don't think that glass will be half full by
8:14 pm
the time the day has ended. >> trace: great to have you on as always, thank you. a big setback to the biden ministrations border policies with the supreme court ruling that texas can arrest migrant suspected of crossing into this country illegally and then send them back to mexico. marianne rafferty is live with what this means for the lone star state. >> good evening trace. texas officials are celebrating a win tonight after a majority of justices agree that state law enforcement can arrest people entering the country illegally. the 6-3 ruling however will only allow texas law as before to go into effect while the case is argued in a lower court. three liberal justices voted against the law, including one justice who wrote that texas can now immediately enforce it's own law imposing criminal liability on thousands of noncitizens requiring the removal to mexico. and the white house also weighed in. the press secretary wrote, it will not only make communities in texas less safe, it will also
8:15 pm
burden law enforcement and so chaos and confusion at our southern border. just another example of republican officials politicizing the border while blocking real solutions. texas lieutenant governor dan patrick had this to say about the ruling... >> this is such an historic night and again, we are going to see it all the way through. i believe it will be doing well in the fifth circuit and will go back to the supreme court and i think today was a good first step. >> this case is expected to make it back to the supreme court were it will be argued on it's merits but it's next stop is before a federal appeals court and there's no word on when those proceedings are going to take place. >> trace: thank you. [♪♪] [♪♪] >> trace: the fox news and night commonsense department is aware of -- that the white house likes to spin topics to fit their narrative, happens every day. but today when the supreme court allowed to texas law to go into effect giving state and local law enforcement the power to arrest illegal immigrants and
8:16 pm
local judges the power to deport them, the white house was furious, calling the decision unconstitutional, saying it will "so chaos and confusion at our southern border." commonsense is not kidding. it was said that enforcing the law would cause chaos and confusion because not enforcing the law for three years has caused what exactly? tranquility and simplicity? does the white house believe that 10 million plus illegal immigrants freely roaming the country has been beneficial? is busting city budgets coast-to-coast a good thing? is fentanyl fine? is crime comforting? does not saying the name blake and riley mean that she's not really gone? because she is gone and there's a reason she's gone and yet the white house again with a straight face says the texas law is a public safety risk. commonsense knows all about political spin but the white house is convinced it has a
8:17 pm
finger on the pulse of america. truth is, it's not checking the countries also, just giving it the finger. let's bring in the sheriff in arizona, it's great to have you on. the white house statement is worth reading, part of it, because it says the following, senate bill for will not only make communities in texas less safe, it will also burden law enforcement and so chaos and confusion at our southern border. what do you think of that? >> first of all you would think they are talking about their own immigration and border policies because that is what has sewn chaos and confusion in the country. what texas is trying to do is actually working. they are controlling a portion of their border and the language they are using, the messaging saying we are going to hold you accountable if you come to the country illegally into the state of texas, it's working because it's driving that traffic into arizona and into california.
8:18 pm
so the only people so inc. eyolfson confusion is this administration. >> trace: an amazing statement. here's what in illegal migrant said today about the illegal immigrants coming across. -- a legal immigrant -- >> it not only hurts the people who come illegally, it hurts the rest of the country. it's a breakdown in our law and order based society that, you know, immigrants have come to value. >> trace: because we know it's a fairness issue, all the way across. >> that's right. he understands it. a lot of these people came from countries where they did not have a strong rule of law. they came to the country to make a better life in for a strong rule of law which is what has made america great. but this administration doesn't want that. they are undermining the rule of law, opening the borders and furthermore, i love the supreme court making a loose siding on
8:19 pm
the side of texas. and arizona's law in the ninth circuit, it ended up being about immigration. immigration is not mentioned in the constitution. naturalization is in article one section eight. the immigration authority has been given to congress by the supreme court and by other judges and while the circuit court, the ninth circuit court with arizona, it dealt with immigration, what we are talking about is protecting our borders. that is what texas is arguing and we have the right to protect our borders. >> trace: and very quickly, we are running a story in a few minutes on burglary tourism, foreign criminals coming in, state department travel program lets them in, they rip us off and go back. i've got about 15, 20 seconds, what you think about what's happening to these people who are getting ripped off by these foreigners? >> we hate it. look, we are dealing with it. the federal government lets everyone in and we and local law enforcement have to deal with the consequences of having these folks in here. we don't like it, we believe in the rule of law and that's why
8:20 pm
i'm running for senate because we need to restore some commonsense insanity to washington, dc. >> trace: best of luck, sheriff, thank you for coming on meantime the presidential race is set by the primaries go on and we have results coming in right now for a key republican u.s. senate race in ohio. see that could decide to controls the majority in the next congress. mark meredith his tracking results in westlake, ohio. >> reporter: trace, good evening. you see the victory party has mostly wrapped up. there are staffers enjoying well own -- earned pizza and beer. the real race begins in the headline at this hour is that republicans have chosen who their nominee will be as they face off against the democrats this november and what could be a very contentious contest. earlier tonight we saw a businessman celebrate his victory over a three-man race in this contest which of course was being closely watched. he had the support of former president trump as well as some of the other people that been out there. we've also seen him tatalk quita
8:21 pm
bit already tonight about what lies ahead. we spoke to him exclusively after tonight's victory and he tells fox he believes the race between him and senator brown could be one of the nastiest nationwide. >> he knows how to raise money from all kinds of special interest groups, he knows how to beat up people all over the nation for five or ten dollars. and he sells them a bill of goods. it's going to be a very nasty race. i'm prepared for it. >> democrats had a statement ready to go saying ohioans have seen he can't be trusted and that's why they will reject him in november. 's chief rival conceded and says turnout was less than he hoped for but he believes republicans have a real shock to turn the seat read this fall. >> will throw the race i said anyone of the three of us would be better than brown and we will continue with that. >> we also heard from the secretary of state conceding the race meeting right now the republicans have their nominee.
8:22 pm
it will be inexpensive senate contest but we heard he's ready to go for this fall. >> trace: mark meredith, thank you. coming up, how many times have you said just google it? a new report is claiming that google has interfered in multiple major u.s. elections for years. we will explain, next. and the nightcap, one of our regular guests, saying the biggest mistake most of my friends have made in the dating world is essentially sticking with a partner who does not want to commit. should long-term relationships have a deadline for marriage, two years, five years, ten years? what's the longest it's okay to wait for your partner to be marriage ready? let us know. x and instagram @tracegallagher. we will read the best responses. don't go away. we coming right back.
8:23 pm
8:24 pm
8:25 pm
8:26 pm
8:27 pm
8:28 pm
>> trace: you know the phrase just google it. maybe not so fast. a new study by conservative media watchdog claims google has been interfering in major u.s. elections since way back in 2008. sin -- senior national correspondent kevin corke with more. >> reporter: this is something else. the media research center says google has interfered with elections 41 times over the last 16 years and it's impact, they claim, has surged dramatically, making it ever more harmful to mark -- to democracy. they claim that in every single case, will harmed candidates, regardless of party, who threatens it -- threatened its left-wing candidate of choice. examples include google using it's algorithm to exclude auto fill results that were potentially damaging to hillary clinton in 2016 but not doing the same for people like donald trump or bernie sanders.
8:29 pm
they also allegedly disabled adds for the most surged candidate in 2020. and suppressing news critical of joe biden, even concealing most republican campaign websites for the 12 competitive senate races as recently as 2022. the mrc says google's outsized influence on information technology, the body politic and american elections became evident in 2008 after failing to prevent donald trump are being inaugurated following the 2016 election. google has since made clear to any discerning observer that it has been and will continue interfering in america's elections. google as you can imagine pushed back, insisting it has a clear business incentive to keep both sides happy. safeguards to ensure nonbiased and accurate search results are there. trace.
8:30 pm
>> trace: just trying to keep everybody happy. live from dc, thank you. let's bring in the cheap -- chief offered being -- operating officer along with contributing writer. stephanie, to you first. this kind of sums it up. "over the years, google has repeatedly used it's power to help push the most liberal candidates to electoral victory while targeting their opponents ." it really is true. i was just talking about this, you google something in the washington post always comes up at the top ten. you want the washington examiner it's like let's go five or six or seven pages deep to get some information on that. what do you think? >> it's incredible how it always seems to work one way, which is favoring the left. it never seems to favor republicans, republican candidates, although you did note that there were instances where it appeared where google was actually favoring the most liberal of the candidates and i found the point very intriguing
8:31 pm
that in 2008, google was allegedly boosting barack obama over hillary clinton in the democratic primary. you have to wonder if that had played a role in helping him get over the finish line. so, you know, this is tremendously of great importance to the american people because so many people trust google. they are unsuspecting, assuming they are just getting information, not realizing that there are powerful people behind their potentially the google overlords who are try to influence the way you think and vote. >> trace: it's becoming like a brand. like vaseline or coke. you say just google it. that's the way it is. the cyber guy said the following... >> this is just another example why algorithms like the one that operates google, should be transparent. it should be not left up to one group to control what we see, when we see it, and they are
8:32 pm
just passing around the megaphone to whoever they choose , and that is how this works. >> trace: transparency would be a very good thing, i think in this situation. >> i agree and you are right, google is like a brand but when it comes to transparency, people are being bothered by this, they feel like they are being censored and that is not transparent. you look at google, search engine optimization results. google can change what you see based off key words, so if they can change what you see based off of that, who's to say they can't hide information, which is what we saw with that report. i think them -- i think they had a fantastic point that this is a bigger issue. every american should question what's going on. this has to do with our first amendment, freedom of speech. >> that's right. and then you come across this thing and every time you google are you look for something, you search the internet for something, it kind of comes up in an interesting way. so the media is still going crazy on trump's bloodbath
8:33 pm
comment. he was clearly talking about the auto industry. today we had been sensing the following. >> i think it helps trump. if you want donald trump to say something genuinely offensive, wait five minutes. he's going to at some point. you don't have to invent something and then rush out there to try to hammer him because then people say these are not reliable narrators, these are not truthful people. >> trace: but when you invent something, you look bad and people don't trust you. when you lose your credibility, you are done. >> this isn't the first time this has happened to trump. in fact it's a vicious cycle where he is taken out of context the mainstream media, a lot of them go with it. even though they have the ability to watch the entire clip , understand the context of it, they choose not to for some reason. and then they go with it. and then they hardly ever
8:34 pm
apologize. in fact many of them are rewarded with promotions, better jobs, a bigger audience. so we saw this again, he clearly wasn't talking about a january 6th bloodbath but the automotive industry. today we are still seeing those who were pushing this whole lie and hoax not apologizing for it, saying, you know, he doesn't actually have to mean it but we know what he means. >> trace: but that's the whole thing, they keep going at this, they keep going back to the same well and eventually they will learn. they have to pay the price at some point. >> on the topic of social media too, bloodbath, that will be click bait. we see that with trump, it's going to be aggressive language, with biden it seems to be his rambling. biden was just praised for using aggressive language in his date of the union address. snl saying he should be more aggressive. bloodbath, we will see that come up with march madness and espn. no one will blink and i. context.
8:35 pm
>> trace: thank you both. coming up, a store in los angeles came up with a novel way to push thieves away. with a good old-fashioned public shaming. you steal from us, we put you on our instagram page. and the mysterious artist banksy strikes again. plus an incredible sight over the san diego skies, the days best of viral videos are next. but first a live look at new bedford, massachusetts, once known as the city that that the world because of their vast quantities of whale oil. we are coming right back.s [♪♪] [♪♪]d i knew i was interested in working with students who were easily excluded. part of my journey is responding to looks. we have to look out for each other. we have to take care of each other. dance is my safe space. i am autistic and i am a performer. and i'm really good at it. once we're in our own space and we get to create that space, it's really fun.
8:36 pm
i am here because i have seen women do it. if you can see her, you can be her. you can't leave without cuddles. but, you also can't leave covered in hair. with bounce pet, you can cuddle and brush that hair off. bounce, it's the sheet.
8:37 pm
8:38 pm
♪ when you donate we notice. we live it. ah! we appreciate it. when you donate, we keep playing. we keep going. because you keep giving. so what are you waiting for? when you go online to loveshriners.org or call this special number with your monthly gift, you'll make a difference too. and help kids like us do things we never thought we could do.
8:39 pm
plus, with your monthly gift of $19 or more, we'll send you your very own love to the rescue® blanket to remind you that we notice all that you're doing for kids like us. because when you donate to shriners children's, it's music to our ears. it inspires us to keep going. it makes all of this possible. so we just want to say thank you for taking the time to notice me. thank you for taking time to notice us. thank you for taking the time to give. because when you donate, we notice we notice we notice you too! so please call or go online to loveshriners.org
8:40 pm
right away with your monthly gift, but you've got to hurry! your moment to make a big difference for a kid like me is about to pass you by. when you go online to loveshriners.org or call this special number with your monthly gift. you'll make a difference too. thank you for giving. >> trace: authorities in california and across the country tracking a new type of criminal act tonight. burglary tourism. police say thieves from chile with fake ids are using technology to ransack homes of the wealthy. here's the senior national
8:41 pm
correspondent. >> there are photographs of over 400 individuals who have been arrested in the united states from chile. >> police call it burglary tourism and some blame the biden a ministration. >> i cannot comprehend why the united states government is trying to protect chileans who are coming in and breaking into our homes. >> reporter: in 2014 shalay become the first lenten american country whose residence did not need a visa to enter the u.s., avoiding a background check in this allowing criminals to board planes there to rob homes here. >> we have a significant increase in burglaries from organized groups that are outside this country. >> reporter: police caught this group year philadelphia with masks, gloves, pride bars and a soft. in north carolina these four face 200 charges of breaking and entering. in glendale, california, police arrested the suspects for multiple burglaries. in baltimore police connected this group to break-ins in maryland.
8:42 pm
north carolina, alabama and oklahoma. according to authorities, they all have one thing in common, they entered the u.s. from chile as tourists. >> the south american theft groups are abusing the visa program and sending criminals to burglarize my constituents. >> reporter: using fake ids to rent cars and lodging, police say existing databases offer little help and if caught, many das don't prosecute and sheriffs cannot or will not call ice. >> not only are they robbing us blind and burglarizing our homes but then they are not held to answer for their crimes. >> reporter: the state department could revoke julie's visa waiver status but says that's not necessary. police tell us it is because the country does not share criminal information as required. the da is suing the biden a ministration to find out why. >> trace: thank you. it's lose lose. let's bring in republican nominee for congress in intensive care physician along
8:43 pm
with former u.s. senate candidate and journalist. thank you for coming on. we could not be making it any easier or these people to come in here, rip us off and then go home with no consequences. >> i mean as you know, they struck my home tail of glendale and we had a very large gathering of concerned citizens at a church where the police updated everyone and let us know it was this chilean gang doing this. when you look at it, there are multiple different areas where things broke down. first there's the catch and release policy of our far left progressive da who does not prosecute criminals. but then after that what you could have done is if local officials were allowed to communicate with federal officials and find that these people were tourists that could be deported, but no, california has century state laws that were signed, voted by one of my opponents. so these far left progressive policies are bruins the state. >> trace: and he hits very close to home for you, christina, because your mother was robbed by a chilean tours last year. your mom said this...
8:44 pm
>> i put my purse into the cart. i looked at some cosmetics in one aisle and all of a sudden it was gone. i turned around, i saw somebody behind me run with their head down. they ran away. they were so fast. i looked, my purse was light but my wallet was gone. it's still upsetting when i think about it. >> trace: so you know a lot about this. when lapd comes out and start saying we are putting a task force together to try to stop this, you know what it's about. >> it's so frustrating. it's sad to watch that back. i love my mom and she went through a lot. this was a year ago today actually and so this has been going on for quite some time. they are very sophisticated, they know how to break into luxury homes and kind of break into the alarm systems and so when will enough be enough? i think requiring a visit -- visa could be a quickstep we put into place right now. >> trace: the little things in life like proof, like identification, stuff like that.
8:45 pm
a fashion lifestyle boutique has a way to kind of shame shoplifters. if you shoplift in their store then you literally get placed, they take it from the closed circuit cameras and put you on instagram. we are just showing general shoplifting but they are putting these people on their instagram and shaming them and some people are like oh my god and they bring the stuff back. i mean what to do you think about that? >> it's been wildly successful so the owner has been one of my biggest supporters from the get-go and a lot of people find this is novel, this is interesting. but what i tell people is, you know, this is somebody who is essentially being a vigilante. our governments should ensure the health, wealth and security of it's citizens and so these far left progressive policies have resulted in abdication of these responsibilities. at some point right now, yes, it's novel but it what point will a small business owner then
8:46 pm
get a gun for example to try to protect things, when will lives be lost and it will no longer be funny? >> trace: it also comes down to the point where somebody who sees themselves online what's their own retribution. they say hey, we are going to go back to the store and maybe take a pound of flesh for putting me on instagram. >> i was speaking to him as well, the owner, this iconic luxury reason -- retail store in los angeles that's been around since i was a kid. he said that he is at the point where he has to take matters into his own hands and what does that say about the society we are living in? it's very frustrating. these businesses already have had so much to contend with the past few years and now this but the thing is, it's working. in the last week alone he's caught two people who came in, shoplifted, sold goods. he put their face on instagram and said does anybody recognize these people and within a few days they came back and they returned to the goods. >> trace: one girl said she was high. i was high when i ripped you
8:47 pm
off, i'm sorry, user stuff back. christina, alex, thank you both. [♪♪] [♪♪] >> trace: first up into nights viral videos, a new mural showed up on the side of a london building and the mysterious artist banksy is not taking credit. the painting is behind a large tree growing near the building and mimics the shape of it's leaves in summer. at least that's what we are told. meantime the first day of spring, the residents of new york buttoning up there jackets. lake effect snow hit the region today because of below normal temperatures. people right here in southern california got a great nighttime glimpse at the space x rocket scoring -- shoring overhead. oling 22 starling satellites into orbit, all part of starling's mission to provide internet access planet wide. and if you have something like that and you want to share it with us, share it with us @tracegallagher or @foxnewsnight on social media. coming up, how long do you think it's okay to date somebody
8:48 pm
before making a longer-term commitment? if you want to get married and they keep dragging their feet, when do you call it quits? two years, three, ten? let us know x, instagram @tracegallagher. we will read the best response is coming in the nightcap. there are many ways to do things. at old dominion freight line, we do them this way. this way has people who start early. people who care and inspire each other to do things the way they should be done. this way uses technology
8:49 pm
(♪) and goes the extra mile (♪) to deliver your promises on-time, every time. this way is why we're the number one national ltl carrier for quality. for us, this way is the right way which is why it's the only way we go.
8:50 pm
8:51 pm
here's why you should switch fo to duckduckgo on all your devie duckduckgo comes with a built-n engine like google, but it's pi and doesn't spy on your searchs and duckduckgo lets you browse like chrome, but it blocks cooi and creepy ads that follow youa from google and other companie. and there's no catch. it's fre. we make money from ads, but they don't follow you aroud join the millions of people taking back their privacy by downloading duckduckgo on all your devices today.
8:52 pm
8:53 pm
>> trace: we are back with the nightcap crew. kevin court, marion lafferty... tonight's topic, relationship expiration. our friend bethany tweeted about a dating mistake she thinks too many people are making. she says i have a friend who's been in a relationship for five years, she's 32, he's 35. he says he loves her but doesn't really feel ready to move in or commit. this is the biggest mistake most of my friends have made in the dating world so what do you think, should there be a deadline to get married when you are in a serious relationship and what should the deadline be? >> no deadline. you do you. anytime people are like i let's wedge you into our problem i'm like wrong, dumb, dumb. if i told you 50/50 if you get on the roller coaster it will break, would you ride it? maybe not. a lot of people are content to
8:54 pm
sit back and wait on watch. >> trace: okay. kevin corke the philosopher. what was that? >> five years, in your thirties, know there's a biological clock. i say five years, if you don't know, move on. >> trace: christina, with child by the way. >> we got a dr here so we are in good hands. i think it people are on the same page it's all good, you do you but if a guy is saying i don't know about this, next. >> trace: jeff. >> a good point. you have to be on the same page. of some but he wants marriage and the other doesn't, that's not going to change. i do feel like this is sort of aimed at me. [ laughter ] >> i'm on this five-year plan. i've had the conversation. >> don't sound so guilty. >> sammy davis junior says there's a choice we have. commitment or fear.
8:55 pm
and passion does not have a timeline so when it feels right, go for it. but after three or four years, it's not feeling right. >> trace: i tell my daughters, two, three years, out they go. here we go. should a long-term relationship have a deadline for marriage great yesterday eight%, yes 74% on instagram. three years. >> my husband and i waited six years and celebrated 22nd anniversary. rosa says it took my husband and i three months to decide to get married. nicole, i dated nine years and we celebrated 25 years of bliss. and, don't get married. thank you for watching. [ laughter ] >> thank you for watching america's late news, entrées gallagher, see you back here tomorrow.
8:56 pm
8:57 pm
8:58 pm
generalized myasthenia gravis made my life a lot harder. but the picture started changing when i started on vyvgart. ♪ vyvgart is for adults with generalized myasthenia gravis
8:59 pm
who are anti-achr antibody positive. in a clinical trial, vyvgart significantly improved most participants' ability to do daily activities when added to their current gmg treatment. ♪ most participants taking vyvgart also had less muscle weakness. and your vyvgart treatment schedule is designed just for you. in a clinical study, the most common side effects included urinary and respiratory tract infections, and headache. vyvgart may increase the risk of infection. tell your doctor if you have a history of infections or symptoms of an infection. vyvgart can cause allergic reactions. available as vyvgart for iv infusion and also as vyvgart hytrulo for subcutaneous injection. additional side effects for vyvgart hytrulo may include injection site reactions. talk to your neurologist about vyvgart.
9:00 pm
much expected to possibly move the markets. here is "the five." ♪ ♪ [♪♪] [♪♪]

48 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on