250 head a year. saving livestock on the highways. most of the time it's in rural areas which is a lot safer about this one blew up pretty big just north of detroit it was pretty unheard of for most of those people. >> great to see you. god bless you both. have a great weekend. it's been my pleasure, my honor, a blessing to be with you. >> welcome to hannity the 45th president of the united states, donald j trump has been indicted by the biden justice department over alleged crimes that biden himself is also accused of committing. while the ongoing federal documents investigation into joe biden is going nowhere donald trump is being forced to appear before a federal judge on tuesday to face what is now criminal charges all 37 felony

counts by the way it's called count stacking 31 of the counts of willful intention of defense information, six process crimes.president trump is calling this election interference at the highest level. members of congress are openly comparing the us government to a corrupt and anna republican on this program a war on the republic. and coming up tonight we will have full legal analysis from alan dershowitz, former acting attorney general matt whitaker and the former speaker of the house newt gingrich the house judiciary committee chairman jim jordan and my preview of my exclusive interview with the california governor gavin newsom coming up friday night but we begin with a statement that you hear a lot from the left. nobody is above the law. they say there is one set of rules for every american in

fact the doj special counsel, jack smith who is prosecuting donald trump emphasize this with a press conference today unfortunately i am not buying it i will explain in a minute but take a look. >> have the fbi view the incident in which hillary clinton instructed jake sullivan to take the markings off of a document that was to be sent to her? >> we looked at that pretty closely. there was a problem with the secure fax machine and email which she says in substance, take the headers off of it and send it as a non-paper. >> we have one set of laws in this country and they apply to everyone. >> there are hundreds of classified documents on the servers. how many people without a security clearance had access to that server? >> i don't know the exact number. it's probably more than two in less than 10. >> we have one set of laws in this country and they apply to everyone.

>> 110 emails and 52 email chains have been determined by the only agency to contain classify information at the time they were sent or received. eight of those contain information that was top-secret at the time they were sent 36 of those contained secret information at the time and age contain confidential information at the time although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. >> we have one set of laws in this country and they apply to everyone. >> one set of laws to everyone really? no reasonable prosecutor would bring charges against hillary clinton even though hillary mishandled thousands of classified documents. james comey says that they were

illegally stored on her private servers likely hacked by foreign countries, our adversaries she attempted to cover her tracks by deleting 133,000 emails a wife those hard drives clean was something we had never heard of before and then of course the blackberries, iphones were smashed with hammers and sim cards were removed.take a look at your screen. this is joe biden's garage during a campaign in 2020 next to his precious corvette before biden was president. the same location in the same garage right there classified documents were uncovered. possibly in the cardboard box on your screen. that is next to joe's precious car but more classified documents were found in biden's office and his house in wilmington a more documents discovered in an unsecured private office at the biden center at the university of pennsylvania in this case

washington d.c.. some materials dating back to biden's time as senator at the university of delaware. biden's pattern of mishandling secret government material went on for decades. and there has never been any charges against joe biden. no even talk of a grand jury with a special counsel. no information at all whatsoever in the lead up to trump's indictment.one day after another so given today's news i guess there are two sets of laws. one for clinton and one for biden and one for democrats and other high-profile liberal democrats and another set of standards as it applies to donald trump 's supporters and the other conservatives when you are a democrat or a trump hater, guess what? you just say whoops and all is forgiven. it's that simple or in case of joe biden you could live for example biden swore he never

spoke to the son or brother or family about a shady foreign business deal. that's a complete lie. we have proven that over and over. biden was pictured with numerous hunter business partners including a fellow board member and now thanks to the house oversight committee investigation, we know that they trusted fbi source accusing joe biden of taking form bribes in exchange for policy decisions, we know more about this individual. we know that biden as vice president was tasked with leading america's policy in ukraine during the obama administration we know that hunter was raking in 50 grand a month from a ukrainian oil giant and gas giant at the very same time will we know that hunter accepted lavish gifts from the founder, we know he was paid a fortune but he admitted on good morning america that he had no experience. did he ever file taxes on those gifts or register as required by the fair act and were there any policy changes and what did he do in exchange for this

money? we know that joe come as vice president he leveraged 1 billion us taxpayer dollars. you get a ukrainian prosecutor fired. that prosecutor investigating hunter's employer and hunter himself for corruption and he withheld that billion and in six hours they fired the guy. now the fbi's confidential human source who has now been out there, this is the james comer and charles grassley 1023 form they have been looking for but that person apparently detconversations with the marie summa executive who refer to hunter as dumb but said had to pay the biden's because ukrainian prosecutor the one that was fired by joe or because of joe was investigating them and it would be difficult to enter the us market in the midst of that investigation thus the same ukrainian prosecutor that biden forced out six hours another $5

million payment to joe biden at hunter biden annas fox news reports these were not direct payments they were made through so many different bank accounts that investigators will not be able to unravel this for 10 years again these are allegations they are made by confidential human source that's what he is saying the fbi trust of the source so much they pay this individual $200,000 plus for previous intelligence and yet as far as we know the doj has known about this since 2017 and not pursuing a case against the big guy, joe and not looking at hunter's laptop for he complained about giving half

his income to pops are paying for pop's home repairs. so after pushing the russia hoax committing abuse falsifying documents. squeezing witnesses overprocessed crimes and using heavy-handed raids to intimidate witnesses and leaking it to the press and also pushing big tech to censor the hunter biden laptop story that we know was real and seemingly ignoring a bribery allegation against a biden i think it is pretty fair for americans to conclude how insulting it is for a doj special counsel to lecture all of us that we have equal treatment under the law because i'm not buying this in this america. joe biden's america. the sheer lack of self-awareness is beyond stunning but in reality biden's far left doj probably doesn't care. they just want to get trump at any cost rate here with more, the author of trial of the century.

greg jarrett and the author of the book get trump alan dershowitz and former acting attorney general matthew whitaker is with us. it to see you. greg, let me start with you very one thing you keep referring to as the presidential records act conspicuously in my view absent any reference to there, why would this be relative in a case like this? >> is the main defense and it's the prevailing controlling law that presidential records act a civil statute gave trump the right under the law to maintain custody and control if they are classified or not, sean, it's a civil not criminal statute because it's a specific statute. it takes precedence over general and for a decade the department of justice agreed with that. it became their own established standard they argued in federal court in a bill clinton case stating emphatically that

clinton was entitled to keep whatever he wanted after leaving office if it was classified or not so that's trump's main defense and the judge in the case endorsed it. the judge ruled the national archives doesn't have authority to decide presidential records and seizing them from a former president is unfounded and contrary to the law so trump relied on that standard. that should be his defense. >> let me go to the statement. we have one set of laws in this country and they apply to everybody and that we can go to what i just played in this particular case it was james comey admitting hillary had top-secret classified materials all over her servers. i would argue that deleting 33,000 emails and destroying devices that may have that information, to me, and maybe

i'm old-fashioned, that would fit the classic definition of obstruction but i am not a prosecutor. do we have the same standards being applied to hillary clinton, joe biden and donald trump in these cases? >> i don't think we do and jack smith try to persuade us that we do. he is probably listen to your show so he deliberately did not indict trump under the provision of the statute >> because of my show? >> the provision. >> what he learned. >> well. listen. he didn't indict him under the provision talks about negligence he indicted him on the higher standard of willfulness will make it harder to prove but will allow him to say see this is distinguishable from hillary clinton not arguing negligence arguing willfulness. there are 2 paragraphs out of almost 100 in the indictment that donald trump, paragraphs

34 and 35, that disclose the consensually recorded tape that trump allowed to tape when he spoke to a writer about a book concerning meadows in which he admitted that the document that he showed him may be flashed in front of him. we don't know. could have been declassified but was not declassified. those are the only paragraphs, 34 and 35 that are on eviscerated and he doesn't have anything to worry about. the rest of them are covered by the record tag or lack of intent it's very hard to prove the crime with level of intent but the paragraphs that are troubling, and i think the defense will probably be look. i was just showing off. i did really show him these materials. i just let him see that we had them. he didn't read them and of

course the government doesn't have the materials themselves so will be hard to prove what's in them but if i were trump's lawyers, those of the paragraphs i would be focusing on. i think the rest is duplicitous and typical and predictable and probably not criminal. >> somatic whitaker, let me go to what james comey said in the three days in 2016 he talked about top-secret classified information being faxed to hillary insisting that the heading be moved, the classification but it didn't declassify the document. people didn't have clearance including lawyers and others also looking at those documents at least 10 people at the time foreign governments likely having hacked into that system and then comey's statement that 30,000 emails forgetting the 33,000 she deleted 110 of them

and 52 email chains determined by the only agency to have classified information at the time eight of those chains had top-secret 36 had secret. tell me how this, in any way comports with the statement that was made by jack smith today that we have one set of the laws in the country that apply to everyone. where the laws applied in that case? >> in the hillary clinton case under the jack smith standard and hillary clinton should have been charged on many counts of violating the statute and this is the problem is the equal justice under the law. that concept is out the window because that was a fleeting moment where the fbi director can stand up and give someone a pass that now we have the biden administration, through their

special counsel and jack smith who directly reports to garland is targeting the main political opponent.he stood up today and said essentially he was representing the intelligence community. guess of the intelligence community when after and 2015 and 2016? donald trump. and here we go again. >> by the way to some shocking news last night. the conspiracy theorists of all theorists rachel maddow said something true on her show. take a pause and note. >> you have to wonder if the justice department is considering if there is some political solution to this criminal problem, if part of the issue here is not just that trump has committed crimes but he has committed crimes and plans to be back in the white house. do they consider as part of a potential plea offer something that would prescribe him from running for office again? i don't know.

>> i would imagine if anything like that happened it would have to come from the defense side of the negotiation. that the trump team would say by the way, with this we will also drop out of the race for president. otherwise it would put the justice department in this position that donald trump claims therein. he claims they are trying to stop him.from becoming president again and that's the only reason they are doing this. >> so it turns out this is about stopping trout from becoming or running for president. now the house judiciary committee chairman jim jordan is raising specific concerns about the doj's investigations. let's get your reaction overall to this and we have been focusing a lot on james comey's defense of hillary in july 2016 you remember it well. even taking classified header

so they could fax documents. people who don't have clearance getting hold of these documents. and the exact same thing that donald trump did. >> this is a sad day for the equal application of the law but this is about election interference. we have an email that the biden administration sent on day three. an email is sent to twitter saying take down this tweet asap and it's by robert f kennedy junior. so the white house is working to censor the primary election opponent and now they are going to indict their general election opponent while joe biden's family took millions of dollars from foreign nationals while joe biden has classified documents at four different locations and of course, there is the comparison that you made to how they were treated,

secretary clinton. this is ridiculous what's going on in the country understands that sees clearly they have been out to get president trump in 2016 when it was the trump russia hopes the crossfire investigation 2020 suppression of the biden laptop story and now this. it is wrong in the country knows it is wrong. >> so you have your colleague looking into obviously the biden family business and how much money did they make from every country and what did the biden members do to earn that money what services did they offer to joe himself commit any acts with it this is stuff that should have been investigated in 2016 and 17 and now we have a situation where biden has four separate locations and he

had information in his possession but there has been no leaks. there has been no talk to grand juries. no reading his home no reading his office no reading any of the locations. what does the average american think watching the same these two did it and they got away with it. why are you going after this guy? >> all the intensity going after president trump. just this past wednesday we interviewed, we had a deposition of the former head of the washington field office for the fbi. mr. san antonio he san antonio told us from the start where is the us attorney assigned to this grade this going to happen in this case with the classified documents. they said there is no us attorney we are running this out of headquarters. and he said why are we doing that now and then he said if we are going to do this why don't we just call president trump's lawyers.

why do we have to go in with a subpoena and they said no we are going to do it that way and he said how about this. when we get there we call a president trump's attorney and he can meet us and like we did for joe biden when his attorneys look through not the way visited mara largo and the people of the headquarters said no we are not going to do it. so right from the get-go this thing was a sham and the lawyer who overruled said we are not going to do it that way. that lawyer is the same one who supposedly said to a lawyer representing someone who worked for mr. trump, threatened him with his judgeship position. this is been in the news as well. this was a problem from the start and everyone sees it. >> we come back the house oversight committee is finding that 1023 document jim was referring to.

what is that mean for the current president? we will check in with newt gingrich who is here as we continue. >> >> >> ly

>> former president trump is shaking up his legal team in the wake of his federal classified document indictment. he removed two of his top attorneys from the case. a reason was not given but both attorneys met with special counsel jack smith about the documents this week. trump is facing nearly 40 counts on seven charges including making false statements and conspiracy to obstruct the charges come almost a year after the fbi allegedly found classified documents at his florida home. people across the eastern half of the us are finally getting much needed fresh air a new weather pattern is pushing the hazardous canadian wildfire smoke over the atlantic ocean earlier this week people in new york city and philadelphia experience the most polluted air ever recorded. now back to hannity.

>> so in a convenient twist of fate the indictment of former president donald j trump came on the same day that members of the house oversight committee viewed the fbi document attend 23 form alleging that joe biden took bribes in exchange fractions as vice president now sources that have seen the documents tell box digital that it details an alleged $10 million payment to joe and hunter from a burisma executive they said they would route the payment through so many shell companies that the transfer would take 10 years to uncover it and burisma this executive would want in exchange for that money? he wanted to halt an investigation into his company by a prosecutor in ukraine the one that joe biden leveraged taxpayer dollars and demanded he be fired in six hours and

some of it be they fire that guy and ask about these allegations president biden left them off. take a look. >> i am supposed to walk off the stage but wait wait wait. >> why the allegation do you have a response? >> where is the money? i'm joking.it's a bunch of malarkey. >> joining us now the author of a new book you can get it bookstores across the country at hannity.com and amazon.com march 4 majority former speaker of the house newt gingrich is with us. there are two things that are beyond puzzling to me. one, in the middle of the trumps impeachment we have joe biden on tape leveraging bragging that he leveraged $1 billion to get a ukrainian prosecutor fired and gave him six hours to do it. they fired him it turns out that prosecutor was investigating burisma and it turns out the prosecutor was

investigating hunter biden hunter biden does an interview on gma and admits he has no experience in energy coal, gas or ukraine. to me that seems like a quid pro quo by joe. nobody showed any interest in that. mr. speaker.why? >> i think all of us who were conservative misunderstood what's going on. it's a lot like hillary. they didn't prosecute hillary. she is so likable. they didn't prosecute hunter because he is such a nice guy. they're not going to go after joe because after all he means well. you have here is absolute total corruption and i have a couple of simple tests for the house republicans. release the document. it is not classified there's no reason why every american can't read it. put on the internet. this is a confidential fbi informant and the fbi paid over

$200,000 over the years so they thought it was a very serious person so let's read what he has to say and i just did a newsletter gingrich 360 say this is the wrong indictment the trip donald trump indictment is wrong. the first indictment ought to be all the people who are mentioned as breaking the rules and breaking the law and the germ report. those are fbi agents in the second ought to be the universities that still haven't told us how much money they got from chinese communists while taking care of the biden's university of pennsylvania got 2 ambassadorships out of the deal and 10 biden administration senior people being paid by the university of pennsylvania with money i think came directly from communist china and the third indictment should be the biden family. how can you have a verysimple , just ask yourself. why was the widow of the mayor

of moscow said $3 million to hunter biden? >> 3 1/2. treatment why would they hire a guy who did know anything? 3 and a half million. i am lowballing. think about it. why would burisma be paying him why would a chinese billionaire be sending him a dime and and we know of at least one case worth $3 million sent to the biden family from china and what does it tell you that apparently the fbi leadership insisted that the irs disband the team that was looking into the money for the biden's. this whole thing is sick and it puts into context what is happening with trump.

you have a deliberate, vicious effort, worthy of zimbabwe or venezuela or cuba and the united states of america to have this kind of totally ruthless use of the power of government. it's ironic. this is the week of the anniversary of the publication of george orwell's 1984. what we are seeing is the use of state power and i hope that the republicans next week will release the document put on the internet let every american see it and then asked the attorney general and the head of the fbi how could you have had this for several years and not investigated it? there's something profoundly sick about this. >> by the way i had the honor of interviewing him on his own podcast about his new book bookstores around the country amazon.com new to 360 i believe is where the podcast is. mr. speaker. thank you.

all right straightahead biden ddhas embarrassed himself and t country in full front of a world leader we will play the tape and get reaction from maranda devine and congressman lonnie jackson. stay ahead. still ahead.o >> >> >>

>> while joe biden headed home

for most of the week he did find time to meet with the prime minister of the united kingdom, the uk and of course it did not go well. what a shock. take a look. >> well mr. president. mr. president. mr. prime minister.it's great to have you back. and there's an awful lot of stories that are told about a bunch of former prime minister i can think anyway. >> >> can you imagine being on his staff and every time he speaks extemporaneously no. please don't screw it. concerns over his age ability continue to grow. polls show 40 percent of independent voters feel biden's agent severely limits his ability to do the job. democrats are desperately looking for another option with biden primary challenger robert

kennedy junior he continues to gain a lot of support fox news contributor maranda devine and former white house physician congressman ronnie jackson. good to see you both. i would not have guessed 21 percent consistently for rfk junior in the polls but that is where he is. and even marianne williamson pulling at close to 10 percent that's amazing and an overwhelming majority of democrats don't want him to be the nominee. your thoughts? >> it's pretty clear why they don't. he is just not the joe biden they thought they were getting. they thought they were getting honest joe and there's corruption allegations. and it's sort of a part-time president and the problem is that joe biden has been in

politics a long time. he has a big machine behind him and they are very catty at winning elections by fair means or foul and as you can see what they are doing with joe biden's primary opponent they are tying him up in all sorts of legal tactics while these allegations that are so damaging to joe biden strolling around the election of the fbi cover-up all of that is coming to fruition and yet what they have done cleverly is now they have a giant smokescreen of donald trump so as bad as joe biden is and as hopeless as he is the machine behind him is propping him up. >> and ronnie jackson you are a medical doctor as well and we talked about biden's cognitive health. it's very obvious and transparent.

is america now at a point to where you believe it is so obvious and transparent that he is not up to the job that independents and democrats would rather have somebody who is a fighter, that is aware, that would have a great solid record on the economy, on energy, on borders, foreign relations with china and russia showed strength around the world. when is america going to come down on this in the end i can imagine america can accept this much longer. >> the big problem is i don't think the american people are in control of what happened. >> i don't think it's any different than she she >> they are using this to distract from his cognitive

inefficiencies in the stuff going on with the biden family and they can't keep him locked up all the time they will do their best to keep them in a basement but every now and then after roland met like this and he's going to say stoop it stuff and declare to everyone who is watching he is incompetent and incapable they are good doing a good job of using the power and authority to stack the deck against president trump and we need a man with his type of leadership and we need him back but i don't know the american people are pulling the strings or controlling what's happening or be able to. >> amazing times we are living in. that's for sure. and doctor jackson always good to see you. when we come back a preview of my exclusive interview with california governor catherine newsom. you don't want to ? gavin newsom. yyou don't want to miss it. it's going to be a fun h day. >>dent >>

>>acem

>> earlier today i had the opportunity to sit down with california governor gavin newsom with an interview. no topic off the table. it ended up being a lot of fun. we will let you decide. here is an exclusive first look.

i am not sure what day we are airing it but i think you'll like the interview but you get the first look where i asked him about president biden. >> do you think he's cognitively strong enough to be president? >> i have conversations with them all the time. yes. >> i have talked to him when i have been overseas i have been in air force one a marine one and i have been in the limo with him. >> how many times does your phone paying a day, people saying you need to get in this race that they agree with me he is not up to the job? >> that's a fair question. >> i am not answering. >> i asked the governor about the trump indictment. here's what he said. >> i would be negligent if i didn't get your reaction to what happened. sue mcfadden i say that as an american. as you know. i didn't have a closed fist but it was incredible.

no politics during and i have a critiques from the left by saying that. >> here with reaction fox news contributor charlie and clay travis. good to see you both. charlie. this is a long-range interview. i think i liked about it was a fun exchange we have known each other for a long time and we don't agree on anything politically but we ended up having a fun discussion. i pushed him and he pushed back and i will let the audience decide but it was fun today. >> that's the most important thing we can have going on in our country today where there is so much of this incredible division much of its own by the most powerful people in the country so that's a very good

thing but i think it is amusing the way he did dodge that question that you had. of course we both know that a lot of people are in the democratic party are freaking out about joe biden and are desperate for an alternative and what they have may be in paris it may be worse than the current problem so they are very desperate and he was good at avoiding answering that question. >> yeah. one thing, clay, that stood out to me. there were moments, and number of them where he fell of the sword. he said you are right. on the french laundry. he said that was stooping. that was his answer. i appreciate occasional honesty.i think he sees what we see about joe but he was being a loyal democrat in that moment. >> he sat down for an interview with you to talk to the fox news audience right in the middle of joe biden falling on the stage and refused to answer

a question that you asked him. of course you did.good for you. you asked him directly how often do you get asked to run for president of the united states and he could have easily said never. he could have lied.he could have said everybody loves biden but he didn't say that. he also didn't take a shot at donald trump and that's what i think this is fascinating it's almost like gavin newsom thinks he is running for president against rhonda santos maybe it's a preview for 2028 and he thinks that is what might ultimately be happening but he refused to say he wasn't being constantly asked to run for president and he didn't take a shot at trump himself. i am just telling you. this guy visited the white house, when joe biden talked to the media. >> he did throw his jacket over his shoulder and he looked comfortable.

>> throw his feet up on the resolute desk. >> i will give you a preview of coming attractions because they have had a back and forth and i compare and contrast a lot of california with florida and the kind of relationship they have and a little hint. i got him to be willing to agree to let me basically just be a quiet moderator, like a timekeeper for two hours. a three hour debate with rhonda santos.how great would that tv be? soon as that would be tremendous. >> but the thing i have to say. he doesn't interview and he presents himself as the same person and i think that's important for the republic having these open discussions at open debates is very important but it does undo the fact that he runs california like a lunatic and when you

look at their efforts >>. [indiscernible] >> in the idea that you're going to pass laws that prevent people from protecting themselves or protecting their property and you see the waves of people leaving california for mexico, that tells you what kind of a guy he is >> we talk about that. we will give you the last word. >> look, a guy wants to be president he knows harris can't do the job. if they force out biden he's going to be the nominee just like all of those people calling him and asking him to run. >> okay. i asked him a number of times. i won't tell you his answer about that very question. i have to tease something others a lot in this interview charlie, clay, have a great weekend. will he come back, more hannity wstraight ahead.

>> unfortunately that is all the time we have left. reporting from the great state of california. before we go, programming note, on monday we are going to try, to get this interview with california governor newsom and we will definitely bring it to you we may have two or three days of material by the time it's all said and done and

wednesday and thursday we have audience shows tickets are free go to hannity .com and don't ever miss an episode of hannity we hope you have a great weekend and thank you for making the show possible. in the meantime let not your heart be troubled here is laura with the ingraham angle. straight ahead. >> >> hi everyone i am laura ingraham this is the ingraham angle. lots of news. get right to it. the american left has worked overtime for decades. slowly but surely destroying every norm that we americans once held dear. sexual norms. they are gone. >> this is kenzie she fell in love with legacy and they fell in love with >> people assume i am the guy. and i have two girlfriends