their territory, to win back their territory, defend their cities and resist the aggressor. and the fairly well-known ukrainian military officer maria berlinska in one of her last interviews stated that it is basically impossible for us to go to the borders of 1991, and even these borders of ours, which were before the full-scale invasion of 2022, this is also... difficult, at the same time today we are also paying attention to the statements in the interview of president volodymyr zelensky, where he says that russia may go on a counteroffensive, one of its own, on another offensive at the end of may, in june of this year, and that we lack weapons, how do you evaluate these statements and the military one, do you separate them, the military one, which mrs. maria berlinska, in particular. well, look

, today is thursday, and if we talk about whether we can get out by monday or tuesday at the border of 91, of course, that is nonsense, yes, but, well, next week, for example, or after next week there, this, this is absurd, of course, what, but if we do not talk about the restoration, about the restoration of the territorial integrity of our state, then what should we do? fold your hands and and and and what's next? i personally believe that we will be able to restore the territorial integrity of our country , whether it will be, it will be difficult, it will be extremely difficult, but we must realize and we must believe in it and we must do everything for it, and this is the question whether we will be able to do it, well, in my opinion, here, first of all, we need to ask questions, these people who are watching us now, now two people have been shown to me on the screen. military uniform, they believe in it

and they do it, but let every viewer who is looking at us now, he will simply think, even without emotions and without the fact that he is saying anything to anyone, let him simply ask himself in his heart the question, will he do something so that ukraine will go to the borders of 1991, is he personally doing something so that we preserve our country, which lived under occupation, so that our children do not see the war and and and... and so on, this is a question primarily for all of us, for the entire ukrainian nation, it's not a question for the military, it 's not a question for the president, it's not a question for the commander-in-chief, to the minister of defense, we always want to find someone, someone will say something, and that's how it will happen, no, unfortunately, the war, the one that is now, and whatever the war is in principle, it affects absolutely everyone , how much the whole country , how much the entire ukrainian nation, how much the entire population, everyone will be aware that

how long this war will last and how quickly we will return will depend on everything, every step, every action to the borders of 1991 and we will restore the territorial one the integrity of our state, this is a question for each of us, a lot of people are now looking for someone and paying attention to someone, there is a lot of discussion in society now about processes, and what macron said there, and what a congressman said there in... parliament , and what did some director of military production in europe say, how much ammunition will they give us, but soon there may be f-16s and they will finally give them, or maybe something else will happen, and they are following some processes to which in in principle, they have no relation, but i wanted that in principle, well, that we all understood that that victory and that war concern us, and and and and everyone should think that... he is doing for this, is he doing

enough, so if a person falls from legs in the evening at home on the bed in civilian life and in the morning wakes up at 60 in the morning and runs to do something to win, then that's how she does enough, and when a person leaves work and thinks that i've been tortured today, i'll go for a beer, and then one more thing, in principle, i had a very difficult week and saturday, sunday, i need to go somewhere to rest, then remember for your acquaintances, for your relatives , the military, many of whom are now without rotation for months, working 24/7, just don't, don't get out of the front without, oh no, i'm surrounded by a lot of positive people, but i'm not from i haven't heard from anyone that i'm tired, i want to take two days a week to lie down , look at the tablet, read the news, read or something else, there is work, it must be done, but when everyone starts to think like that,

then we can say that this is a victory and the return to the borders of 91 will be much faster if just sitting something talk, watch, read the news, well then , she will be there for... a very long time. marken lupachak, thank you for these words, for these, for these, i would even say, emotions, which are absolutely justified on our air. and for this activation. mr. mikhalchysin, i have a question for you. i understand that, well, what markiyan lupachak said about, well, very often we discuss things, mm, on which we cannot influence, but nevertheless, today, well, we quote. the times, where the world should prepare for the scenario of the fall of kyiv, the fall of kyiv, this is important, as they say international journalists, precisely, well there, no , an unfavorable scenario for kyiv, namely the fall of kyiv, yes, loudly, but, but

the headline, at the same time we read that scholz, the chancellor of germany, declares that now there are many international partners of germany, including ukraine , looking for an option, how to sit down at the negotiation table, how would you assess this situation, how realistic it is, rather, even the second part of the negotiation question. well, first of all, as markiyan lombachak rightly said, there are so many pseudo-experts in kyiv, for example, in lviv experts, such people with negative , with negative opinions, there are no such people, there are a lot of them in kyiv, for some reason, in the west it is a different matter, here, first of all, there is also... there is a press that is purely left-wing, that is about, has pro-soviet sympathies, and now also pro-russian, and the second is a lot of bought, such as serious publications new york times, washington post, or the economist, they were considered

serious, and some such real publications that follow journalistic ethics, in fact, are they bought russians, are they pro-russian, what are they... carrying now lately there have been such strange texts with sympathy, and sympathy for russia, but there was this famous interview of tucker carlson with putin, and it turned out to be a hoax, because everyone thought that tucker karsen would be, karsen wants to promote himself and promote russia , in fact, everything turned out the other way around, in relation to those negotiations, it is clear that the war is already in everyone's throat, so to speak. in the west, they had too profitable a life and forgot about the old principle, as mr. golomsha reminded here, if you want peace, prepare for war. to us it seemed that those times had already passed , it seemed to everyone, but in fact that old wisdom works, and the sunsets, that wisdom and that, and that matter,

it is not in spirit at all and that is why they would like to end that war with great satisfaction , and of course, some negotiations are underway, they want to do something. there are different forces, there are different political parties, different people, but recently, just the other day, chancellor schröder appeared from it, a friend of putin, a former, former german chancellor, now one of the leaders of some, some russian gas union, on which he earns millions, millions of euros a year, he said again that with my authority i want to imprison ukraine and russia again. at the table , at the negotiating table, there are such, there are, of course , such trends, there are such elements, and even very dangerous elements, which, on the other hand , distract western governments from providing us with some more real help, because

help we need it right now, but still, let's be honest, the help is not enough compared to the opportunities that the west, western governments and the west have. countries, especially the united states, well , what are 31 leopards, and for a laugh, we know how long a tank lives on the battlefield, the military knows how long these 31 leopards will last, if they leave, what will happen to them, yes that the aid is insufficient, and we, and these very negotiations, want to divert attention from the necessary aid that should be provided to ukraine. mr. andriyan, but i will still clarify, you said that the aid is not enough. because they are preparing for the election, waiting for this election campaign, including the americans, but is there anything else or, because, well, the ukrainians also ask this question, why don't they help us, why don't they give us the weapons to defeat the germans, that the germans are scared, they are afraid to give

us the taurus, they directly say that we are afraid that the ukrainians will shell moscow, and after that, the third world war will begin, for them the word is the third world war, immediately them... or maybe, as some commentators say, that the third world war has already begun, it is very, very difficult to say now, there are different opinions on this topic, but the worst that there is fear in such situations, if we are afraid, we have nothing to fear anymore, we are at war, we are at war, and we, it is clear that everyone is afraid for their lives, but we understand that we have no other way out, we have a fight to the end, in there is a great fear of the west, and that is a fact, and we can't deny it, taraks, i noticed you read this scholz quote that was behind my back, you know, on the one hand... on the other hand, all wars end in negotiations, and and very often wars

end in a way that none of the participants in this war would like, and indeed there complete surrenders, very rarely do wars end, no matter how much someone wants them to be there, and if we're talking about this situation with potential renegotiations, and do we have a negotiating position at all, well, look, when i'm listening to this... statements like this statement of scholz, which is shown on the screen, gives me the impression that scholz flew from space, well, in fact, he did not fly from space, he understands everything perfectly, he perfectly understands that what he is talking about is not true, that when he says that the war can stop at any time, it's just that putin needs to withdraw the troops, he knows very well that putin will not do it, and he simply cannot admit it publicly. that he is simply terrified of drawing germany into a war against russia, for germany any

negotiations, but that he wants to freeze, and just here we just have to understand the logic of the west in this russian-ukrainian war, i deeply dislike this logic, she i despise this logic, but it is there. so, where does the west come from? russian military doctrine provides for the use of limited, application of nuclei. weapons in case russia loses the war, tactical or strategic? the west has read the russian military doctrine very well, and the west is sure that russia will use nuclear weapons, as it will lose the war, and the west is limiting the supply of weapons to ukraine, because it is afraid that russia will strike with a nuclear war. why is he afraid, because the west will have to respond if russia strikes with a nuclear missile. not only in the country, even in nato, even in the territory of ukraine. and since the west believes that the west is panickingly

afraid of protracting the war, but to respond will have to moreover, analysts of the western military, primarily in the united states of america, go even further. they believe that if such a scenario were to start, it could involve a war, including a nuclear one, and china, north korea, and the united states of america would be forced... to respond not only in the european theater of war in the russian-ukrainian war , to get involved in the pacific basin in the area and, god forbid , a near east, and the american military doctrine proceeds from the fact that america will not drag such a war, and they want it to avoid, this is a horror, because they come from the right, from the wrong foundation, the longer we allow ourselves and... the west to be drawn into this rhetoric that, whatever he strikes, the closer we

are to the third world war, because if if ukraine now received a sufficient number of weapons, and the issue with russia would be over, then the probability of the third world war would decrease, not increase, and the longer we drag on the supply of weapons, the west drags on the supply of weapons, the more it gives putin the opportunity to acquire allies, agree with korea to the north. to come to an agreement with iran and with china and with various groups there, and then the probability grows, but how to break through this reinforced concrete wall of western thinking that russia will definitely use nuclear weapons and that in order for this not to happen, it is necessary to prevent ukraine from winning, then we are in impasse, we are simply at an impasse, we simply will not go beyond that impasse, and it seems to me that the ukrainian and political leadership... and our expert community cannot break through this deeply mistaken logic

of the west, this is the basis of what is being done now, and why such arms deliveries, that's why 31 abrams, which 25 are standing in nevada, why are there no planes, their panic fear that russia will resort to a limited nuclear strike, that is the crux of the matter, and this impasse is still the gordian knot that... cannot be tied, we add before our conversation, valery chalyo , ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary of ukraine to the usa in 2015-19 , chairman of the board of the ukrainian crisis media center. mr. valery, congratulations. you are on our broadcast, i congratulate you, taras tetskiv was talking about the impasse, which we all leaned into, and from which it is very difficult exit, of course we would like to exit with victory and with the end of this war, what do you think about this, at which stage we are in the world in principle, yes, because there is the united states

of america, there is europe, europe, there the president of france has his some... position of america, it slightly negates his position, but the russian federation behaves as it does, an aggressor and a terrorist. well, i generally agree with what mr. taras stetskiv said. the only thing is that, well, according to my information, in the 22nd year there was a joint position between the united states and china, regarding, well, warning russia not to use even tactical nuclear weapons. and china agreed to monitor it, so i have little idea how russia could use nuclear weapons. i fully imagine that they are ready and would like to do something, but i will say one thing, it is important: until we see a test of a nuclear warhead, that is, a real test on the territory of russia,

of course, to say at all that they are ready for something, it’s not worth it, that’s why this fear, year, it seems to me that it has been largely overcome, well, at least i would like to think so from the communication that i have with the same americans, there is another problem here, much more complicated, that is, they really adhere to this false logic or strategy of escalation management, that is, they really do not see and do not, well, do not work for ... russia, this it is obvious, and it is so obvious that the mistakes made in this are already trying to discuss among themselves, but the problem is that you know, well, this is such a threat that we were not ready for, let's be honest, if we called and many of us saw that it would be large-scale

invasion, well, we do not want to repeat those mistakes, so... on the one hand , i would not like us to constantly put pressure on everyone in the world, because we just need to do concrete things, with arguments, and the argument is very simple, my position is as follows, and it seems to me that some kind of wall has broken through, it’s not only that, by the way , i heard your program in part to do something there, even programs, discussions, they are monitored by the embassies here in ukraine, this information is transmitted, i’m sure of it i will say, 100%, i know this from... my work, so, back in the 22nd year , the question of a possible conflict with nato was not raised by them at all, and in general they believed that it was unrealistic, now it is an absolutely logical conclusion that it is possible, moreover, recently at the kyiv security

at the forum, i met many of my former acquaintances, including, well, we continue to communicate, including those who told me at one time that an attack on estonia was being prepared in 2013, there was an operational plan of the russian general staff, and only that that's all yanukovych's weakness ran around, and that regime gave them the opportunity to use this trick here, and if it was possible, this blow would have been in the other direction, so what will happen in the world, a lot of things can still be different, so i think that we ... know , my position is as follows: i was the ambassador to the usa, i may not have been the most comfortable ambassador for them, they believed, we had a trusting relationship, but they knew that i was clearly protecting the interests of ukraine, and when some sticks were put in the wheel, i was going to use lobbyists of the military-industrial complex, special services

american, only to achieve success for ukraine, and we and the administration of the white house are currently acting. as he will tell us , that's why we screwed lentlis, sorry for such a word, and did not explain to them that we should have such a tool on the table now, when the failure is in the logic of half a year and a half years ago, that they thought, outdoing each other, did not lose, and as a result, as a result , putin was given six months to attack, that is, how it happened is another matter, i have my own thoughts on this matter, i do not want to dwell on it now, but what we also have... there are questions that they can ask, yes, that is, they are also questions that they can ask for us, if we show the result, well, these are realities, everyone there looks at success, well, so situation. they look if there is success, and not necessarily on the line, on the dry land, on the front line. they scrapped some ships of the black sea fleet there, a good signal has already gone out, they made it so that

the production of fuel for tanks and planes and in general for the russian refueling of the military machine fell by 10%. a good result, that is, i understand this, my position, we are on the same front, but simply on... we will not win this war, we have an asymmetry with russia. the maximum task is to pull in, excuse the word, they must be in collective defense with us, because putin's blackmail was against them, against nato, against washington in the 21st year, the letter was sent, and they are protected by this reputable ukraine. the time has come, not only, well, i, i understand, publicly, i don’t want to say this, i say it in closed conversations, but we have to give them arguments, for example,... i will tell you a fresh for example, poland, a missile, you talked about it there, a missile from another country flew by, that this is under normal conditions, this is an act of aggression, so according to

the protocols, everyone should be shot down, i have my opinion , they missed, this is the third time already and i think , that they missed this missile, then there are a lot of explanations, but here the question arises , excuse me, that is, we made a noise there... some emotions began to talk emotionally about it, i have a simple question, why ours, and i turned, and so and they did not, we have an agreement on good neighborly relations with poland, signed on december 30, 1992 ratified in december 1992, it contains the fourth article, which obliges the parties not to allow acts of military aggression by third parties on their territory, obligates, this is not the case. what i want, i don’t want, yes, poland can say , you also let a third party into our territory, it’s true, we simply can’t do it, we, we don’t have the means, and this is

considered an excuse in international law, well that is it is impossible to do it, and why does poland not fulfill this fourth article of the bilateral agreement, the second, in the 18th year, is already when i worked as an ambassador, i know that i was in the ukraine-poland consultative committee, and i know that we prepared a lot. documents, among them the agreement between the cabinet of ministers of ukraine and the government of poland on defense cooperation, there is article 12, paragraph one - this is assistance to poland during martial law with weapons, they do it, and in the package, by the way, thank you, even in this post-order 155 , they are there too and they helped a lot, but there is another article in which it is written that they can send personnel to us, military personnel. so why not us joint control of the airspace over the border, the more brussels has already thought about it, we can do it, all our documents allow it, and what is there

to be afraid of, it will allow the poles not to worry about the fact that they are under threat, and we will give them the opportunity shoot them down with the systems above us, well, we will have to do that, this is war, if they are shot down by the poles with the systems of the patriots, which the americans did not give us, none, that is... the americans contributed, i understand, they sent three there, we have none of the american no, well, let's not elaborate there , no, they have it there, they could have given us five, seven, but they didn't, so then let's use the polish ones, let's use the romanian ones, but then we have to sign this agreement, make the possibility of joint air defense, joint pro, and to close these 100 km , which allow standard nato approaches, why not do this and why do we not use it... and effective mechanisms of cooperation with partners, sign some blah blah blah empty declarations, and where we have contractual relations, where we have them

toolkit, we don't say anything about it at all, so i think that we also need to think about how professionally we work now in the field of diplomacy, in bilateral relations. thank you, valery chala, for such an outpouring of emotions. mr. golomsh, but you have 30 seconds before the end of the broadcast on the tv channel. concluding this broadcast , we put three dots in espresso on youtube, we will continue on espresso, we will meet in a week traditionally at 9:15 p.m. to all of nato if you shoot down my missile. on your territory, then this will be considered an act of aggression against the russian federation, and i will be responsible, and poland, nato, somehow in...

thinking, indeed, this could be an act of aggression, and the fact that a missile flies into the territory of these countries, then this is not an act of aggression, three dots, thank you for your attention, it was a project says velikiy lviv, see you on the espresso tv channel in exactly one week, take care, see you. especially for you, the favorite fighters of the legendary band are gathering at 7 p.m. 6 in april at the fest, tickets for the ua concert. there are

discounts on helpex anticold. 20% in pharmacies, travel to you and savings. lacquer fix reliably fixes, my dentist advised me, and it also reduces inflammation of the gums. and the price is good, economical. lacaka fix. riv is a leading manufacturer of windows and materials for windows. ditch. for more than 20 years, we have been creating quality at an affordable price. oh, there are no potatoes, you will bring them. and already something caught ascin. i will remind you of dr. tice's comfrey ointment and you get up to work again, comfrey ointment is a german ointment for joint and muscle pain, comfrey brings back movement for joint and muscle pain, dr. tice's natural comfrey ointment, also try dr. tice's comfrey warming cream, a proven remedy, a real-life dictatorship reigns in a fictional country, turn on

hbo's new satirical series on mekogo. regime: can its tyranny lead to freedom? watch in ukrainian in megogo subscription. there are 15% discounts on phyto broncholithin in travel bam and savings pharmacies. long-acting cream relieves pain, reduces swelling and improves joint mobility. with the cream dolgit, whatever you want, i will raise. dolgit is the only one yellow cream for joint and back pain. try flebodia 600. pink french pills for acute hemorrhoids. phlebodia 600 cure hemorrhoids without any side effects. there are 10% discounts on zzilor in the pharmacies of plantain pam and oskadu. exclusively on the air of our channel. greetings friends. politklub is on the air on the espresso tv channel. the most relevant topics of the week. war. russia

against ukraine, the war in the middle east, the crisis on the border between ukraine and poland. topics causing resonance in our society: drone attack on kyiv and other cities of ukraine, drone attacks on moscow and other cities of russia. analysis of the processes that change the country and each of us. the country should get the right to start negotiations on joining the eu. vitaly portnikov and guests. of the project: we are bored because there is nothing to fight about, let's get out, help understand the present and predict the future, the second trump presidency will be terrible for the world. a project for those who care and think, political club. every sunday at 20:10 at espresso. the premium sponsor of the national team

represents. united by football together stronger about the new large-scale offensive of russia and freezing of the conflict 15 million shells for ukraine. from the czech initiative and whether telegram will be blocked in ukraine, we are talking about this and other things right now, this is svoboda life, my name is serhii stetsenko. the new offensive of the russian federation in the next few months may break through the defense of ukraine, analysts of the british publication the economist write about this. as noted in the article, ukraine will have some easing of shelling and fighting in the coming weeks, however.