it will show you how climate change and environmental conservation is taking shape around the world and how we can make a difference. knowledge grows through sharing, download it now for the donald trump. sounds like an extortionist of allies want the protection of the us say they have to pay it is a blunt warning by the republican presidential candidates had a taste of what's to come. should he return to the president's rush, i would be able to do whatever it wants when delinquent natal members? the possibility that paul's at horrifies nato partners. many new countries see trump statements as a wake up come to become militarily self. sufficient. crane is also planning to challenge russia with new military leadership, add a new strategy on to the point we ask, coaching and trump new access again, state of enterprise,

the welcome to this week to the point time, have you know, yes, it's good to have you with us and these are today's guest rachel hotels and point is a senior fellow at the german marshall funding. with scott. monday is a reporter for germany's stand magazine, for which he recently reported from ukraine. and nicole, i guess there's a political consultant and security expert, and a senior fellow at the munich security conference is joining us from the city of unit 12. you thank you for joining us today and rachel, i'd like to start with you because here we are talking about donald trump's remarks, even before he's officially the republican candidate. now that it let alone a president or the president of the united states, why is that? again at trump is magic. if there's one thing he knows how to do, it's to get everyone's attention. even when he says things that actually aren't

surprising. we know that this is trump's position on nato. we know he's not a fan of nato. he spent his 1st presidency complaining about the, the members who didn't pay up. and in his way of saying, and yet he is able to shock americans and the world by saying, you know what, he thinks in a, in a particularly outragious way in the world. a certainly reacting niko. i'd like to get to you and munich, a, the munich security conference gathers international leaders in germany to talk about global security issues. as donald trump, one of them is one of the lead us or one of the issues. i think that's what would be the basics. um, i would say one of the issues up already for the moment be certainly i think this is a long campaign coming into united states. we're still to ask ourselves the question, do we really want to deal with what donald trump says every day? at the same time, it is true that especially at this munich security conference,

the question, how do you or pm's will continue to support your claim? and what was your opinions to a folder on security to deter russia? the questions will be on the table and they will be in terms of we've discussed. you already mentioned a nickel and moments i'd like to ask you of donald trump's efforts to get to the white house this time around are different because of the context of the word and ukraine. how do you think? does that change the stakes of the us election? i think that's it basically means for the europeans. that's uh, we should be, we should hope for the best, but prepare for the worst. so i would say that the until the end of last year, everybody was still hoping that maybe the republicans will choose another candidates for the presidential elections. and the well, the, the help for financial help for ukraine will somehow pause. but over the last weeks

we understood that's neither the 1st thing. no, the seconds happens. so we should um, prepare for the worst, which means no more financial or military aid from the u. s. for ukraine and a possible president, trump possible president trump, that we don't know what he's going to do with nato. trump recently drew attention to himself with these statements in which he threatened to hand over delinquent natal members to put him if they failed to meet their budget. it's the largest needle maneuver of all time operation steadfast defender a name that says it all. a 4 month long military exercise to demonstrate the strength of the military alliance. meanwhile, in the usa presidential candidate, donald trump reiterate this low opinion of nato, and valves to cut off protection for delinquent allies who don't pay their dues in full. no, i would not protect you. in fact,

i would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want. so you gotta say, gotta pay your bill trumps publications or anything new. even when he was president, he repeatedly criticized the alliance. but this time his comments are horrifying. partners in the alliance, nieto chief against oldenburg claimed trunk supports undermine our security. in europe is worried. that's what's nato's promise of protection applies with that restriction on hold for 11 for all. i see the company when it comes to the security of the western world, if nothing can replace the american power series. but for obvious reasons, we in europe need to wake up the security in europe even possible without the usa. that's of course, the question, some european leaders as we saw are extremely concerned. well that's is that, is that justified? do you think they should be fearing unimed powered russia?

of course if it's justified, because without the help of the us. if you look at the conflict on the war in the ukraine and they are totally different perspective, it's obvious that even if the union scales up, it's a help for ukraine. if can't replace the military aid from the u. s. the that chunk is just too big. so the perspective of this war is totally different without a funding from the us. what about the perspective for the european security as a whole? well, i think further, you can say it security as a whole. uh, that's the same thing. if a trump, basically a trump is not president at the moment, but basically at him saying things like this already undermines at this point a european security because from the perspective of, of prussia, which means uh,

that's the article 5 of the natal maybe is not bit serious effect is not that see, i guess as a team articles, meaning that if one country has an expression, all the other countries will defend it. michel susan may as well. let's just say, donald trump is not president yet. we've been here before, haven't we? fearing what could happen, political leaders insecure about what he's saying, but don't from was already president ones. and i would say most of those scenarios and it didn't really happen. do you think it changes this time around with respect to nato? i think it changes, 1st of all is your other question. i mean, there's already an active or, you know, in on the european continental that, that changes the stakes of everything. the 1st time trump was elected, most european countries were playing the waiting game. thought it's just going to be one term we can wait it out in america. well, you know, we gain it senses well. america looks like it's possibly going to elect donald

trump again. meaning we should have some doubts about the reliability of this us protection guarantee. and 2nd of all, now, europeans, unlike in 2016 understand war in europe, is a real possibility. most europeans, at least as you know, sort of central western europeans didn't believe that war was really, i think that could happen in europe. so the stakes are much higher and i think the concern is rightfully is rightfully more this time. you also think that the values that nato stands for are not necessarily represented by the us anymore, or by donald trump. they're not represented. i mean uh, trump is still not the majority of americans. uh, according to a pull we did last year, 68 percent of americans still support a strong rule of europe of the united states and european security and most europeans. but most americans support nato still. but those numbers are sinking among republicans and you know, donald trump is,

is absolutely an exception. he does not believe that you do, you know, the us interests are well served by nato, and he didn't in his 1st term either because we've heard some trump's critics, including his own former national security adviser of saying that trump, ultimately, once the us out of nato are these budgetary reasons? just unexcused, do you think if the countries paid more, the risk wouldn't be there? as we know from his last term that donald trump things about everything in transactional terms and re, i'm not very good in that, but maybe we have to become transactional. at least the use of the trump, if you show up the president again that too. but once he says it is directly against us interest, and i think that should also be an issue in the us. it is a vital interest of the us to have made to, to have partners to have a basis and to work to get are in the nature of framework. and this is

a missing link. and it seems to be that in the united states, it's difficult to find the democratic legitimacy for, for, and then security policy in the interest of the united states. but that's not exclusive to the us receive similar development in france. but to be honest, we also see it in germany, that it's difficult to find majorities for the right for an insecure with the policy and put in, tries to play on this. and i think the messaging around trump's a campaign statement is very important. and unfortunately, it does not sound one of the european side very much as a deterrent to put in. it almost sounds like an invitation, an invitation that, of course, would be extremely dangerous with russia says it's only defending itself that it doesn't have any intention to invade, for example, in a to country. so you have been in ukraine, you've seen what i originally question means and what is your take on the

intentions there as well. i'm sure that the putting wants to restore the territory of the soviet union and the ukraine is maybe the most important part in this without ukraine. his whole and imperial project is not valid. um, and at this point i would say that the biggest danger actually exists for our country is like a georgia armina mold tool, the which were a part of the soviet union. and if he succeeds in ukraine, those countries are the biggest danger. i don't think that's a like the 1st step would be nato countries, because attacking the nato still is a very big risk for russia. so yeah, that's my take on this. however, when we take a look at the us perspective on this,

rachel nika was telling us that this is not in the interest of the united states to, for example, pulls out of nato. but it seems like in the us, at least republicans or followers. i've done that from specifically. don't seem to think that would be a big deal if the us pull that up later as the country that much more vulnerable with that happens us. i mean, and there's a sort of narrow view of security and a broader view of security. if you take the narrow view of security that really have to do with sort of territorial attacks against the united states or something like that. this is probably the way you know, trumping a lot of his voters would think about security there of course more focused on the southern border and where there are, you know, concerns or things like terrorism. and so to make the case that sort of the war in ukraine or poland has a lot to do with the us security. so it's a more difficult case to me. i would say the majority of the political leaders in

the united states still have this view of allied security and understand the international alliances makes us stronger. but that's a case that's slightly more difficult to make in the public than it used to be, especially among republican voters. but we're not quite there. i mean, trump is dropped is extreme um in his views. but, but the parts that shared across, across the, basically the entire revolution party and also part of the democratic party is, is this part about nato members not paying up? which is to say, this kind of resentment that the us is paying too much or investing too much in europe and security. and that's actually been a long standing critique, especially from republicans, but also from a democratic presidents. the question is, of course, what can be done now because of course, the, your opinion has been considering going to board and creating an independent military for a long time. it is also talking about spending more militarily,

is all that viable at the current moment, especially to create, let's say, a unified european military the one in europe. i think one starts to wonder how many wake up court calls do. we actually need. there was a movement on this runs in 2014. that was the russian for the invasion into your created in 2022. and now there is this, the projection of a new a, trump presidency. something has been done. and for example, that germany is serious me working towards permanent plus or off investment ready brigade in this way. and you know, i think it's a significant step forward. but i think it's also fair to say that even if trump is expressing things in a totally unacceptable way, there is a high truth at the bottom of it. and to hop truth is that we have not done what we committed ourselves to in nato. and that we always are looking for others to solve our security problems for us and to hold argumentation will be much easier,

regardless of who, who will be president of the united states. if does your opinions step up in their own security matters. and that means really digging deep to help your train more and to find in your initiative on the europe in level to support your train, especially in this critical phase, also to provide hope to ukrainians ends at the same time, making your up more secure the eastern so the angles made to us at the same time, the eastern vote of, to europe in union. and i think there's a lot in your opinions could do, instead of just expressing concerns or writing up at all, let us to one another from what you say and you call it all starts in ukraine at this moment. if you're p and nato countries fear they might have to defend themselves alone in the future. that outlook is even more dire for you crate in the us right wing republicans pushed by trump recently blocked and age package that included military assistance for ukraine. the consequences are felt on the battlefield and now even triggered a change of leadership bible auditors, lensky. to meet the new dye commander in chief alexander ski. once

the head of the ground forces. he's now replacing former commander in chief of police. neat, who was beloved by both the people in the army known for his toughness as their sky trained at the military academy in moscow. and i'm not sure since our goals remained unchanged to me and then holding our positions, we were holding our territory with exhausting the enemy by inflicting maximum casualties. listen, you will conducting an active defense within your by seizing the initiative, thinking specific critical. we already do it on a daily basis, should be in that and say that because of the new army chief brings his own team with him and is relying on a new strategy, which includes expanding the use of electronic warfare and more automated weapon systems. drones will compensate for immunization shortages. the additionally troops will be supplied with weapons from abroad

more quickly. the new strategy also allows for a more rapid rotation of soldiers. but the new mobilization laws that would make this possible is still stuck in parliament. do these changes present more risks or opportunities for you create lots? it seems like with trump's remarks, with the charge royal gains of russia and ukraine in recent weeks. and of course, with those changes and keeps top positions, things are really not looking good for a clean at the moment. how bad as well. the sphere was a bad. it was bad already an autumn or the beginning of winter. when was clear that the counter offensive basically failed. so people understood that's the perspective is totally clear the perspective of this war before people thought, okay, we have to endure a little more and then the war will. and now this is a totally unclear year. and since then over the last weeks,

it gets clear the may well basically from the u. s. a nothing to expect. and this year and also among the ukrainians, these political games and the leadership. and i would say that the 2nd offers, illuminated by who landscape is also part of the political game. it seems not very positive because what do we know about that new strategy that the new commander in chief wants to follow and how dependent is that from us? how on on tactics. um, i think that was one of the main conflicts between the me and the president. whether to for example, holds of the guy as long as possible administer loss as to the russian side. or to leave of the car. and shop in the front lines, especially with limited resources when it comes to i'm

a nation and other important resources. now that the decision has been made just b as in charles, a troops have been reinforced enough the and to be honest with you overall, i'm really trying to point of view, i'm skeptical of and this might the maybe administer lots as to the russian side. but also take very important power away from other segments of the front line and maybe even future offensive power away from ukraine. but it seems that this key is better in translating the political well off the president into the bedroom fields into small trusted by the ukranian president. and it all points to a very difficult phase for ukraine to come under foot. that the combined is not changed as one issue, but i think ukraine has to solve mobilization and not deposited on as a hot potato from one to another. i think they have to take responsibility and get mobilization on track if it's necessary for ukraine. and the other element is the

adjusters in the mobilization. i know this is hard for everybody who was able to to be to avoid being mobilized at the moment. but i think this is necessary also for the in a piece of ukrainian society so that there is no impression that some people fighting and others who can avoid being proud of to 5. but let's be very honest either the next months will be very difficult for ukraine on the petals. you know, especially in the coming back to the question of financing and weapons. do you think you cream can manage, having less support from the us because it was said for a long time that it was not possible without the us. can europe deal with that alone? it's not so much about money. it is about money to and the psalms, a very important all also for the media debate about this. but in the end, it's about production capabilities. and we in europe where i'm not able to

raise our production capabilities in time. they might kick in later some steps i've taken now. so i think we should consider also using the european piece specific to money or other european money to buy from us companies, if necessary, if the congress is not giving to funds. and what is important is that the company abilities are arriving, but the ukrainians, and especially in the gap between now and at least the presidential elections in the us in the to provide also some way forward for the agreements. i think that's crucial, and i think is your opinion still when it comes to from each of these pain, they have multiple abilities and they shall do more. but somebody has to relate the process, bring everybody to get her, put something on the table, then say look, that's what we are doing. now let's make a new effort please everybody join in. but i'm missing exactly that element. maybe something will happen here at noon security conference that starts tomorrow leading

the process is unimportant keywords there. rachel, critics of joe biden have said that the west lacks a clear strategy on what it wants regarding russia in general. do you agree with that? or? i think joe biden has a very clear strategy of what he would want. the problem as we're seeing is that the president's abilities are limited by fighting as been pushing for a long time for this funding package to support ukraine. and he can make the difference, right. the republicans can stop at. so i think i think bite and strategy is pretty clear. but what happens with the u. s. support is very much an open question. i think you have battling visions, battling priorities, and up until the election is going to be very difficult. what about the relation between uh donald trump and vladimir putin. and how does that play into the equation? because again, this was something that was speculated a lot about in the last term of donald trump. and it was not like we could say that

the us became a strong ally of brush or anything like it. or these fears were justified this time around. i don't know if they're more justified, but i think they're still justified. i mean, uh on, on 2 accounts to the 1st account is that and, you know, trump has something like a grudge against, you know, certain european countries. you know, those who don't carry their weight and his view and his relationship with vertebra putting us a bit unclear. um, and it's not always clear that he has those sort of long term strategy, a visa vi put. and so i think there is plenty of room to be concerned on both accounts for europe. so yeah, i want to ask you if the prospective new crane is the same, but maybe i may have the, as a historian, it was a dream already of the soviet union for the russians to split europe and the us. and so in this sense of letting me put in the election of donald trump is

a very nice the present. although he says he doesn't want that. he just said that he was july. and besides a lot of things. yeah. the only one of those and i also advise uh, yeah, yeah. okay. uh, would you like we nickel that uh, putting us succeeding in that goal if you will. well, 1st of all, on what 14 says, i think he is a cajun b person. and he never actually says what the things and he never does what he says . so i would most subscribe to his idea that he supports 5, and i think the opposite is true. and when it comes to sickness, to 14, i think it's very important for the europeans now to do everything necessary to signal support and look. if you attack us, whatever you will do, you will lose. so and if the europeans are saying, oh, it's very difficult without the united states, and please, please us help us because we cannot do it alone, that this might be the victim taishan football team to try things. so it's very

important, i think also to get the communication around this right? and some conversations, for example, about nuclear determines should not be made. look toral campaign considerations. what are your pin problem? and i think they should be discussed behind the scenes between the, the nature partners, including friends and then you. okay. i think that's also a very necessary element right now. what i like just to exit, exercising. i think this is a good signal to the russian side. with the exercise of stuff going on right now, i think we need more that's all we have time for in this discussion. thank you so much talk 3 of you for joining us. and of course we'll see how that plays around. we cannot predict the future, but we certainly can try and just see scenarios. so thank you to all of you for that. thank you for watching, of course. and remember that you can always watch our shows and comments on them on our youtube channel. as always, stats don't even use, i'm for you to get us on behalf of the entire team. thank you for joining us. so

you next the of the

child do we want to die? equally important. how do not want to die? there aren't enough people in germany asking themselves these questions before it's too late. modern medicine still interprets patient welfare, of preserving life at all costs. but other perspectives are gaining traction in 15 minutes on the w 9. but you will tell here

we are happy that we are back to the story. we have a getting a visa is more difficult than finding gold hosted to use the dream force and for the future in the stories and issues that are being discussed across the country. news africa in 90 minutes on the w the i wish i could've done more to save. you just click away, find out best documents on you to really see the world. he's never seen it before. the drive now

to dw and started. we started to understand clearly and what you need to do for us. ukraine was assembled. are we moving towards europe or not? 2015. the still is afraid democracy protests in ukraine. the country response to your price to ship the west has recognized the danger and the terms of being fulfilled on the funds with us. we really understand that so easily. a fail uh we will lose our concepts, euro my done jobs february 17th on t w. the,

this is the news line from above and well, bases and defense specialists arrive in germany for the annual unix security conference. garza and ukraine has top prior to associated with the training. and the president of them is that that is key to, to attend, alongside that us vice president campbell of israel's right on gauze as last functioning major hospital leads behind the chaos casualties. and kind of just the tire assessments is around says it acted on what it describes as credible evidence that her mom was holding costs. the

.