somebody and i wouldn't lose any voters. okay. select i still occasionally talked to mark, who declined to participate in this documentary. i think because of how guilty he feels about what this all did to his four sons. he says he's working hard on those relationships and maybe i'm a fool, but i believe them >> scandals the capitate people. scandals take people completely out the game. and mark sanford, that didn't happen tomorrow the mark didn't get impeached, >> he finished his term >> and he actually won another race for the united states congress by being honest to himself, being honest to his conservative political values, and being honest with the public the real mark sanford was able to shake the perfection of the past and start building a new story. even if it took him a long walk along the appalachian trail to get there

>> welcome to the whole story. i'm anderson cooper last week, former president donald trump asked the supreme court to take up the issue of presidential immunity. further delaying his federal criminal trial related to the 2020 election in the january 6 attack on the capitol. now the claim was already heard and rejected by a federal appeals court it's now up to the highest court to decide to take the case or to let the ruling stand and clear the way for this trial to begin. now the timing is crucial because the former president is likely to become the republican nominee and he wants to delay the trial until after voters head to the polls in november. he's charged with four counts of obstruction and conspiracy, but what exactly is he accused? just if doing to subvert the election? and is it his actions that matter or his intent over the next hour, cnn anchor and chief legal analyst laura coats will lay out the facts. the federal indictment, most of which are undisputed by

the former president and his attorneys, and examine the strengths and weaknesses of the case against him. >> today. >> an indictment was unsealed charging donald j. trump with conspiring to defraud the united states conspiring to disenfranchise voters and conspiring attempting to obstruct an official proceeding tack on our nation's capital on january 6, 2021, was an unprecedented assault in the seat of american democracy it was fueled by lies >> in august 2023, less than a year after attorney general merrick garland appointed jack smith as special counsel to investigate donald trump the former president was indicted on federal felony charges

stemming from his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. >> if you count the legal votes by easily win. numerous times, we found glitches and every single time that glitch went 100% to biden trump has pleaded not guilty to all charges. >> this indictment told a very cohesive story that former president trump was responsible for the conspiracy to tell american public that the election had been stolen. >> big difference between losing and winning and how they get stolen and that he used various mechanisms to push forward that big lie and that it led to the attack on the capitol out of the gate >> page, one of the federal criminal indictment begins with a statement that donald trump has spent the past three years denying the very first thing they said, donald trump lost the election. that's the first statement >> and even before outlining the criminal charges, the

special counsel chose to address trump's claim that the government has infringed on his first amendment right to free speech the cases is a ridiculous cases. the first amendment case. >> a special counsel makes it very clear that the words that former president trump said he is allowed to say them but they can be used as evidenced to show intent. they can be used in court. >> trump is charged with four felonies emanating from one set of facts established in the criminal indictment the first one is a conspiracy to defraud the united states, essentially a conspiracy to steal the election from the united states and from the voters. the second and the third charges are obstruction and conspiracy to met obstruction. and the just there is that donald trump's goal was to try to block or delay the counting of the electoral votes in congress. then the fourth charge is a conspiracy against rights which specifically means a conspiracy to deprive the american voters of their right to vote because

he tried to steal an election that he actually lost. >> we fight, we fight like hell. >> one crime. trump has not been charged with. >> we will stop the steal insurrection i think jack smith wanted to keep his charges as straightforward and plain as possible. i think he realized that insurrection is harder to prove then obstruction or conspiracy so you'd have to prove this intent to overthrow the united states government >> jack smith's indictment has only four counts. >> what's behind that >> straight to the heart, like a cannonball and the heart here is donald trump, not the people around him, not the people in the states, which may explain why the indictment includes six unnamed unindicted, coconspirators from trump's orbit. even though the coconspirators are not named, the descriptors are specific enough to clearly reveal most, if not all, of their identities

there are other reasons why jack smith may have declined to pursue indictments against the coconspirators. >> i do think one of the goals that jack smith had in charging the case, the way he did is to try to flip others like tim parlatore want to trump's former attorneys point to speed. >> jack smith clearly wants to get this case tried before the election. there's no way that jack smith is going to add a co-defendant to this case because that will definitely push the trial i allowed past the election with this trial times of the essence. donald trump is the leading republican candidate for the upcoming presidential election. november. >> jack smith for all the pushing he's done to try this case as quickly as possible. he has never and i believe will never acknowledged that he wants to try trump specifically before the election. i think he doesn't want that appearance of anything that might be interpreted as being political >> the 45 page indictment

alleges in stunning detail exactly what donald trump did to remain in power much of which the american public is familiar with from the january 6 committee's investigation, president trump relentlessly pursued multiple the department of justice was able to take what we did and they had some more tools, they add some more ways to compel witnesses and i think they have a lot more information. everything we've been learning has been in sort of dribs and drabs and reports with the exception of when jack smith file things, special, counsel, jack smith plans to present evidence filings have tipped the public off to previously unknown aspects of the case, like alex stations that a trump campaign employee sought to start a riot to quote, obstruct the vote count in detroit. is it safe to say that the indictment is the tip of an iceberg and what they're really preparing to present at trial i think it is safe to say that the indictment is exactly

that that it gives us a little bit of a vantage point. he wanted to tell a story, but i think at juncture, after juncture, smith has earned on the side of staying sphinx like and not reveal which tracks with the special counsel's reputation. >> i've never seen a prosecutor who hates the cameras as much as jack smith. and i mean that is a complement, the platonic ideal of the prosecutor would be somebody who has no interest in public profile, who just wants to keep his head down and do the job i think jack smith is that he certainly projecting that jack smith by reputation as a hard-driving prosecutor, you, ryan goodman is a former special counsel at the department of defense, and a professor at nyu. >> he has gone after a political corruption on both sides of the aisle, democrats and republicans he's also somebody who served as a war crimes prosecutor and has indicted a sitting president in kosovo. so he's that kind of an individual that moves fast and moves aggressively at the same

time that also might come with some risks. >> why is there some criticism that he overreaches? >> well, if you look at jack smith's history, his three highest profile cases before this, all of them have failed either at the trial level or the appellate level. and so the criticism is, well, he's old we're eager, he's over anxious >> what is going to be one of the toughest hurdles for jack smith's team to overcome everything in this case will turn on what donald trump state of mind is and whether there was corrupt intent all the facts they play down on national television. the speeches have been played millions of times. >> erin, georgia, there were tens of thousands of illegal votes cast. so there's not going to be that much in the way disputed issues of fact, but it's more of an interpretation. >> our lecture was so corrupt that in the history of this country, we've never seen anything like ultimately the way that this case it's going to have to be framed to a jury is the difference between trying to fraudulently overturn

the will of the people? versus trying to do everything in your power to ensure that the will of the people was accurately counted >> i know there was massive fraud. >> the prosecution alleges that trump's spread prolific lies about the election. lies they say he knew were false. >> the indictments cites >> an exhaustive list of those surrounding the former president who told trump that his claims were untrue even mike pence, trump's loyal vice president, told the then president he had seen no evidence of outcome determinative fraud why is that so important? >> it's important to lay out that the former president was told that he had lost the election because it goes back to that intent piece. it's important for the special counsel that's all to establish that former president trump knew or that are reasonable person would have known that they lost the election. >> we're going to the capitol

this central because the fact that he knew means that all these things that happened leading up to january 6 >> and on january 6 hadn't intended goal, hadn't intended purpose, hadn't intended outcome that purpose was frankly the overthrow of the federal government and the invalidation shan of a legitimate election by the people, the united states of america >> that's chilling >> coming up in the legislature gets to do what it wants had this rogue legal theory, this overwhelming proof of fraud, the pressure campaign hits the swing states. >> it was a total ambush and i was livid

>> meet avocados, best-selling green mattress made with certified organic cotton, wool. and latex, plus pocketed coils to support your body's natural curves. for cool and restorative sleep featuring a one year in home sleep trial. complete your bedroom away with organic pillows and bedding shop today with avocado green, proud supporter of 1% for the planet in an election year, guaranteed to divide. >> this is a debacle >> second term we can nobody central daily show on comedy central streaming next day on

fair enough >> luck and good guys situations are better with the credit gods on your side, upcoming for awards. once available to the few are now accessible hello, to the many earn points for travel with credit one bank and liz large, i'm bobby brown and i started jones road because i wasn't done. jones road is a modern approach to my beauty philosophy clean, good for you products that are versatile and easy learn more at jones road beauty.com, did you know that only one in ten americans consume adequate amounts of fruits and vegetables ag one fills nutritional gaps that promotes good health with essential vitamins and minerals pre and probiotics and superfoods supporting your health doesn't need to be complicated. try a g1 today >> there was a ton of pressure

on my colleagues on the republican side of the aisle to start in motion, something that would lead to donald trump being able to overturn the election >> by the time georgia state senator alayna parent attended a meeting at the state capitol on december 3, 2020 joe biden had already been declared the winner. she wondered why her peers across the aisle had hastily convened this meeting. >> i feared that we were going to be walking into an amplification of disinformation and conspiracy theories and the day featured boat called the subcommittee of the judiciary to order a sensibly the meeting was called to address allegations of fraud in the presidential election. the reality was much darker >> were you expecting to see members of trump's legal >> team at that meeting >> not at all. it was a total ambush and i was livid

>> the election must be vacated and cannot be allowed to stand. >> members of the president's legal team pushed wild unsubstantiated claims. some of the most shocking were shown in a video. trump's team falsely claimed that video was evidence of fraud from election night ballot counting at the state farm arena in atlanta. >> once everyone is gone, coast is clear they are going to pull ballots out from underneath a table >> and former new york city mayor rudy giuliani was there supporting the claims well, i don't don't have to be a genius to figure out what happened >> as the meeting unfolded, trump tweeted about the hearing, amplifying the lies to his ten of millions of followers >> and then >> another member of the trump legal team pushed a theory that took the meeting into dangerous new territory

>> my name is john eastman. i'm a professor of constitutional law and former dean had this rogue legal theory that if the legislature felt odd about the results of the election, it was our duty to seize the decision on who georgia's electoral votes should go to, correct me if i'm wrong here are your argument is that essentially we have a failed election that would require the legislature to step in and assign electors. am i correct? >> yes. >> and that's when the purpose of the meeting became clear. >> they thought that they could get officials there to call a special session throughout their electors and appoint a on alternate set of electors or fake electors urine attorney? >> yes. what did you make a bet legal argument >> i thought it was totally bogus because it was very clear under georgia law that we had

no such power >> during the hearing. parent tweeted about being forced to listen to the trump team's conspiracy theories all of a sudden, i was going viral in these right-wing segments of twitter >> you would bring threatened. >> oh yeah. right away. right away. death threats, right away >> state senator parent wasn't alone defending georgia's free and fair election other georgia officials like governor brian kemp and attorney general chris carr, fielded in treaties from the president audio from secretary of state brad raffensperger's hour long phone call with the president was leaked well, i want to do is this. i just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more that we have because we won the state. >> you got to see a window into

donald trump's heart. he was willing to just push without facts or figures, and elected official to do something illegal >> according to the indictment, georgia wasn't the only state targeted by trump and his allies across other crucial swing states. similar effort to overturn the election were occurring time and time again. trump and his cohorts were stymied by local politicians many times, fellow republicans like former arizona house speaker rusty bowers, who got a call from trump, and giuliani. >> he said that there is a legal theory or a legal ability in arizona that you can remove the electors of president biden and replace them. and i said, i've never heard of any such thing. >> trump also invited michigan republicans to the white house, where he raised already debunked theories about fraud

in their state. >> did you make the point to the president that you were not going and to do anything that violated michigan law? >> i believe we did. i think that words that i would have more likely used is we are going to follow the law >> when it became clear, the pressure on the state and local officials was going to be unsuccessful. trump and his allies set their sights on a new goal replacing the biden electors with those who would vote for trump at some stage, the fake electors plot might have actually been somewhat legitimate >> well, assisting with trump campaign's legal efforts in wisconsin. an attorney by the name of kenneth cheseboro wrote a memo the memo advocated electors for trump should meet and cast votes for the then president. while the legitimate electors were doing the same for biden they wanted to file these documents on the idea

that in case donald trump were to prevail in >> litigation, then they could submit those certificates to congress. the problem is that it's switched at a certain point from contingent electors to false electors >> state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by trump's team challenging the election instead of the trump electors voting as a contingency should court cases prevail court cases became the cover to organize the electors >> it was a farce, it was just to keep the image up of the idea that this is being litigated in court. and therefore, it's legitimate and it was not legitimate. they knew that they weren't going to win. >> the campaign was central to this effort. because you can't pull this off without the apparatus of the political campaign four days before the

electors were scheduled to vote kenneth cheseboro sent the targeted states a streamlined version of the fake electors memo, instructions and bogus electoral certificates, he had drafted a lot of these false electors at the state level were duped. they were told that it was contingent on litigation, but they were being lied to the facility save the voting when legitimate electors in each state gathered on december 14, 2020. all 16 electors cast their ballots for joseph r. biden fake electors met in seven swing states to falsify votes for trump for the state of arizona. here by certified filed this is an organized effort to do something illegal to change the outcome of reality. if somebody would have produced one ounce of legitimate proof that the election was rigged. >> all this is this just called melt away in a heartbeat. but they haven't

>> cheseboro has since pleaded guilty to one felony in georgia for his role in the fake elector scheme. and is cooperating in another case in nevada up next, the justice department under siege >> donald trump was so desperate to hold onto power but he didn't care about the rules >> candidate john edwards cheated on his cancer-stricken wife, had a baby with his girlfriend, and then tried to pass it off as a campaign staffers kid >> we're here to get your side of the story. >> united states of scandal with jake tapper. new episode next sunday night and cnn shopifys point-of-sale system helps you sell at every stage of your business with vasan secure payment card readers, you can rely on in one place to manage it hall, whatever the stage businesses that grow, row with shopify

>> doesn't omar she didn't need me to >> storing data the line. you don't even mean what do you more than a captain hyundai stay how to go to hands let me say i even own not the rhenium day. i just o'connor, colorado mother, you don't notice be

>> half the price. >> that's amazing. and great customer service based here in america >> that's amazing and no hidden fees no contracts and free activation >> that's something hello >> barbara. >> sorry. i was muted. >> that's amazing. >> i know rights barbara >> this morning >> but the rise now. own for limited time visit sandoz.com are call 1-800 sandals >> have you heard slain jd offers the news you love for less weight you look and sound just like me. actually i am you. because on the same news programs on slang for less you mean you're me but for less money, a lot less. i'm all your favorite news programs and more on sling starting at just $40 a

month, everything great about me, but for less money, which makes me greater than you think it's the same news for less, starting at $40 a month >> roe sparks engineered for the spontaneous, a dual action formula with the active ingredients of viagra. and see alice faster acting and long-lasting grabbed the moment get started at row slash sparks on medicare. have diabetes with a freestyle libre, three system, you'll know your glucose and where it's headed, know fingers needed. now covered by medicare for more people m so, you've got the power of xfinity at home. now take it outside with xfinity mobile. like speed? it's the fastest mobile service around... and right now, you can get a free line of our most popular unlimited plan. all on the most reliable 5g network nationwide. ditch the other guys and you'll save hundreds. get a free line of unlimited intro for 1 year when you buy one unlimited line.

and for a limited time, get the new samsung galaxy s24 on us. absolutely free text palo viii to three-to-one, three-to-one today anderson cooper 360 tomorrow at eight on cnn. >> closed captioning bronchi you by meso book.com we've offered a free book about missile filial motto for ten years. call 1808724901, or go

to meso book died the calm at the department of >> justice, civil servants work to follow the law wherever it may lead without prejudice. or improper influence. but according to jack smith's indictment, thank you very much. donald trump attempted to wield that influence in an effort to hold onto the presidency how do you view the level of pressure that trump placed on the department of justice? >> does ever been anything like it because donald trump was so desperate bid to hold onto power that he didn't care about the rules >> but leadership at the department of justice did care about the rules and was not bending to the pressure leaders in the department of justice told the former president that there was no outcome determinative fraud for them to launch an investigation to

overturn the election. so as part of the pressure campaign and the permanent address, this this is where mr. jeffrey clark kind of rose to prominence. >> jeffrey clark is environmental lawyer lower-level person at the department. he was a completely unremarkable figure >> at a january 6 committee hearing, former acting attorney general, jeffrey rosen, testified about president trump's call to him on christmas eve, 2020. >> did he mention jeff clark's name? >> yes. >> was something about did i know jeff clark or did i know who he was or something like that? i was quizzical as to how does the president even know mr. clark >> rosen confronted clark, directing him to immediately stop having unauthorized contact with the white house but the very next morning, clark spoke on the phone again with donald trump. >> hours >> later, trump phoned rosen,

who eventually asked, then acting deputy attorney general, richard donoghue to during the call. >> so during this conversation, did did you take handwritten notes directly quoting the president? >> i did. >> so let's now put up the notes. where were you, quote the president, just say the election was corrupt and leave the rest of me in the republican congressman. >> he wanted them to plant a said he wanted them to at least leave the door open >> they told the president as long as they were in charge, they would not publicly back his false election fraud claims. so trump tried to ensure that they were no longer in charge he began to unveil his plan to appoint a new acting attorney general people tell me jeff clark is great. >> i should put him in >> the rest of the dangerous scheme would be revealed to rosen and donoghue, the very next day. in an email sent to

them by trump's alleged coconspirator for jeffrey clark, that included this proposed letter this is a letter that he wanted them to send to the elected officials in georgia. the idea was to raise questions about the election results in georgia. and suggest to the governor there to call a special session how did rosen and donoghue respond to that letter? >> there were shocked >> these were individuals who are actually responsible for looking into election security or election fraud or crimes of this nature. so for mr. clark, as an environmental lawyer to be willing to say this in a letter. i believe the special counsel probably has evidenced directly on point just like we collected in the january 6 committee, that he knowingly knew them to not be true. >> what do you think the effect of that letter would have been in your legislative branch? it would have been another breaking the dam or another

domino falling and the question i have is, what breaking the dam or domino that falls over, which is the one that's going to make the rest of them go disturbed by the letter. >> donoghue >> immediately responded to clark writing, quote, this would be a grave step for the department to take, and it could have tremendous constitutional political, and social remedy vacations for the country. >> you imagine as a local elected official or a local official getting a official letter from the department of justice stressing that there were accusations and frankly, evidence of corruption or evidence of votes being stolen it will lead and do another panic. >> a new year's eve, trump's summoned rosen donoghue, and others to the oval office again, he raised claims of election fraud and once again, those justice department officials told him those claims

were false. trump didn't hide his anger toward the end of the meeting. the president, again was getting very agitated and he said, people tell me i should just get rid of both of you i should just remove you and make a change in leadership. put jeff clark in maybe something will finally get done >> it wasn't long before trump did offer clark the position of attorney general and that's when clark tried one more time to get rosen and donoghue to sign the draft letter. he wanted sent the georgia state officials a letter full of lies so you still refused to sign and send that letter? i take it? >> that's right. i think mr. donoghue and i were both very consistent that there was no way we were going to sign that letter >> undeterred >> clark, move forward with the scheme to keep trump in office he accepted the president's offer to become acting attorney general on january 3 according

to the indictment of donald trump later that same afternoon, the deputy white house counsel warned clark that there was no evidence of election fraud. and if trump remained in office, nonetheless, there would be, quote riots in every major city in the united states to its clark responded, quote, well, that's why there's an insurrection act that evening, there was a contentious three-hour meeting with president trump in the oval office attendees included white house lawyers clark donoghue, and rosen so after some preliminaries, the president turned to me and he said, well, one thing we know is you >> rosen, you aren't going to do anything. you don't even agree with the claims of election fraud? and this other guy at least might do something. the conversation this point was really about

whether the president should remove jeff rosen and replace him with jeff clark and everyone in the room. i think understood that that meant that letter would go out >> then trump asked, suppose i replace him jeff rosen with him, jeff clark what would you do? and i said, mr. president, we resign immediately and i said mr. president within 24, 48, 72 hours, you could have hundreds and hundreds of resignations of the leadership of your entire justice for me because of your actions. >> the whole plan here was to put enough doubt in people's minds to give credence to possibly overturning the election when all of the department of justice officials basically threatened to resign the former president realized that backed off of that plan and then turned his attention to january 6 >> up next, >> donald trump lied to gin up his people don't fight like hell. you're not going to have a country anymore. >> he knew when you're

surprising, upset, you're much more likely to commit violence a headline or las vegas that's what i want to do >> it's unlike anywhere else in the world vegas, the story of sin city next sunday at ten on cnn >> guys got hair loss. >> i know what you're thinking. should i shave my head? >> coleman over? >> wear a hat. >> just stop. this isn't 1970. keep your hair and your competence because bosley americas number one hair restoration experts can give you your real hair back permanently, check them out because they're giving away an absolutely free information kit and a free gift card to everyone who's ganz, this qr code. dude, you don't have to look like your dad because this isn't your dad's hair loss treatment people all over the country trust possibly because they're ahead of the curve, they use the latest technology to give you your real hair back

and the best part, bosley is permanent solution is protected by the bosley guaranteed let them show you for free how awesome your hair could look with an absolutely free information kit and a gift card for $250 off scan the qr the code don't wait, scan the code now and ask about the bosley guarantee. >> my goal is to make lines in the face absolutely. okay. >> i >> believe in looking your best at every stage and being okay. where you are miracle bomb is a game changer for mature skin. it's the product i've been dreaming about my whole life >> he has his whole life ahead of them. >> and i wouldn't be there for >> all of it, you know time is precious i want to make the most because he deserves my best

>> with the freestyle libre three system. know your glucose levels. no finger sticks needed. >> all with the world's smallest thinnest sensor. >> manage your diabetes with more >> confidence and lawyering once dry for free at freestyle libre.us. >> hey, you with the small business you've got all kinds of bright ideas that your customers need to know about constant contact makes it easy with everything from managing your social posts and events to email and sms marketing constant contact delivers all the tools you need to help your business grow, gets started today at constant contact.com. constant contact helping the small stand tall, meet avocados, best-selling green mattress, made with certified organic cotton, wool and linen

texts, plus pocketed coils to support your body's natural curves for cool and restorative sleep. featuring a one year in home sleep trial complete your bedroom, a waste with organic pillows and bedding shop today with avocado green proud supporter of 1% for the planet life is better with the credit gods on your side. rewards once available to the view, are now accessible well to the man

this election is about who shares your values. let me share mine. i'm the only candidate with a record of taking on maga republicans, and winning. when they overturned roe, i secured abortion rights in our state constitution. when trump attacked our lgbtq and asian neighbors, i strengthened our hate crime laws. i fought for all of us struggling to keep up with the rising cost of living. i'm evan low, and i approve this message for all of our shared values. out how to get a free 30-day supply plus free shipping with your first-order at super beats choose.com. >> king charles, wednesday, it's on cnn the evidence of the fraud is monumental and more is coming out >> just after weeks of spreading lies at the election was stolen i'm creating anger and resentment among his supporters. trump sent this tweet in december big protest

in dc on january 6 be there will be wild now we know there was more meaning behind those words that he used. there was a very meticulous planning that was happening behind the scenes leading up to january 6 four days later, trump retweeted and later deleted a memo titled operation pence card john eastman drafted a similar plan to have mike pence reject the election results on january 6, the de congress was set to certify biden's electoral college victory. >> jahmy is mucking up with a really kind of crazy the goal theory, where he tried to convince the vice president that he had the authority to basically declare which slate of electors is accurate or to not accept a slate of electors, the constitution is very clear that he doesn't have that

authority. >> but for trump, he was last day aspirin attempt to stay in the white house >> there were multiple steps here. i mean, part of it was to declare that there was fraud and then if you didn't do that, to send it back to the states where he felt republican legislators would appoint new electors >> that would then vote for him. if none of that work. he knew that he was going to have supporters coming into town to try to pressure pence to do one of these things >> but the president began his pressure campaign immediately trump tried to coerce pants on several private phone calls even on christmas day and then there was the public pressure on pence she's a great guy >> if he doesn't come through, i won't like what as much >> on january 5th, trump

tweeted the vice president has the power to reject fraudulently chosen electors. and he released a knowingly false public statement that the vice president and i are in total agreement donald trump lied to gin up his people because he knew what mike pence was going to do and he wanted them to be surprised and upset because when you're surprising upset, you're much more likely to commit violence or to do extreme things >> trump increased his pressure on pence with tweet starting at 01:00 a.m. on january 6 if vice president mike pence comes through for us, we will win the presidency based on for years have seen mike pence being very loyal. i think donald trump believe that in the end, he could get my pens to fold >> we're taking this country

back as his supporters gathered for the rally. >> drop >> trump repeated these days dangerous, nice >> all vice president pence has to do is send it back to the states to recertify and we become president. and you are the happiest people >> then mike pence puts out his statement that says he does not have the authority to do anything >> misstatement came out while the president was on stage urging his supporters to march to the capitol >> we fight like hell. and if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore he knows that these people were his most loyal followers. the hanging on every word of his, and he told them to march to the capital after his speech. >> trump returned to the white

house. >> he was watching the television coverage. he was impressed with how big this crowd was when rioters breached the capitol. >> trump's advisers told him to send out a >> message to come the cloud. >> he refused sarah matthews was trump's deputy press secretary. at the time. >> at what point did you begin to realize? how dangerous this had become >> we started seeing those initial interactions between some of the people arriving to the capitol. and that was the first sign of okay, wait, this could really escalate and this could escalate quickly >> at 02:24, trump tweeted mike pence didn't have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our country he was putting a target on his own vice president's back.

>> we thought that was pouring gasoline on the fire, right? we already had a situation that was kidding control. and the president's tweet just really inflamed that even more >> we can pinpoint the second that came out, the violence massively accelerated one minute later at 02:25, the secret service was forced >> to evacuate pence to a secure location >> he did not care about his safety. and the thing that kills me is that the vice president's family was there >> one point the crush of the mob was only he 15 feet away from mike pence and his small entourage not only did he just put out that tweet he also told a witness who testified to us that in fact, donald trump said, well, maybe you should be hung for more than three hours. >> trump refused to tell rioters to leave the capitol

despite repeated pleas from his senior advisors >> what did he do absolutely. >> nothing >> he didn't do anything for 187 minutes until he knew he couldn't when we had an election, that was stolen from us, it was the president finally relented at for 17:00 p.m. when he released a video telling the rioters to go home this was a fraudulent election, but we can't play into the hands of these people we have to have peace >> so go home. >> we love you. you're very special. >> former president trump was responsible for the big lie versus responsible for the conspiracy, which led to the violence on january 6 >> even in the aftermath of the deadly attack tack on the capitol, trump and his coconspirators were still trying to convince lawmakers to overturn the election. >> i think that they were using

the violence and chaos their advantage to have more time to make calls to lawmakers and try to get them to go along with their scheme coming up >> the rule of law is it sake the american democracy is at stake. we have never played at higher stakes corruption lies. prison. governor rod blagojevich went down in a blaze of infamy i've done a lot wrong criminal night. >> okay. that's why i'm back there. united states of scandal with jake tapper, back-to-back premieres next on cnn upon his first day of retirement, markers rogers made a contract with themselves i will never again work for another the man or woman or todd especially. >> i lay down my >> badge, abandoned my corporate phone plan and i'll get a new plan with consumers for cellular without a contract, without sacrificing comfort >> let's go over when freedom

calls, we're here to answer. >> this will be a goldmine of local intelligence you way. >> so tell us about this corn festival. he got your corn pudding. you've got your corn chowder. it's how is it safe for anterior sometimes the family of eight were to need a cold plunge. >> where would they find it? >> then they dip it in butter and bam, it goes right and really cute vampire bar like a reverend doesn't like a blessing on the core doughnut shops. >> how far from you know, eyebrows, think about light. it'll feel in the summer. we kind of run 11,000 or neighborhoods to go >> homes.com rose sparks engineered for the spontaneous, a dual action formula with the active ingredients of viagra. and see alice faster acting and long-lasting grabbed the moment. get started at row.co slash sparks in an election year, guaranteed to divide. >> this is a debacle >> a second term we can all agree on nobody central daily

show on comedy central and streaming next day on fair enough books. >> procrastination has been my biggest enemy in my life. i felt completely helpless listen to it, and i knew it was holding me back from who i really needed to be in life. >> now with the >> cis, it's this perfect mix of an increased energy, a deep kind of tunnel focus and i'm going to show up. i'm going to be present i couldn't imagine going back to a life that didn't have thesis in it, that you want to get stuff done you need to try >> we're standing up for our right to be lazy by sitting down and reclining that >> we worked full time and repairing full-time we will be required until further notice. >> it's our right to let the dishes soak overnight and to mow the lawn tomorrow. wish. >> we proudly declare that. yes, we are still watching that. >> and no, we will be busy tonight. >> we the lazy are taking back

i'm daniel lurie and i've spent my career fighting poverty, helping people right here in san francisco. i'm also a father raising two kids in the city. deeply concerned that city hall is allowing crime and lawlessness to spread. now we can do something about it by voting yes on prop e. a common sense solution that ensures we use community safety cameras to catch repeat offenders and hold them accountable. vote yes on e.

i paid before go to harrys.com slash shave to claim your $7 trial for >> solomon in new york >> is cnn closed captioning bronchi you by meso book.com >> we've offered a free book about missile filial month for over ten years called 1808724901 are going to meso book.com when you look at >> where we are, i mean, we're standing in front of the way the stakes in this trial are enormously consequential. >> the rule of law is at stake. the american democracy is at stake we have never played at higher stakes. yes. >> and john dean would know there was a cancer growing on the presidency. >> the former white house counsel turned cooperating witness and the watergate

scandal is remembered as the man who brought down former president richard nixon at the time. it was arguably the biggest scandal the presidency had ever faced. you said ones that you thought at the darkest days were behind us after the nixon water okay gate scandal >> is that a soul true? >> it is not true. >> i didn't think we would ever go back to worse than watergate, but we are there today hey, we have never been more threatened >> how strong is this case >> i think this is a good case. a strong case, but not necessarily an overwhelming case. the way these laws are being applied is novel and it's not jack smith's fault. it's because we've never seen anything like think this in this trial. >> most of the facts aren't up for debate. >> whenever you're doing any criminal case, intent is always a big part of it. proving intent is always difficult and the indictment rises and falls on whether the jury believes

that donald trump honestly thought there might have been election fraud or some election irregularity, knowing him as well as i do. and in talking to him many times, i believe that he firmly believed that there were election irregularities that made a difference in the election what jack smith is going to have to show is that trump knew he lost the way you have to do that is primarily in this case with testimony from people around him. i think we're going to see a parade of witnesses at this trial taking the stand, saying, i told donald trump no unequivocal terms. he had lost this election, isn't going to be difficult to meet this burden of proof. >> i never tried a case that wasn't difficult. and that's the way our system was meant to be taking away somebody's liberty should be hard and then beyond a reasonable doubt is a tough burden to reach what do you think is trump's strongest defense? >> i think that a laser-focus defense on he believed that there was fraud. >> i've had jew elections. i

want both of them. it's amazing. >> and that every action he took was based on what he believed his obligations as the chief executive to ensure that the laws are faithfully executed. to ensure that the world of people was accurately counted i think that if he keeps a laser focus on that, that is where the case is winnable at trial. >> i think the advice of counsel is an important defense in the case. i can assure you he had many people, lawyers, and investigators, and others was telling him they absolutely could prove that there was election fraud. and i think he was entitled to trust those people whose counsel he chose to trust i don't think that's going to end up working for him. why many other lawyers that he would point to or his coconspirators. if your lawyers involved in the conspiracy that's not going to work for you as a legal defense, the law is very specific about this. if that's what you want to say, advice of counsel do you need to show everything you've learned? that means not just

eastman, but there were lawyer after lawyer within his inner circle who told him there's nothing here. you can go forward and all the evidence suggests that the trump just kept going and going and going until he could get the answer he wanted. >> there has been a sprint by the prosecution to have this trial heard as soon as possible. >> i think jack smith probably believes that the american public deserves an answer before they go to the ballots and decide who they're voting for. >> and while there is an argument for the public to know the verb verdict before they cast a ballot. there is also the issue of what happens if the trial is delayed and trump is re-elected. >> the president? can simply command the department of justice close down this case. i don't need to give you a reason. >> so if a trial is going on and donald trump is inaugurated. the department of justice could simply dismiss

the case, even in the middle of trial. >> not only could they they would be ordered to the plug is pulled all power goes down. it's over >> even if the trial moves forward. trump can still be found guilty and win reelection and as president, he may still have one gala jail free card. >> he might try to pardon himself. that's ever happened before. we don't actually know whether a president can or cannot do that. pardon, power doesn't have any specific limitation. >> what happens if donald trump loses? >> and he's convicted? >> it's a great question and in a way, the ultimate question in theory he is a normal citizen. >> is there a world? >> where an american president can go to prison? >> there is a world in which that could happen. i think it'd be a horrible, horrible mistake in this country, even if he were convicted. >> i don't know how they would do it every aspect of this case is messy because our system was

not built with the anticipation >> of a president being criminally charged. >> which has left a number of legal theories which have never been tested one major point of contention the issue of presidential immunity, which trump is currently appealing >> donald trump's claim here is that he cannot be prosecuted because what he did was within the scope of his job as president i firmly believe the president trump is entitled to immunity. i believe that his conduct with respect to the election was within the official duties of a president a federal appeals court disagreed. the three-judge panel ruled unanimously that trump is not immune from prosecution for alleged crimes he committed bid during his presidency to reverse the 2020 election results. >> the argument that trump is totally immune is absurd. i

mean it is so contrary to american law. >> and if you can't prosecute a president for crimes, you don't have a fully functioning democracy based on on the rule of law. >> trump has taken his appeal directly to the supreme court. if the court decides to hear the case, it would first hear oral arguments at a future date. >> and even >> men, it could be weeks or months before a decision is made. the court could decline to hear the case, which would have the effect of letting the lower court ruling stand and sidestepping a politically charged case at a time when the supreme court has been plagued by ethical inquiries and accusations of partisanship. >> certainly, the chief justice wants in the worst way for the american people not to perceive that the courts, somehow this cited this election that would be a kind of catastrophe >> if you were donald trump's

attorney defending him in this case? >> what would worry you the most dc jury, the political tenor against donald trump is so strong and overwhelming in dc in that pocket of the country that it's very difficult for him to get a fair trial. there, especially with all of the publicity cases are won on and lost at the stage of jury selection. because if you don't conduct that carefully to make sure you have a fair and objective jury you're dead before you've even started. >> well, goal is to find 12 people who can be fair and neutral. and how many people have no particular view on donald trump? let's let's pause it for example, that is a hung jury that's not a loss, but guess what? in the system with all the buildup we've had, i think it will play as it's a loss and we'll occasion real reflection in the doj whether

to go gamble >> and all it takes is one sure. >> i think that's the hope to trump hangs onto that he at least reaches somebody who ends up city in that jury. >> do you think that he will be found guilty in this trial? >> i shutter if he doesn't get found guilty because i think that sends a message that if you're in power you can try anything to stay in power this federal case is one of four criminal trials. the former president has been seeking to delay, but just days ago, a manhattan judge throughout emotion to dismiss the charges in the case involving hush money payments during the 2016 campaign that trial is now set to begin march 25 thanks for watching the whole story.