already everybody has pointed as already everybody has pointed out, navalny�*s lawyers saw him two or three days ago and said he didn't have any health complaints, he was looking quite optimistic and energetic. yesterday, navalny was on trial via video link and that video was published today. once again, he looks well, isjoking, in a good mood. russian channel that according to their sources he might have had a blood clot. they put it to dance. the doctor that the bbc russian service has spoken to say this version may exist, but it is strange to put it out so early because to put out that version you would need

to carry out medical procedures which will take some time. if a person was alive, energetic, smiling just a day before, the only easy way to blame his sudden death is via a blood clot. the fact that this version appeared on a state—owned tv channel so quickly adds to all the questions that are already there. you mentioned of course the last video that we saw of him. there has also been a post on instagram. i think we can bring that up on screen. it was a valentines message that you can see their to his wife. it read, between us there are cities and thousands of kilometres, but i feel you are near every second and i love you more and more. aside from the fact that he was a politician

and a prominent critic of the kremlin, he also was a husband who leaves behind a family. he kremlin, he also was a husband who leaves behind a family.— leaves behind a family. he was, and he was actually _ leaves behind a family. he was, and he was actually very _ leaves behind a family. he was, and he was actually very humane. - leaves behind a family. he was, and he was actually very humane. it - leaves behind a family. he was, and he was actually very humane. it was very open but not to open about his relationship. i met him personally as a journalist many times over the last ten or 12 years. one memory that sticks out brightly his when he was on his first trial back in 2012, there was a moment when the trial, there was a moment when the trial, the hearing was waiting. there was a brief moment when he was still free and he had this dilemma, he could speak tojournalists and and he had this dilemma, he could speak to journalists and deliver another message, but he said it could you please stay a few steps behind, i want to have a moment with my wife. he decided to spend those few minutes with his wife rather than give another speech to

journalists. this is what i remember. this really touched me because itjust shows that he was also human, a husband and actually valued his family very much. over these past few years he managed to send many messages from prison both privately and publicly to his family, to his kids, his wife. some of them were public and theyjust shoot the scale of his affection to his family. shoot the scale of his affection to his famil . ., ., , ._ , his family. olga, to stay with us. we will be _ his family. olga, to stay with us. we will be back _ his family. olga, to stay with us. we will be back with _ his family. olga, to stay with us. we will be back with you - his family. olga, to stay with us. we will be back with you in - his family. olga, to stay with us. we will be back with you in a - his family. olga, to stay with us. i we will be back with you in a short moment. let's go to munich, where where we arejoined moment. let's go to munich, where where we are joined by at doucet, chief international correspondent, for more reaction from there. everywhere you go, everyone is discussing the shocking news of alexei navalny, some saying that they believed it would just be a matter of time. all the defence

chiefs, presidents, prime ministers are gathered here, russia is already on the agenda with the war in ukraine almost marking its second year since the full scale invasion by russia. this adds another level of concern. joining us now is the former swedish prime minister and former swedish prime minister and former prime minister, coral belt. you have met alexei navalny in the past. you have met alexei navalny in the ast. ~ . , you have met alexei navalny in the ast, . ., , ,., you have met alexei navalny in the astr ., , you have met alexei navalny in the ast.~ . , , past. what is your response? it is obviously a _ past. what is your response? it is obviously a tragedy. _ past. what is your response? it is obviously a tragedy. a _ past. what is your response? it is obviously a tragedy. a tragedy . past. what is your response? it isj obviously a tragedy. a tragedy for his family— obviously a tragedy. a tragedy for his family but also for russia. he was a _ his family but also for russia. he was a brave — his family but also for russia. he was a brave man. he represented hope for many— was a brave man. he represented hope for many russians that there was something beyond this particular regime — something beyond this particular regime. he was a popular man among primarily— regime. he was a popular man among primarily a _ regime. he was a popular man among primarily a lots of young, educated russian _ primarily a lots of young, educated russian people who couldn't speak up but knew _ russian people who couldn't speak up but knew there was hope sometimes. do you _

but knew there was hope sometimes. do you hold _ but knew there was hope sometimes. do you hold president putin responsible? i do you hold president putin responsible?— do you hold president putin responsible? do you hold president putin resonsible? ., . ,, ., responsible? i do. we knew that he willt to responsible? i do. we knew that he will try to murder _ responsible? i do. we knew that he will try to murder him _ responsible? i do. we knew that he will try to murder him before - responsible? i do. we knew that he will try to murder him before with l will try to murder him before with the poisoning. there is no question about— the poisoning. there is no question about that — the poisoning. there is no question about that. we know that he was put injail_ about that. we know that he was put injail under— about that. we know that he was put in jail under increasingly severe conditions. he was evidently in good health— conditions. he was evidently in good health as _ conditions. he was evidently in good health as of yesterday. does it happen — health as of yesterday. does it happen that people just drop dead without— happen that people just drop dead without advanced warning? we don't know _ without advanced warning? we don't know i_ without advanced warning? we don't know. i don't think we will ever know — know. i don't think we will ever know the _ know. i don't think we will ever know. the authorities in russia will -ive know. the authorities in russia will give their— know. the authorities in russia will give their version. will we believe that version? no, we won't. we know for ceriain— that version? no, we won't. we know for certain that they wanted him dead _ for certain that they wanted him dead and — for certain that they wanted him dead and we know that he is dead, then we _ dead and we know that he is dead, then we can — dead and we know that he is dead, then we can draw our conclusions. they— then we can draw our conclusions. they wanted him dead because he was a threat to president putin. yes. they wanted him dead because he was a threat to president putin.— a threat to president putin. yes, he was. with a threat to president putin. yes, he was- with his— a threat to president putin. yes, he was. with his personality _ a threat to president putin. yes, he was. with his personality and - a threat to president putin. yes, he was. with his personality and his i was. with his personality and his ability— was. with his personality and his ability to— was. with his personality and his ability to organise politics. he had

all sorts— ability to organise politics. he had all sorts of— ability to organise politics. he had all sorts of ideas, organisational schemes — all sorts of ideas, organisational schemes. he had a large, dedicated team _ schemes. he had a large, dedicated team of— schemes. he had a large, dedicated team of young people all over russia — team of young people all over russia. some of them are still inside — russia. some of them are still inside russia, some outside russia. he created — inside russia, some outside russia. he created that. that remains a threat _ he created that. that remains a threat to — he created that. that remains a threat to the regime. it he created that. that remains a threat to the regime.— threat to the regime. it sends a messa . e threat to the regime. it sends a message to _ threat to the regime. it sends a message to anyone _ threat to the regime. it sends a message to anyone else - threat to the regime. it sends a message to anyone else who, l threat to the regime. it sends a | message to anyone else who, as threat to the regime. it sends a - message to anyone else who, as well. there are already a whole set of rules and restrictions in russia that make it almost impossible to organise politically. it is not longer before the next russia elections. , , . longer before the next russia elections-— longer before the next russia elections. , , ., ., , elections. this is a regime that is not particularly — elections. this is a regime that is not particularly secure. _ elections. this is a regime that is not particularly secure. if - elections. this is a regime that is not particularly secure. if this - elections. this is a regime that is| not particularly secure. if this was a secure _ not particularly secure. if this was a secure regime that was secure of the support— a secure regime that was secure of the support of its people it wouldn't need to murder people or restrict— wouldn't need to murder people or restrict them. they have such are tough _ restrict them. they have such are tough regime, that shows the basic and security of the regime to do this in— and security of the regime to do this in order to maintain their own

power _ this in order to maintain their own power that — this in order to maintain their own power. that is not a sign of the health— power. that is not a sign of the health of— power. that is not a sign of the health of the russian regime. his wife, now health of the russian regime. h 3 wife, now widow, it is believed that she was going to be attending meetings here, underlining that it is notjust the war in ukraine that is notjust the war in ukraine that is on the agenda, but the nature of russian society. it is on the agenda, but the nature of russian society.— russian society. it is, indeed. it is the nature — russian society. it is, indeed. it is the nature of _ russian society. it is, indeed. it is the nature of the _ russian society. it is, indeed. it is the nature of the russian - russian society. it is, indeed. it. is the nature of the russian regime that has— is the nature of the russian regime that has created a security issue in europe _ that has created a security issue in europe that — that has created a security issue in europe that is fairly fundamental. we saw— europe that is fairly fundamental. we saw the interview that vladimir putin— we saw the interview that vladimir putin gave — we saw the interview that vladimir putin gave the other day i was a strange — putin gave the other day i was a strange thing. he talked for half an hour interrupted in saying that he did not— hour interrupted in saying that he did not believe that ukraine ever existed~ — did not believe that ukraine ever existed~ it — did not believe that ukraine ever existed. it is a fundamental threat to ukraine — existed. it is a fundamental threat to ukraine immediately but also to global— to ukraine immediately but also to global security. we to ukraine immediately but also to global security-— to ukraine immediately but also to global security. we want to continue this discussion _ global security. we want to continue this discussion of _ global security. we want to continue this discussion of the _ global security. we want to continue this discussion of the reaction - global security. we want to continue this discussion of the reaction to - this discussion of the reaction to the death of alexei navalny end up

penal, multi—? penal colony in the arctic circle. we havejust penal, multi—? penal colony in the arctic circle. we have just been to see lord cameron, the foreign secretary britain. this is his reaction. secretary britain. this is his reaction-— secretary britain. this is his reaction. ., ., , secretary britain. this is his reaction. . ., ., , ., reaction. alexei navalny was an incredibly brave _ reaction. alexei navalny was an incredibly brave fight _ reaction. alexei navalny was an incredibly brave fight against i incredibly brave fight against corruption _ incredibly brave fight against corruption and _ incredibly brave fight against corruption and he _ incredibly brave fight against corruption and he gave - incredibly brave fight against corruption and he gave up. incredibly brave fight against - corruption and he gave up everything to campaign— corruption and he gave up everything to campaign for— corruption and he gave up everything to campaign for what _ corruption and he gave up everything to campaign for what he _ corruption and he gave up everything to campaign for what he believed - corruption and he gave up everything to campaign for what he believed in. | to campaign for what he believed in. my heart _ to campaign for what he believed in. my heart goes — to campaign for what he believed in. my heart goes out _ to campaign for what he believed in. my heart goes out to _ to campaign for what he believed in. my heart goes out to his _ to campaign for what he believed in. my heart goes out to his wife - to campaign for what he believed in. my heart goes out to his wife and i my heart goes out to his wife and family _ my heart goes out to his wife and family we — my heart goes out to his wife and family. we should _ my heart goes out to his wife and family. we should be _ my heart goes out to his wife and family. we should be clear- my heart goes out to his wife and family. we should be clear about| family. we should be clear about what _ family. we should be clear about what has — family. we should be clear about what has happened _ family. we should be clear about what has happened here. - family. we should be clear about. what has happened here. vladimir putin's_ what has happened here. vladimir putin's russia, _ what has happened here. vladimir putin's russia, imprisoned - what has happened here. vladimir putin's russia, imprisoned him, . putin's russia, imprisoned him, trumped — putin's russia, imprisoned him, trumped up _ putin's russia, imprisoned him, trumped up charges _ putin's russia, imprisoned him, trumped up charges against - putin's russia, imprisoned him, i trumped up charges against him, poisoned — trumped up charges against him, poisoned him. _ trumped up charges against him, poisoned him, sent— trumped up charges against him, poisoned him, sent him - trumped up charges against him, poisoned him, sent him to - trumped up charges against him, poisoned him, sent him to an- trumped up charges against him, . poisoned him, sent him to an arctic penal— poisoned him, sent him to an arctic penal colony — poisoned him, sent him to an arctic penal colony and _ poisoned him, sent him to an arctic penal colony and now _ poisoned him, sent him to an arctic penal colony and now he _ poisoned him, sent him to an arctic penal colony and now he has - penal colony and now he has tragically— penal colony and now he has tragically died. _ penal colony and now he has tragically died. we _ penal colony and now he has tragically died. we should i penal colony and now he has . tragically died. we should hold peter— tragically died. we should hold peter nad _ tragically died. we should hold peter nad accountable - tragically died. we should hold peter nad accountable for- tragically died. we should holdj peter nad accountable for their tragically died. we should hold i peter nad accountable for their and no one _ peter nad accountable for their and no one should — peter nad accountable for their and no one should be _ peter nad accountable for their and no one should be in _ peter nad accountable for their and no one should be in any— peter nad accountable for their and no one should be in any doubt i peter nad accountable for their and i no one should be in any doubt about the dreadful— no one should be in any doubt about the dreadful nature _ no one should be in any doubt about the dreadful nature of _ no one should be in any doubt about the dreadful nature of vladimir- the dreadful nature of vladimir putin's— the dreadful nature of vladimir putin's regime. _ the dreadful nature of vladimir putin's regime. iinfill— the dreadful nature of vladimir putin's regime.— putin's regime. will there be consequences _ putin's regime. will there be consequences now? - putin's regime. will there be consequences now? there i putin's regime. will there be i consequences now? there should putin's regime. will there be - consequences now? there should be because there _ consequences now? there should be because there is _ consequences now? there should be because there is no _ consequences now? there should be because there is no doubt _ consequences now? there should be because there is no doubt in - consequences now? there should be because there is no doubt in my i consequences now? there should be| because there is no doubt in my mind that this _ because there is no doubt in my mind that this man— because there is no doubt in my mind that this man was a brave fighter against _

that this man was a brave fighter against corruption, forjustice and democracy, — against corruption, forjustice and democracy, and look what vladimir putin's_ democracy, and look what vladimir putin's russia did to him. they trumped — putin's russia did to him. they trumped up charges, poisoned him, sent him _ trumped up charges, poisoned him, sent him to — trumped up charges, poisoned him, sent him to a penal colony. no one can look— sent him to a penal colony. no one can look at— sent him to a penal colony. no one can look at this regime that are not recognise _ can look at this regime that are not recognise it — can look at this regime that are not recognise it for what it has, truly dreadful— recognise it for what it has, truly dreadful nature.— dreadful nature. lord cameron s-ueakin dreadful nature. lord cameron speaking a _ dreadful nature. lord cameron speaking a short _ dreadful nature. lord cameron speaking a short time - dreadful nature. lord cameron speaking a short time ago. i dreadful nature. lord cameron i speaking a short time ago. while we were listening to that, kamala harris, who leads the us delegation here, has expressed sympathies to the family of alexei navalny and says she holds president putin responsible. in says she holds president putin responsible-— says she holds president putin resonsible. , _, ,, ., responsible. in this context i know that there are _ responsible. in this context i know that there are questions _ responsible. in this context i know that there are questions here i responsible. in this context i know that there are questions here in i that there are questions here in europe — that there are questions here in europe and _ that there are questions here in europe and around _ that there are questions here in europe and around the - that there are questions here in europe and around the world i that there are questions here in i europe and around the world about the future — europe and around the world about the future of— europe and around the world about the future of america _ europe and around the world about the future of america pots - europe and around the world about the future of america pots macro l europe and around the world about| the future of america pots macro of global— the future of america pots macro of global leadership. _ the future of america pots macro of global leadership. these _ the future of america pots macro of global leadership. these are - global leadership. these are questions _ global leadership. these are questions the _ global leadership. these are questions the american i global leadership. these are i questions the american people global leadership. these are - questions the american people must also ask— questions the american people must also ask ourselves. _ questions the american people must also ask ourselves. whether - questions the american people must also ask ourselves. whether it - questions the american people must also ask ourselves. whether it is i questions the american people must also ask ourselves. whether it is in i also ask ourselves. whether it is in america's— also ask ourselves. whether it is in america's interest _ also ask ourselves. whether it is in

america's interest to _ also ask ourselves. whether it is in america's interest to continue i also ask ourselves. whether it is in america's interest to continue to l america's interest to continue to engage _ america's interest to continue to engage with _ america's interest to continue to engage with the _ america's interest to continue to engage with the world. - america's interest to continue to engage with the world. or- america's interest to continue to engage with the world. or to i america's interest to continue toi engage with the world. or to turn inward _ engage with the world. or to turn inward. whether— engage with the world. or to turn inward. whether it _ engage with the world. or to turn inward. whether it is— engage with the world. or to turn inward. whether it is in— engage with the world. or to turn inward. whether it is in our- inward. whether it is in our interest— inward. whether it is in our interest to _ inward. whether it is in our interest to defend - inward. whether it is in our- interest to defend long—standing rules— interest to defend long—standing rules and — interest to defend long—standing rules and norms _ interest to defend long—standing rules and norms that _ interest to defend long—standing rules and norms that have - interest to defend long—standing i rules and norms that have provided for unprecedented _ rules and norms that have provided for unprecedented peace _ rules and norms that have provided for unprecedented peace and - for unprecedented peace and prosperity, _ for unprecedented peace and prosperity, or— for unprecedented peace and prosperity, or to— for unprecedented peace and prosperity, or to allow- for unprecedented peace and prosperity, or to allow them i for unprecedented peace and l prosperity, or to allow them to for unprecedented peace and i prosperity, or to allow them to be trampled — prosperity, or to allow them to be trampled. whether— prosperity, or to allow them to be trampled. whether it _ prosperity, or to allow them to be trampled. whether it is _ prosperity, or to allow them to be trampled. whether it is in - prosperity, or to allow them to be . trampled. whether it is in america's interest— trampled. whether it is in america's interest to _ trampled. whether it is in america's interest to fight _ trampled. whether it is in america's interest to fight for _ trampled. whether it is in america's interest to fight for democracy - trampled. whether it is in america's interest to fight for democracy or. interest to fight for democracy or to accept— interest to fight for democracy or to accept the _ interest to fight for democracy or to accept the rise _ interest to fight for democracy or to accept the rise of _ interest to fight for democracy or to accept the rise of dictators. i interest to fight for democracy or. to accept the rise of dictators. and whether— to accept the rise of dictators. and whether it — to accept the rise of dictators. and whether it is — to accept the rise of dictators. and whether it is in _ to accept the rise of dictators. and whether it is in america's- to accept the rise of dictators. and whether it is in america's interestl whether it is in america's interest to continue — whether it is in america's interest to continue to _ whether it is in america's interest to continue to work _ whether it is in america's interest to continue to work in _ whether it is in america's interest to continue to work in lockstep i whether it is in america's interest i to continue to work in lockstep with our allies— to continue to work in lockstep with our allies and — to continue to work in lockstep with our allies and partners _ to continue to work in lockstep with our allies and partners or— to continue to work in lockstep with our allies and partners or go - to continue to work in lockstep with our allies and partners or go it- our allies and partners or go it alone — our allies and partners or go it alone today— our allies and partners or go it alone today i_ our allies and partners or go it alone. today i will— our allies and partners or go it alone. today i will explain i our allies and partners or go it| alone. today i will explain how president _ alone. today i will explain how president biden_ alone. today i will explain how president biden and _ alone. today i will explain how president biden and i- alone. today i will explain howl president biden and i answered alone. today i will explain how - president biden and i answered these questions _ president biden and i answered these questions with — president biden and i answered these questions. with full— president biden and i answered these questions. with full knowledge - president biden and i answered these questions. with full knowledge that l questions. with full knowledge that how america — questions. with full knowledge that how america responds _ questions. with full knowledge that how america responds will- questions. with full knowledge that how america responds will affect i questions. with full knowledge thatl how america responds will affect the american _ how america responds will affect the

american people. _ how america responds will affect the american people, the _ how america responds will affect the american people, the people - how america responds will affect the american people, the people of- american people, the people of europe — american people, the people of europe and _ american people, the people of europe and people _ american people, the people of europe and people around i american people, the people of europe and people around the i american people, the people of- europe and people around the world. i europe and people around the world. i believe _ europe and people around the world. i believe it— europe and people around the world. i believe it is— europe and people around the world. i believe it is in— europe and people around the world. i believe it is in the _ europe and people around the world. i believe it is in the fundamental- i believe it is in the fundamental interest— i believe it is in the fundamental interest of— i believe it is in the fundamental interest of the _ i believe it is in the fundamental interest of the american - i believe it is in the fundamental. interest of the american people... that is— interest of the american people... that is the — interest of the american people... that is the us _ interest of the american people... that is the us vice _ interest of the american people... that is the us vice president - that is the us vice president kamala harris addressing the issue that is at the top of the agenda here at a conference that is rooted in the belief of the importance of a strong transatlantic relationship, relationship between europe and the united states, as well as canada. of course the relationship of this transatlantic partnership with russia, especially at a time of this war ukraine that drags on, it is the top topic at all of the table tear. now there is another issue to discuss that is linked to that, that is the death of alexei navalny. here with us is the former swedish prime

minister coral belt. we heard from lord cameron saying in response to my question should there be consequences for russia, and he said yes, but walk at the world do, there are already so many sanctions against russia? it are already so many sanctions against russia?— are already so many sanctions against russia? it is difficult to see what could _ against russia? it is difficult to see what could be _ against russia? it is difficult to see what could be done. i against russia? it is difficult to see what could be done. the i against russia? it is difficult to i see what could be done. the picture of the _ see what could be done. the picture of the russian regime has been reinforced. the interesting question will be _ reinforced. the interesting question will be what will happen in russia. ithink— will be what will happen in russia. i think we — will be what will happen in russia. i think we can safely predict that there _ i think we can safely predict that there will— i think we can safely predict that there will be intense repression in russia _ there will be intense repression in russia in— there will be intense repression in russia in the next few weeks. will they even— russia in the next few weeks. will they even allow a funeral of a public— they even allow a funeral of a public nature or will theyjust try to hide _ public nature or will theyjust try to hide the entire thing over what might— to hide the entire thing over what might be — to hide the entire thing over what might be a — to hide the entire thing over what might be a public reaction? we don't know _ might be a public reaction? we don't know that— might be a public reaction? we don't know. that has to be the story to follow _

know. that has to be the story to follow. , , . . , know. that has to be the story to follow. ,, .. , , , know. that has to be the story to follow. ,, , , , , follow. especially because it is believed one _ follow. especially because it is believed one of _ follow. especially because it is believed one of the _ follow. especially because it is believed one of the reasons i follow. especially because it is i believed one of the reasons why president putin wanted him locked away was his power to bring people onto the streets. you're a the protests. it will be a test of society and of courage at a time when the risks are so high. yes. society and of courage at a time when the risks are so high. yes, i didn't think _ when the risks are so high. yes, i didn't think we _ when the risks are so high. yes, i didn't think we should _ when the risks are so high. yes, i didn't think we should expect i when the risks are so high. yes, i didn't think we should expect any j didn't think we should expect any mass _ didn't think we should expect any mass protest because people are, quite _ mass protest because people are, quite rightly so, afraid. there will be put _ quite rightly so, afraid. there will be put in — quite rightly so, afraid. there will be put in prison, arctic penal colonies _ be put in prison, arctic penal colonies or— be put in prison, arctic penal colonies or whatever. but i don't think— colonies or whatever. but i don't think it _ colonies or whatever. but i don't think it will — colonies or whatever. but i don't think it will pass completely without _ think it will pass completely without uncertainty and an element of political — without uncertainty and an element of political turmoil in russia. you will remember _ of political turmoil in russia. you will remember at _ of political turmoil in russia. gm. will remember at these conferences in the past, sir guy laphroaig always caused a stir with his comments inside this building. russia has not been invited to steer because the munich security conference said they did not believe the president putin was interested in dialogue. when he was interviewed

by tucker carlson, president putin said he did want dialogue. do you believe that is a general statement? he wants a dialogue but on his conditions. the basic message of that particular interview is that he spent _ that particular interview is that he spent half—an—hour saying that ukraine — spent half—an—hour saying that ukraine never existed, will not exist. — ukraine never existed, will not exist. has— ukraine never existed, will not exist, has no right to exist, it is a phantom _ exist, has no right to exist, it is a phantom creation and there should only be _ a phantom creation and there should only be a _ a phantom creation and there should only be a greater russian empire. that was— only be a greater russian empire. that was the key message. the fact that he _ that was the key message. the fact that he spent half—an—hour saying that he spent half—an—hour saying that shows — that he spent half—an—hour saying that shows the deep conviction that's— that shows the deep conviction that's he — that shows the deep conviction that's he has in his imperialist vision, — that's he has in his imperialist vision, nostalgia, whatever you call it, vision, nostalgia, whatever you call it. not— vision, nostalgia, whatever you call it, not very— vision, nostalgia, whatever you call it, not very much room for negotiation there.- it, not very much room for negotiation there. coral built, thank you _ negotiation there. coral built, thank you very _ negotiation there. coral built, thank you very much - negotiation there. coral built, thank you very much for i negotiation there. coral built, i thank you very much forjoining us with your reflections on alexei navalny on this sudden and shocking news of his death in an arctic penal colony, also reflections on russia

at this time. russia was always going to be on the agenda at the munich security conference and now it is doubly so. it is believed his wife, no widow, we don't know if she is here that she was meant to attend this conference along with russian civil society organisations, including one of the very few independent russian television channels. they will have something to say about all these developments. we heard earlier from to say about all these developments. we heard earlierfrom jens stoltenberg, holding president putin responsible. we also heard from kamala harris, who is now addressing the main halljust behind us. many, many people here on our reflecting on the life and times of alexei navalny and russia in this time. we will continue to follow the reactions here as well as other issues on the agenda, but back to you now in london.

these two set,