soon they will not talk about the darkness as the most influential person in russia, but even relying on male help, the empress always reserved the final decisions for herself. empire, catherine ii. premiere, tomorrow on the first. potemkin was preparing the main surprise for the woman he loved. the sevastopol harbor appeared before the eyes of those present. a declaration

of love, a festive concert in the kremlin , a premiere, tomorrow on the first day, you don’t need to read 200 volumes about russia, attend one concert of the berezka ensemble, the audience all says, well, that’s how they are, they don’t walk, they float. it’s always a mystery, and it’s your secret, and the secret is not revealed, no, folk character dance in the form in which we teach is not taught anywhere in the world, sometimes you have to work like this, it’s dancing for the audience, it’s smiles , nadezhdino finds out that the ring romance, prima birch and solis moiseevsky...

and naturally, this is a scandal, this is a nightmare, these are screams. now we just remember the goosebumps, and of course, i said yes, birch, beauty in russian, the premiere of the documentary film is on march 10, on the first one. they broke into bank, three of us wearing masks. they started beating, shooting , it was very scary, in donetsk they robbed a private bank, cleaned out your cells, victor fedor, find it, you will take this business for yourself, this is a chance, you will move to the major league, lieutenant colonel, gambling addict, now he is involved in the donetsk case, they should not get involved too far, the main intrigue is whether ukraine will sign an association agreement with the eu? we do everything right, everything will be fine. great. you are now offering me

to distribute power with my own hands. only a real crisis on the maidan will allow you to keep power. what do you need from me? we need you. tymoshenko is the only man in ukrainian politics. the americans bring a lot of weapons here from poland. let's go with torches to the maidan. let's go. i will not give such a command. maidan, premiere from march 11 on the first. there is information that they want to liquidate you. no one should cross the line, i will go on alone, the banner towards me. mister, what are you talking about?

stand with your soldiers, be with them, i can convince them, they will come with us. seryozha, seryozha! surrender, no, third gun, afrod, mr. major, you heard the order, regiment commander, and you want him to just be killed?

put it aside, stand, stand, stand, stand, stand, everyone, yes, what are you doing, sergei ivanovich, victoria, she’s so close, fucking cease fire,

seryozha, do you hear? that everything, everything is over, seryozha, but what about our dream, for the sake of a dream, we can die, we can’t kill.

muravyov, apostle sergei ivanovich, i am 29 years old, i remember you, in the semenovsky regiment.

nobleman, brought up in a private boarding school in paris, single, religion christian, greek rite. i haven’t been to confession at the holy communion since 1821, why? were you afraid to spill the beans about your plans? no worries, what about now? not now, so does that mean i have to let you go? does that mean you are not guilty of anything? i don’t understand you, it’s very easy for you to understand us, you are the same as us, no, there is a difference between the legitimate authorities and impostors who

imagine themselves to be the saviors of the fatherland, there is no difference, explain. are you tired? yes, what? i feel sorry for their intrigues,

go!

victoria, gentlemen, victoria, hurray!

today foreign policy, well, at the same time, how they predict that they will sharply attack their opponent in the election, donald trump, but in general, despite the fact that... the american economy is not in such bad shape, not in the best, but not catastrophic, it seems that they managed to curb inflation, the mood.

are already experiencing a shortage of equipment , primarily ammunition, but also equipment, because, well, let’s say, for some reason everyone is talking about ammunition, but artillery barrels also have an expiration date and after a certain number of shots, depending on the system, the barrels are needed change, given that

the americans stopped supplies completely , the same pyatriot, well, that’s enough already - it has a good gun, a good guidance system, but nevertheless its main shortcomings remain, it’s still heavy, now it will begin to unravel, of course it will be completely difficult for him to move , plus a gas turbine engine, it glows in thermal imagers, these mcdonalds are here, who

criticized him all the time, suddenly supported him, everyone rallied around trump, i don’t know, maybe. but trump won’t persuade him to help ukraine, yes, so why do i think that after all true, there is pressure on him, on johnson , which can work, i think that the pressure is primarily from other republican members of congress, and not even in the compromise that seemed to be promised to johnson, there in exchange for

aid package for ukraine and taiwan, there will be...

real, real political success on the eve of the elections, i'm not sure that in the end such a concession will be made, only the money that... biden said that it will remain, so to speak , in america they will go to orders to the american military-industrial complex to carry out arsenals , to replenish american arsenals, well

, from which, after they are, so to speak, replenished, some kind of, so to speak, weapons, ammunition will be supplied to ukraine, well, in general, we must really understand, that the opposition to aid to ukraine in the american congress is based less on antipathy towards ukraine and... more on nationalism and the desire to first strengthen the border, that is, a compromise is theoretically possible, but firstly, it will take time, and secondly, you are right they said not much money, as originally expected , thirdly, this is also not, not, i would say, a guaranteed deal, yes, okay, lieutenant general reshetnikov, it’s true that you are a general from ...

methods, new approaches, accusing us of talk about new technology in intelligence , new technology that we have just started an aggressive policy,

aggression against ukraine, but we know why our community, the intelligence officers of the foreign intelligence service, was outraged by this and they asked me to write this: we know that the special operation is being carried out by the cia and other us intelligence agencies, along with the ministry of defense, with the state department. the operation , which began with a coup, with the elimination of the legally elected government, continued with the war in donbass with all these actions, of course , i don’t know about the official discrepancy, but if you look at all the actions, you remembered today about the middle east, but there, too, it’s mostly an imitation , there is no real action. the united states is aimed at solving the problem, there is an imitation, as there was an imitation in many hot spots where the united states occupied, bombing is an imitation of some solutions,

there are no solutions, so we decided, you probably read his article, and read his, read yours, yes, well, in his article, i read his book before, and you absolutely correctly note that the book is much more serious than the article .

i read it under a microscope, maybe i couldn’t agree with something, but since i didn’t read it under a microscope, it seemed to me that it was a completely convincing article.

so, biden’s policy is based, among other things, on the taiwan factor, and we see an interesting thing, just now has ended, or rather continues, while we are talking about the all-china people's congress , and we see that the chinese economy, unlike what biden tried to do, is not collapsing, there are many difficulties, this is a separate conversation, but the country is recording 5% gdp growth - this is a very serious thing, and the most important thing is that when china is criticized for its huge debt, the chinese debt

is less than the american debt. domestic debt, but the most important thing is that it was possible, that’s what really succeeded during biden’s policy, it really is roughly speaking, to knock china off a certain rut, china tried to enter the western world with its developments, tried to propose its own concept, it was not allowed to do this, it’s great how useful it was to try to drive china into such a dead end, firstly, the whole biden policy in my opinion it was very clumsily built. in relation to china, and what biden has achieved, namely his entire administration, is that russia and china have acquired a completely new common platform. now, if only politics were a little smarter and a little less aggressive or a little more flexible, i do not exclude that china somewhere would try to be completely above the fray and say that you know, the main concern is about the chinese people, and not about the interests of russia, ukraine, everything else, but now we see something else, that china is quite harshly criticizes

the united states, and this is... criticism, if before biden it was at the level of just blogs, today it all happens at the level of experts, at the level of official policy. for the first time during the biden era, china began to voice the united states as one of its rivals, never before was not announced. finally, the story of taiwan. i understand, and we all understand, why all this is happening, to take china weakly, to show that china cannot withstand competition with the usa, that taiwan... the usa is playing a win-win game, china will launch a military operation against taiwan or there will be something -that’s a clash, then the yuan falls, the regional southern chinese economy collapses, tavan is being written off, who wins the usa, great, there won’t be any fight, well then everyone will say, china is weak, what’s wrong doing them would seem to be a win-win situation, but look at the reaction of the countries of east and

south-east asia. are not united by a feeling that is not very clear to americans, american political circles, this feeling is called national dignity, coming from the post-colonial era, there is practically a position here that look, china may not be the most pleasant partner, but they are beating ours, these are ours asians, who suddenly found themselves under attack under the influence of the united states, received a lot of criticism from countries, malaysia, indonesia, which they treated the usa softly, but... they will find it because, because they are trying to destroy this factor of asian unity. i think there’s nothing to boast about biden, other than the fact that he destroyed relations, trade relations with china. china still finds workarounds, but at the same time, let’s be honest, political interaction has been completely destroyed. and you think that this is not, not some temporary situation, but reflects some long-term trends. i think this is

a very deep situation, because what to be honest, previous american presidents, who also did not always have a positive attitude towards china, tried to prevent this, there was obama’s anti-chinese, anti-chinese steps, clinton’s policies, it was all there, but since the time of nixon it was accepted, apparently an internal consensus, that it is necessary to interact with china under any conditions, as long as china does not interfere in the affairs of the united states, china did not interfere in the affairs of the united states, in the economy, yes, but it did interfere in the economies of other countries. now a trend has emerged, as in essence, the united states has brought the situation to a civilizational level confrontation, this has never happened , they have never said that the united states threatens china’s development model, this is what they are saying in china now, and i think that if it changes, or rather, when biden changes and any other american president actually comes, anti-chinese sentiments in american society have become so strong, it is so common to blame china for all sins that...

more flexible than in the usa, he does not like the usa, but he understands that in any case, economic interaction must be preserved, what is called under any political wait a minute, you know, one thing that has changed a lot , it seems to me, in the american approach to the world is that before, even such cool presidents, for example, ronald reagan, and even nixon, although he was, as it were, the author of détente and normalization with china. but in general , bombing was the nicest thing for him when it came to vietnam and when he was described as a crazy bomber and like a son of a bitch, he took it as a compliment, he believed that

for the president to be perceived like that in the world, not bad at all, but all these american leaders, it seems to me, they were taken by other countries, especially seriously...

the other great nuclear power did not have a strong leader, and although , of course, he frankly did not like the actions, especially the actions of androp within the soviet union, i cannot imagine that reagan would personally insult andropov, and i can’t imagine, i lived in washington at that time, i can’t imagine that someone told me that when you say that sandropov...

is of american interests, instead they tell you: you are in a country of authoritarian powers, totalitarianism, in china, in china there is a genocide of the uyghurs, yeah, and if you are not ready to raise this topic every time you sit down, caught by the chinese leaders, then you have no conscience, no honor. and i think that you are absolutely right here, the situation here is even deeper, it seems to me that our american colleagues have run out of political narrative. what is called, here is some kind of argumentation, because the easiest way is always to argue from the point of view of simple truisms that lie within the framework of this uh political discourse, violation of human rights is bad, oppression in tibet, uh in xinzian is bad, but

the problem is something else, the problem is that america treated china well as long as it felt that it was winning any technological race, as long as china was a large manufacturer, which produced everything, he had little interest in the usa, he could not be a competitor, on the contrary, everyone was happy, but when china began to lay claim to the formulation of the meaning of the future, the technological future, in all respects, it is not only artificial intelligence, but also full reality, this is a biopharma and much more, at that moment the attack began on it, that is, the most important thing is that china suddenly, in my opinion, is unpredictable for american political circles, although experts understood this all perfectly, it began to noticeably reduce the gap in technology , that is, at some... moment the united states, and western technologies in general, will become unnecessary to china, and this will happen in five, maybe 7 years there, at this moment they are trying to put pressure on china in every possible way, that’s why this the question is not, roughly speaking, calling china names there

dictators, and the question is that the united states understands that it is losing the race so that it can be won, for example, by reducing spending, reducing spending on supporting some countries. alexey, from your point of view, why is interfering in all points of space perceived as so mandatory in the united states, even regardless of the cost? and in my opinion, this is a feeling of deep responsibility for the fate of the world, no matter how loud it sounds, in fact it’s not bad to feel responsibility, it’s just a question of how it’s all about regulating everything, because china, for example, does it simply, it finances the construction of roads, infrastructure, and so on. the usa and china work with any government

that exists, even if it is not very nice, the usa has a different story, the world must be homogeneous, monotonous, it must obey certain rules of the game, so give up the fact that peace can be, the idea that the world can be more diverse than it seems, this is very difficult, after all, for more than 200 years the country was formed according to the principle of uniformity, this is very, this it is impossible to rebuild, unfortunately, until there is... a civilizational collapse, a serious blow, and the thinking, you know, the sense of responsibility does not change, in fact this is very good, this is especially good for a great power and even in many ways natural, which worries me , this is that in addition to a sense of responsibility, there is also, well, if you want, messianic.

which they use, looking at everything, and this becomes a guide to action , they begin to deliver, as you know, serious blows, including military blows, but we’ll talk about this after advertising, we leave for advertising, we will return in just a few minutes, this is a wild feeling, crowds of lonely people, of course, fluttering.

world, then they no longer need the previous system of international relations that emerged as a result of the second world war, they are not satisfied with it, because the balance in the world has changed, that’s all, we need to start rebuilding the international legal order for ourselves, what do i mean , well, the events in iraq, for example, were still done there without the sanctions of the un security council, in the same syria.

well, it is absolutely obvious that this is exactly how it is, because when we talk about double standards, this is not a figure of speech, this is how it is, because it means that there is the right of the strong and the right of everyone else, in fact, the united states has already many years ago they began to destroy the balance of power that had developed after the creation of the un, when it really regulated many many situations, look, here is another major power close to me, china. since 1979, china has not developed a single war, not a single clash, and in 1979 this the vietnamese conflict, and then there was a certain explanation, cambodia, which means that china began to defend cambodia, but no matter how much china was blamed, it did not

start a war, who started the war, well, the president says he directly listed the main conflicts, it is important why this is happening, because in my opinion or... let's look at the political statements of the united states, it seems that the world consists of children who are not, who must be supervised all the time, otherwise they will either hurt their neighbor or hurt themselves, that's why from time to time time they either need to be pulled apart or pitted against each other, this is the attitude towards the world as an immature political subject, it exists almost everywhere in the usa, and hence the understanding that...

with some kind of ambitions, and such, for example, countries in there are quite a lot of asia, they can do the same thing, but it was impossible to open pandora’s box, the usa was the first to open it, that’s for sure, you know, if you look at the american history of the last century, then in general i don’t know a single president who to one degree or another would disagree with ronald reagan, who spoke of america as a shining castle on... a hill, but if you want, it is also like communism, the bright future of all humanity, and as they said at that time in the soviet union, the ideology was that how can you put doubt that the soviet union has the right and even

the duty, correctly, to help this kind of development of the world, the international proletariat is always right, and so the united states has this... our mission is to rule the world, but he emphasized that this is a divine mission, what if we abandon it, the united states will fall apart, disintegrate and there will be no

united united states, and in continuation of what my colleagues said, i would like to say that the united states and the leadership, the current, current president. previous ones, they somehow missed the moment when the children you were talking about grew up, grew up, they already had their own sense of the world, their own worldview, not only china, you talk about this in your article, i talk about this in mine article, you look at burns, the director of the cia, touches on a huge complex of issues, but only russia and china are present there, and the middle east is barely mentioned. there is no one else, yes, melkom talks about the countries of the south, everything for him for america still remains the same. uh, ideology, that idea of ​​the world that was 20 years ago, 30 years ago, under these presidents that dmitry spoke about,

so now this is such a surprise for russia, why such a harsh assessment of everything we do, well, this is, first, of course, contradicts the interests of the united states, and secondly, they did not expect that russia would still follow the path full acquisition of sovereignty, complete, not in vain putin. our president emphasizes this, one of the tasks of everything that is happening is complete sovereignty, so now biden, not at a very young age, has to sort out what has been lost over the years, i understand, but it seems to me, dmitry, that i still understand no, it still remains in our heads, like such a dogma, we are the bosses, these are the subordinates, we save the world, they... can often spoil this world, and the united states will have a very hard time now, very hard now to get out of this situation.

you know, i want to look at this problem from a slightly different angle, of course, the hegemonic americans got used to leading after the collapse of the soviet union, but this narrative, the fact that russia’s aggression in ukraine was not provoked, it of course lost all meaning, because when. .. a special military operation began when our troops began to advance from kiev to kharkov, they began to capture, so to speak, some strong points, ukrainian headquarters, they began to find documents that ukraine was preparing to launch an operation to liberate donbass somewhere at the turn of may-june, but naturally no one believed it, everyone said that these were russian fakes, so to speak , all this... has nothing to do with it, so to speak to reality, but when the new york times had already written an article about how the cia, and

there not only the cia, but also the department of defense, the nsa, because they were already talking about the centers of radio-radio intelligence, what they were doing, what the american intelligence services were doing in russia -ukrainian border, they prepared the commandos, they prepared, so to speak, they created terrorist centers.

they started singing this song that that’s it, guys , no more, so to speak, treaties , no more arms control, because we are partners, a little more strategically there, and then allies, so forget it, and what they said, so to speak, on the sidelines, that guys, enough is enough, we are the only superpower, all these treaties are in favor of the weak, we don’t want to conclude treaties, do you want to develop your own nuclear tria there? god help you, you have no money, the economy is you are, so to speak, in the pen, so we’ll see what you can do, but if you

give us a free hand, then we, as trump later said, that he has money like a fool ’s candy wrappers, and he can rivet so many warheads that it doesn’t seem like much, they began to destroy these treaties, saying that russia can no longer be taken into account, so to speak , or not, they want... us, she is at war, us tanks are driving through the territory

of the russian federation, this is bad. they don't just drive, they drive until a certain moment, and then they burn because we we destroy them, and we will continue to destroy them, and if american planes fly over our territory, i have no doubt that our valiant military will also make sure that these planes burn and fall. it was said very strongly. but also with the clarity and caution inherent in dmitry peskov, the caution is that, general buzhinsky, peskov very clearly explained that if the americans do this, striking at russian territory, then there may be the most decisive

countermeasures on russian territory, and well certainly. on the territory of ukraine, but so far , as i understand it, the presidential press secretary is not ready to go beyond the ukrainian conflict, and does not talk about the possibility of any counterattacks on the territory of those countries that, as he himself said, are actually at war with russia.