they are not involved in the guardianship authorities. those families in which your children will live much better than with you. and you deal with your miserable life. you yourself have chosen it. it's hard because i'm always hungry i don't feel full. what were you fed as a child? what are you as straight as yeast pies? well, what she cooks, then she ate all this, i eat it from behind, i can’t on weekends. even more to eat already two eggs were four sausages two sandwiches and coffee stewed the chicken in the oven by almost 100 kg.

good afternoon live big game tonight the kiev regime tried with two drones to strike at the kremlin both drones were disabled by radar warfare systems from their explosions and shrapnel no one glory. god did not suffer no, as well as material damage, the kremlin called these actions of the kiev regime a planned terrorist act and an attempt on the president of russia and stated that russia reserves the right. uh, retaliate where and when it sees fit to say that the president's schedule russia and plans to hold a victory parade on red square. on may 9, the terrorist attacks have not changed, in general they have already become a hallmark of the kiev regime, which is less and less like the state and more and more like a terrorist organization only today, by the way, the fsb

arrested agents of the main intelligence directorate of the ministry of defense of ukraine who were planning a series of terrorist attacks in crimea, including against the leadership republic of a today and on the eve of e terrorists of the kiev regime have already made the second in the last 3 days, undermining the railway tracks in bryansk moreover, on the eve of the minister of defense of ukraine reznikov said that he would not be surprised if a serious man-made disaster occurs in russia, which will require the immediate attention of the government of the accumulation of resources, including soldiers, for example, according to the rating, this disaster can occur at a power plant at a hydroelectric power plant or focus on a nuclear power plant. that is, we have already been closed - openly threatened with nuclear terrorism from kiev. alexei petrovich, i want to ask you, don't you think that blows on the kremlin and these are reznikov's statements about possible man-made disasters. it’s not just, let’s say, such passing acts of terrorism, but their reaching a qualitatively new

level, which probably requires a qualitatively new approach and can be not only in relation to the kiev regime itself and its leadership, but their curators back any terrorist acts. yes, it is planned , especially if we are talking about such complex operations that are observed, for example, in moscow, we observed even on approach. they say a drone was also shot down in moscow, but this suggests that, of course, terrorism has moved to a new one. uh, a phase of state terrorism. can you say that? here and uh, this kind of method is resorted to only when, say, they cannot win the main phase of the hostilities that are now taking place in the zone of a special military operation, they cannot, they cannot, but something needs to be reported earlier. it has always worked. something happened there, the whole world was buzzing about it, so they think that just for this they will praise and so on, but, uh, the owners demand something else. they demand a counter-offensive, and they must

carry it out, but terrorist acts. yes, it’s clear that the special services worked with this, too. and not only ukraine. i think that there are other special services there, too. i think that the investigation will sort it out, so it was. it is said that we will make a decision, when we need it and where we need it, so let them wait. well, i completely agree with your idea that the transition to the practice of terrorism, especially against heads of state. it's a sign of weakness let me remind you that hitler is german. especially carefully and actively they tried to carry out terrorist attacks against joseph stalin when they were already suffering a catastrophic defeat. i think we are seeing a roughly similar picture here, but today volodymyr zelensky is in helsinki, where he is holding talks with finnish president sauli or st, then he will have talks with the heads of state of the nordic countries, i emphasize in helsinki, not in copenhagen, not in oslo, in helsinki yes finland for 75 years it was believed that constructive relations with russia in its

interests, but now, apparently, he is currying favor with nato, so to speak, justifies his entry into the north atlantic alliance, and then, uh, zelensky will go to berlin and on may 13, his first trip to germany will take place since last february, he will hold talks from scholz and with president steinmeier , and after berlin will go to the city of ahin ahin is the ancient capital. e, the so-called sacred of the roman empire, yes, which was created by charles- e charlemagne sherman the unification of europe, that is, zelensky united europe well, ivan vasilievich must be assumed that the unification of europe is not only on an anti-russian basis, but also on the basis of terrorism against russia

. -some unification that europe should be something united, it lives lives for a long time lives for centuries, but there were examples of different unification of europe and for example, hitler also united europe but, probably, hardly someone counts. what this is what this is some example. ah, an example of a union. although, in general, now europe is uniting in many ways. uh, just as it was before the uh of the second world war and during the second world war it was united against the e-soviet against the soviet union and unfortunately in the european one. stories, there are examples of the unification of europe, er, the force of arms, forcibly actually enslaving. e peoples. and this is the same charlemagne. this is napoleon. then it’s

actually, hitler but this is some kind of hidden european dream, and mirny association. it was embodied in the second half of the 20th century, but it collapsed, it turned out that behind all this beautiful philosophy behind e, rhetoric, philosophical and political reality. that is, the one that these unifying europes dreamed of did not arise. here, this sign collapsed, and there is still the same evil forceful grin, i want to emphasize that such a forceful unification of europe is possible only when europe simultaneously finds an external enemy and finds someone to rob outside, or begins to conquer colonies and rob them or find an enemy. in the east, and it’s going, uh, it’s going to him, it was like that with napoleon, it was like that from hitler, so what’s zelensky.

uh, giving this award confirms that european political thought has reached a dead end and is turning to the worst historical examples . absolutely. yes, this is a very strong symbol of how the european union has changed, and i agree with you that the facade has fallen? that is, it is not that the european union has fundamentally changed, but just a screen, but it was the essence of the association against that that collapsed and was exposed. i would uh i think you're right. although there is such an element. what is it that zelensky is doing now, until quite recently, the europeans themselves considered horror a nightmare. and as long as it doesn't happen. that 's what they deceived themselves, and now they have torn off the masks or they just turned out to be completely their own after, uh, the second world war, political philosophical projects bankrupt. nothing worked out for them, and they again grabbed the american boot, kissed him and prayed to him.

well, let's now talk about what is happening on the fronts of the special operation. eh, the future is still determined in many ways europe and maybe europe, following the results of this special operation, will be different . this is an rt war correspondent who has just returned from under e marinka and vlad sergeevich good afternoon. please. tell us what you saw here marinka yes studios good afternoon about the awards of horrors and nightmares about what you said, well, just the same yesterday with the fighters we were talking about it, because, in ukraine, there was a petition where people created this petition after a certain number of votes, that is, zelensky must see and sign that it has been entered. and the order of bandera, this order caused a resonance. dmitry anatolyevich medvedev said the guys were just, uh, indignant in outraged, because

, of course, this is absolutely insanity. uh, pure water, it turns out the order of bandera for military personnel, who are still some. as a matter of fact, they studied, studied, read and knew bandera as a completely opposite hero. and accordingly, it concerns the horrors of how things have changed. so we were not from under the little one. we already said, uh building high-rise buildings - it's uh the military says it's officially a multistory building. we have a small all passed, exclusively private sector. uh, downtown . uh, they discovered stella well, like stella, a pillar 30 m high, on which the camera stood today, this camera, uh , they just showed it back, therefore, they simply didn’t have time physically yet, and all the material was processed at a height of 37 m chamber from which was stretched into the table. that which was stretched out,

respectively, the cord down and the enemy could just watch the city center. marinka, the movement, which began at the beginning, was immediately knocked down and discovered, as we understand it, june was not possible, but uh, as we progressed, the whole thing, of course, went with us e went with us easier and pulls it up. i am dragging out, as far as the counteroffensive is concerned , of course, the enemy forces and equipment are pulling up. the fact is that the weather was not very good for 3 whole days. and now it's just cleared up, as we can see behind me, but the road. eh, roads are roads. we don't recover that quickly. and this, of course, it complicates. strictly speaking, the advance and, in addition to everything, a counterattack along the entire front or not, that is, such a large-scale counteroffensive. uh, probably won't, because close the front line of the order. uh, hmm, about 1,500 kilometers, that's very difficult, so there will definitely be some specific directions. where it will be struck, and

the enemy will be a tile of delivering some kind of blow, but the fact is that our fighters did not have the same data about this counter entry in advance, so the parents of the line buildings are coming. they are prepared. therefore, we will wait. yes, thanks a lot to the power of sergeyevich. i completely agree with you and thank you for mentioning the order. bandera it seems to me, uh, to give out the charlemagne prize to the one who issues the order of bandera, this means recognizing bandera as a symbol and, uh, a hero, of that united europe that exists today once again thank you very much vlad sergeevich take care of yourself. and now let's talk about what is generally happening on the fronts of the special operation and we have direct communication with our traditional military observer boris alexandrovich rozhin boris alexandrovich good afternoon good afternoon to you. yes, again, against the backdrop of the problem with the thaw, that is, the inevitable expectation, and the intensification

of hostilities, while our offensive operations in the donbass continue , of course, attention is riveted to artyom, where it remains to squeeze the enemy quite a bit on the western outskirts, where he leans back against a block of high-rise buildings. well, here, too , our troops are gradually flowing around it through the uh north through the private sector and gradually are approaching with their high-rise buildings. that is, already about 2.5 km², there the malysh will be cleaned before then the question of further operations west of artemovsk, where the battles near krasny and khromov continue , the enemy is suffering very heavy losses, again estimated 400-56 per day. that is , this information is confirmed by western sources, so the cost of this operation for ukraine has already turned out to be quite large in terms of people and in the sense that it disrupted certain deadlines. e, which the west was counting on in ukraine, waiting for the spring offensive vsu. as for other sectors, in the seversk direction of our troops or the fighting in the area of ​​​​the cornflower and cheerful

, fighting also continued in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bthe disputed and belogorovka, which means that our troops are in the augiev direction. uh, fought to the west and north of krasnohorovka. here the enemy is trying to counterattack, but again, the local prevents this. well, our troops are repelling these attacks and are trying to move forward themselves, and in a small one, the fighting was already going on in the western parts of the city in the private sector, and in observation. the direction, as in the zaporizhzhya region, has been going on without changes over the past 24 hours, positional battles in the svatov direction of our troops owned the initiative and attacked the nevsky direction in the makeevka area and also in the lesnoy massif west of the flint. well, in the kupyansk direction, there were battles in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bthe two-river and senkovka. the front as a whole froze in anticipation, but this does not prevent our troops from delivering powerful missile strikes in a number of regions of ukraine , ammunition depots, fuel depots, and accumulations of equipment. uh, that is those these beats go in zaporozhye dnepropetrovsk kherson sumy kharkiv region, as well as

the kramatorsk glomeration. thank you very much boris alexandrovich keep us informed. i completely agree with you that the front has stopped waiting a and the west is more and more frankly telling the kiev regime that it's time. literally every day there is a statement that the west has already done everything for ukraine. that's all it takes for a successful offensive to do its own job. and now, in fact, their, uh, part of it is time to go on a big offensive. i was just talking about this yesterday. uh, john kirby is a spokesman for the national security council. and yesterday a large and very interesting interview was published. the mile mark of the chief of the joint chiefs of staff in the top american magazine face and he also talks about the same thing. look, i don't want to talk about the details of the offensive. i can only say that over the past few months , the ukrainians have been asking us for military assistance

in training, supplying and equipping troops. and i say we are i mean nato of all european partners. we did it. i would say that the ukrainians have the opportunity to attack right now. well, at the same time, the western american liberal publication cnn, which is very loyal to the white house, emphasizes that, despite this imaginary readiness, there are very serious problems with which ukrainians ukrainian armed forces. it is not necessary to collide in this counter-offensive, listen ukraine says its preparations for the spring counter-offensive are almost complete, when it starts probably in the south it will become turning point in the conflict, but the russians had about 6 months to prepare the ground and build a complex defense system, breaking through it will be a serious test, satellite images and viewed by cnn and other news outlets show the extent of the russian defense that they have built in a number of areas in southern ukraine this and layers of

anti-tank slaves, and obstacles, namely fields and trenches. the task for ukrainians will be to bypass or overcome such obstacles with lightning speed, creating momentum that will lead to a weakening of russian command and control, ukrainian officials acknowledged, in contrast to the sudden capture of most of the kharkiv region in september last year. now they may not have enough elements of surprise in any major counter-offensive, the russians retain a clear advantage in the air and this can be decisive in slowing down the advance of ukraine aleksey petrovich so i would probably add the insufficiency of the ukrainian air defense system to your forecast if russia has it. i think that they will still be forced to advance, because here are the emergency ramsteins that passed. they just concerned the saturation of the ukrainian grouping of the missing armored vehicles. what jens tolkien was talking about when he called

specific numbers and air defense systems a, k. in addition , europe and the united states accepted two e unscheduled military aid packages that they deployed in order to deliver e ammunition, including e, ammunition, well, out of control reactive systems. here are the ones that the americans used in the fifties, but this suggests that they are trying to create the maximum fire cover. well, that is , to provide advancing troops and cover for air defense systems, but the fact is that the longer ukraine does not advance, the more likely we are to discover the accumulation of ammunition troops. so, to inflict precision strikes on them, and what happened last week, pavlograd and other directions there, they say that our work is effective and, uh, ukraine, of course, wants say, here we just blew up a warehouse. give us more supplies to them they said everything,

because after all. uh, of course, the west will continue to supply ukraine. well, they were given a lot of weapons for a specific offensive operation. it can go, yes, in different directions the holiday will achieve results or not, but uh, whether they want it or not, the surprise factor, with all their desire, which are created even in the information space, is also connected with the events in moscow it does not cancel the offensive. they will go on the attack. do they want or not, so we are ready to accept them. meet well, as they said to bury, as they say on the battle line, it must be said that the western military leaders themselves do not particularly believe in the success of this ukrainian offensive. this is evidenced by the leaked, e and caught in the network. the x-files about the same openly says mark miele here. listen to the forecast he gives to this counteroffensive. i really believe that the probability of achieving russia or ukraine and their political goals, and the war is a policy

using exclusively military means extremely low, to be honest, hardly anyone will succeed this year. well, the secretary of state of the united states, tony bruynkin, said that, in principle, ukraine and the west had already won, that russia had already lost only because ukraine remained as an anti-russian pro-western state, therefore letting it go. she is now directly going on the offensive, and then ivan vasilyevich is negotiating. how do you assess such a policy? i think that you, dmitry vyacheslavovich, are essentially right that, uh, the task of uh is some kind of major military success before kyiv regime, most likely not put. well, if you're lucky, if, of course, they break through wonderfully, but the task is set. uh, forcing russia to ah is unprofitable. for her agreements. and i think that this is possible, if figuratively speaking, the main thing, if

indeed, a year ago, it was about the fact that they wanted to smash russia to shreds with economic sanctions, military pressure, and so on. now the task is rather to bring russia to its knees politically, in order to demonstrate to everyone that this is our vassal, we, of course, supplied, but this is just our vassal and he was able to oppose something against russia as a great power, so that russia went for something that at least did not want to go, so the main elements are to impose something. i think that you are correctly translating this into the category that they are trying, and how would the last one survive from kiev jim in order to force russia to retreat from

the goals of a special military special military operation. i would say that russia, of course, will not do the united the states really do not hide that it does not matter to them where the new border will pass to them. the main thing is that the kiev regime should be preserved as anti-russia on steroids, as i call it and uh, pumped up with weapons, fiercely integrated with the west, anti-russian alive. yes. e, located on western life support, ideally not yet completely, cut off the black sea and russia of course, this will not go. and yes, and in this there is, you know, such an element that they do not even pursue their own interests. yes. in this case, the only interest is to harm russia here just hurt russia no self- interest. not europeans, nor americans, nor , moreover, the kiev regime does not pursue communications. i want to draw your attention to what these nato officials say all the time. why are they shwe in finland , they are dragging the same thing so quickly. but you didn't want to. uh, to be within your boundaries. and

here we dragged it, that is, it is absolutely. here. uh, such a stupid policy. here is something to shout to counter. and this is to show a hybrid war, actually and uh, just an entry into finland and the likely entry of sweden into nato, as well as many other actions, prove that the goal of the west is a long-term hybrid war with russia . by the way, yesterday at this table we discussed that finland is already preparing an agreement with the united states on the deployment of american military bases on the territory of finland, too, just as an argument in favor of what you have just said, we will interrupt for a short advertisement, then we will continue. this charming star boy tucker carlson is paired with a russian finisher then it never occurred to anyone to call carlson an agent of the kremlin, but now there are such memes dancing to the russian tune that

russia exploded nord stream. i asked, why would they suddenly do this, they immediately exclaimed about you being an accomplice of putin is it possible that the american establishment decided to shut up the tv presenter who was cutting the truth of the uterus. they want the war to continue. why is it so? because they are getting richer here are such ideas, my dear carlson, what have you never dreamed of? so go while you walk, he does not go in step with the current white house, but he was accused of being a traitor to america they work for a small group of people who are actually you and run the world the work is not over yet. more precisely, it is completed for carlson's attacker, the audience is getting too big to be drowned by carlson, who lives without a roof

. compare will help fill out just one loan application and get approved for the best conditions, and the largest banks to compare. if the loan is in the application. compare subscription mix from tele2 unique offer. collect it yourself and pay only for the selected content, and this has no analogues. even not our tele2 other rules will be able to purchase an instant subscription. it’s filmed to chop, old fools, we know how, but i haven’t tried the meat-cutting serverat from our farmers, we take meat, chop it pastorally , add fragrant spices, and simmer the gray fret in the oven for an owl of juiciness and taste hmm the old farm is really tasty, coupon two two twister deluxe for 149 rubles. in the kfc app, living with prostatitis is hard even harder longidaza helps to reduce inflammation and

break down fibrosis points longidasa is simply against fibrosis in prostatitis thank you album in which an austrian equipment brand was born 50 years ago equipment norms, born in the alps pay less. operator deferral of the first payment up to 90 days to issue a cash loan and receive money right now tinkoff he is such a one movie one tv

presents lovely ladies attention, before you is still a living legend. enough

cinema 1tv presents what your name is tatyana , look, they will let you wash, this village girl did not know how and is ill-mannered. in russia sukharev antonov to block all memories disable emotions.

now nothing can stand in the way of successful execution on the air the big game is the most discussed topic, in fact, the only topic discussed in the united states today is, of course, the threat of default, especially after may 1 janet yelen, secretary of the treasury, wrote a letter on the rules letter to the speaker of the house representatives to kevin mccarthy that time x date date x will be as early as june 1st, when the united states will no longer be able to serve. uh, actually your debt, and that's it, either before that the ceiling of the state debt will be, uh, increased, or the default rates are very high. here. listen to how these rates and uh, the height of these rates are described by former us secretary of state hillary clean today the competition between democracies and autocracies has become more intense the struggle for the state ceiling is undermining america's credibility and

questioning the supremacy of the dollar topics. playing right into the hands of pin and vladimir putin, a default on our debt could cost the united states 7 million jobs, and our economy will fall into a deep recession, even if we do not take into account this economic carnage, feuding over the national debt ceiling reinforces the autocrats' claim about that american democracy is in decline and cannot be trusted. but that 's not all , playing with the national debt ceiling is jeopardizing the prominence of the dollar in the global economy and the power it gives to the united states. central location the us dollar is given far-reaching influence. this allows us to impose devastating sanctions like the ones we used against iran and the ones i negotiated under the obama administration and the ones the biden administration had in response to russia's invasion of ukraine if congress continues to flirt with default calls to

topple the dollar. as the world's reserve currency will sound much. louder and more. in beijing and moscow, countries around the world will want to play it safe. well, after this letter, uh, jana kellin, sort of like, uh the biden administration has begun to show a little more willingness to negotiate with the republican house of representatives. biden is scheduled to meet with democratic and republican leaders in both houses of congress for may 9, but as politics magazine points out, while both sides have dug in and show no inclination to compromise, biden, still insists that congress should automatically, a raise the ceiling of the state long without any conditions, and kevin mccarthy and the republicans in the house of representatives are already 26 april, let me remind you, they adopted a bill stating that yes, they are ready to raise the ceiling by one and a half trillion dollars, but in exchange for the fact

that federal budget spending will increase by no more than one. the pentagon's cent and budget should return to the level of 22 years, that is, a de facto reduction in the defense budget and a significant cut in social spending vladimir sergeevich, how do you predict the situation? is it possible to imagine a default in the united states , it is quite possible, because the united states of america really approached the problem, when or to the situation when the question is not worth it or will not be the question is when and here what happens to us is one of those situations that really, for which we need to go to jail, because it can really lead to what affected clinton. but in this case, it's easy to quote, because this is the opinion of her, and of economists, that if the united states of america does not sort of solve this problem today, then the economy may fall into recession. and the american economy, which has fallen into recession, will pull with it,

possibly the western economy. it is also necessary to understand the data that you have given very much. shows, in fact, they say, even without these problems, america is currently heading into recession, the rate of economic growth is declining, the forecast of american economists, for the second quarter, the growth rate is practically zero. but, and then the completely incomprehensible situation of the tadrama that unfolds, it falls into two very different things. so to speak, or rather, in two two. eh, two. uh, action is the first thing to do? and secondly, who is to blame here to date the situation has developed, so while being played first so to speak, the scene is the first e. hmm so the first action. first scene. who is to blame today will determine the outcome of what to do. now, when what to do, then, they will all get together and will already really think what to do? because then there is a problem. what is the united state of america to do well, what is hillary clinton pushing them to do as a former secretary of state really, while

really this is the problem not a position, no, no it is precisely aimed at today in the political consciousness of america to approve the principle who is to blame biden, biden does not want to negotiate for one simple reason. uh, oddly enough, he really wants to be the president, so to speak, for whom it's not a problem. it’s not a problem to write here, moreover, this e is connected with his experience of the eleventh year. uh, when obama then participated in negotiations with the republicans, both biden and, according to the americans, took part in them. here is the fact that the president agreed to participate in these negotiations. this led to the republicans imposed on him more favorable conditions than those that the administration wanted to receive, and in this case, obama and in this case what babaydan constantly says, if i enter into negotiations, then they will take me hostage, and this

cannot be allowed, that he can be and not far from the truth right? biden took the composition, and here it is all or nothing, and here the question arises well, and what will they agree on, and here i want to say one very interesting thing. here is the bill that was adopted, so to speak, by the republicans. this is a trap. you see, therefore , negotiations cannot be negotiated, because it roughly resembles a trap, but you know this kind of molasses or this kind of tape where, for example, insects sit. now, if you just start to conduct these negotiations, you will have either a tail, a head, or one leg, or a left leg. that's all right now, they are trying to drag the administration into these negotiations. if the administration starts these negotiations on these 320-page paragraphs, it is considered that it has lost for sure, and then the fifth corner. and the last thing i want to say is that the fate of these negotiations today decides, perhaps, not only the situation in ukraine, but the outcome

of the presidential elections. that's why today these stakes are so great all the way with you. agree and indeed. this one and a half trillion increase in the public debt, which is provided for by the bill of the house of representatives, means that this money, this ceiling, will end again next summer. that is, just before the presidential elections, and in this situation there is a sideance. will again be in a hopeless situations right before the elections. he will again have to conduct extremely difficult negotiations with the republicans to cut social spending. and naturally. this will have an extremely negative impact on his electoral results. so yes, i completely agree that this is a trap but you see, the republicans, too, so to say, er proud. yes, they have already legally accepted the project . kevin mccarthy made a deal with the so-called freedom corps with the right-wing republicans and, against this background, to risk his seat as a speaker, to risk at all here republican republican majority

in the house of representatives. this is also not very easy and therefore the situation is hopeless. i agree with you here. who is to blame then you are already shaking up the entire leadership of the house of representatives, and this will cross out the election results for 22 years. this is also a bath. here is oleg borisovich, and hillary clinton said that one of the likely consequences is not even that defaults are defaults, but the delay in this whole discussion is de-dalorization , a gradual departure from the dollar, your forecast for this account. well, she's right, because she's actually here, she might feel differently about that quote. but in principle, she said, on the whole, it is correct, but because the more we see, yes, these are the problems that are being discussed, the more we see internal , these endless squabbles, we see a weakening president in the broadest sense of the word. we see how they cannot agree among themselves. and this question was absolutely rightly said. and what will happen in the next elections, and who will the new trump choose? now and so on. this is a very difficult question and it directly depends on how the united states will perceive the outside

world. and this is the key, because we constantly say yes in this studio. domination is not on the states a is based on the dollar, but not to a lesser extent it is based on the image of the united states and they are in every possible way supporting the image of an infallible democracy, a city on a hill and so on, but when it is based on trust quite right, and why, in fact, they continue invest in us securities paper. it's a matter of trust. it's not just a matter of what they pay them and whether they raise or not. threshold a long but question trust in america in general, as an idea, as such, and when we see it, it collapses before our eyes. naturally. this affects the entire global economy. and uh, rightly so, in this case, uh, clinton uh, because more and more countries are turning to other tools. china has reduced its purchases of americans. well, russia actually abandoned them and other countries. and of course, and as far as hmm well forgive this expression, this american democracy is rotting. you understand them , new healthier forms appear. here, and one of the main obstacles to

de-dalarization is usually called the absence. alternatives, well, dollars are so convenient, they are universal and everyone uses them, and so on, but as joseph salem, former special adviser to president trump and member of the white house council of economic advisers, is such a global alternative, it is not a regional one, but a global alternative to dollars. it may well appear. and you know what it is according to him is the common currency. brix well, listen. such a currency could indeed displace the us dollar as the reserve currency of the brix members, as opposed to past options such as the digital yuan - this hypothetical currency has real potential to at least shake the dominance of the dollar. let's call the hypothetical currency brik if the brix parties used only this currency for international trade. they would remove the obstacles that are now hindering their efforts. avoid dollar hegemony, these efforts.

currently often taking the form of bilateral agreements to denominate trade outside dollar currencies such as the yuan, which is currently the main trading currency between china and russia, the obstacle is that russia is unwilling to receive the rest of its imports from china in this way after bilateral transactions between the two countries and russia tends to seek to place proceeds in dollar assets in order to buy part of its improvised rest of the world, which still trades in dollars. however , with china and russia only brik , russia would not need to transfer income from bilateral trade. in dollars, after all , russia will use briks, not dollars , to purchase steel imports. is it realistic to imagine that briks uses only brik da oleg borisovich for trading very briefly. you agree with this, and agree with the analysis as a whole, but not soon, not immediately. more precisely , not that it will not be soon, not immediately, because, of course, the transition to some such. let's artificial currency. brix , of course, will probably not happen in the near future , most likely, there will be some transitional moment between the dollar, apparently, there will be, maybe some kind of digital currency or several groups

of currencies. well, sooner or later, i'm sure. yes, we will move on to some new currency, maybe within the framework of the brix there may be some new organization for you, which will appear by then, because it is simply inevitable, because the dollar is no longer pulling the dollar. can't, uh, supply all the world's trade anymore investment as it was once? well, we see tectonic shifts happening. they occur not only in the world of finance, but also in the world of geopolitics. here in the same interview with eforena fs, which we already talked about today, mark miles. l is a very interesting analysis of relations in the triangle of the usa china russia and according to mark of a mile we are now witnessing a three-pole world. there are only three centers of power. this is actually the united states , china and russia, listen to this part of his interview. unlike during the cold war , there are now three great powers in the world, the united states china and russia they all have significant internal potential, which lies in the population, the economy

and, of course, the military, and they all have a significant and nuclear arsenal, the united states is the most powerful by any measure, but on the other hand, russia and china also strong enough it is not in the us interest to see russia china form a strategic military alliance, and we must do everything in our power to prevent this from happening. today. we live in a three polar world three - this is more difficult than two and these relationships are very difficult to manage, so we want to make sure that russia and the chinese form one. geostrategic political military alliance against the united states there are some signs that china russia are moving closer we will see where this leads, but we do not yet see a full-fledged truly, lasting and sustainable geopolitical alliance between china and russia. could this happen in the future? we should be afraid of this. we have to do everything we can to make sure that doesn't happen, well contradictory enough for statement on the one hand. he sends hello e to everyone in the west. who says that

russia has weakened and suffered a strategic defeat. can it be written off at all? yes , mark mile says that apart from the usa , there are no more china and russia in the world, but comparable centers of power. yes, but on the other hand, he, but repeats with a refrain that it is not in the interests of the united states to allow a strategic alliance between china and russia regarding china, how would uh? explain this is a paradox. e, dmitry slavoch. you very uh, softly said the contradiction, of course, you can say more harshly that this is schizophrenia says, here are the three main ones, but we are the main ones. yes, they really strengthens, too, that is, of course, that's even. and this main american military man must definitely bend before his own liberal establishment. yes, otherwise, even this general has so many stars, and everything is afraid

of his uh ideologists, who will give him a hat. and if in fact, then you are completely right, even in those rules that set, well, logical rules, rules , intellectual rules that americans set themselves. now they don't ask the world anything, but they ask themselves. here is their notorious triangle. yes, the usa, russia, china, and whoever wants to win must have better relations with the other two than they have with each other, even according to this old logic of theirs, they lose insanely, because indeed russia and china bring miles closer together. maybe you can't see it for miles. maybe squint can take? shadow glasses to see it better, really. it knows perfectly well, it simply cannot admit it, because it should have been recognized then. you know, we failed according to our own rules, but

i would like to emphasize that from my point of view , this is not even the point, but the fact that all this logic is flawed in general, it seems to the americans that they have climbed onto the world pedestal, someone throws them out. here russia and china unite to throw them off the world pedestal. they used to have a fixed idea that wishing to overthrow america, russia and china will quarrel over who will be in charge and will not be able to overthrow america. now they say, oh no, apparently, they will not quarrel and throw us off the pedestal. the reality from my point of view is that no one wants to throw them off from anywhere , you want to be on a pedestal. stop. we simply bypass you and begin to live without you. this one, neither china nor russia, is obsessed with throwing off america, throw off this america that's what you did against america, mechanisms are simply being created. that's about it. just now

it was said how to live in a world without america america is toxic its financial political instruments are toxic, therefore russia and china create tools so that everyone who wants to live without america but this is how it turns out to be the worst for washington, they are ready for anything. but i just participated in this in america and was a leader, and it seems to me that such a perception of the policy of russia and china of the rest of the world is connected, but i would say with a coup d'état sin, or something of the american state or with two original sins it is commitment. seanism yes , the perception of itself as a god-chosen nation, which is simply obliged to rebuild everyone according to the only correct model, and secondly, this is a historical commitment to primacy, uh, the united states was the strongest. e players in their immediate environment perceive primacy as a synonym for security, if the primacy is violated, then the guard means a threat to national security. and those who dare to violate

the primacy, they must be destroyed. i uh, still said there was another one original sin. they could not even get along with the indigenous people of the land on which they landed from europe and destroyed the indians. could not live next to the indigenous people. here to destroy. this is also an element of this superiority. but this is also original sin. here, only we can’t get along with anyone next to us. this, unfortunately, the americans have, here, returning to the interview of a mile. there is also a very interesting point, it is dedicated to the risks of escalation, moreover, horizontal escalation. tion, that is, the risk of leakage ukraine, the military conflict in ukraine is at the level of a hot war for the russians, and according to mark, a mile is a risk and you need to be serious deal with the fact that you did not happen, listen i think that it is in the interests of everyone to prevent escalation russia does not want a war with nato or the united states, and nato and the united states do not want a war with russia , while the likelihood of an escalation

is quite real, wars are very emotional in them a lot, fear of pride of interest, as fukidit would tell us, every single day, we calculate our every step and every action on the part of the russians and analyze the possibility of escalation. every single day. why because the consequences of escalation are so severe and the consequences of an armed conflict between the united states and russia or anyone from nato and russia would be devastating for both sides. so it's in everyone's interest not to have them. now, if they calculate the risks of escalation every single day. probably they should exercise caution and autocracy of autocracy, and today , at a press conference, the sauna at the service station zelensky stated that he had no doubt that after the big offensive of ukraine, the west would give him a zap. the plane, although the sauli ninosnaya , immediately declared that no, they would not let him refuse. and alexey petrovich, in the context of the technical attacks that ukraine produces, moreover, bringing these

terrorist attacks to a qualitatively new level, what can you say about the risks of escalation. and now, does the united states really think every single day about how to prevent this very line of transition to a hot war, they really think, but not on that reason they don't want to, because they're not ready and talking about it, uh, many american analysts, including those who work for a well-known analytical structure like the corporate market, which clearly said that the continued escalation in ukraine at the rate weapons. e for the united states will end quite badly. it will pass. and to the fact that a regional conflict could turn into a continental conflict, so they advised everyone to get out of this conflict and dump it on the shoulders of the europeans. and do hybrids yourself operations against russia, by the way, terrorist attacks. they are just entering into this hybrid war that the collective west has been waging against us

for quite a long time. uh, it is considered that such a hybrid war. it reduces the risk of a retaliatory strike, because to prove that someone did it and well, this should be investigated, than a direct escalation due to the fact that you become supporters, well , a country of conflict, because it already says that ukraine is at war , for example, no one can turn their tongues only with their resources, because ukraine is completely depends on the supply of military weapons. e is completely dependent on military equipment , completely dependent on those specialists who arrive there either as instructors, or as mercenaries, and such a situation. she is rather shaky if e due to costs, because, for example, if to catch up with all the technique of expression. he has something in america - it's still logistics, and if you do something like a two-way move, that is, europe receives american equipment, and gets rid of its own, in principle, we are now observing this,

because he supply items and technique. so, the one that e. was recently in the arsenals. and in general, e was used as a weapon by the active parts of the countries of europe and the country of europe, in the words of the same petrunius, who is the minister of defense of the federal republic of germany, he says, the next thing that must be supplied even to the detriment of one's own security, because it is there that fate is decided in ukraine. it is clear that it is not the fate of ukraine that is being decided, and the same analysts from the corporate market said that territorial integrity is not, well, it’s not part of an interesting national security, the united states of america will fly for them so that this conflict does not end, then what the mile warns about is a global conflict with the use of nuclear weapons, if we look at their programs to modernize nuclear weapons to create a new updated air defense systems they do not have time. they need time. therefore

, the prolongation of the conflict in ukraine plays, including a plus, but despite the fact that the united states should not participate directly, therefore, now the united states is talking to the europeans. but you let's do it there. and we have another problem called china. well , i think the united states is increasingly realizing that it is losing this global confrontation. it seems to me that he is lying a million when he says that the united states is really not interested in escalation, but it is necessary that they soberly assess how the kiev regime is behaving through the prism of the risks of escalation today. now we'll snuggle up to a small ad, then we'll continue. the life of a man, what profession to choose? what kind of people to be friends with who to connect? for a lifetime, every decision affects your fate and the fate of your loved ones, but today your choice can affect

the fate of the country. protect your future and the future of your children. service number one in russia tele2 i found an unusual object this is a smartphone of a person of the 21st century.

now, when someone decides to steal your food at burger king, he will definitely burn himself from spicy burgers and spicy snacks. make anything spicy and try not to sleep at burger king at speed and be the fastest megaphone that feeling when you just got the money

which were needed right now tinkoff immediately. deferment of the first payment up to 90 days to issue a cash loan . they found the body of a woman, they say it is ours sitting for streams on the square, of course, turned to the left, it turns out. oh yes, it seems to be over . you should be happy, good afternoon, mr. fondyuk, military prosecutor's office. she's a nice girl, but

she just worked for me. after all, you understand that you are the main suspects , i order you both, and the existence of the fonberg, to forget him for any interrogations, is not called under the laws of wartime. remember the moment you realize what your mom thinks. cinema 1tv presents packing your bags, it's a joke. no, it's not a joke, come on. you

gave me the keys yourself, but this does not mean that you can come as to your home. i'm not going to jail because of this freak. it was necessary to bang him right there in the restaurant. so, if something was following my order, did you understand? on air, the big game the united states has taken a course not only on the economic and, above all, technological gap with china, but in fact on the curtailment of globalization in that the way it has existed for the last 40-50 years, the other day, jake sullivan , national security adviser to the president , delivered a keynote speech at the brookings institution and proclaimed, in fact, a new us foreign economic strategy that provides, firstly, reindustrialization. moreover, with the help

of, among other things, the injection of a large-scale injection of public money, and secondly, the switching of technological chains, especially on issues of high and military technologies from china to the united states itself and a. perhaps on their e, allies and like-minded people. here. hear what jake sullivan had to say about high tech. now america produces only about 10% of the semiconductors in the world, and production as a whole, especially when it comes to the most advanced microcircuits , is geographically concentrated elsewhere. this creates a critical economic risk and national security vulnerability. today, the united states produces only four percent video 13% mare zero percent nickel and zero percent graphite, necessary to meet the current demand for an electric vehicle, meanwhile more than 80% of critical minerals are processed by a single country in china

, clean energy supply chains risk being weaponized just like oil in the 1970s or natural gas in europe in 2022. well, here we are offered a new paradigm, more precisely, the denial of the old paradigm of interdependence. this is bad communication with china. this is bad. and the salivan calls, in fact, for a new course of franklin roosevelt only in the high-tech sphere vladimir sergeyevich, is the united states ready for a new course for a new high-tech course? uh, i understand roosevelt, so this is sullivan's speech to me, which is nothing but a continuation of the election campaign that is going on in the united states of america, this is not such a slogan that fits very well into biden's statement. let's finish the job. well, give us another 4 years , then we definitely solved the problems, which means you already see that what sally says is not enough, maybe it's different. how did

trump dissuade his time, it is absolutely necessary to return the pier with its production and capital and e, technological and jobs in the american economy. this is where it starts. most importantly, the biden administration at the beginning of the 21st year. well, it seems to have stood in the position of neo-liberal e its globalization, and then there are no many other things under the influence of inflation. she turned and said everything, let's return it all, let's do everything. in america let it now be american and so on biden's 22nd year devoted very large. uh, speaking of this topic, so to speak, but there is one problem if look at the us indexes of return, capital, technology and jobs, then for the last 2 years. they have gone into such a minus that there has never been, here it comes today, what hillary clinton said is the distrust of american capital and the american, maybe even the technological elite, in what is happening inside the united states of america, this is just a reaction to the policy of the biden administration, and

what is happening today for those firms that have already taken their production outside the united states of america, they are looking for opportunity to find others. uh, niches in the world economy from china, they don’t want to transfer from southeast asia from europe , we will transfer to africa latin america by the way, that is, american capital is really looking for niches the system of the world economy has already withdrawn its capital from the united states of america but all the talk session about all sorts of defaults, they don't inspire much optimism, because in any case, in terms of profits, the profits being made today outside the united states of america they are getting more than if they were in the united states states of america against the background of the administration's talk that it is ready to raise today , uh, the tax on american-style profits. well , you know, the best way to raise capital is to raise taxes on the profits

of american corporations. here's one that works domestically. well, the circle is closed. that is why today and already the problems that are happening in the united states of america are absolutely such an election must, well, in the expectation that you give us this mandate, maybe we will fulfill it for some time. well the election elections, but you correctly noted that the formation. a bipartisan consensus on the fact that china should be fenced off and that it is necessary to move on to reindustrialization and what is called now friends showing, that is, closing the chains of delivered value to like-minded allied countries, as it were, consolidating the collective west and closing off technological from garage . i would say the collective west from the rest of the world. and this naturally depends on the behavior of europe, and here, as bloomberg writes the fact that there are such renegades, as macron said, who seems to want to continue

to maintain constructive relations with china. still, most of the european common denominator tends to follow the format of the united states here. listen to what he writes. european countries are imposing new restrictions on chinese exports and investment, which is more in line with washington's strategy, countries such as germany, italy, following the example of the netherlands , are studying us measures to control exports and investments, according to public according to statements by numerous individuals familiar with the leaders' positions, such changes represent a major shift for a continent that has previously resisted us calls to cut economic ties. allies are discussing export controls with china tightening investment controls and expanding cooperation in the supply of critical materials goods, one of the goals is to restrict exports to

china of chemicals that are used to manufacture semiconductors. even italy, which maintains close ties with beijing, is looking for ways to limit the chinese company's influence on tire maker precious. to the largest shareholders, which she is well , they also write that italy is going to withdraw from the chinese belt and road project. uh, rome was the only capital of the seven countries that officially joined this chinese initiative. oleg borisovich here. do you agree with this assessment that europe will indeed be to its own detriment at the expense of its competitiveness. this is how to integrate into american politics, because from the inflation reduction act, uh, acts to reduce inflation are one of the main protectionist tools. the biden administration, it turns out, will not, of course. well, it's important to understand here that europe here, uh, doesn't operate on its own. yes, in this whole big game. here, yes, as our program is called europe, because what she staked on was performed. now russia is there something else will fall apart. and here we are, like

the good old days, we will get some colossal free resources there. and now we will lose. yes, therefore, europe found itself in such a subordinate position to the united states, so it was a subordinate position. and now there’s nothing left. let’s close how to act on orders from the united states . well, can anyone seriously think that italy germany france will really be at the expense of depth believe in this at the expense of your business your future well-being in it is not beneficial for future generations to break off relations with china. they understand this perfectly well , moreover, if we look not at the statement of politicians. here are the highest ones, and there, for example, on the statement of industrialists of large european entrepreneurs. there is a completely different rhetoric. is there rhetoric on the contrary? let's look for some way to trade with china to improve relations, but no, it's impossible, because this is some kind of created subordinate position of europe and the united states is pushing its back in every possible way. no swear from china no short circuit. here, i really liked your vyacheslavovich. she's such an illusion. here's to the fact that a certain new technological iron curtain yes, some kind of their e. well, i don't know,

the warsaw pact is not the best after all. yes, there was nothing wrong with him , yes, that is, there is some kind of garageing, yes it goes, well, yes, here you are ours and we will be friends with you. here in this sandbox. yes, don't you dare go there. and of course, this , in general, fits into the further strategy of such a thing. well, so maybe i'm degreasing europe yes, so that europe is just forever another 100 years. e was completely subordinate to, uh, the united states and became nothing more than just either a market for american goods, which is what the united states has been striving for for a very long time, or a supplier, please, here brains send us people send us, which, in fact, the united states successfully pretends in life. well, if with europe the united states, uh, although not in everything, but it turns out, but with countries outside the collective west, i would say not very well. sergey lavrov is flying to goa today. india is currently chairing the shanghai cooperation organization. tomorrow there, uh, there will be a ministerial meeting of the sco and

, here, vladimir sergeevich, the united states is now placing a very big stake on india in every possible way, so to speak, they are stroking it on the head and want, uh, to bring it closer against china against russia, but even in the united states, they write about that it is doomed to failure, because india does not want to join someone against someone and, most importantly, cut ties. uh, with someone for the united states, you agree with this. yes, i think this is absolutely true, because the policy of the last year and a half, which, in general , the united states of america, trying to india, is really closed in on itself , i propose, by the way, to say strategic cooperation in the field of defense. it is in general, how is it for you again? it turns out well not quite efficient, india is ready. it may be to participate in these projects, but for the sake of their own national interests. and here's something that doesn't work in washington. let's do this for our american gingerbread. you still let's build your foreign

policy and others and forget about other interests in other regions or in others in other directions. that's what the connection turns out to be, india behaves like this : our relations with russia are one thing. our relations with america are also the same with china and with other countries. here comes the multi-vector policy and proceed, and the americans, as always, would like to replace with their presence indeed all other countries, which is absolutely impossible in relation to india today, because the idea in general cannot develop economically, only focusing on the united states of america, even more so, i will say for india can only develop, focusing on africa, asia and the euro, even europe, the nose of the united states absolutely and some observers even called this policy of multi- accession, not not affiliation of the cold war model, but multi-affiliation, that is, really balanced cooperation with everyone. and according to bloomberg, russian oil deliveries to india in

april for the first time exceeded the total volume of oil supplies from saudi arabia and iraq , the spiegel aggregate indicates that over the past 3 months, russia has sold its oil to asian countries at prices. above the ceiling uh-huh, and an average of $ 73, and as bloomberg again writes in may. russia will resume the purchase of foreign currency for its gold and foreign exchange reserves, primarily in yuan, and oleg borisovich, that is , the russian economy is doing quite well in the current e situation. like uh, energy trends will appreciate. well, firstly, in general, absolutely right, indeed. russian economy shows not only not just a revival, but some general upward trend. yes, and as we have repeatedly said in this studio , i was asked this question by all these ceilings and other purely political history. she doesn't work when it comes to the real economy. and of course, if we talk about energy in particular, then, of course, russia is just that. well, of course, the most reliable supplier. here, before the explosion in

the northern streams, before all these, yes, the situation in russia is still 60 years old, when soviet soviet times. we were in the reliable supplier, never mind has violated its obligations. and the same, but correct. we have focused on asian markets and india china are well aware that we will be the same reliable supplier with ourselves, you can always agree on our prices. yes, not above the ceiling, but they are not prohibitively high, like me in the united states or in other regions that offer themselves as an alternative. and not even the same as in the middle east, plus the plants do not impose any political agenda. and this is very important and appreciated. it is the energy industry itself that shows an example of the formation of the world around the united states without the united states and without its dominance. now we are passing the floor to the news and the big game will return at 23:00 not to be missed.